Moderators of academic performance on the use of generative artificial intelligence (original) (raw)
References
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Huamaní Jordan, O., López Roca, C., & Tirado, S., K (2024). Analysis of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: Effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z Article Google Scholar
Algerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Alfadda, H., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Understanding the factors influencing higher education students’ intention to adopt artificial intelligence-based robots. IEEE Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions,11, 99752–99764. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314499 Article Google Scholar
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: A case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development,72(4), 2401–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w Article Google Scholar
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 Article Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,16(3), 297–334. Article Google Scholar
Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about ChatGPT usage. Computers And Education: Artificial Intelligence,5, Article 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180 Article Google Scholar
Foroughi, B., Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Khanfar, A., Ghobakhloo, M., Annamalai, N., & Naghmeh-Abbaspour, B. (2024). Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for educational purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and FsQCA. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,40(17), 4501–4520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495 Article Google Scholar
Gustilo, L., Ong, E., & Lapinid, M. R. (2024). Algorithmically-driven writing and academic integrity: Exploring educators’ practices, perceptions, and policies in AI era. International Journal for Educational Integrity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00153-8 Article Google Scholar
Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited. Google Scholar
Kampa, R. K., Padhan, D. K., Karna, N., & Gouda, J. (2024). Identifying the factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: An evidence-based review of the literature. Accountability in Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2311212 Article Google Scholar
Kim, J., & Kweon, S. O. (2023). Effects of English proficiency on motivational regulation in a videoconference-based EFL speaking class. Education and Information Technologies,28(7), 8401–8422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11374-0 Article Google Scholar
Kučinskas, G. (2024). Negative effects of revealing AI involvement in products: Mediation by authenticity and risk, moderation by trust in AI and familiarity with AI. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4805186 Article Google Scholar
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55. Google Scholar
Luo, T., Muljana, P. S., Ren, X., & Young, D. (2024). Exploring instructional designers’ utilization and perspectives on generative AI tools: A mixed methods study. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10437-y Article Google Scholar
Ni, A., & Cheung, A. (2023). Understanding secondary students’ continuance intention to adopt AI-powered intelligent tutoring system for English learning. Education and Information Technologies,28(3), 3191–3216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11305-z Article Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428 Article Google Scholar
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C. S. (2023). The moderating effects of gender and need satisfaction on self-regulated learning through artificial intelligence (AI). Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8691–8713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11547-x Article Google Scholar
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6 Article Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Jiang, H., Qiao, Z., & Li, P. (2024). Students’ Response to ChatGPT: An Adaptive Technology-To-Performance Model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2024.2386546
Zhu, L., Lai, Y., Mou, W., Zhang, H., Lin, A., Qi, C., Yang, T., Xu, L., Zhang, J., & Luo, P. (2024a). ChatGPT’s ability to generate realistic experimental images poses a new challenge to academic integrity. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-024-01543-8 Article Google Scholar
Zhu, W., Huang, L., Zhou, X., Li, X., Shi, G., Ying, J., & Wang, C. (2024b). Could AI ethical anxiety, perceived ethical risks and ethical awareness about AI influence university students’ use of generative AI products?? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277 Article Google Scholar