Assessing the Sensibility of Two Clinical Decision Support Systems (original) (raw)

References

  1. Kushniruk, A., Triola, M., Stein, B., Borycki, E., and Kannry, J., The relationship of usability to medical error: An evaluation of errors associated with usability problems in the use of a handheld application for prescribing medications. Medinfo. 11:Pt 21073–1076, 2004.
    Google Scholar
  2. Neilson, J., Usability engineering. Academic, New York, pp. 744–748, 1993.
    Google Scholar
  3. Rossen, M. B., and Carroll, J. M., Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufman, New York, 2002.
    Google Scholar
  4. Lewis, J. R., IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7:57–78, 1995.
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., and Norman, K. L., Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human–computer interface. ACM CHI’88 Proceedings. pp. 213–218, 1988.
  6. Lin, H. X., Choong, Y., and Salvendry, G., A proposed index of usability: A method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems usability evaluation methods. Behav. Inf. Technol. 16:267–278, 1997.
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Feinstein, A., The theory and evaluation of sensibility. In: Feinstein, A. (Ed.), _Clinimetrics_Murray, Westford, MA, pp. 141–166, 1987.
    Google Scholar
  8. Rowe, B. H., and Oxman, A. D., An assessment of the sensibility of a quality-of-life instrument. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 11:4374–380, 1993, Jul.
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Burns, K. E., Sinuff, T., Adhikari, N. K., et al., Bilevel noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure: Survey of Ontario practice. Crit. Care Med. 33(7):1477–1483, 2005, Jul.
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Griffith, L. E., Cook, D. J., Guyatt, G. H., and Charles, C. A., Comparison of open and closed questionnsire formats in obtaining demographic information from Canadian general internists. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52:10997–1005, 1999, Oct.
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Nelson, E. C., Splaine, M. E., Batalden, P. B., and Plume, S. K., Building measurement and data collection into medical practice. Ann. Intern. Med. 128:6460–466, 1998, 15 March.
    Google Scholar
  12. Peloso, P. M., Wright, J. G., and Bombardier, C., A critical appraisal of toxicity indexes in rheumatology. J. Rheumatol. 22:5989–994, 1995, May.
    Google Scholar
  13. Sinuff, T., Eva, K. W., Meade, M., Dodek, P., Heyland, D., and Cook, D., Clinical practice guidelines in the intensive care unit: A survey of Canadian clinicians’ attitudes: [Guide de pratique clinique dans les unites de soins intensifs: un sondage sur les attitudes des cliniciens canadiens]. Can. J. Anaesth. 54:9728–736, 2007, Sep.
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Stiell, I. G., Grimshaw, J., Wells, G. A., et al., A matched-pair cluster design study protocol to evaluate implementation of the Canadian C-spine rule in hospital emergency departments: Phase III. Implement. Sci. 2:4, 2007.
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Hunt, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Hanna, S. E., and Smith, K., Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA. 280:151339–1346, 1998, 21 Oct.
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Fine, M. J., Auble, T. E., Yealy, D. M., et al., A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 336(4):243–250, 1997, Jan 23.
    Article Google Scholar

Download references