Modeling antimalarial and antihuman African trypanosomiasis compounds: a ligand- and structure-based approaches (original) (raw)

References

1. Rodriguez F, Rozas I, Kaiser M, Brun R, Nguyen B, Wilson WD, Garcia RN, Dardonville C (2008) New bis(2-aminoimidazoline) and bisguanidine DNA minor groove binders with potent in vivo antitrypanosomal and antiplasmodial activity. J Med Chem 51:909–923. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm7013088
   Article CAS Google Scholar
2. Kennedy PG (2013) Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness). Lancet Neurol 12:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70296-X
   Article Google Scholar
3. Franco JR, Cecchi G, Priotto G, Paone M, Diarra A, Grout L, Mattioli RC, Argaw D (2017) Monitoring the elimination of human African trypanosomiasis: update to 2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11:e0005585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005585
   Article Google Scholar
4. Babokhov P, Sanyaolu AO, Oyibo WA, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Iriemenam NC (2013) A current analysis of chemotherapy strategies for the treatment of human African trypanosomiasis. Pathog Glob Health 107:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047773213Y.0000000105
   Article CAS Google Scholar
5. Arbeitskreis Blut U (2009) Malaria. Transfus Med Hemother 36:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000197327
   Article Google Scholar
6. Verma S, Debnath U, Agarwal P, Srivastava K, Prabhakar YS (2015) In silico exploration for new antimalarials: arylsulfonyloxy acetimidamides as prospective agents. J Chem Inf Model 55:1708–1719. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00392
   Article CAS Google Scholar
7. Brun R, Don R, Jacobs RT, Wang MZ, Barrett MP (2011) Development of novel drugs for human African trypanosomiasis. Fut Microbiol 6:677–691. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.11.44
   Article CAS Google Scholar
8. Dardonville C, Brun R (2004) Bisguanidine, bis(2-aminoimidazoline), and polyamine derivatives as potent and selective chemotherapeutic agents against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation. J Med Chem 47:2296–2307. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm031024u
   Article CAS Google Scholar
9. Dardonville C, Barrett MP, Brun R, Kaiser M, Tanious F, Wilson WD (2006) DNA binding affinity of bisguanidine and bis(2-aminoimidazoline) derivatives with in vivo antitrypanosomal activity. J Med Chem 49:3748–3752. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm060295c
   Article CAS Google Scholar
10. Arafa RK, Brun R, Wenzler T, Tanious FA, Wilson WD, Stephens CE, Boykin DW (2005) Synthesis, DNA affinity, and antiprotozoal activity of fused ring dicationic compounds and their prodrugs. J Med Chem 48:5480–5488. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm058190h
    Article CAS Google Scholar
11. Mayence A, Vanden Eynde JJ, Krogstad FM, Krogstad DJ, Cushion MT, Huang TL (2004) Parallel solution-phase synthesis of conformationally restricted congeners of pentamidine and evaluation of their antiplasmodial activities. J Med Chem 47:2700–2705. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm030545e
    Article CAS Google Scholar
12. Cory M, Tidwell RR, Fairley TA (1992) Structure and DNA binding activity of analogues of 1,5-bis(4-amidinophenoxy)pentane (pentamidine). J Med Chem 35:431–438. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00081a003
    Article CAS Google Scholar
13. Chtita S, Ghamali M, Ousaa A, Aouidate A, Belhassan A, Taourati AI, Masand VH, Bouachrine M, Lakhlifi T (2019) QSAR study of anti-human African Trypanosomiasis activity for 2-phenylimidazopyridines derivatives using DFT and Lipinski’s descriptors. Heliyon 5:e01304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01304
    Article Google Scholar
14. Masand VH, El-Sayed NNE, Mahajan DT, Mercader AG, Alafeefy AM, Shibi IG (2017) QSAR modeling for anti-human African trypanosomiasis activity of substituted 2-Phenylimidazopyridines. J Mol Struct 1130:711–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.11.012
    Article CAS Google Scholar
15. Maheshwari N, Goyal A, Jain S, Jain D, Moorthy NSHN (2014) Atom based 3D-QSAR study of 1,4-benzodiazepine-2-ones as potent anti-trypanosomal agents and its validation. Med Chem Res 23:765–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-013-0675-4
    Article CAS Google Scholar
16. Srivastava HK, Chourasia M, Kumar D, Sastry GN (2011) Comparison of computational methods to model DNA minor groove binders. J Chem Inf Model 51:558–571. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100474n
    Article CAS Google Scholar
17. Song C, Zhang X, Li F, Zhu Y, Liu C, Li X, Li Y, Zhang W, Wei D, Tang M (2016) Theoretical study of binding affinity for diamidine with DNA. Struct Chem 27:681–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-015-0610-z
    Article CAS Google Scholar
18. Schaller D, Hagenow S, Stark H, Wolber G (2019) Ligand-guided homology modeling drives identification of novel histamine H3 receptor ligands. PLoS ONE 14:e0218820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218820
    Article CAS Google Scholar
19. Srivastava HK, Bohari MH, Sastry GN (2012) Modeling anti-HIV compounds: the role of analogue-based approaches. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 8:224–248
    Article CAS Google Scholar
20. Srivastava HK, Sastry GN (2012) Molecular dynamics investigation on a series of HIV protease inhibitors: assessing the performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches. J Chem Inf Model 52:3088–3098. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci300385h
    Article CAS Google Scholar
21. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery Jr JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2013) Gaussian 09, Revision D.01 Gaussian Inc, Wallingford
22. Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30:2785–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256
    Article CAS Google Scholar
23. Zhu W, Wang Y, Li K, Gao J, Huang CH, Chen CC, Ko TP, Zhang Y, Guo RT, Oldfield E (2015) Antibacterial drug leads: DNA and enzyme multitargeting. J Med Chem 58:1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm501449u
    Article CAS Google Scholar
24. Brown DG, Sanderson MR, Skelly JV, Jenkins TC, Brown T, Garman E, Stuart DI, Neidle S (1990) Crystal structure of a berenil-dodecanucleotide complex: the role of water in sequence-specific ligand binding. EMBO J 9:1329–1334
    Article CAS Google Scholar
25. Simpson IJ, Lee M, Kumar A, Boykin DW, Neidle S (2000) DNA minor groove interactions and the biological activity of 2,5-bis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 10:2593–2597. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-894x(00)00511-4
    Article CAS Google Scholar
26. Munde M, Lee M, Neidle S, Arafa R, Boykin DW, Liu Y, Bailly C, Wilson WD (2007) Induced fit conformational changes of a “reversed amidine” heterocycle: optimized interactions in a DNA minor groove complex. J Am Chem Soc 129:5688–5698. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja069003n
    Article CAS Google Scholar
27. Nunn CM, Neidle S (1995) Sequence-dependent drug binding to the minor groove of DNA: crystal structure of the DNA dodecamer d(CGCAAATTTGCG)2 complexed with propamidine. J Med Chem 38:2317–2325. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00013a008
    Article CAS Google Scholar
28. Wei D, Wilson WD, Neidle S (2013) Small-molecule binding to the DNA minor groove is mediated by a conserved water cluster. J Am Chem Soc 135:1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja308952y
    Article CAS Google Scholar
29. Drew HR, Wing RM, Takano T, Broka C, Tanaka S, Itakura K, Dickerson RE (1981) Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer: conformation and dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2179–2183. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.4.2179
    Article CAS Google Scholar
30. Trent JO, Clark GR, Kumar A, Wilson WD, Boykin DW, Hall JE, Tidwell RR, Blagburn BL, Neidle S (1996) Targeting the minor groove of DNA: crystal structures of two complexes between furan derivatives of Berenil and the DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG)2. J Med Chem 39:4554–4562. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm9604484
    Article CAS Google Scholar
31. Guerri A, Simpson IJ, Neidle S (1998) Visualisation of extensive water ribbons and networks in a DNA minor-groove drug complex. Nucleic Acids Res 26:2873–2878. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.12.2873
    Article CAS Google Scholar
32. Katritzky AR, Lobanov VS, Karelson M (1995) QSPR: the correlation and quantitative prediction of chemical and physical properties from structure. Chem Soc Rev 24:279–287. https://doi.org/10.1039/CS9952400279
    Article CAS Google Scholar
33. Srivastava HK, Sastry GN (2013) Efficient estimation of MMGBSA-based BEs for DNA and aromatic furan amidino derivatives. J Biomol Struct Dyn 31:522–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2012.703071
    Article CAS Google Scholar
34. Proft FD, Geerlings P (1997) Calculation of ionization energies, electron affinities, electronegativities, and hardnesses using density functional methods. J Chem Phys 106:3270–3279. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473796
    Article Google Scholar
35. Wadehra A, Ghosh SK (2005) A density functional theory-based chemical potential equalisation approach to molecular polarizability. J Chem Sci 117:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02708343
    Article CAS Google Scholar
36. Sabin JR, Trickey SB, Apell SP, Oddershede J (2000) Molecular shape, capacitance, and chemical hardness. Int J Quantum Chem 77:358–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(2000)77:1%3c358:aid-qua35%3e3.0.co;2-d
    Article CAS Google Scholar
37. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: an N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98:10089–10092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464397
    Article CAS Google Scholar
38. Roy K, Kar S, Ambure P (2015) On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst $V 145:22–29
    Article CAS Google Scholar
39. Roy K, Chakraborty P, Mitra I, Ojha PK, Kar S, Das RN (2013) Some case studies on application of “rm2” metrics for judging quality of quantitative structure–activity relationship predictions: emphasis on scaling of response data. J Comput Chem 34:1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23231
    Article CAS Google Scholar
40. Case DA BV, Berryman JT, Betz RM, Cai Q, Cerutti DS, Cheatham TE III, Darden TA, Duke RE, Gohlke H, Goetz AW, Gusarov S, Homeyer N, Janowski P, Kaus J, Kolossváry I, Kovalenko A, Lee TS, LeGrand S, Luchko T, Luo R, Madej B, Merz KM, Paesani F, Roe DR, Roitberg A, Sagui C, Salomon-Ferrer R, Seabra G, Simmerling CL, Smith W, Swails J, Walker RC, Wang J, Wolf RM, Wu X, Kollman PA (16, 2015) AMBER. University of California, San Francisco

Download references