The OPAL bugs count survey: exploring the effects of urbanisation and habitat characteristics using citizen science (original) (raw)
References
Altermatt F (2012) Temperature-related shifts in butterfly phenology depend on the habitat. Glob Chang Biol 18:2429–2438 Article Google Scholar
Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill MO, Pullin A, Rushton S, Austin K, Small E, Wood B, Wadsworth R, Sanderson R, Thompson K (2006) Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci Total Environ 360:196–204 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Baker RR (1968) Sun orientation during migration in some British butterflies. Proc R Ent Soc Lond A 43:89–95 Google Scholar
Baker RR (1972) Territorial behavior of nymphalid butterflies, Aglais urticae (L) and Inachis io (L). J Anim Ecol 41:453–469 Article Google Scholar
Bates AJ, Sadler JP, Everett G, Grundy D, Lowe N, Davis G, Baker D, Bridge M, Clifton J, Freestone R, Gardner D, Gibson C, Hemming R, Howarth S, Orridge S, Shaw M, Tams T, Young H (2013) Assessing the value of the garden moth scheme citizen science dataset: how does light trap type affect catch? Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 146:386–397 Article Google Scholar
Bates AJ, Sadler JP, Grundy D, Lowe N, Davis G, Baker D, Bridge M, Freestone R, Gardner D, Gibson C, Hemming R, Howarth S, Orridge S, Shaw M, Tams T, Young H (2014) Garden and landscape-scale correlates of moths of differing conservation status: significant effects of urbanisation and habitat diversity. Plos One 9(1):e86925. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086925 ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed Google Scholar
Bergerot B, Fontaine B, Renard M, Cadi A, Julliard R (2010) Preferences for exotic flowers do not promote urban life in butterflies. Landsc Urban Plan 96:98–107 Article Google Scholar
Beumer C, Martens P (2015) Biodiversity in my (back)yard: towards a framework for citizen engagement in exploring biodiversity and ecosystem services in residential gardens. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0270-8 Google Scholar
Bone J, Archer M, Barraclough D, Eggleton P, Flight D, Head M, Jones DT, Scheib C, Voulvoulis N (2012) Public participation in soil surveys: lessons from a pilot study in England. Environ Sci Technol 46:3687–3696 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, Shirk J (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59:977–984 Article Google Scholar
Bonter DN, Cooper CB (2012) Data validation in citizen science: a case study from project feeder watch. Front Ecol Environ 10:305–307 Article Google Scholar
Cohn JP (2008) Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? Bioscience 58:192–197 Article Google Scholar
Crall AW, Newman GJ, Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ, Waller DM, Graham J (2010) Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biol Invasions 12:3419–3428 Article Google Scholar
Davies L, Bell JNB, Bone J, Head M, Hill L, Howard C, Hobbs SJ, Jones DT, Power SA, Rose N, Ryder C, Seed L, Stevens G, Toumi R, Voulvoulis N, White PCL (2011) Open air laboratories (OPAL): a community-driven research programme. Environ Pollut 159:2203–2210 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426 Article Google Scholar
Di Mauro D, Dietz T, Rockwood L (2007) Determining the effect of urbanisation on generalist butterfly species diversity in butterfly gardens. Urban Ecosyst 10:427–439 Article Google Scholar
Faeth SH, Warren PS, Shochat E, Marussich WA (2005) Trophic dynamics in urban communities. Bioscience 55:399–407 Article Google Scholar
Fox R, Warren MS, Brereton TM, Roy DB, Robinson A (2011) A new red list of British butterflies. Insect Conserv Divers 4:159–172 Article Google Scholar
Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390–394 ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed Google Scholar
GeoConvert (2012) GeoConvert: an online geography matching and conversion tool for UK academics. www.geoconvert.mimas.ac.uk
Grewal SS, Grewal PS (2012) Can cities become self-reliant in food? Cities 29:1–11 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu JG, Bai XM, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hobbs SJ, White PCL (2012) Motivations and barriers in relation to community participation in biodiversity recording. J Nat Conserv 20:364–373 Article Google Scholar
Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35 Article Google Scholar
Horsák M, Lososová Z, Čejka T, Juřičková L, Chytrý M (2013) Diversity and biotic homogenization of urban land-snail faunas in relation to habitat types and macroclimate in 32 central European cities. Plos One 8(8):e71783. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071783 ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed Google Scholar
Hunter MR, Hunter MD (2008) Designing for conservation of insects in the built environment. Insect Conserv Divers 1:189–196 Google Scholar
Imhoff ML, Bounoua L, DeFries R, Lawrence WT, Stutzer D, Tucker CJ, Ricketts T (2004) The consequences of urban land transformation on net primary productivity in the United States. Remote Sens Environ 89:434–443 Article Google Scholar
Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Book Google Scholar
Lyytimaki J, Sipila M (2009) Hopping on one leg - the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For Urban Green 8:309–315 Article Google Scholar
McIntyre NE, Rango J, Fagan WF, Faeth SH (2001) Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landsc Urban Plan 52:257–274 Article Google Scholar
McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanisation on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176 Article Google Scholar
Memmott J, Waser NM, Price MV (2004) Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271:2605–2611 Article Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington DC Google Scholar
Miller-Rushing A, Primack R, Bonney R (2012) The history of public participation in ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 10:285–290 Article Google Scholar
Niemelä J, Kotze DJ (2009) Carabid beetle assemblages along urban to rural gradients: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 92:65–71 Article Google Scholar
OPAL (2012) Open Air Laboratories. Explore Nature. Available: http://www.opalexplorenature.org/. Accessed 2014 Jan 2. Natural History Museum
Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Boone CG, Groffman PM, Irwin E, Kaushal SS, Marshall V, McGrath BP, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Troy A, Warren P (2011) Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manag 92:331–362 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Prather CM, Pelini SL, Laws A, Rivest E, Woltz M, Bloch CP, Del Toro I, Ho C-K, Kominoski J, Newbold TAS, Parsons S, Joern A (2013) Invertebrates, ecosystem services and climate change. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88:327–348 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Sadler JP, Small EC, Fiszpan H, Telfer MG, Niemela J (2006) Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban–rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. J Biogeogr 33:1126–1138 Article Google Scholar
Sadler J, Bates A, Donovan R, Bodnar S (2011) Building for biodiversity: accomodating people and wildlife in cities. In: Niemelä J, Breuste JH, Guntenspergen G, McIntyre NE, Elmqvist T, James P (eds) Urban ecology. Patterns, processes and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 286–297 Chapter Google Scholar
Sattler T, Borcard D, Arlettaz R, Bontadina F, Legendre P, Obrist MK, Moretti M (2010) Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology 91:3343–3353 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Shirk JL, Ballard HL, Wilderman CC, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Jordan R, McCallie E, Minarchek M, Lewenstein BV, Krasny ME, Bonney R (2012) Public oarticipation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecol Soc 17(2):29. doi:10.5751/ES-04705-170229 Google Scholar
Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Shwartz A, Turbé A, Simon L, Julliard R (2014) Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: an experiment. Biol Conserv 171:82–90 Article Google Scholar
Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2006a) Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate abundance. Biodivers Conserv 15:2515–2545 Article Google Scholar
Smith RM, Warren PH, Thompson K, Gaston KJ (2006b) Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodivers Conserv 15:2415–2438 Article Google Scholar
Taylor JR, Taylor Lovell S (2012) Mapping public and private spaces of urban agriculture in Chicago through the analysis of high-resolution aerial images in Google Earth. Landsc Urban Plan 108:57–70 Article Google Scholar
ter Braak CFJ, Šmilauer P (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca Google Scholar
Toogood M (2013) Engaging publics: biodiversity data collection and the geographies of citizen science. Geogr Compass 7(9):611–621 Article Google Scholar
Van Dyck H, Van Strien AJ, Maes D, Van Swaay CAM (2009) Declines in common, widespread butterflies in a landscape under intense human use. Conserv Biol 23:957–965 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Verboven AF, Uyttenbroek R, Brys R, Hermy M (2014) Different responses of bees and hoverflies to land use in an urban–rural gradient show the importance of the nature of the rural land use. Landsc Urban Plan 126:31–41 Article Google Scholar
Wilson EO (1987) The little things that run the world (the importance and conservation of invertebrates). Conserv Biol 1:344–346 Article Google Scholar
Zhang Y (2013) Urban metabolism: a review of research methodologies. Environ Pollut 178:463–473 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar