Sparse Reconstruction of Log-Conductivity in Current Density Impedance Tomography (original) (raw)

References

  1. Adesokan, B., Knudsen, K., Krishnan, V.P., Roy, S.: A fully non-linear optimization approach to acousto-electric tomography. Inverse Probl. 34, 104004 (2018)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  2. Alessandrini, G., Nesi, V.: Univalent \(\sigma \)-harmonic mappings. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 158, 155–171 (2001)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  3. Ambartsoumian, G., Gouia-Zarrad, R., Krishnan, V.P., Roy, S.: Image reconstruction from radially incomplete spherical Radon data. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 29(3), 470–493 (2018)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  4. Ammari, H., Garnier, J., Jing, W., Nguyen, L.H.: Quantitative thermo-acoustic imaging: an exact reconstruction formula. J. Differ. Equ. 254(3), 1375–1395 (2013)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  5. Ammari, H., Grasland-Mongrain, P., Millien, P., Seppecher, L., Seo, J.-K.: A mathematical and numerical framework for ultrasonically-induced Lorentz force electrical impedance tomography. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 103(6), 1390–1409 (2015)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  6. Ammari, H., Boulmier, S., Millien, P.: A mathematical and numerical framework for magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction. J. Differ. Equ. 259(10), 5379–5405 (2015)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  7. Ammari, H., Qiu, L., Santosa, F., Zhang, W.: Determining anisotropic conductivity using diffusion tensor imaging data in magneto-acoustic tomography with magnetic induction. Inverse Probl. 33, 125006 (2017)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  8. Bal, G., Guo, C., Monard, F.: Imaging of anisotropic conductivities from current densities in two dimensions. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 7(4), 2538–2557 (2014)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  9. Bal, G., Guo, C., Monard, F.: Inverse anisotropic conductivity from internal current densities. Inverse Probl. 30, 025001 (2014)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  10. Candes, E.J., Romberg, J.K., Tao, T.: Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 59, 1207–1223 (2006)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  11. Catté, F., Lions, P.-L., Morel, J.-M., Coll, T.: Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29, 182–193 (1992)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  12. Chan, T.F., Esedoglu, S., Nikolova, M.: Algorithms for finding global minimizers of image segmentation and denoising models. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66(5), 1632–1648 (2006)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  13. Cheney, M., Issacson, D., Newell, J.C.: Electrical impedance tomography. SIAM Rev. 41, 85–101 (1999)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  14. Ekeland, I., Témam, R.: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems. SIAM, Philadelphia (1999)
    MATH Google Scholar
  15. Gao, H., Osher, S., Zhao, H.: Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography, Mathematical Modeling in Biomedical Imaging II, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2035, pp. 131–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
    Google Scholar
  16. Garmatter, D., Harrach, B.: Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): convergence and reduced basis approach. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 11(1), 863–887 (2018)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  17. Gilbarg, D., Trudinger, N.S.: Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. Springer, Berlin (2001)
    MATH Google Scholar
  18. Hasanov, K.F., Ma, A.W., Nachman, A., Joy, M.L.G.: Current density impedance imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27(9), 1301–1309 (2008)
    Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, K., Knudsen, K.: Iterative reconstruction methods for hybrid inverse problems in impedance tomography. Sens. Imaging 15, 96 (2014)
    Google Scholar
  20. Khang, H.S., Lee, B.I., Oh, S.H., Woo, E.J., Lee, S.Y., Cho, M.H., Kwon, O., Yoon, J.R., Seo, J.K.: \(J\)-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phaontom experiments for static resistivity images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21, 695–702 (2002)
    Google Scholar
  21. Knudsen, K., Lassas, M., Mueller, J.L., Siltanen, S.: Regularized D-bar method for the inverse conductivity problem. Inverse Probl. Imaging 3, 599–624 (2009)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  22. Kuchment, P., Steinhauer, D.: Stabilizing inverse problems by internal data. Inverse Probl. 28(8), 084007 (2012)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  23. Kwon, O., Woo, E.J., Yoon, J.R., Seo, J.K.: Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of \(J\)-substitution algorithm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49, 160–167 (2002)
    Google Scholar
  24. Kim, Y.J., Kwon, O., Seo, J.K., Woo, E.J.: Uniqueness and convergence of conductivity image reconstruction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl. 19, 1213–1225 (2003)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  25. Kim, S., Kwon, O., Seo, J.K., Yoon, J.-R.: On a non-linear partial differential equation arising in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 34(3), 511–526 (2002)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  26. Kruger, M.V.P.: Tomography as a metrology technique for semiconductor manufacturing. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2003)
  27. Lee, J.Y.: A reconstruction formula and uniqueness of conductivity in MREIT using two internal current distributions. Inverse Probl. 20, 847–858 (2004)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  28. Li, M., Yang, H., Kudo, H.: An accurate iterative reconstruction algorithm for sparse objects: application to 3D blood vessel reconstruction from a limited number of projections. Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 2599–2609 (2002)
    Google Scholar
  29. Liu, J.J., Seo, J.K., Sini, M., Woo, E.J.: On the convergence of the harmonic \(B_z\) algorithm in magentic resonance electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 67, 1259–1282 (2007)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  30. Liu, J.J., Seo, J.K., Woo, E.J.: A posteriori error estimate and convergence analysis for conductivity image reconstruction in MREIT. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70, 2883–2903 (2010)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  31. Monard, F., Bal, G.: Inverse diffusion problems with redundant information. Inverse Probl. Imaging 6(2), 289–313 (2012)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  32. Moradifam, A., Nachman, A., Timonov, A.: A convergent algorithm for the hybrid problem of reconstructing conductivity from minimal interior data. Inverse Probl. 28(8), 084003 (2012)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  33. Nachman, A., Tamasan, A., Timonov, A.: Conductivity imaging with a single measurement of boundary and interior data. Inverse Probl. 23, 2551–2563 (2007)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  34. Nachman, A., Tamasan, A., Timonov, A.: Recovering the conductivity from a single measurement of interior data. Inverse Probl. 25(3), 035014 (2009)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  35. Nachman, A., Tamasan, A., Timonov, A.: Current density impedance imaging. Tomogr. Inverse Transp. Theory 559, 135–149 (2011)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  36. Perona, P., Malik, J.: Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12, 629–639 (1990)
    Google Scholar
  37. Qiu, L., Santosa, F.: Analysis of the magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 8(3), 2070–2086 (2015)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  38. Roy, S., Annunziato, M., Borzì, A.: A Fokker–Planck feedback control-constrained approach for modelling crowd motion. J. Comput. Theor. Transp. 45, 442–458 (2016)
    MathSciNet Google Scholar
  39. Roy, S., Annunziato, M., Borzì, A., Klingenberg, C.: A Fokker–Planck approach to control collective motion. Comput. Optim. Appl. 69(2), 423–459 (2018)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  40. Roy, S., Borzì, A.: A new optimisation approach to sparse reconstruction of log-conductivity in acousto-electric tomography. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 11(2), 1759–1784 (2018)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  41. Roy, S., Krishnan, V.P., Chandrasekhar, P., Vasudeva Murthy, A.S.: An efficient numerical algorithm for Radon transform inversion with applications in ultrasound imaging. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 53, 78–91 (2015)
    MATH Google Scholar
  42. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D 60, 259–268 (1992)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  43. Scherzer, O., Weickert, J.: Relations between regularization and diffusion filtering. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 12, 43–63 (2000)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  44. Schindele, A., Borzí, A.: Proximal methods for elliptic optimal control problems with sparsity cost functional. Appl. Math. 7, 967–992 (2016)
    Google Scholar
  45. Schindele, A., Borzí, A.: Proximal schemes for parabolic optimal control problems with sparsity promoting cost functionals. Int. J. Control 90, 2349–2367 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2016.1245870
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  46. Scott, G.C., Joy, M.L.G., Armstrong, R.L., Henkelman, R.M.: Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10, 262–374 (1991)
    Google Scholar
  47. Seagar, A.D., Barber, D.C., Brown, B.H.: Theoretical limits to sensitivity and resolution in impedance imaging. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 8(Suppl. A), 13–31 (1987)
    Google Scholar
  48. Seo, J.K., Woo, E.J.: Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomogrpahy. SIAM Rev. 53, 40–68 (2011)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  49. Stadler, G.: Elliptic optimal control problems with \(L^1\)-control costs and applications for the placement of control devices. Comput. Optim. Appl. 44, 159–181 (2009)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  50. Tamasan, A., Veras, J.: Conductivity imaging by the method of characteristics in the 1-Laplacian. Inverse Probl. 28, 084006 (2012)
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  51. Waterfall, R.C., He, R., Beck, C.M.: Visualizing combustion using electrical impedance tomography. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52(13), 2129–2138 (1997)
    Google Scholar
  52. Zain, N.M., Chelliah, K.K.: Breast imaging using electrical impedance tomography: correlation of quantitative assessment with visual interpretation. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 15(3), 1327–1331 (2014)
    Google Scholar

Download references