Occupational and behavioural factors in the explanation of social inequalities in premature and total mortality: a 12.5-year follow-up in the Lorhandicap study (original) (raw)

Abstract

The respective contribution of occupational and behavioural factors to social disparities in all-cause mortality has been studied very seldom. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of occupational and behavioural factors in explaining social inequalities in premature and total mortality in the French working population. The study population consisted of a sample of 2,189 and 1,929 French working men and women, who responded to a self-administered questionnaire in mid-1996, and were followed up until the end of 2008. Mortality was derived from register-based information and linked to the baseline data. Socioeconomic status was measured using occupation. Occupational factors included biomechanical and physical exposures, temporary contract, psychological demands, and social support, and behavioural factors, smoking, alcohol abuse, and body mass index. Significant social differences were observed for premature and total mortality. Occupational factors reduced the hazard ratios of mortality for manual workers compared to managers/professionals by 72 and 41%, from 1.88 (95% CI: 1.17–3.01) to 1.25 (95% CI: 0.74–2.12) for premature mortality, and from 1.71 (95% CI: 1.18–2.47) to 1.42 (95% CI: 0.95–2.13) for total mortality. The biggest contributions were found for biomechanical and physical exposures, and job insecurity. The role of behavioural factors was very low. Occupational factors played a substantial role in explaining social disparities in mortality, especially for premature mortality and men. Improving working conditions amongst the lowest social groups may help to reduce social inequalities in mortality.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dalstra JA, Kunst AE, Borrell C, Breeze E, Cambois E, Costa G, et al. Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: an overview of eight European countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(2):316–26.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Huisman M, Kunst AE, Bopp M, Borgan JK, Borrell C, Costa G, et al. Educational inequalities in cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and older men and women in eight western European populations. Lancet. 2005;365(9458):493–500.
    PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJ, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2468–81.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. van Lenthe FJ, Gevers E, Joung IM, Bosma H, Mackenbach JP. Material and behavioral factors in the explanation of educational differences in incidence of acute myocardial infarction: the Globe study. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12(8):535–42.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey SG. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(1):7–12.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey SG. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(2):95–101.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Goldman N. Social inequalities in health disentangling the underlying mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;954:118–39.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Mackenbach J-P. Health inequalities: Europe in profile. In: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4121584.pdf. European Commission; 2006.
  9. Wilkinson R, Marmot M. Social determinants of health: the solid facts. 2nd ed. In: World Health Organization; 2003.
  10. Skalicka V, Van Lenthe F, Bambra C, Krokstad S, Mackenbach J. Material, psychosocial, behavioural and biomedical factors in the explanation of relative socio-economic inequalities in mortality: evidence from the HUNT study. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(5):1272–84.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  11. van Oort FV, van Lenthe FJ, Mackenbach JP. Material, psychosocial, and behavioural factors in the explanation of educational inequalities in mortality in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(3):214–20.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Chastang JF, Menvielle G, LeClerc A, Luce D. Social inequalities in mortality by cause among men and women in France. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63(3):197–202.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Mackenbach JP, Bos V, Andersen O, Cardano M, Costa G, Harding S, et al. Widening socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in six Western European countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(5):830–7.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Laaksonen M, Talala K, Martelin T, Rahkonen O, Roos E, Helakorpi S, et al. Health behaviours as explanations for educational level differences in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a follow-up of 60,000 men and women over 23 years. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18(1):38–43.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Lantz PM, House JS, Lepkowski JM, Williams DR, Mero RP, Chen J. Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA. 1998;279(21):1703–8.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and acute myocardial infarction? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(10):934–42.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Pekkanen J, Tuomilehto J, Uutela A, Vartiainen E, Nissinen A. Social class, health behaviour, and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland. BMJ. 1995;311(7005):589–93.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Siahpush M, English D, Powles J. The contribution of smoking to socioeconomic differentials in mortality: results from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, Australia. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(12):1077–9.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Woodward M, Oliphant J, Lowe G, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Contribution of contemporaneous risk factors to social inequality in coronary heart disease and all causes mortality. Prev Med. 2003;36(5):561–8.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Landsbergis PA. Assessing the contribution of working conditions to socioeconomic disparities in health: a commentary. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53(2):95–103.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Aldabe B, Anderson R, Lyly-Yrjanainen M, Parent-Thirion A, Vermeylen G, Kelleher CC_,_ et al_._ Contribution of material, occupational, and psychosocial factors in the explanation of social inequalities in health in 28 countries in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010.
  22. Borg V, Kristensen TS. Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment? Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(7):1019–30.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Borrell C, Muntaner C, Benach J, Artazcoz L. Social class and self-reported health status among men and women: what is the role of work organisation, household material standards and household labour? Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(10):1869–87.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Hemstrom O. Health inequalities by wage income in Sweden: the role of work environment. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(3):637–47.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, David S, Kelleher C. The contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in health: findings from the national French SUMER survey. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(11):1870–81.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Schrijvers CT, van de Mheen HD, Stronks K, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: the contribution of working conditions. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(6):1011–8.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Sekine M, Chandola T, Martikainen P, Marmot M, Kagamimori S. Socioeconomic inequalities in physical and mental functioning of Japanese civil servants: explanations from work and family characteristics. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(2):430–45.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Warren JR, Hoonakker P, Carayon P, Brand J. Job characteristics as mediators in SES-health relationships. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(7):1367–78.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Chau N, Khlat M. Strong association of physical job demands with functional limitations among active people: a population-based study in North-eastern France. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(7):857–66.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Gauchard GC, Deviterne D, Guillemin F, Sanchez J, Perrin PP, Mur JM, et al. Prevalence of sensory and cognitive disabilities and falls, and their relationships: a community-based study. Neuroepidemiology. 2006;26(2):108–18.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Loos-Ayav C, Chau N, Riani C, Guillemin F. Functional disability in France and its relationship with health-related quality of life—a population-based prevalence study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(5):701–8.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Beresford TP, Blow FC, Hill E, Singer K, Lucey MR. Comparison of CAGE questionnaire and computer-assisted laboratory profiles in screening for covert alcoholism. Lancet. 1990;336(8713):482–5.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Krieger N, Rehkopf DH, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Marcelli E, Kennedy M. The fall and rise of US inequities in premature mortality: 1960–2002. PLoS Med. 2008;5(2):e46.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Goldberg M, Chastang JF, LeClerc A, Zins M, Bonenfant S, Bugel I, et al. Socioeconomic, demographic, occupational, and health factors associated with participation in a long-term epidemiologic survey: a prospective study of the French GAZEL cohort and its target population. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(4):373–84.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Monden CW. Current or lifetime smoking? Consequences for explaining educational inequalities in self-reported health. Prev Med. 2004;39(1):19–26.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Monden CW. Current and lifetime exposure to working conditions. Do they explain educational differences in subjective health? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(11):2465–76.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Niedhammer I, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Piciotti M, Bonenfant S. How is sex considered in recent epidemiological publications on occupational risks? Occup Environ Med. 2000;57(8):521–7.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

Lorhandicap study group: N Chau, F Guillemin, JF Ravaud, J Sanchez, S Guillaume, JP Michaely, C Otero Sierra, B Legras, A Dazord, M Choquet, L Méjean, N Tubiana-Rufi, JP Meyer, Y Schléret, and JM Mur. The authors would like to thank D Saouag, M Weiss, M Depesme-Cuny, and B Phélut for their help during the survey. The work was granted by the Pôle Européen de Santé.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INSERM, U1018, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Epidemiology of Occupational and Social Determinants of Health Team, Villejuif, France
    Isabelle Niedhammer
  2. Univ Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, Villejuif, France
    Isabelle Niedhammer
  3. Université de Versailles St-Quentin, UMRS 1018, Villejuif, France
    Isabelle Niedhammer
  4. UCD School of Public Health, University College Dublin, Woodview House, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
    Isabelle Niedhammer
  5. Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité (INRS), WHO Collaborative Centre, Département Epidémiologie en Entreprise, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
    Eve Bourgkard
  6. INSERM, U669, Paris, France
    Nearkasen Chau
  7. Univ Paris-Sud, UMRS 669, Paris, France
    Nearkasen Chau
  8. Univ Paris Descartes, UMRS 669, Paris, France
    Nearkasen Chau

Authors

  1. Isabelle Niedhammer
  2. Eve Bourgkard
  3. Nearkasen Chau

Consortia

The Lorhandicap Study Group

Corresponding author

Correspondence toIsabelle Niedhammer.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Description and prevalence (No. of exposed, % exposed) of occupational exposures among the population studied (N = 4,118)

Full size table

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niedhammer, I., Bourgkard, E., Chau, N. et al. Occupational and behavioural factors in the explanation of social inequalities in premature and total mortality: a 12.5-year follow-up in the Lorhandicap study.Eur J Epidemiol 26, 1–12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9506-9

Download citation

Keywords