Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities (original) (raw)

References

• Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C., & Cicero, T. (2012). What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? Scientometrics, 93(3), 1005–1017. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0714-9.
  Article Google Scholar
• Altbach, P. G. (Ed.). (1996). The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  Google Scholar
• Bentley, P. J. (2012). Gender differences and factors affecting publication productivity among Australian university academics. Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 85–103. doi:10.1177/1440783311411958.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 48–63. doi:10.1177/0963662510384461.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2012). Academic work from a comparative perspective: a survey of faculty working time across 13 countries. Higher Education, 63(4), 529–547. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9457-4.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2013). Individual differences in faculty research time allocations across 13 countries. Research in Higher Education, 54(3), 329–348. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 225–237.
  Article Google Scholar
• Clark, M., & Centra, J. (1985). Influences on the career accomplishments of Ph. D’.s. Research in Higher Education, 23(3), 256–269.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar
• Creamer, E. (1998). Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 26). Washington D.C.: ASHE-ERIC/George Washington University.
• Cummings, W. K., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2012). Comparing the research productivity of US academics scholars in the changing American academy. In (Vol. 4, pp. 51–62, The changing academy: The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective), Springer Netherlands.
• Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631. doi:10.1023/a:1018705823763.
  Article Google Scholar
• Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34(3), 347–372.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 285–305.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of education, 65(4), 293–305.
• Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 542–571.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gingras, Y., Lariviere, V., Macaluso, B., & Robitaille, J.-P. (2008). The effects of aging on researchers’ publication and citation patterns. PLoS ONE, 3(12), e4048.
  Article Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. (2013). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1057–1075.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542.
  Article Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
  Article Google Scholar
• King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S. (1991). Productivity in academia: Scientific publishing at Norwegian Universities. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics, 58(1), 35–48.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S. (2009). Allocating time resources for research between academic staff: The case of norwegian university colleges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(3), 109–122.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., & Larsen, I. (1997). The exchange of knowledge: A small country in the international research community. Science Communication, 18(3), 238–264.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., & Olsen, T. (2008). Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities? Scientometrics, 76(3), 439–455.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(1), 54–71.
  Article Google Scholar
• Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., & von Ins, M. (2008). Scientific output and impact: Relative positions of China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 1–10.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.
  Article Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23–36.
  Article Google Scholar
• Long, J. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159–178.
  Article Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.
• Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2012). Are more senior academics really more research productive than junior academics? Evidence from Australian law schools. Scientometrics, 96(2), 411–425.
• Neate, P. (2012). Publishing ethics and intellectual property rights. In A. Youdeowei, P. Stapleton, & R. Obubo (Eds.), Scientific writing for agricultural research scientists: A training resource manual (pp. 161–168). Wageningen, The Netherlands: CTA.
  Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28(2), 207–226.
  Article Google Scholar
• RIHE (Ed.). (2008). The changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspectives. (Vol. 12, RIHE International Seminar Reports). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.
• Rosser, V. J., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). an examination of faculty work: Conceptual and theoretical frameworks in the literature. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 449–475). Dordrecht: Springer.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Rostan, M., Finkelstein, M., & Huang, F. (2014). Concepts and Methods. In The internationalization of the academy: Changes, realities and prospects (pp. 23–36, The changing academy: The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective 10). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Sax, L., Hagedorn, L., Arredondo, M., & DiCrisi, F. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.
  Article Google Scholar
• Schuckit, M. A. (1997). Editor’s corner: Double publishing: A dilemma of language. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 58(3), 229–230.
  Google Scholar
• Sheehan, B., & Welch, A. (1996). The Australian academic profession. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits from fourteen countries (pp. 51–94). Carnegie Foundation: Princeton.
  Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1992). Striking the mother lode in science: The importance of age, place, and time. New York: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39(2), 201–222.
  Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
• Verleysen, F., & Engels, T. E. (2014). Internationalization of peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed book publications in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Scientometrics, 1–14, doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1267-x.
• Ward, K., & Grant, L. (1996). Gender and academic publishing. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 172–222). New York: Agathon Press.
  Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847–870.
  Article Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.
  Article Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H. (2001). The careers of men and women scientists: gender differences in career attainment in studies. In M. Wyer (Ed.), Women, science and technology: A reader in feminist science (pp. 69–78). New York: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Download references