A process ontology approach in biochemistry: the case of GPCRs and biosignaling (original) (raw)

References

• Alassia, F.: ¿ Es posible una ontología procesual de las entidades bioquímicas? Consideraciones a partir del caso de los receptores celulares y la señalización celular. Estudios de Filosofía 65, 153–175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.345867.
• Bartol, J.: Biochemical kinds. British J. Phil. Sci. 67(2), 531–551 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu046
  Article Google Scholar
• Berg, K.A., Clarke, W.P.: Making sense of pharmacology: inverse agonism and functional selectivity. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 21(10), 962–977 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyy071
  Article Google Scholar
• Birch, C., Cobb, J.B.: The Liberation of Life: From the Cell to the Community. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)
  Google Scholar
• Bulusu, G., Desiraju, G.R.: Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand recognition. J. Indian Inst. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00141-9
  Article Google Scholar
• Calebiro, D., Koszegi, Z.: The subcellular dynamics of GPCR signaling. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 483(2019), 24–30 (2019)
  Article Google Scholar
• Cobb, J.B.: Ecology, science, and religion: toward a postmodern worldview. In: Griffin, D.R. (ed.) The Reenchantment of Science, pp. 99–114. State University of New York Press, New York (1988)
  Google Scholar
• Cox, M.M., David, L.N.: Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 6th edn. Wh Freeman, New York (2012)
  Google Scholar
• Davis, C.M., Gruebele, M., Sukenik, S.: How does solvation in the cell affect protein folding and binding? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 48, 23–29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2017.09.003
  Article Google Scholar
• De Lean, A., Stadel, J.M.Y., Lefkowitz, R.L.: A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties and the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 255, 7108–7117 (1980)
  Article Google Scholar
• Deichmann, U.: “Molecular” versus “colloidal”: Controversies in the history of biology and biochemistry, 1900–1940. Bull. Hist. Chem. 32, 105–118 (2007)
  Google Scholar
• Dupré, J.: The Metaphysics of Biology (Elements in the philosophy of biology). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021)
  Book Google Scholar
• Dupré, J., Nicholson, D.: A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. In: Nicholson, D., Dupré, J. (eds.) Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, pp. 3–45. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Ferreira de Freitas, R., Schapira, M.: A systematic analysis of atomic protein–ligand interactions in the PDB. MedChemComm 8, 1970–1981 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MD00381A
  Article Google Scholar
• Fischer, E.: Einfluss der Konfiguration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 27, 2985–2993 (1894)
  Article Google Scholar
• Fischer, E.: Untersuchungen über aminosäuren, polypeptide und proteine. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 39, 530–610 (1906)
  Article Google Scholar
• French, S. Krause, D.: Identity in physics: A historical, philosophical and formal analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2006).
• Goodwin, W.: Structure, function, and protein taxonomy. Biol. Philos. 26(4), 533–545 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9252-8
  Article Google Scholar
• Grouleff, J., Irudayam, S.J., Skeby, K.K., Schiøtt, B.: The influence of cholesterol on membrane protein structure, function, and dynamics studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1848(9), 1783–1795 (2015)
  Article Google Scholar
• Gurevich, V.V., Gurevich, E.V.: GPCR signaling regulation: the role of GRKs and arrestins. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 125 (2019)
  Article Google Scholar
• Guttinger, S.: A process ontology for macromolecular biology. In: Nicholson, D., Dupré, J. (eds.) Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, pp. 303–320. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Guttinger, S.: Process and practice: understanding the nature of molecules. HYLE Int. J. Philos. Chem. 27, 47–66 (2021)
  Google Scholar
• Havstad, J. C.: Messy chemical kinds. British J. Phil. Sci. 69, 719–743 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw040
  Article Google Scholar
• Hilger, D., Masureel, M., Kobilka, B.: Structure and dynamics of GPCR signaling complexes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25(1), 4–12 (2018)
  Article Google Scholar
• Hipp, M.S., Kasturi, P., Hartl, F.U.: The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20(7), 421–435 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0101-y
  Article Google Scholar
• Kenakin, T.: Principles: receptor theory in pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 25(4), 186–192 (2004)
  Article Google Scholar
• Koshland, D.E.: Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 44, 98–104 (1958)
  Article Google Scholar
• Krause, D., Arenhart, J.R.B.: Individuality, quantum physics, and a metaphysics of non-individuals. The role of the formal. In: Guay, A., Pradeu, T. (eds.) Individuals Across the Sciences, pp. 61–84. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)
  Google Scholar
• Labarca, M., Lombardi, O.: Why orbitals do not exist? Found. Chem. 12(2), 149–157 (2010)
  Article Google Scholar
• Lehn, J.M.: Supramolecular chemistry—scope and perspectives molecules, supermolecules, and molecular devices (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 27(1), 89–112 (1988)
  Article Google Scholar
• Lewowicz, L.Y., Lombardi, O.: Stuff versus individuals. Found. Chem. 15(1), 65–77 (2013)
  Article Google Scholar
• Lowe, E.J.: Individuation. In: Loux, M.J., Zimmerman, D.W. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, pp. 75–95. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)
  Google Scholar
