Citation impact prediction for scientific papers using stepwise regression analysis (original) (raw)
References
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation,12(3), 159–170. Article Google Scholar
Borsuk, R. M., Budden, A. E., Leimu, R., Aarssen, L. W., & Lortie, C. J. (2009). The influence of author gender, national language and number of authors on citation rate in ecology. Open Ecology Journal,2, 25–28. Article Google Scholar
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2011). Multiple dimensions of journal specificity: Why journals can’t be assigned to disciplines. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), The 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (Vol. I, pp. 123–133). Durban: ISSI, Leiden University and the University of Zululand. Google Scholar
Burrell, Q. L. (2001). Stochastic modelling of the first-citation distribution. Scientometrics,52, 3–12. Article Google Scholar
Burrell, Q. L. (2003). Predicting future citation behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,54(5), 372–378. Article Google Scholar
Danell, R. (2011). Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author’s track record? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(1), 50–60. Article Google Scholar
Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,64(5), 1055–1064. Article Google Scholar
Feitelson, D., & Yovel, U. (2004). Predictive ranking of computer scientists using CiteSeer data. Journal of Documentation,60(1), 44–61. Article Google Scholar
Fu, L. D., & Aliferis, C. F. (2010). Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature. Scientometrics,85(1), 257–270. Article Google Scholar
Fu, L. D., Aphinyanaphongs, Y., & Aliferis, C. F. (2013). Computer models for identifying instrumental citations in the biomedical literature. Scientometrics,97(3), 871–882. Article Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2010). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics,87(2), 251–265. Article Google Scholar
Gibbons, M. R. (1982). Multivariate tests of financial models: A new approach. Journal of Financial Economics,10(1), 3–27. Article Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., & Thijs, B. (2003). Better later than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics,58(3), 571–586. Article Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1995). Predictive aspects of a stochastic model for citation processes. Information Processing and Management,31(1), 69–80. Article Google Scholar
Hargens, L. L., & Schuman, H. (1990). Citation counts and social comparisons: Scientists’ use and evaluation of citation index data. Social Science Research,19(3), 205–221. Article Google Scholar
Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Muller, K. E., & Nizam, A. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Google Scholar
Kohavi, R. (1995). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,2(12), 1137–1143. Google Scholar
Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience,55(5), 438–443. Article Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10 % (or top-25 %?) of the most-highly cited papers. Scientometrics,92(2), 355–365. Article Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). Integrated impact indicators (I3) compared with impact factors (IFs): An alternative design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(7), 1370–1381. Article Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science,159, 56–63. Article Google Scholar
Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics,4(3), 265–277. Article Google Scholar
Peñas, C. S., & Willett, P. (2006). Brief communication: Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science,32(5), 480–485. Article Google Scholar
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology,24, 1–24. Article Google Scholar
Prpić, K. (2002). Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics,55(1), 27–58. Article Google Scholar
Radicchi, F., & Castellano, C. (2012). Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts. Journal of Informetrics,6(1), 121–130. Article Google Scholar
Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. PNAS,105(45), 17268–17272. Article Google Scholar
Sin, S. C. J. (2011). International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(9), 1770–1783. Article Google Scholar
Stewart, J. A. (1983). Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces,62(1), 166–189. Article Google Scholar
Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (1999). How influential are demography journals? Population and Development Review,25(2), 229–251. Article Google Scholar
Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2001). What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers. Scientometrics,50(3), 455–482. Article Google Scholar
Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2005). Signals in science-on the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics,64(2), 209–233. Article Google Scholar
Wang, M. Y., Yu, G., An, S., & Yu, D. R. (2012). Discovery of factors influencing citation impact based on a soft fuzzy rough set model. Scientometrics,93(3), 635–644. Article Google Scholar
Wang, M. Y., Yu, G., & Yu, D. R. (2011). Mining typical features for highly cited papers. Scientometrics,87(3), 695–706. Article Google Scholar