De-Facto Science Policy in the Making: How Scientists Shape Science Policy and Why it Matters (or, Why STS and STP Scholars Should Socialize) (original) (raw)
Allenby, Braden, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2011. The techno-human condition. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Barke, Richard P. 1998. Authority in science and technology policy. Minerva 20(1): 116–123. Google Scholar
Barke, Richard P. 2003. Politics and interests in the republic of science. Minerva 41: 305–325. Article Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. The risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage. Google Scholar
Bettencourt, L.M.A., and J. Kaur. 2011. Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108(49): 19540–19545. Article Google Scholar
Bliziotis, I., K. Paraschakis, P. Vergidis, et al. 2005. Worldwide trends in quantity and quality of published articles in the field of infectious diseases. BMC Infectious Diseases 5: 16. Article Google Scholar
Bocking, Stephen. 2004. Nature’s experts: science, politics, and the environment. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cinzia Daraio. 2003. Age effects in scientific productivity. Scientometrics 58(1): 49–90. Article Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, Andrea, Cinzia Daraio, and L. Simar. 2006. Advanced indicators of productivity of universities: An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics 66(2): 389–410. Article Google Scholar
Borner, K., C. Chen, and K.W. Boyack. 2003. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) 37: 179–255. Article Google Scholar
Bozeman, Barry. 2003. Public value mapping of science outcomes: theory and method. Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes. http://www.cspo.org/products/rocky/Rock-Vol2-1.PDF. Accessed on 31 December 2011.
Bozeman, Barry, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2005. Public values and public failure in US science policy. Science and Public Policy 32: 119–136. Article Google Scholar
Bozeman, Barry, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2011. Public value mapping and science policy evaluation. Minerva 49(1): 1–23. Article Google Scholar
Cameron, B.D. 2005. Trends in the usage of ISI bibliometric data: uses, abuses, and implications. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 5(1): 105–125. Article Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Book Google Scholar
Cash, David W., William C. Clark, Frank Alcock, Nancy M. Dickson, Noelle Eckley, David H. Guston, Jill Jäger, and Ronald B. Mitchell. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(14): 8086–8091. Article Google Scholar
Carpenter, Stephen R., et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(5): 1305–1312. Article Google Scholar
Clark, William C. 2007. Sustainability science: A room of its own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(6): 1737–1738. Article Google Scholar
Clark, William C. 2010. Sustainable development and sustainability science. In report from Toward a Science of Sustainability Conference, Airlie Center, Warrenton, VA.
Clark, William C., and Nancy M. Dickson. 2003. Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14): 8059–8061. Article Google Scholar
Clark, William C., and Simon A. Levin. 2010. Toward a science of sustainability: Executive summary. In report from Toward a Science of Sustainability Conference, Airlie Center, Warrenton, VA.
Clark, William C., Thomas P. Tomich, Meine van Noordwijk, David Guston, Delia Catacutan, Nancy M. Dickson, and Elizabeth McNie. 2011. Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108.
Collingridge, David, and Colin Reeve. 1986. Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Google Scholar
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. 2007. Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Cooper, G.J. 2003. The science of the struggle for existence: On the foundations of ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Book Google Scholar
Douglas, Heather E. 2009. Science, policy and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank. 1999. Technological deliberation in a democratic society: The case for participatory inquiry. Science and Public Policy 26: 294–302. Article Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Fisher, Erik. 2011. Public science and technology scholars: Engaging whom? Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 607–620. Article Google Scholar
Fortun, Kim. 2001. Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, disaster, new global orders. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Friiberg Workshop Report. 2000. Sustainability science. Statement of the Friiberg Workshop on Sustainability Science, Friiberg.
Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739–755. Article Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1978. Problem retention and problem change in science. Sociological Inquiry 48(3/4): 96. Article Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795. Article Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1995. Boundaries of science. In Handbook of science and technology studies, eds. Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
Guston, David H. 2004. Forget politicizing science, let’s democratize science! Issues in Science and Technology 21: 25–28. Google Scholar
Guston, David H. 2010. The anticipatory governance of emerging technologies. Journal of the Korean Vacuum Society 19(6): 432–441. Article Google Scholar
Guston, David H., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2002. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24: 93–109. Article Google Scholar
Hackett, Edward J. 2005. Essential tensions: Identity, risk, and control in scientific collaboration. Social Studies of Science 35: 787–826. Article Google Scholar
Hagendijk, Rob, and Alan Irwin. 2006. Public deliberation and governance: Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva 44: 167–184. Article Google Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. 1993. Living within limits: Ecology, economics, and population taboos. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Hicks, D., H. Tomizawa, Y. Saitoh, and S. Kobayashi. 2004. Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of federally funded research in the United States. Research Evaluation 13(2): 76–86. Article Google Scholar
Holbrook, J.B. 2005. Assessing the science–society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s second merit review criterion. Technology in Society 27(4): 437–451. Article Google Scholar
Hulme, Michael, Roger A. Pielke Jr., and Suraje Dessai. 2009. Keeping prediction in perspective. Nature Reports Climate Change 3: 126–127. Article Google Scholar
Irwin, Alan. 2006. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299–320. Article Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1987. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science 17(2): 195–230. Article Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2001. Image and imagination: The formation of global environmental consciousness. In Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance, eds. Paul Edwards, and Clark Miller. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41(3): 223–244. Article Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order, ed. Sheila Jasanoff. New York: Routledge. Chapter Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2011. Constitutional moments in governing science and technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 621–638. Article Google Scholar
Jones, Charles I., and John C. Williams. 1998. Measuring the social return to R&D. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4): 1119–1135. Article Google Scholar
Kates, Robert W. 2011. From the unity of nature to sustainability science: ideas and practice. Center for international development working paper no. 218, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Kates, Robert W., William C. Clark, J. Robert Corell, Michael Hall, Carlo C. Jaeger, Ian Lowe, James J. McCarthy, et al. 2001. Sustainability science. Science 292(5517): 641–642. Article Google Scholar
Keller, D.R., and F.B. Golley. 2000. Ecology as a science of synthesis. In The philosophy of ecology: From science to synthesis, eds. D.R. Keller, and F.B. Golley, 1–19. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. Google Scholar
Kinchy, Abby J., and Daniel Lee Kleinman. 2003. Organizing credibility: Discursive and organizational orthodoxy on the borders of ecology and politics. Social Studies of Science 33(6): 869–896. Article Google Scholar
Kingsland, Sharon E. 2005. The evolution of American ecology, 1890–2000. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
Kinzig, Ann, D. Starrett, K. Arrow, S. Aniyar, B. Bolin, P. Dasgupta, P. Ehrlich, et al. 2003. Coping with uncertainty: A call for a new science-policy forum. Ambio 32(5): 330–335. Google Scholar
Kohler, Robert E. 2002. Landscapes and labscapes: Exploring the lab-field border in biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Book Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, truth and democracy. Cambridge: Oxford University Press. Book Google Scholar
Kretschmer, H. 2004. Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the web. Scientometrics 60(3): 409–420. Article Google Scholar
Kwa, C. 1987. Representations of nature mediating between ecology and science policy: The case of the International Biological Programme. Social Studies of Science 17(3): 413–442. Article Google Scholar
Kyvik, Svein. 2003. Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics 58: 35–48. Article Google Scholar
Lackey, Robert T. 2007. Science, scientists and policy advocacy. Conservation Biology 21(1): 12–17. Article Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Leimgruber, P., C.A. Christen, and A. Laborderie. 2005. The impact of landsat satellite monitoring on conservation biology. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 106(1–3): 81. Article Google Scholar
