Separating gains and losses in health when calculating the minimum important difference for mapped utility measures (original) (raw)

References

  1. Food and Drug Administration. (FDA) (2006). Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcomes measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. FDA, Rockville, MD. Available online at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/5460dft.pdf#search=%91draft%20guidance%20fda%20patient%20reported%20outcomes’
  2. Torrance, G. W., & Feeny, D. (1989). Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 5, 559–575.
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  3. Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Rusell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Google Scholar
  4. Wyrwich, K. W., Bullinger, M., Aaronson, N., Hays, R. D., Patrick, D. L., & Symonds, T. (2005). Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 14, 285–295. doi:10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Lydick, E., & Epstein, R. S. (1993). Interpretation of quality of life changes. Quality of Life Research, 2, 221–226. 10.1007/BF00435226.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  6. Revicki, D. A., Cella, D., Hays, R. D., Sloan, J. A., Lenderking, W. R., & Aaronson, N. K. (2006). Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 70–74. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-70.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Medical Care, 27(Suppl.), S178–S189. doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  8. Wyrwich, K. W., Tierney, W., & Wolinsky, F. D. (1999). Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52, 861–873. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00071-2.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Google Scholar
  10. Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care, 14(5), 582–592. doi:10.1097/00005650-200305000-00004.
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341–357. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.341.
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Guyatt, G. H., Norman, G. R., Juniper, E. F., & Griffith, L. E. (2002). A critical look at transition ratings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 900–908. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00435-3.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1507–1515. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00045-3.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  14. Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wywrich, K. W., & Norman, G. R.; Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371–383.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2005). Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1523–1532. doi:10.1007/s11136-004-7713-0.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Cella, D., Hahn, E. A., & Dineen, K. (2002). Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening. Quality of Life Research, 11, 207–221. doi:10.1023/A:1015276414526.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Lundberg, L., Johannesson, M., Isacson, D. G. L., & Borgquist, L. (1999). The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population. Medical Decision Making, 19(2), 128–140. doi:10.1177/0272989X9901900203.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  18. Shmueli, A. (2004). The relationship between the visual analog scale and the SF-36 scales in the general population: An update. Medical Decision Making, 24(1), 61–63. doi:10.1177/0272989X03261562.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Von Korff, M., Wagner, E. H., & Saunders, K. (1992). A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 197–203. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90016-G.
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 4–11. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-4.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Ware, J. E., & Kosinski, M. (2001). The SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales. A manual for users of version 1, 2nd edn. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
    Google Scholar
  22. Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Nichol, M. B., Sengupta, N., & Globe, D. R. (2001). Evaluating quality-adjusted life years: Estimation of the health utility index (HUI2) from the SF-36. Medical Decision Making, 21, 105–112. doi:10.1177/02729890122062352.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  24. Yost, K. J., Cella, D., Chawla, A., Holmgren, E., Eton, T., Ayanian, J. Z., West, D. W. (2005). Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 1241–1251. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.008.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  25. Pickard, A. S., Wang, Z., Walton, S. M., & Lee, T. A. (2005). Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 11–19. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-11.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Brissette, I., Leventhal, H., & Leventhal, E. A. (2003). Observer ratings of health and sickness: Can other people tell us anything about our health that we don’t already know? Health Psychology, 22, 471–478. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.471.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Brissette, I., Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2002). The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 102–111. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.102.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Wyrwich, K. W., Metz, S. M., Babu, A. N., Kroenke, K., Tierney, W. M., & Wolinsky, F. D. (2002). The reliability of retrospective change assessments. Quality of Life Research, 11(7), 636.
    Google Scholar

Download references