The correlation between paper length and citations: a meta-analysis (original) (raw)

References

• Adair, J. G., & Vohra, N. (2003). The explosion of knowledge, references, and citations: Psychology’s unique response to a crisis. American Psychologist, 58(1), 15–23.
  Article Google Scholar
• Agnieszka, B. K. (2012). Published, not perished, but has anybody read it? Citation success of finance research articles. Applied Financial Economics, 22(20), 1679–1695.
  Article Google Scholar
• Antoniou, G. A., Antoniou, S. A., Georgakarakos, E. I., Sfyroeras, G. S., & Georgiadis, G. S. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 29, 286–292.
  Article Google Scholar
• Arao, L. H. (2015). The half-life and obsolescence of the literature science area: A contribution to the understanding the chronology of citations in academic activity. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4, 603–610.
  Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L. (2015). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1123–1144.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 419–429.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 164–175.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W. S. (1984). Graphs in scientific publications. American Statistician, 38(4), 261–269.
  Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Psychology Press.
  MATH Google Scholar
• Di Bitetti, M., & Ferreras, J. A. (2016). Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio, 46(1), 121–127.
  Article Google Scholar
• Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 861–873.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Whitehead, M. A., Robinson, D., O’Neill, D., & Langhorne, P. (2011). Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 343, d6553.
  Article Google Scholar
• Falagas, M. E., Zarkali, A., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Bardakas, V., & Mavros, M. N. (2013). The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049476.
  Google Scholar
• Foley, J. A., & Della, S. S. (2011). Do shorter Cortex papers have greater impact? Cortex, 47(6), 635–642.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fox, C. W., Paine, C. E. T., & Sauterey, B. (2016). Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals. Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2505.
  Google Scholar
• Frogel, J. A. (2010). Astronomy’s greatest hits: The 100 most cited papers in each year of the first decade of the 21st century (2000–2009). Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 122(896), 1214–1235.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gross, P. L., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, 66(1713), 385–389.
  Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., Sotto, E., & Pennebaker, J. (2002). Style and substance in psychology: Are influential articles more readable than less influential ones? Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 321–334.
  Article Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., et al. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169–185.
  Article Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., & Koval, P. (2010). Predicting long-term citation impact of articles in social and personality psychology. Psychological Reports, 106(3), 891–900.
  Article Google Scholar
• Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hayashi, T., & Fujigaki, Y. (1999). Differences in knowledge production between disciplines based on analysis of paper styles and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 46(1), 73–86.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hegarty, P., & Walton, Z. (2012). The consequences of predicting scientific impact in psychology using journal impact factors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1), 72.
  Article Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2002). Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: A critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7(1), 51–61.
  Article Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hodge, D. R., Victor, B. G., Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Perron, B. E. (2017). Disseminating high-impact social work scholarship: A longitudinal examination of 5-year citation count correlates. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 8(2), 211–231.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 275–292.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  Book Google Scholar
• Kostoff, R. N. (2007). The difference between highly and poorly cited medical articles in the journal Lancet. Scientometrics, 72(3), 513–520.
  Article Google Scholar
• Laperche, S., & Pillonel, J. (2005). Data envelopment analysis of OR/MS journals. Scientometrics, 64(2), 133–150.
  Article Google Scholar
• Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(1), 28–32.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  Google Scholar
• Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., McKinlay, R. J., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2008). Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: Retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 336, 655–657.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & Xu, F. (2010). The drivers of citations in management science journals. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), 422–430.
  Article MATH Google Scholar
• Nieri, M., Clauser, C., Franceschi, D., Pagliaro, U., Saletta, D., & Pini-Prato, G. (2007). Randomized clinical trials in implant therapy: Relationships among methodological, statistical, clinical, paratextual features and number of citations. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 18(4), 419–431.
  Article Google Scholar
• O’Leary, D. E. (2008). The relationship between citations and number of downloads in decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 972–980.
  Article Google Scholar
• Onodera, N., & Yoshikane, F. (2015). Factors affecting citation rates of research articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 739–764.
  Article Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 39–49.
  Article Google Scholar
• Robson, B. J., & Mousquès, A. (2014). Predicting citation counts of environmental modelling papers. In B. P. Ames, N. W. T. Quinn, and A. E. Rizzoli (Eds.), Proceedings—7th international congress on environmental modelling and software: Bold visions for environmental modeling (iEMSs) (Vol. 3, pp. 1390–1396).
• Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2017). The effect of document types and sizes on the scaling relationship between citations and co-authorship patterns in management journals. Scientometrics, 110, 1–17.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  Book Google Scholar
• Royle, P., Kandala, N. B., Barnard, K., & Waugh, N. (2013). Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: Analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Systematic Reviews, 2, 74.
  Article Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. L., Sanghack, L., & Sung, H. J. (2010). Author and article characteristics, journal quality and citation in economic research. Applied Economics Letters, 17, 1697–1701.
  Article Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2006). Scientific status of disciplines, individuals, and ideas: Empirical analyses of the potential impact of theory. Review of General Psychology, 10(2), 98–112.
  Article Google Scholar
• Slyder, J. B., Stein, B. R., Sams, B. S., Walker, D. M., Beale, B. J., Feldhaus, J. J., et al. (2011). Citation pattern and lifespan: A comparison of discipline, institution, and individual. Scientometrics, 89, 955–966.
  Article Google Scholar
• So, M., Kim, J., Choi, S., & Park, H. W. (2015). Factors affecting citation networks in science and technology: Focused on non-quality factors. Quality and Quantity, 49, 1513–1530.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. (2007). The quest for citations. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2018). Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 203–216.
  Article Google Scholar
• Uthman, O. A., Okwundu, C. I., Wiysonge, C. S., Young, T., & Clarke, A. (2013). Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Who wrote the top 100 most cited articles? PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078517.
  Google Scholar
• Vanclay, J. K. (2013). Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 265–271.
  Article Google Scholar
• Vandermeulen, A. (1972). Manuscripts in the maelstrom: A theory of the editorial process. Public Choice, 13, 107–111.
  Article Google Scholar
• Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2010). Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 1–13.
  Article Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D. (2006). Predicting subsequent citations to articles published in twelve crime-psychology journals: Author impact versus journal impact. Scientometrics, 69(3), 499–510.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wesel, M. V., Wyatt, S., & Haaf, J. T. (2014). What a difference a colon makes: How superficial factors influence subsequent citation. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1601–1615.
  Article Google Scholar
• Xiao, X. B., & Chai, Y. J. (2016). Properties of scholarly papers and number of citations. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 6, 46–52 (in Chinese).
  Google Scholar

Download references