Leshner, A. 2002. Science and sustainability. Science 297(5583): 897. Article Google Scholar
Logar, Nathaniel. 2011. Chemistry, green chemistry, and the instrumental valuation of sustainability. Minerva 49(1): 113–136. Article Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Loorbach, Derk. 2010. Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23: 161–183. Article Google Scholar
Lubchenco, Jane. 1998. Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science 279(5350): 491. Article Google Scholar
Maricle, Genevieve. 2011. Prediction as an impediment to preparedness: Lessons from the US hurricane and earthquake research enterprises. Minerva 49(1): 87–111. Article Google Scholar
Mauleón, E., and M. Bordons. 2006. Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of Materials Science. Scientometrics 66(1): 199–218. Article Google Scholar
May, R.M. 1981. The role of theory in ecology. Integrative and Comparative Biology 21(4): 903. Article Google Scholar
McCullough, Ellen, and Pamela Matson. 2012. Linking knowledge with action for sustainable development: A case study of change and effectiveness. In Seeds of sustainability: Lessons from the birthplace of the Green Revolution in agriculture, ed. Pamela Matson. Washington, DC: Island Press. Google Scholar
Meyer, Ryan. 2011. The public value failures of climate science in the US. Minerva 49(1): 47–70. Article Google Scholar
Mervis, Jeff. 2006. NSF begins a push to measure societal impacts of research. Science 312(5772): 347. Article Google Scholar
Miller, C. 2004. Resisting empire: globalism, relocation, relocalization, and the politics of knowledge. In Earthly politics: local and global environmental governance, eds. Sheila Jasanoff and Marybeth Long Martello. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Miller, Thaddeus R. 2011. Constructing sustainability: A study of emerging research trajectories. Dissertation. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
Miller, Thaddeus R. 2013. Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustainability Science 8(2): 279–293. Google Scholar
Mitman, Gregg. 1992. The state of nature: Ecology, community and American social thought, 1900–1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Mooney, Harold A., and O.E. Sala. 1993. Science and sustainable use. Ecological Applications 3: 564–565. Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1999. Our common journey: A transition toward sustainability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar
Neff, Mark W. 2011. What research should be done and why? Four competing visions among ecologists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9(8): 462–469. Article Google Scholar
Neff, Mark W. In review. Research priorities and the potential pitfall of path dependencies in coral reef science.
Neff, Mark W., and Elizabeth Corley. 2009. 35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics 80(3): 657–682. Article Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 2003. On the uneven evolution of human know-how. Research Policy 32: 909–922. Article Google Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 2005. Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Book Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga. 2007. How many policy rooms are there? Evidence-based and other kinds of science policies. Science, Technology and Human Values 32(4): 479–490. Article Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science:Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Oxford: Polity Press. Google Scholar
Odum, E.P. 1977. The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science 195(4284): 1289–1293. Article Google Scholar
Palmer, Margaret, et al. 2004. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304(5675): 1251–1252. Article Google Scholar
Parens, Eric, Josephine Johnston, and Jacob Moses. 2009. Ethical issues of synthetic biology: An overview of the issues. Synthetic Biology project. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. http://www.synbioproject.org/process/assets/files/6334/synbio3.pdf?. Accessed 21 December 2011.
Parker, John N., and Edward J. Hackett. 2011. Hot spots and hot moments in scientific collaborations and social movements. American Sociological Review. doi:10.1177/0003122411433763.
Picard-Aitken, M., D. Campbell, and G. Côté, G. 2011. Demonstrating a shift toward ecosystem-based research using scientometrics. Presented at the Society for the Social Studies of Science, Cleveland, Ohio. http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_Picard-Aitken_4S_2011_Shift_Ecosystem.pdf. Accessed 21 December 2011.
Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva 1: 54–73. Article Google Scholar
Price, D.D.S. 1971. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Price, D.D.S. 1986. Little science, big science–and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Proctor, Robert. 1991. Value free science? Purity and power in modern knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Pielke, Jr., Roger A. 2006. When scientists politicize science. Regulation 29(1): 28–34.
Pielke, Jr., Roger A. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pielke, Jr., Roger A. 2010. The climate fix: What scientists and politicians won’t tell you about global warming. New York: Basic Books.
Prpić, K. 2002. Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics 55(1): 27–58. Article Google Scholar
Rayner, Steve. 2000. Prediction and other approaches to climate change. In Prediction: Science, decision making, and the future of nature, eds. Daniel Sarewitz and Roger Pielke, Jr. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
Rayner, Steve. 2003. Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making. Science and Public Policy 30: 163–170. Article Google Scholar
Rayner, Steve, and Elizabeth Malone, eds. 1998. Human choice and climate change. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
Reid, W.V., et al. 2010. Earth system science for global sustainability: Grand challenges. Science 330: 916–917. Article Google Scholar
Rittel, Horst W.J., and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169. Article Google Scholar
Rip, Arie. 1981. A cognitive approach to science policy. Research Policy 10(4): 294–311. Article Google Scholar
Rip, Arie. 1985. Commentary: Peer review is alive and well in the United States. Science, Technology and Human Values 10(3): 82–86. Article Google Scholar
Rip, Arie, and B.J.R. van der Meulen. 1996. The post-modern research system. Science and Public Policy 23: 343–352. Google Scholar
Rip, Arie, and Rene Kemp. 1998. Technological change. In Human choices and climate change, eds. Steve Rayner, and Elizabeth Malone. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. Google Scholar
Roco, M.C. 2005. International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7: 707–712. Article Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark. 2008. The economy of the earth: Philosophy, law, and the environment, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel. 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy 7: 385–403. Article Google Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel. 2011. The dubious benefits of broader impact. Nature 475: 141–142. Article Google Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel, and Richard Nelson. 2008. Three rules for technological fixes. Nature 456: 871–872. Article Google Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel, David Kriebel, Richard Clapp, Cathy Crumbley, Polly Hoppin, Molly Jacobs, and Joel Tickner. 2010. The Sustainable Solutions Agenda. Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes and Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, Arizona State University and University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
Schoener, T.W. 1986. Mechanistic approaches to community ecology: A new reductionism. Integrative and Comparative Biology 26(1): 81–106. Article Google Scholar
Schoolman, E.D., J.S. Guest, K.F. Bush, and A.R. Bell. 2011. How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustainability Science. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z.
Shackley, Simon. 2000. Epistemic lifestyles in climate change modeling. BRIDGES 7(1/2): 99–138. Google Scholar
Shapira, P., and J. Youtie. 2006. Measures for knowledge-based economic development: Introducing data mining techniques to economic developers in the state of Georgia and the US South. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73: 950–965. Article Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1968. Introduction. In Criteria for scientific development: Public policy and national goals, ed. Edward Shils, pp. iv–v. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Siegel, R.W. 1999. WTEC panel report on nanostructure science and technology: R&D status and trends in nanoparticles, nanostructured materials, and nanodevices. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
Smith, Adrian, Andy Stirling, and Frans Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34: 1491–1510. Article Google Scholar
Stirling, Andy. 2008. “Opening up” and “closing down”: Power, participation and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 33(2): 262–294. Article Google Scholar
Stirling, Andy. 2009. Direction, distribution and diversity! Pluralising progress in innovation, sustainability and development. STEPS working Paper 32, Brighton: STEPS Centre.
Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution. Google Scholar
Swierstra, Tsjalling, and Arie Rip. 2007. Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. Nanoethics 1(1): 3–20. Article Google Scholar
Takacs, David. 1996. The idea of biodiversity: Philosophies of paradise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul B., and Kyle Powys Whyte. 2011. What happens to environmental philosophy in a wicked world? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10806-011-9344-0.
Tlili, Anwar, and Emily Dawson. 2010. Mediating science and society in the EU and UK: From information-transmission to deliberative democracy? Minerva 48(4): 429–461. Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1964. The complexity of scientific choice: A stocktaking. Minerva 2: 343–359. Article Google Scholar
Turner II, B.L., et al. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14): 8074–8079. Article Google Scholar
White, H.D., and K.W. McCain. 1998. Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(4): 327–355. Google Scholar
Wilson, C.S., and V.A. Markusova. 2004. Changes in the scientific output of Russia from 1980 to 2000, as reflected in the Science Citation Index, in relation to national politico-economic changes. Scientometrics 59: 345–389. Article Google Scholar
Worster, Donald. 1994. Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Wynne, Brian. 1989. Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information. Environment 31(2): 10–39. Article Google Scholar
Wynne, Brian. 2001. Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture 10: 445–481. Article Google Scholar
Ziman, J.M. 1987. The problem of “problem choice”. Minerva 25(1): 92–106. Article Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet. 1978. Theory choice and problem choice in science. Sociological Inquiry 48(3/4): 65. Article Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet. 1989. The other Merton thesis. Science in Context 3(1): 239–267. Article Google Scholar