Methods for Preparing Fluorescent and Neutral Red-Stained Whole Mounts of Mouse Mammary Glands (original) (raw)
Abstract
Whole mount preparations of mouse mammary glands are useful for evaluating overall changes in growth and morphology, and are essential for detecting and evaluating focal or regionally-localized phenotypes that would be difficult to detect or analyze using other techniques. We present three newly developed methods for preparing whole mounts of mammary glands from genetically-engineered mice expressing fluorescent proteins, as well as using either neutral red or a variety of fluorescent dyes. Unlike traditional hematoxylin- or carmine-stained preparations, neutral red-stained and some fluorescent preparations can be used for several common downstream analyses.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
CFSE:
carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester
DAPI:
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole
ECFP:
enhanced cyan fluorescent protein
EGFP:
enhanced green fluorescent protein
PBS:
phosphate-buffered saline
PFA:
paraformaldehyde
RFP:
red fluorescent protein
YFP:
yellow fluorescent protein
References
- Rasmussen SB, Young LJT, Smith GH. Preparing mammary gland whole mounts from mice. In: Ip MM, Asch BB, editors. Methods in mammary gland biology and breast cancer research. Boston: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2000. p. 75–85.
Google Scholar - Lu P, et al. Genetic mosaic analysis reveals FGF receptor 2 function in terminal end buds during mammary gland branching morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2008;321(1):77–87.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Egeblad M, et al. Visualizing stromal cell dynamics in different tumor microenvironments by spinning disk confocal microscopy. Dis Model Mech. 2008;1(2–3):155–67. discussion 165.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Tilli MT, et al. Comparison of mouse mammary gland imaging techniques and applications: reflectance confocal microscopy, GFP imaging, and ultrasound. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:21.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Welm BE, et al. Sca-1(pos) cells in the mouse mammary gland represent an enriched progenitor cell population. Dev Biol. 2002;245(1):42–56.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Welm BE, et al. Lentiviral transduction of mammary stem cells for analysis of gene function during development and cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2(1):90–102.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Ahmed F, et al. GFP expression in the mammary gland for imaging of mammary tumor cells in transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2002;62(24):7166–9.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Ingman WV, et al. Macrophages promote collagen fibrillogenesis around terminal end buds of the developing mammary gland. Dev Dyn. 2006;235(12):3222–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Moraes RC, et al. Ptch1 is required locally for mammary gland morphogenesis and systemically for ductal elongation. Development. 2009;136(9):1423–32.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Moraes RC, et al. Constitutive activation of smoothened (SMO) in mammary glands of transgenic mice leads to increased proliferation, altered differentiation and ductal dysplasia. Development. 2007;134(6):1231–42.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- The Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, BCM600; Room N1210, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
John D. Landua, Adriana P. Visbal & Michael T. Lewis
Authors
- John D. Landua
- Adriana P. Visbal
- Michael T. Lewis
Corresponding author
Correspondence toMichael T. Lewis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Landua, J.D., Visbal, A.P. & Lewis, M.T. Methods for Preparing Fluorescent and Neutral Red-Stained Whole Mounts of Mouse Mammary Glands.J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 14, 411–415 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-009-9155-3
- Received: 04 November 2009
- Accepted: 04 November 2009
- Published: 24 November 2009
- Issue date: December 2009
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-009-9155-3