Quantifying Economic Dependency (original) (raw)

Abstract

In this paper we compare several types of economic dependency ratios for a selection of European countries. These dependency ratios take into account not only the demographic structure of the population, but also the differences in age-specific economic behaviour such as labour market activity, income and consumption as well as age-specific public transfers. In selected simulations where we combine patterns of age-specific economic behaviour and transfers with population projections, we show that in all countries population ageing would lead to a pronounced increase in dependency ratios if present age-specific patterns were not to change. Our analysis of cross-country differences in economic dependency demonstrates that these differences are driven by both differences in age-specific economic behaviour and in the age composition of the populations. The choice of which dependency ratio to use in a specific policy context is determined by the nature of the question to be answered. The comparison of our various dependency ratios across countries gives insights into which strategies might be effective in mitigating the expected increase in economic dependency due to demographic change.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Source EUROSTAT; EU-SILC 2011 and Population 1st of January

Fig. 2

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Source www.ntaccounts.org

Fig. 3

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Source EU-SILC 2011 (employment and labour income); www.ntaccounts.org (consumption)

Fig. 4

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Source EU-SILC, 2011, own employment projections; Eurostat, EUROPOP2013 (2050), main scenario

Fig. 5

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Source EU-SILC, 2011; www.ntaccounts.org, own NTA projections; Eurostat, EUROPOP2013 (2050), main scenario

Fig. 6

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Source EUROSTAT (population data); EU-SILC 2011 (EbDR); EU-SILC 2011, www.ntaccounts.org (NtaDR)

Fig. 7

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Source EUROSTAT (population data); EU-SILC 2011 (EbDR); EU-SILC 2011, www.ntaccounts.org (NtaDR, \(NtaDR_{ABR}\), DRpub)

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Source EUROPOP 2013, main scenario.
  2. In order to be consistent, we chose EU-SILC as data source for economic activity since this is also our data source for labour income (cf. Table 9).
  3. For detailed description of the NTA results for Finland, Germany, Hungary, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden see Lee and Mason (2011). For the Italian data see Zannella (2013) and for Austria see Hammer (2014).
  4. The use of consumption age profiles from different years should not affect our results much. The historical NTA data show that the shape of the age profiles changes only slowly with time, see, e.g. Hammer (2014) for Austria from 1995 to 2010. Furthermore, consumption of adults is rather constant over the whole adult age range.
  5. Transfer inflows and outflows are recorded from the individuals point of view: inflows constitute the benefits, outflows the contributions to the transfer systems. Public transfer inflows consist, for example, of benefits such as pensions, health services or child benefits while the public transfer outflows consist mainly of taxes and social contributions.
  6. Labour income from self-employment comprises part of mixed income (income of non-incorporated firms). In NTA 2/3 of mixed income is allocated to labour and 1/3 to capital income.
  7. NTA capture only current transfers. Capital transfers such as bequests are not directly captured, but through the income which they generate for their owners.
  8. Age-specific asset-based reallocations are not available for France and Hungary. The definition of NTA flows excludes capital transfers; however, in the case of the UK, bequests have been included as transfers. This difference in the methodology affects the comparability of the savings variable, as its estimation relies on income, consumption and transfer estimates. In the case of Spain, public transfers have been defined in a non-comparable way, which again affects the estimates of age-specific savings. We therefore do not include these four countries in our comparison of the general dependency ratio.
  9. We calculated the NTA dependency ratio and the NTA general dependency ratio also for the year 2005. The results are very similar, and in particular the relative position of the countries does not change. We conclude that these indicators are robust regarding changes in the macro-economic environment.
  10. TGI is the abbreviation for Transfers Government Inflows, TGO for Transfers Government Outflows.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013 under grant agreement No. 290647. It has also been supported by funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No. 613247. This paper uses data from the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC; cross-sectional EU-SILC UDB—version from August 01, 2013). We herewith acknowledge data provision for EU-SILC by EUROSTAT and the European Commission, respectively. Presented results and drawn conclusions are those of the authors and not those of EUROSTAT, the European Commission or any of the national authorities whose data have been used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Elke Loichinger
  2. Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
    Alexia Prskawetz & Michael Freiberger
  3. Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital, (IIASA, VID/OeAW, WU), Vienna, Austria
    Elke Loichinger, Bernhard Hammer & Alexia Prskawetz
  4. Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Joze Sambt
  5. Vienna Institute of Demography, Vienna, Austria
    Bernhard Hammer & Alexia Prskawetz

Authors

  1. Elke Loichinger
  2. Bernhard Hammer
  3. Alexia Prskawetz
  4. Michael Freiberger
  5. Joze Sambt

Corresponding author

Correspondence toElke Loichinger.

Appendix: Employment Patterns by Age and Sex

Appendix: Employment Patterns by Age and Sex

Tables 8 and 9 and Figs. 8 and 9.

Fig. 8

Fig. 8

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Full size image

Source EU-SIlC 2011 (based on self-defined activity status)

Age-specific employment rates, men, 2011

Fig. 9

Fig. 9

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Full size image

Source EU-SIlC 2011 (based on self-defined activity status)

Age-specific employment rates, women, 2011

Table 8 Employment-based dependency ratios by economic status, 2005

Full size table

Table 9 Overview: data sources

Full size table

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loichinger, E., Hammer, B., Prskawetz, A. et al. Quantifying Economic Dependency.Eur J Population 33, 351–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9405-1

Download citation

Keywords

JEL Classification