Strategies of industry-science cooperation in the Russian manufacturing sector (original) (raw)
References
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,120(2), 701–728. Google Scholar
Albuquerque, E., Suzigan, W., Kruss, G., & Lee, K. (Eds.). (2015). Developing national systems of innovation: University-industry interactions in the global south. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar
Aristei, D., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2016). University and inter-firm R&D collaborations: propensity and intensity of cooperation in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer,41(4), 841–871. Google Scholar
Arranz, N., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation,28(1), 88–100. Google Scholar
Arvanitis, S., Sydow, N., & Woerter, M. (2008). Do specific forms of university-industry knowledge transfer have different impacts on the performance of private enterprises? An empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data. The Journal of Technology Transfer,33(5), 504–533. Google Scholar
Aschhoff, B., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Empirical evidence on the success of R&D cooperation—happy together? Review of Industrial Organization, 33(1), 41–62. Google Scholar
Badillo, E. R., & Moreno, R. (2016). What drives the choice of the type of partner in R&D cooperation? Evidence for Spanish manufactures and services. Applied Economics,48(52), 5023–5044. Google Scholar
Bayona Sáez, C., García Marco, T., & Huerta Arribas, E. (2002). Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Management,32(4), 321–341. Google Scholar
Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy,33(2), 209–223. Google Scholar
Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy,37(10), 1837–1853. Google Scholar
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization,22(8), 1237–1263. Google Scholar
Boone, J. (2008). A new way to measure competition. The Economic Journal,118, 1245–1261. Google Scholar
Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110(463), 388–410. Google Scholar
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy,39(7), 858–868. Google Scholar
Carvalho, L., Madeira, M.J., Carvalho, J., Moura, D.C. and Duarte, F.P. (2018), “Cooperation for Innovation in the European Union: Outlook and Evidences Using CIS for 15 European Countries”. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, pp. 1–20.
Castellacci, F. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy,37(6–7), 978–994. Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal,99(397), 569–596. Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science,48(1), 1–23. Google Scholar
Dachs, B., Ebersberger, B., & Pyka, A. (2008). Why do firms cooperate for innovation? A comparison of Austrian and Finnish CIS3 results. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy,4(3–4), 200–229. Google Scholar
De Faria, P., Lima, F., & Santos, R. (2010). Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners. Research Policy,39(8), 1082–1092. Google Scholar
De Fuentes, C., & Dutrenit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy,41(9), 1666–1682. Google Scholar
De Moraes Silva, D. R., Furtado, A. T., & Vonortas, N. S. (2018). University-industry R&D cooperation in Brazil: a sectoral approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer,43(2), 285–315. Google Scholar
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy,11(3), 147–162. Google Scholar
Dosi, G. (1988). “Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation”. Journal of economic Literature, pp. 1120–1171.
Eom, B.-Y., & Lee, K. (2010). Determinants of industry–academy linkages and their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization. Research Policy,39(5), 625–639. Google Scholar
Fiaz, M., & Naiding, Y. (2012). Exploring the barriers to R&D collaborations: a challenge for industry and faculty for sustainable UI collaboration growth. International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology,5(2), 1–15. Google Scholar
Fischer, B. B., Schaeffer, P. R., Vonortas, N. S. and Queiroz, S. (2017), “Quality comes first: university-industry collaboration as a source of academic entrepreneurship in a developing country. The Journal of Technology Transfer, pp. 1–22.
Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: Towards an Agenda. R&D Management,36(3), 223–228. Google Scholar
Gokhberg, L., & Kuznetsova, T. (2015). Russian Federation. UNESCO science report: towards,2030, 343–363. Google Scholar
Gokhberg, L., & Roud, V. (2016). Structural changes in the national innovation system: longitudinal study of innovation modes in the Russian industry. Economic Change and Restructuring,49(2–3), 269–288. Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed., pp. 803–805). Boston: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Hayter, C. S., Nelson, A. J., Zayed, S., & O’Connor, A. C. (2018). Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: A review, analysis and extension of the literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, pp. 1–44.