• Lowe, E.J.: Non-individuals. In: Guay, A., Pradeu, T. (eds.) Individuals Across the Sciences, pp. 49–60. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)
  Google Scholar
• Manglik, A., Kobilka, B.: The role of protein dynamics in GPCR function: insights from the β2AR and rhodopsin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 27, 136–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.01.008
  Article Google Scholar
• Maudsley, S., Patel, S.A., Park, S.S., Luttrell, M.L., Martin, B.: Functional signaling biases in G protein-coupled receptors: game theory and receptor dynamics. Mini. Rev. Med. Chem. 12(9), 831–840 (2012)
  Article Google Scholar
• McEwen, B.S., Wingfield, J.C.: The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm. Behav. 43(1), 2–15 (2003)
  Article Google Scholar
• Morange, M.: From the beginnings: How biochemistry has evolved as a discipline. Biochemist 29(5), 6–10 (2007)
  Article Google Scholar
• Morange, Michel: Explanatory relationships between chemical and biological sciences. In: Philosophy of Chemistry, pp. 509–518. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51675-6.50032-3
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Morange, M.: The Black Box of Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2020)
  Book Google Scholar
• Nicholson, D.Y., Dupré, J. (eds.): Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
  Google Scholar
• Pauling, L.: Molecular architecture and biological reactions. Chem. Eng. News 24(10), 1375–1377 (1946)
  Article Google Scholar
• Pauling, L., Corey, R.B., Branson, H.R.: The structure of proteins: two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 37(4), 205–211 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.37.4.205
  Article Google Scholar
• Pradeu, T.: Genidentity and biological processes. In: Nicholson, D.Y., Dupré, J. (eds.) Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, pp. 96–112. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Rescher, N.: Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. Suny Press, Albany (1996)
  Google Scholar
• Santos, R., Ursu, O., Anna Gaulton, A., Bento, P., Donadi, Ramesh S., Bologa, C.G., Karlsson, A., Al-Lazikani, B., Hersey, A., Oprea, T.I., Overington, J.P.: A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Dis. 16(1), 19–34 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.230
  Article Google Scholar
• Santos, G., Vallejos, G., Vecchi, D.: A relational-constructionist account of protein macrostructure and function. Found. Chem. 22(3), 363–382 (2020)
  Article Google Scholar
• Schoffeniels, E.: Phenomenology and ontology of the molecular concept. In: Maruani, J. (ed.) Molecules in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, pp. 3–24. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2849-7_1
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Schummer, J.: The chemical core of chemistry I: a conceptual approach. HYLE Int. J. Philos. Chem. 4, 129–162 (1998)
  Google Scholar
• Seibt, J.: Ontological tools for the process turn in biology some basic notions of general process theory. In: Nicholson, D., Dupré, J. (eds.) Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, pp. 113–136. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Seibt, J. (2021). Process Philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition). Online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/process-philosophy/.
• Seyedabadi, M., Ghahremani, M.H., Albert, P.: Biased signaling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs): molecular determinants of GPCR/transducer selectivity and therapeutic potential. Pharmacol. Ther. 200, 148–178 (2019)
  Article Google Scholar
• Slater, M.H.: Macromolecular pluralism. Philos. Sci. 76(5), 851–863 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1086/605817
  Article Google Scholar
• Staudinger, H.: Über polymerisation. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 53, 1073–1085 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.19200530627
  Article Google Scholar
• Steed, J., Atwood, J.L.: Supramolecular Chemistry. Wiley, Hoboken (2022)
  Google Scholar
• Stein, R.L.: Towards a process philosophy of chemistry. Hyle Int. J. Philos. Chem. 10(4), 5–22 (2004)
  Google Scholar
• Stein, R.L.: Enzymes as ecosystems - a panexperientialist account of biocatalytic chemical transformation. Process. Stud. 34, 62–80 (2005)
  Google Scholar
• Stein, R.L.: A process theory of enzyme catalytic power – the interplay of science and metaphysics. Found. Chem. 8, 3–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-005-7907-8
  Article Google Scholar
• Stein, R. L. (2022). Mechanisms of macromolecular reactions. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 44(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00492-0
• Stephenson, R. P.: A modification of receptor theory. British J. Pharm. 11, 379–393 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1956.tb00006.x
  Article Google Scholar
• Tahko, T.E.: Where do you get your protein? Or: biochemical realization. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 71(3), 799–825 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy044
  Article Google Scholar
• Tobin, E.: Microstructuralism and macromolecules: the case of moonlighting proteins. Found. Chem. 12(1), 41–54 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-009-9078-5
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Bugge, K., Kragelund, B.B., Lindorff-Larsen, K.: Role of protein dynamics in transmembrane receptor signalling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 48, 74–82 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.017
  Article Google Scholar
• Wennerström, H., Estrada, E.V., Danielsson, J., Oliveberg, M.: Colloidal stability of the living cell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117(19), 10113–10121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914599117
  Article Google Scholar
• Vallejos-Baccelliere, G. F. (2022). Problemas contemporáneos en la filosofía de la bioquímica. Culturas Científicas, 3(1), 45–77.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references