Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities (original) (raw)
References
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C., & Cicero, T. (2012). What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? Scientometrics,93(3), 1005–1017. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0714-9. Article Google Scholar
Altbach, P. G. (Ed.). (1996). The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Google Scholar
Bentley, P. J. (2012). Gender differences and factors affecting publication productivity among Australian university academics. Journal of Sociology,48(1), 85–103. doi:10.1177/1440783311411958. Article Google Scholar
Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science,20(1), 48–63. doi:10.1177/0963662510384461. Article Google Scholar
Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2012). Academic work from a comparative perspective: a survey of faculty working time across 13 countries. Higher Education,63(4), 529–547. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9457-4. Article Google Scholar
Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2013). Individual differences in faculty research time allocations across 13 countries. Research in Higher Education,54(3), 329–348. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4. Article Google Scholar
Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine,80(3), 225–237. Article Google Scholar
Clark, M., & Centra, J. (1985). Influences on the career accomplishments of Ph. D’.s. Research in Higher Education,23(3), 256–269. Article Google Scholar
Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Creamer, E. (1998). Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 26). Washington D.C.: ASHE-ERIC/George Washington University.
Cummings, W. K., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2012). Comparing the research productivity of US academics scholars in the changing American academy. In (Vol. 4, pp. 51–62, The changing academy: The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective), Springer Netherlands.
Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education,39(6), 607–631. doi:10.1023/a:1018705823763. Article Google Scholar
Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education,34(3), 347–372. Article Google Scholar
Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science,13(2), 285–305. Article Google Scholar
Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of education, 65(4), 293–305.
Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science,35(1), 131–150. Article Google Scholar
Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education,78(5), 542–571. Article Google Scholar
Gingras, Y., Lariviere, V., Macaluso, B., & Robitaille, J.-P. (2008). The effects of aging on researchers’ publication and citation patterns. PLoS ONE,3(12), e4048. Article Google Scholar
Harzing, A.-W. (2013). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners. Scientometrics,94(3), 1057–1075. Article Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research,66(4), 507–542. Article Google Scholar
Katz, J., & Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy,26(1), 1–18. Article Google Scholar
King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature,430(6997), 311–316. Article Google Scholar
Kyvik, S. (1991). Productivity in academia: Scientific publishing at Norwegian Universities. Oslo: Norwegian University Press. Google Scholar
Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics,58(1), 35–48. Article Google Scholar
Kyvik, S. (2009). Allocating time resources for research between academic staff: The case of norwegian university colleges. Higher Education Management and Policy,21(3), 109–122. Article Google Scholar
Kyvik, S., & Larsen, I. (1997). The exchange of knowledge: A small country in the international research community. Science Communication,18(3), 238–264. Article Google Scholar
Kyvik, S., & Olsen, T. (2008). Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities? Scientometrics,76(3), 439–455. Article Google Scholar
Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology and Human Values,21(1), 54–71. Article Google Scholar
Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., & von Ins, M. (2008). Scientific output and impact: Relative positions of China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management,2(2), 1–10. Article Google Scholar
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science,35(5), 673–702. Article Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics,78(1), 23–36. Article Google Scholar
Long, J. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces,71(1), 159–178. Article Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.
Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2012). Are more senior academics really more research productive than junior academics? Evidence from Australian law schools. Scientometrics, 96(2), 411–425.
Neate, P. (2012). Publishing ethics and intellectual property rights. In A. Youdeowei, P. Stapleton, & R. Obubo (Eds.), Scientific writing for agricultural research scientists: A training resource manual (pp. 161–168). Wageningen, The Netherlands: CTA. Google Scholar
Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education,28(2), 207–226. Article Google Scholar
RIHE (Ed.). (2008). The changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspectives. (Vol. 12, RIHE International Seminar Reports). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.
Rosser, V. J., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). an examination of faculty work: Conceptual and theoretical frameworks in the literature. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 449–475). Dordrecht: Springer. Chapter Google Scholar
Rostan, M., Finkelstein, M., & Huang, F. (2014). Concepts and Methods. In The internationalization of the academy: Changes, realities and prospects (pp. 23–36, The changing academy: The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective 10). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sax, L., Hagedorn, L., Arredondo, M., & DiCrisi, F. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education,43(4), 423–446. Article Google Scholar
Schuckit, M. A. (1997). Editor’s corner: Double publishing: A dilemma of language. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,58(3), 229–230. Google Scholar
Sheehan, B., & Welch, A. (1996). The Australian academic profession. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits from fourteen countries (pp. 51–94). Carnegie Foundation: Princeton. Google Scholar
Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1992). Striking the mother lode in science: The importance of age, place, and time. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education,39(2), 201–222. ArticleMathSciNet Google Scholar
Verleysen, F., & Engels, T. E. (2014). Internationalization of peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed book publications in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Scientometrics, 1–14, doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1267-x.
Ward, K., & Grant, L. (1996). Gender and academic publishing. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 172–222). New York: Agathon Press. Google Scholar
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review,63(6), 847–870. Article Google Scholar
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy,35(1), 83–104. Article Google Scholar
Zuckerman, H. (2001). The careers of men and women scientists: gender differences in career attainment in studies. In M. Wyer (Ed.), Women, science and technology: A reader in feminist science (pp. 69–78). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar