Nikkhah M, Edalat F, Manoucheri S, Khademhosseini A. Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell-substrate interface. Biomaterials. 2012;33:5230–46. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Ashkenas J, Muschler J, Bissell MJ. The extracellular matrix in epithelial biology: shared molecules and common themes in distant phyla. Dev Biol. 1996;180:433–44. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Amini AR, Adams DJ, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:1376–88. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Hutmacher DW. Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues—state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2001;12:107–24. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Sachlos E, Czernuszak JT. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater. 2003;5:29–40. CAS Google Scholar
Zhang R, Ma PX. Synthetic nano-fibrillar extracellular matrices with predesigned macroporous architectures. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:430–8. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG. Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:1197–211. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Prabhakaran MP, Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Jin G, Ramakrishna S. Electrospun conducting polymer nanofibers and electrical stimulation of nerve stem cells. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;112:501–7. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Di Martino A, Liverani L, Rainer A, Salvatore G, Trombetta M, Denaro V. Electrospun scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011;95:69–80. Article Google Scholar
Nisbet DF, Forsythe JS, Shen W, Finkelstein DI, Horne MK. Review paper: a review of the cellular response on electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl. 2009;24:7–29. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Soliman S, Sant S, Nichol JW, Khabiry M, Traversa E, Khademhosseini A. Controlling the porosity of fibrous scaffolds by modulating the fiber diameter and packing density. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;96:566–74. Google Scholar
Kwon IK, Kidoaki S, Matsuda T. Electrospun nano- to microfiber fabrics made of biodegradable copolyesters: structural characteristics, mechanical properties and cell adhesion potential. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3929–39. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Schindler M, Nur-E-Kamal A, Ahmed I, Kamal J, Liu HY, Amor N, Ponery AS, Crockett DP, Grafe TH, Chung HY, Weik T, Jones E, Meiners S. Living in three dimensions: 3D nanostructured environments for cell culture and regenerative medicine. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2006;45:215–27. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Desai TA. Micro- and nanoscale structures for tissue engineering constructs. Med Eng Phys. 2000;22:595–606. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, Chua CK. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:679–89. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Patel H, Bonde M, Srinivasan G. Biodegradable polymer scaffold for tissue engineering. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2011;25:20–9. Google Scholar
Lu L, Mikos AG. The importance of new processing techniques in tissue engineering. MRS Bull. 1996;21:28–32. CAS Google Scholar
Valmikinathan CM, Hoffman J, Yu X. Impact of scaffold micro and macro architecture on Schwann cell proliferation under dynamic conditions in a rotating wall vessel bioreactor. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2011;31:22–9. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Del Gaudio C, Grigioni M, Bianco A, De Angelis G. Electrospun bioresorbable heart valve scaffold for tissue engineering. Int J Artif Organs. 2008;31:68–75. Google Scholar
Andersson AS, Bäckhed F, von Euler A, Richter-Dahlfors A, Sutherland D, Kasemo B. Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3428–36. Article Google Scholar
Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealy PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials. 1999;20:573–88. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, Murphy CJ, Nealy PF. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1881–92. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Carletti E, Endogan T, Hasirci N, Hasirci V, Maniglio D, Motta A, Migliaresi C. Microfabrication of PDLLA scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011;5:569–77. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Sodha S, Wall K, Redenti S, Klassen H, Young MJ, Tao SL. Microfabrication of a three-dimensional polycaprolactone thin-film scaffold for retinal progenitor cell encapsulation. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2011;22:443–56. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Figallo E, Flaibani M, Zavan B, Abatangelo G, Elvassore N. Micropatterned biopolymer 3D scaffold for static and dynamic culture of human fibroblasts. Biotechnol Prog. 2007;23:210–6. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Jackman RJ, Duffy DC, Cherniavskaya O, Whitesides GM. Using elastomeric membranes as dry resists and for dry liftoff. Langmuir. 1999;15:2973–84. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Vozzi G, Flaim C, Ahluwalia A, Bhatia S. Fabrication of PLGA scaffolds using soft lithography and microsyringe deposition. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2533–40. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Delamarche E, Schmid H, Michel B, Biebuyck H. Stability of molded polydimethylsiloxane microstructures. Adv Mater. 1997;9:741–6. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography for micro- and nanoscale patterning. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:491–502. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
McBane JE, Sharifpoor S, Labow RS, Ruel M, Suuronen EJ, Santerre JP. Tissue engineering a small diameter vessel substitute: engineering constructs with select biomaterials and cells. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2012;10:347–60. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
McGuigan AP, Sefton MV. The influence of biomaterials on endothelial cell thrombogenicity. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2547–71. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Yang J, Motlagh D, Webb AR, Ameer GA. Novel biphasic elastomeric scaffold for small-diameter blood vessel tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:1876–86. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Lee SJ, Liu J, Oh SH, Soker S, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Development of a composite vascular scaffolding system that withstands physiological vascular conditions. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2891–8. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Thomas V, Donahoe T, Nyairo E, Dean DR, Vohra YK. Electrospinning of Biosyn(®)-based tubular conduits: structural, morphological, and mechanical characterizations. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2070–9. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Williams C, Xie AW, Yamato M, Okano T, Wong JY. Stacking of aligned cell sheets for layer-by-layer control of complex tissue structure. Biomaterials. 2011;32:5625–32. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Wu H, Fan J, Chu CC, Wu J. Electrospinning of small diameter 3-D nanofibrous tubular scaffolds with controllable nanofiber orientations for vascular grafts. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:3207–15. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Khan OF, Sefton MV. Endothelialized biomaterials for tissue engineering applications in vivo. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29:379–87. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Ayres CE, Jha BS, Meredith H, Bowman JR, Bowlin GL, Henderson SC, Simpson DG. Measuring fiber alignment in electrospun scaffolds: a user’s guide to the 2D fast Fourier transform approach. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19:603–21. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Wegener J, Abrams D, Willenbrink W, Galla HJ, Janshoff A. Automated multi-well device to measure transepithelial electrical resistance under physiological conditions. Biotechniques. 2004;37:590–7. CAS Google Scholar
Heath DE, Lannutti JJ, Cooper SL. Electrospun scaffold topography affects endothelial cell proliferation, metabolic activity, and morphology. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;94:1195–204. Google Scholar
Del Gaudio C, Fioravanzo L, Folin M, Marchi F, Ercolani E, Bianco A. Electrospun tubular scaffolds: on the effectiveness of blending pol(ε-caprolactone) with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100B:1883–98. Article Google Scholar
Wang X, Heath DE, Cooper SL. Endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation to PEGylated polymers with covalently linked RGD peptides. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100:794–801. Google Scholar
Zhang M, Wang K, Wang Z, Xing B, Zhao Q, Kong D. Small-diameter tissue engineered vascular graft made of electrospun PCL/lecithin blend. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23:2639–48. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Hajialai H, Shahgasempour S, Naimi-Jamal MR, Peirovi H. Electrospun PGA/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds and their potential in vascular tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2011;6:2133–41. Article Google Scholar
Hsia HC, Nair MR, Mintz RC, Corbett SA. The fiber diameter of synthetic bioresorbable extracellular matrix influences human fibroblast morphology and fibronectin matrix assembly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2312–20. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Vaquette C, Cooper-White JJ. Increasing electrospun scaffold pore size with tailored collectors for improved cell penetration. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2544–57. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
McMillan JR, Akiyama M, Tanaka M, Yamamoto S, Goto M, Abe R, Sawamura D, Shimomura M, Shimizu H. Small-diameter porous poly(epsilon-caprolactone) films enhance adhesion and growth of human cultured epidermal keratinocyte and dermal fibroblast cells. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:789–98. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Salem AK, Stevens R, Pearson RG, Davies MC, Tendler SJB, Roberts CJ, Williams PM, Shakesheff KM. Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;61:212–7. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Wegener J, Zink S, Rösen P, Galla HJ. Use of electrochemical impedance measurements to monitor β-adrenergic stimulation of bovine aortic endothelial cells. Pflügers Arch. 1999;437:925–34. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Vasioukhin V, Bauer C, Yin M, Fuchs E. Directed actin polymerization is the driving force for epithelial cell–cell adhesion. Cell. 2000;100:209–19. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Fong H, Chun I, Reneker DH. Beaded nanofibers formed during electrospinning. Polymer. 1999;40:4585–92. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Apel P. Track etching technique in membrane technology. Radiat Meas. 2001;34:559–66. ArticleCAS Google Scholar