Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics (original) (raw)

References

• Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Pajek—Analysis and visualization of large networks. In M. Jünger & P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software (pp. 77–103). Berlin: Springer.
  Google Scholar
• Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404.
  Article Google Scholar
• Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991a). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis, part 1: Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233–251.
  Article Google Scholar
• Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991b). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis, part II: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 2–266.
  Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37, 195–221.
  Article Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011a). Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 297–309.
  Article Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W. & Thijs, B. (2011b). Using ‘core documents’ for detecting new emerging topics. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—The 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban, South Africa (pp. 224–235). KwaDlangezwa: University of Zululand.
• Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., & de Moor, B. (2005). Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1548–1572.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. (1987). Limitations of co-citation analysis as a tool for science policy. Social Studies of Science, 17, 295–316.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jo, Y., Lagoze, C. & Giles, C. L. (2007), Detecting research topics via the correlation between graphs and texts_._ In KDD-2007 Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 370–379). San Jose.
• Lamirel, J. C., Ta A. P., Attik, M. (2008). Novel labeling strategies for hierarchical representation of multidimensional data analysis results. In A. Gammerman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 26th IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Austria (pp. 169–174), 11–13 February 2008. Innsbruck, Austria: ACTA Press.
• Lamirel, J. C., Safi, Gh., Pryankar, N., & Cuxac, P. (2010). Mining research topics evolving over time using a diachronic multi-source approach. The Fourth International Workshop on Mining Multiple Information Sources—ICDM 2010. Kansas City.
• Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal–journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(5), 601–613.
  Article Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Yu, S., Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., Moreau, Y., & De Moor, B. (2010). Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on large-scale journal database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(6), 1105–1119.
  Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65.
  Article MATH Google Scholar
• Sen, S. K., & Gan, S. K. (1983). A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30, 78–82.
  Google Scholar
• Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28(11), 758–775.
  Article Google Scholar
• Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature—New measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
  Article Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Glänzel, W., & Liang, L. (2009). Tracing the role of individual journals in a cross-citation network based on different indicators. Scientometrics, 81(3), 821–838.
  Article Google Scholar
• Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1994). Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics, 30(1), 333–351.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references