Telescopic and panoramic views of library and information science research 2011–2018: a comparison of four weighting schemes for author co-citation analysis (original) (raw)
References
Bertin, M., & Atanassova, I. (2018). InTeReC: In-text reference corpus for applying natural language processing to bibliometrics. Retrieved April 18, 2019 from https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2080/paper6.pdf.
Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Gingras, Y., & Lariviere, V. (2016). The invariant distribution of references in scientific articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,67(1), 164–177. Google Scholar
Bertram, S. (1972). Citations counts. In A. Pitemick (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the american society for information science, Western Canada Chapter (pp. 61–67). Vancouver: University of British Columbia. Google Scholar
Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,33, 208–216. Google Scholar
Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,36, 3–72. Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What co-citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation,64, 45–80. Google Scholar
Boyack, K. W., Small, H., & Klavans, R. (2013). Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,64(9), 1759–1767. Google Scholar
Boyack, K. W., Van Eck, N. J., Colavizzac, G., & Waltman, L. (2018). Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis. Journal of Informetrics.,12(1), 59–73. Google Scholar
Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,36(4), 223–229. Google Scholar
Brooks, T. A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,37(1), 34–36. Google Scholar
Bu, Y., Wang, B. L., Huang, W. B., Che, S. K., & Huang, Y. (2018). Using the appearance of citations in full text on author co-citation analysis. Scientometrics,116, 275–289. Google Scholar
Callahan, A., Hockema, S., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Contextual cocitation: Augmenting cocitation analysis and its applications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(6), 1130–1143. Google Scholar
Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior—Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,40, 284–290. Google Scholar
Case, D. O., & Higgins, G. M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,51(7), 635–645. Google Scholar
Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science,5(4), 423–441. Google Scholar
Ding, Y., Liu, X., Guo, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics,7(3), 583–592. Google Scholar
Elkiss, A., Shen, S., Fader, A., Erkan, G., States, D., & Radev, D. (2008). Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(1), 51–62. Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing—Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Gipp, B., & Beel, J. (2009). Citation Proximity Analysis (CPA)—A new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI’09) (pp. 571–575).
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Hanney, S., Frame, I., Grant, J., Buxton, M., Young, T., & Lewison, G. (2005). Using categorizations of citations when assessing the outcomes of health research. Scientometrics,65, 357–379. Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W. (2015). Health warning: might contain multiple personalities—the problem of homonyms in Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators. Scientometrics,105(3), 2259–2270. Google Scholar
Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,29(6), 308–310. Google Scholar
Hou, W., Li, M., & Niu, D. (2011). Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution. BioEssays,33, 724–727. Google Scholar
Hsiao, T.M., & Chen, K.H. (2018). How authors cite references? A study of characteristics of in-text citations. ASIST Proceedings,55(1), 179–187. Google Scholar
Hu, Z., Lin, G., Sun, T., & Hou, H. (2017). Understanding multiply mentioned references. Journal of Informetrics,11(4), 948–958. Google Scholar
Jeong, Y. K., Song, M., & Ding, Y. (2014). Content-based author co-citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics,8(1), 197–211. Google Scholar
Kim, J., & Diesner, J. (2016). Distortive effects of initial-based name disambiguation on measurements of large-scale coauthorship networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,67, 1446–1461. Google Scholar
Liu, M. (1993). The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation,49, 370–408. Google Scholar
Liu, S., & Chen, C. (2012). The proximity of co-citation. Scientometrics,91(2), 495–511. Google Scholar
McCain, K. W., & Turner, K. (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in Molecular-Genetics. Scientometrics,17, 127–163. Google Scholar
Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science,5(1), 86–92. Google Scholar
Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington, DC: Computer Horizons. Google Scholar
Otto, W., Ghavimi, B., Mayr, P., Piryani, R., Singh, V.K. (2019). Highly cited references in PLOS ONE and their in-text usage over time. Retrieved April 18, 2019 from ArXiv.org.
Pak, C., Yu, G., & Wang, W. (2018). A study on the citation situation within the citing paper: citation distribution of references according to mention frequency. Scientometrics,114(3), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2627-0. Article Google Scholar
Qiu, J. (2008). Scientific publishing: Identity crisis. Nature News,451(7180), 766–767. Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S. K. S. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science,25(3), 477–498. Google Scholar
Small, H. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B. J. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 287–310). Norwood: Ablex. Google Scholar
Strotmann, A., & Zhao, D. (2012). Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make in author-based citation analysis? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,63(9), 1820–1833. Google Scholar
Strotmann, A., & Zhao, D. (2015). An 80/20 data quality law for professional scientometrics? Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, June 30–July 3, 2015, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tang, R., & Safer, M. A. (2008). Author-rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications. Journal of Documentation,64, 246–272. Google Scholar
Thelwall, M. (2019a). Should citations be counted separately from each originating section? Journal of Informetrics. Retrieved June 2019, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.07547.pdf.
Thelwall, M. (2019). The rhetorical structure of science? A multidisciplinary analysis of article headings. Journal of Informetrics.,13(2), 555–563. Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics,12(1), 47–72. Google Scholar
Voos, H., & Dagaev, K. S. (1976). Are all citations equal? Or Did we op. cit. your idem? Journal of Academic Librarianship,1, 20–21. Google Scholar
White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 84–106). Newbury Park: Sage. Google Scholar
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49, 327–355. Google Scholar
White, H. D., & Wang, P. L. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: contributions, criteria, and meta-level documentation concerns. Library Quarterly,67, 122–154. Google Scholar
Zhao, D., Cappello, A., & Johnston, L. (2017). Functions of uni-and multi-citations: Implications for weighted citation analysis. Journal of Data and Information Science,2(1), 51–69. Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008a). Information Science during the first decade of the Web: An enriched author co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(6), 916–937. Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008b). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in Information Science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(13), 2070–2086. Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008c). Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of Information Science. Journal of Informetrics,2(3), 229–239. Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2011). Intellectual structure of Stem Cell research: A comprehensive author co-citation analysis of a highly collaborative and multidisciplinary field. Scientometrics,87(1), 115–131. Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2014). In-text author citation analysis: Feasibility, benefits and limitations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,65(11), 2348–2358. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23107. Article Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2014). The knowledge base and research front of Information science 2006–2010: An author co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,65(5), 996–1006. Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015b). Re-citation analysis: Promising for research evaluation, knowledge network analysis, knowledge representation and information retrieval? Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, June 30–July 3, 2015, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2016). Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency-weighted in-text citation counting. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,67(3), 671–628. Google Scholar
Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., & Vellino, A. (2015). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,66(2), 408–427. Google Scholar