Bauer, K., Bakkalbasi, N. (2005), An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9), Retrieved December 23, 2005, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html
Bawden, D., Holtham, C., Courtney, N. (1999), Perspectives on information overload. Aslib Proceedings, 51(8): 249–255. Article Google Scholar
Belew, R. (2005), Scientific impact quantity and quality: Analysis of two sources of bibliographic data. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.IR/0504036
Bollacker, K. D., Lawrence, S., Lee, C. (1998), CiteSeer: An autonomous web agent for automatic retrieval and identification of interesting publications. In: Proceedings of 2nd International ACM Conference on Autonomous Agents, ACM Press, 1998: 116–123, Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://maya.cs.depaul.edu/:_classes/ds575/papers/citeseer.pdf
Brody, T., Carr, L., Harnad, S. (2002), Evidence of hypertext in the scholarly archive. Proceedings of ACM Hypertext 2002: 74–75.
Brody, T., Stamerjohanns, H., Harnad, S. Gingras, Y., Vallieres, F., Oppenheim, C. (2004), The effect of open access on citation impact. Presented at: National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output: An International Meeting. Southampton University, Southampton UK. 19 February 2004. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19oa/brody-impact.pdf
Brown, C. (2003). The role of electronic preprints in chemical communication: analysis of citation, acceptance in the journal literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5): 362–371. Article Google Scholar
Davis, P. M., Fromerth, M. J. (2006), Does the arXiv Lead to Higher Citations and Reduced Publisher Downloads for Mathematics Articles? Retrieved May 5, 2006, from http://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0603/0603056.pdf
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) (2006), Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.doaj.org
Friend, F. (2006), Google Scholar: Potentially good for users of academic information. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 9(1), Retrieved April 28, 2006, from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3336451.0009.105
Fry, J., Talja, S. (2004), The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields. In: ASIST 2004: Proceedings of the 67th ASIST Annual Meeting (Vol. 41, pp. 20–30): Medford, NJ.: Information Today. Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1994), Little Scientometrics — Big Scientometrics ... and Beyond. Scientometrics, 30(2–3): 375–384. Article Google Scholar
Goodrum, A.A., McCain, K.W., Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L. (2001), Scholarly publishing in the Internet age: a citation analysis of computer science literature. Information Processing & Management, 37(5): 661–676. ArticleMATH Google Scholar
Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., Gingras, Y. (2005), Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4): 39–47. Retrieved May 5, 2006, from http://sites.computer.org/debull/A05dec/hajjem.pdf Google Scholar
Harnad, S., Carr, L. (2000), Integrating, navigating, and analysing open eprint archives through open citation linking (the OpCit project). Current Science, 79(5): 629–638. Google Scholar
Harnad, S., Brody, T. (2004), Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html
Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., Hilf, E. (2004), The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4). Retrieved May, 5, 2006, from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10209/01/impact.html
Harter, S., Ford, C. (2000), Web-based analysis of E-journal impact: Approaches, problems, and issues, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(13): 1159–1176. Article Google Scholar
Herring, S.D. (2002), Use of electronic resources in scholarly electronic journals: A citation analysis. College and Research Libraries, 63(4): 334–340. Google Scholar
Hitchcock, S., Bergmark, D., Brody, T., Gutteridge, C., Carr, L., Hall, W., Lagoze, C., Harnad, S. (2002), Open Citation Linking: The way forward. D Lib Magazine, 8(10), Retrieved Jan 10, 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/hitchcock/10hitchcock.html
ISI Press Release Essay on the Impact of Open Access Journals: A Citation Study from Thomson ISI. Retrieved November 13, 2004, from http://www.isinet.com/oaj
Jacso, P. (2004), Google Scholar Beta. Péter’s Digital Reference Shelf, Retrieved Jan 10, 2006, from http://snipurl.com/dwco
Jacso, P. (2005a), Google Scholar: the pros and the cons. Online Information Review, 29(2): 208–214. Article Google Scholar
Jacso, P. (2005b), As we may search: Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9): 1537–1547. Retrieved April 28, 2006, from http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/nov102005/1537.pdf Google Scholar
Kim, H.J. (2000), Motivations for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: A qualitative study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(10): 887–899. Article Google Scholar
Kling, R., McKim, G. (1999), Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 50(10): 890–906. Article Google Scholar
Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. (2006). Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles. Scientometrics, 68(3): 501–517. Article Google Scholar
Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. (to appear, 2007). Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(6): 1055–1065. Article Google Scholar
Kurtz, M.J. (2004), Restrictive access policies cut readership of electronic research journal articles by a factor of two, Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved November 13, 2006, from http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19oa/kurtz.pdf
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Murray, S. S. (2005), Worldwide use and impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 56(1): 36–45. Article Google Scholar
Lancaster, F.W., Warner, A. (2001), Intelligent Technologies in Library and Information Service Applications, Information Today, Medford, NJ.
Lancaster, F. W. (2003), Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Champaign, IL. Google Scholar
Lawson, M., Kemp, N., Lynch, M., Chowdhury, G. (1996), Automatic extraction of citations from the text of English-language patents: an example of template mining. Journal of Information Science, 22(6): 423–436. Article Google Scholar
MacRoberts, M. H., MacRoberts, B. R. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5): 342–349. Article Google Scholar
MacRoberts, M. H., MacRoberts, B. R. (1996), Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3): 435–444. Article Google Scholar
Oppenheim, C. (2000), Do patent citations count? In: B. Cronin, H. B. Atkins (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festscrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Information Today Inc ASS Monograph Series, Metford, NJ, pp. 405–432.
Pauly, D., Stergiou, K. (2005), Equivalence of results from two citation Thomson ISI’s Citation Index and Google’s Scholar service. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, December: 33–35. Retrieved April 25, 2006, from http://www.int-res.com/articles/esep/2005/E65.pdf
Shin, E.-J. (2003), Do Impact Factors change with a change of medium? A comparison of Impact Factors when publication is by paper and through parallel publishing. Journal of Information Science, 29(6), 527–533. Article Google Scholar
Smith, A. G. (1999), A tale of two Web spaces: Comparing sites using Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 55(5):577–592. Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., Björneborn, L. (2005), Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, Information Today Inc., Medford, NJ. 81–135. Google Scholar
Thelwall, M. (2006), Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(1): 57 (1):60–68. Article Google Scholar
Vaughan, L., Hysen, K. (2002), Relationship between links to journal Web sites and Impact Factors. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 54(6):356–361. Google Scholar
Vaughan, L., Shaw, D. (2003), Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(4): 54 (4):1313–1324. Article Google Scholar
Vaughan, L., Thelwall, M. (2003), Scholarly use of the Web: What are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1):29–38. Article Google Scholar
Vaughan, L., Shaw, D. (2005), Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10):1075–1087. Article Google Scholar
Wouters, P., Vries, R. (2004), Formally citing the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14):1250–1260. Article Google Scholar
Zhao, D., Logan, E. (2002), Citation analysis using scientific publications on the Web as data source: A case study in the XML research area. Scientometrics, 54(3):449–472. Article Google Scholar
Zhao, D. (2005), Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science — A comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals. Information Processing and Management, 41(6):1403–1418 Article Google Scholar