HSE. (2017a). Science and Technology Indicators: 2017. Data Book. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics. Google Scholar
HSE. (2017b). Indicators of Innovation Activities: 2017. Data Book. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics. Google Scholar
Jensen, R. A., Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2003). Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: ‘The best we can do with the s** t we get to work with’. International Journal of Industrial Organization,21(9), 1271–1300. Google Scholar
Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market structure and innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001). Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy,30(5), 791–804. Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In N. Rosenberg & R. Landau (Eds.), The positive sum strategy. Washington: National Academy Press. Google Scholar
Kratzer, J., Meissner, D., & Roud, V. (2017). Open innovation and company culture: Internal openness makes the difference. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,119, 128–138. Google Scholar
Kudrin, A., & Gurvich, E. (2015). A new growth model for the Russian economy. Russian Journal of Economics,1(1), 30–54. Google Scholar
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy,33(8), 1201–1215. Google Scholar
Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer,25(2), 111–133. Google Scholar
Lööf, H., & Broström, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? The Journal of Technology Transfer,33(1), 73–90. Google Scholar
López, A. (2008). Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization,26(1), 113–136. Google Scholar
Maietta, O. W. (2015). Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341–1359. Google Scholar
Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1997). Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change,6(1), 83–118. Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy,26(7), 773–776. Google Scholar
Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy,32(8), 1481–1499. Google Scholar
Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. (2003). What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2. Managerial and Decision Economics,24(2–3), 133–145. Google Scholar
OECD. (2015). Frascati manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD Publishing. Google Scholar
OECD. (2016). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing. Google Scholar
OECD and Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing. Google Scholar
Parrilli, M. D., & Heras, H. A. (2016). STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances. Research Policy,45(4), 747–756. Google Scholar
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews,9(4), 259–280. Google Scholar
Polischuk, L. I. (2013). Institutional performance. The Oxford handbook of the Russian economy (pp. 189–220). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 56–85). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Rapini, M. S., Albuquerque, E. da M., Chave, C. V., Silva, L. A., De Souza, S. G. A., Righi, H. M., et al. (2009). University–industry interactions in an immature system of innovation: Evidence from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Science & Public Policy,36(5), 373–386. Google Scholar
Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy,31(3), 303–328. Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. (2013). Universities as knowledge nodes in open innovation systems: more than just knowledge providers. In R. Capello, A. Olechnicka, & G. Gorzelak (Eds.), Universities, cities and regions: Loci for knowledge and innovation creation (pp. 82–99). London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Schmidt, T., & Salomo, N. (2007). The modes of industry-science links. In: DRUID summer conference on appropriability, proximity, routines and innovation in Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007.
Schwab, K. (2017). The global competitiveness report 2017_–_2018. World Economic Forum.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy,23(4), 640–660. Google Scholar
Srholec, M. (2016). Persistence of cooperation on innovation: econometric evidence from panel micro data. Prague Economic Papers,25(1), 53–70. Google Scholar
Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,18(7), 509–533. Google Scholar
Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2012). Fostering industry-science cooperation through public funding: Differences between universities and public research centres. The Journal of Technology Transfer,37(5), 676–695. Google Scholar
Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy,31(6), 947–967. Google Scholar
Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base. Research Policy,37(6–7), 1079–1095. Google Scholar
Thurner, T., & Zaichenko, S. (2015). Knowledge inputs to science- and development-based regimes: Evidence from the behavior of Russian RTOs. International Journal of Innovation Management,19(1), 1–23. Google Scholar
Tornatzky, L. G., Waugaman, P. G., & Gray, D. O. (2002). Innovation U: New university roles in a knowledge economy. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Technology Council. Google Scholar
Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization,23(5), 355–379. Google Scholar
Wang, C., & Han, Y. (2011). Linking properties of knowledge with innovation performance: the moderate role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management,15(5), 802–819. Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2014). Academic entrepreneurship, technology transfer and society: Where next? The Journal of Technology Transfer,39(3), 322–334. Google Scholar
Yakovlev, A. (2014). Russian modernization: Between the need for new players and the fear of losing control of rent sources. Journal of Eurasian Studies,5(1), 10–20. Google Scholar
Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review,27(2), 185–203. Google Scholar
Zaichenko, S. (2018). The human resource dimension of science-based technology transfer: lessons from Russian RTOs and innovative enterprises. The Journal of Technology Transfer,43(2), 368–388. Google Scholar
Zudin, N., Kuzyk, M., & Simachev, Yu. (2017). Science-industry cooperation in Russia: current status, problems, effects of government support. In: Russian Economy in 2016. Trends and Outlooks. (Issue 38). Gaidar Institute Publishers, Moscow, pp. 393–415.