The cultural environment: measuring culture with big data (original) (raw)
References
Abbott, A. (1995). Things of boundaries. Social Science Research, 62(4), 857–882. Google Scholar
Abbott, A. (1997). On the concept of turning point. Comparative Social Research, 16, 85–106. Google Scholar
Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Agnew, J., Gillespie, T., Gonzalez, J., & Min, B. (2008). Baghdad nights: Evaluating the US military “surge” using nighttime light signatures.
Alexander, J. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Book Google Scholar
Alexander, J., & Smith, P. (2001). The strong program in cultural theory: Elements of a structural hermeneutics. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 135–150). New York: Springer. Google Scholar
Armstrong, E. A. (2002). Forging gay identities: Organizing sexuality in San Francisco, 1950–1994. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Bail, C. (2012). The fringe effect: civil society organizations and the evolution of media discourse about Islam, 2001–2008. American Sociological Review, 77(7), 855–879. Article Google Scholar
Bail, C. (2013a). Winning minds through hearts: Organ donation advocacy, emotional feedback, and social media. Working Paper, Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Bail, C. (2013b). Taming big data: Apps and the future of survey research. Working Paper, Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Bail, C.A. (forthcoming). Terrified: How anti-muslim organizations became mainstream. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of cultural difference. Boston: Little, Brown. Google Scholar
Bartley, T. (2007). How foundations shape social movements: the construction of an organizational field and the rise of forest certification. Social Problems, 54(3), 229–255. Article Google Scholar
Baumer, E. P. S., Polletta, F., Pierski, N., Celaya, C., Rosenblatt, K., & Gay, G. K. (2013, February). Developing computational supports for frame reflection. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/38374.
Bearman, P., & Stovel, K. (2000). Becoming a Nazi: a model for narrative networks. Poetics, 27(2), 69–90. Article Google Scholar
Bearman, P., Faris, R., & Moody, J. (1999). Blocking the future: new solutions for old problems in historical social science. Social Science History, 23(4), 501–533. Google Scholar
Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2003, November 28). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Review-article.
Biernacki, R. (2012). Reinventing evidence in social inquiry: Decoding facts and variables. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Book Google Scholar
Blei, D. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. Article Google Scholar
Blei, D., & Lafferty, J. (2006). International Conference on Machine Learning, ACM, New York, New York, 113–120.
Blei, D., & Lafferty, J. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17–35. Article Google Scholar
Blei, D., & McAuliffe, J. (2010). Supervised topic models. arXiv:1003.0783. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.0783.
Blei, D., Ng, A., & Jordan, M. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022. Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progres of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 1–19. Article Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Homo Academicus (1st ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Cerulo, K. A. (1998). Deciphering violence: The cognitive structure of right and wrong (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Chang, J., Boyd-graber, J., Gerrish, S., Wang, C., & Blei, D. M. (2009). Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models.
Collins, R. (2013). Solving the Mona Lisa smile, and other developments in visual micro-sociology. Working Paper, Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania.
D’Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Book Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287. Article Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., & Bonikowski, B. (2008). Make money surfing the web? The impact of internet use on the earnings of U.S. workers. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 227–250. doi:10.1177/000312240807300203. Article Google Scholar
Dimaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. (2001). Social implications of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336. Article Google Scholar
Dimaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (forthcoming). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of government arts funding in the U.S. Poetics, Page numbers unknown.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger. Book Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Google Scholar
Eliasoph, N., & Lichterman, P. (2003). Culture in interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 735–794. Article Google Scholar
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343. doi:10.2307/223484. Article Google Scholar
Evans, R., & Kay, T. (2008). How environmentalists “Greened” trade policy: strategic action and the architecture of field overlap. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 970–991. doi:10.1177/000312240807300605. Article Google Scholar
Eyal, G. (2009). The space between fields. Working Paper, Center for Comparative Research, Yale University.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26. Article Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (1st ed.). New York: Vintage. Google Scholar
Franzosi, R. (2004). From words to numbers: Narrative, data, and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Franzosi, R. (2009). Quantitative narrative analysis (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. Google Scholar
Gaby, S., & Caren, N. (2012). Occupy online: how cute old men and Malcolm X Recruited 400,000 U.S. users to OWS on Facebook. Social Movement Studies, 11, 367–374. Article Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Ghaziani, A., & Baldassarri, D. (2011). Cultural anchors and the organization of differences. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 179–206. doi:10.1177/0003122411401252. Article Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Touchstone. Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Gold, M. K. (2012). Debates in the digital humanities. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and day length across diverse cultures. Science, 333(6051), 1878–1881. doi:10.1126/science.1202775. Article Google Scholar
Grimmer, J. (2010). A Bayesian hierchical topic model for political texts: measuring expressed agendas in senate press releases. Political Analysis, 18(1), 1–35. Article Google Scholar
Grimmer, J., & King, G. (2011). General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2643–2650. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018067108. Article Google Scholar
Griswold, W., & Wright, N. (2004). Wired and well read. In Society online: The internet in context. New York: Sage.
Hopkins, D. (2013). The exaggerated life of death panels: The limits of framing effects in the 2009–2012 health care debate. Working Paper, SSRN.
Hopkins, D. J., & King, G. (2010). A method of automated nonparametric content analysis for social science. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 229–247. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00428.x. Article Google Scholar
Ignatow, G., & Mihalcea, R. (2013). Text mining for comparative cultural analysis. Working Paper, Department of Sociology, University of North Texas.
Johnson-Hanks, J., Bachrach, C., Morgan, P., & Kohler, H.-P. (2011). Understanding family change and variation: toward a theory of conjuctural action. Understanding Population Trends and Processes, 5, 1–179. Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. (2004). Endogenous explanation in the sociology of culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 335–357. Article Google Scholar
King, G. (2011). Ensuring the data rich future of the social sciences. Science, 331(11 February), 719–721. Article Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. H. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. Google Scholar
Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Book Google Scholar
Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar
Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201–221. Article Google Scholar
Lamont, M., & White, P. (2009). The evaluation of systematic qualitative research in the social sciences. Report of the U.S. National Science Foundation.
Lan, T., & Raptis, M. (2013). From subcategories to visual composites: A multi-level framework for object recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
Latour, B. (1988). How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A.-L., Brewer, D., et al. (2009). SOCIAL SCIENCE: computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723. doi:10.1126/science.1167742. Article Google Scholar
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30(4), 330–342. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002. Article Google Scholar
Lieberson, S. (2000). A matter of taste: How names, fashions, and culture change. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Livne, A., Simmons, M. P., Adar, E., & Adamic, L. (2011). The party is over here: Structure and content in the 2010 election. Proceedings of the Fifth Intenrational AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 201–209.
Loveman, M., & Muniz, J. (2007). How Puerto Rico became white: boundary dynamics and inter-census racial classification. American Sociological Review, 72, 915–939. Article Google Scholar
Manning, C. D., & Schuetze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing (1st ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Mark, N. P. (2003). Culture and competition: homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 319–345. doi:10.2307/1519727. Article Google Scholar
Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49. Article Google Scholar
Medvetz, T. (2012). The rise of think tanks in America: Merchants of policy and power. Chicago: University of Chicago. Book Google Scholar
Merton, R. (1949). Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar
Mische, A. (2008). Partisan publics: Communication and contention across Brazilian youth activist networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Mohr, J. (1998). Measuring meaning structures. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 345–370. Article Google Scholar
Mohr, J., & Guerra-Pearson, F. (2010). The duality of niche and form: The differentiation of institutional space in New York City, 1888–1917. In Categories in markets: Origins and evolution (pp. 321–368). New York: Emerald Group Publishing.
Mohr, J., Singh, A., & Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2013). CulMINR: Cultural meanings from the interpretation of narrative and rhetoric: A dynamic network approach to hermeneutic mining of large text corpora. Working Paper, Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Mohr, J., Wagner-Pacifici, R., Breiger, R., Bogdanov, P. (2014). Graphing the grammar of motives in National Security Strategies: cultural interpretation, automated text analysis, and the drama of global politics. Poetics, 41(6), 670–700. Google Scholar
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. London: VERSO BOOKS. Google Scholar
Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Paul, M. J., & Dredze, M. (2011). You are what you tweet: Analyzing Twitter for public health. Fifth International Conference on Weblogs.
Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. H., & Radev, D. R. (2010). How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 209–228. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x. Article Google Scholar
Sewell, W. (1996). Historical events as transformations of structures: inventing revolution at the Bastille. Theory and Society, 25(6), 841–881. doi:10.1007/BF00159818. Article Google Scholar
Smith, T. (2007). Narrative boundaries and the dynamics of ethnic conflict and conciliation. Poetics, 35, 22–46. Article Google Scholar
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286. Article Google Scholar
Swidler, A. (1995). Cultural power and social movements. In Social movements and culture. London: Routledge.
Tangherlini, T. R., & Leonard, P. (2013). Trawling in the Sea of the Great Unread: sub-corpus topic modeling and Humanities research. Poetics. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.002. Google Scholar
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2013). Consequences in Action: A pragmatist approach to causality in ethnography. Working Paper, New School for Social Research.
Wuthnow, R. (1993). Communities of discourse: Ideology and social structure in the reformation, the enlightenment, and European socialism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. A. R. (1985). Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar