The IoT Architectural Framework, Design Issues and Application Domains (original) (raw)

References

  1. Botterman, M. (2009). Internet of Things: An early reality of the Future Internet. Workshop Report, European Commission Information Society and Media, May 2009.
  2. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805.
    Article MATH Google Scholar
  3. Stankovic, J. A. (2014). Research directions for the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 3–9.
    Article Google Scholar
  4. ITU-T. Internet of things global standards initiative. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/studygroups/2013-2016/13/Pages/default.aspx.
  5. IETF. (2010). The internet of things—Concept and problem statement. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lee-iot-problem-statement-00.txt.
  6. IEEE Interent of Things, Towards a Definition of the Internet of Things (IoT), Revision 1, May 27 (2015).
  7. Vasseur, J. (2011). Terminology in low power and lossy networks. IETF Internet Draft, September 2011.
  8. Vermesan, O., & Friess, P. (2013). Internet of things: Converging technologies for smart environments and integrated ecosystems. The River Publishers Series in Communications, June 2013.
  9. NarrowBand IoT. http://www.3gpp.org/news-events/3gpp-news/1733-niot.
  10. IETF 6LoWPAN Working Group. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan.
  11. ZigBee IP and 920IP. http://www.zigbee.org/zigbee-for-developers/network-specifications/zigbeeip/.
  12. Winter, T. et al. (2012). RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. In RFC 6550 (Proposed Standard), Internet Engineering Task Force, March 2012.
  13. IETF, The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP), in RFC 7252 (Proposed Standard), June 2014. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252.
  14. ZigBee Smart Energy. http://www.zigbee.org/zigbee-for-developers/applicationstandards/zigbeesmartenergy/.
  15. MQTT Protocol. http://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/os/mqtt-v3.1.1-os.
  16. IETF, Using IEEE 802.15.4e Time-Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) in the Internet of Things (IoT): Problem Statement. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7554.
  17. Buratti, C., Stajkic, A., Gardasevic, G., Milardo, S., Abrignani, M. D., Mijovic, S., et al. (2016). Testing protocols for the internet of things on the EuWIn platform. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(1), 124–133.
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Texas Instruments, CC2538 Powerful Wireless Microcontroller System-On-Chip for 2.4-GHz IEEE 802.15.4, 6LoWPAN, and ZigBee Applications. http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc2538.
  19. Libelium Waspmote. http://www.libelium.com/development/waspmote.
  20. Tmote Sky platform. http://www.advanticsys.com/shop/mtmcm5000msp-p-14.html.
  21. MICAz platform. http://www.cmt-gmbh.de/MICAz.
  22. Raspberry Pi platform. http://www.adafruit.com/pdfs.
  23. Arduino platform. https://www.arduino.cc/.
  24. Intel Galileo platform. http://www.intel.com/content.
  25. BeagleBone platform. http://beagleboard.org/bone.
  26. TinyOS Operating System. http://www.tinyos.net/.
  27. Contiki Operating System. http://www.contiki-os.org/.
  28. FreeRTOS Operating System. http://www.freertos.org/.
  29. RIOT Operating System. http://www.riot-os.org/.
  30. Watteyne, T., Vilajosana, X., Kerkez, B., Chraim, F., Weekly, K., Wang, Q., et al. (2012). OpenWSN: A standards-based low-power wireless development environment. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 23, 480–493. doi:10.1002/ett.2558.
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Sensinode NanoStack 2.0. http://sensinode.sivuviidakko.fi.
  32. Thingsquare platform. http://www.thingsquare.com/.
  33. Google Brillo OS. https://developers.google.com/brillo/.
  34. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. The Future Internet. Lecturer Notes in Computer Science, 6656, 431–446.
  35. Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22–32. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328.
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Aug-Blum, I., Boussetta, K. Rivano, H. Stanica, R., & Valois, F. (2012). Capillary networks: A novel networking paradigm for urban environments. In Proceedings of the first workshop on Urban networking (UrbaNe ’12), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25-30. doi:10.1145/2413236.2413243.
  37. Open Cities, EU FP7 project. http://www.opencities.net/.
  38. VITAL, EU FP7 project. http://www.vital-iot.eu/vision.
  39. RERUM, EU FP7 project. https://ict-rerum.eu/.
  40. CityPulse, EU FP7 project. http://www.ict-citypulse.eu/page/.
  41. Smart Santander, EU FP7 project. Future internet research and experimentation. http://www.smartsantander.eu/.
  42. ITU-T Study Group 5. Environment and climate change. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/studygroups/2013-2016/05/Pages/default.aspx.
  43. IEEE 2030 Smart Grid Interoperability Working Group. https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/2030-2011.html.
  44. Riazul Islam, S. M., Daehan, K., Humaun, K., Hossain, M., & Kyung-Sup, K. (2015). The internet of things for health care: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 3, 678–708. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951.
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Fang, H., Dan, X., & Shaowu, S. (2013). On the Application of the internet of things in the field of medical and health care. In Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), 2013 IEEE and Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom), IEEE International Conference on and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, (pp. 2053–2058), 20-23 Aug. 2013. doi:10.1109/GreenCom-iThings-CPSCom.2013.384.
  46. Ugrenovic, D., & Gardasevic, G. (2015). Performance analysis of IoT wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications. In The 2nd International Conference on Electrical, Electronic and Computing Engineering IcETRAN 2015, Silver Lake, Serbia, June 8–11, 2015.
  47. ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities, An overview of smart sustainable cities and the role of information and communication technologies. www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ssc/.../TR-Overview-SSC.docx.
  48. OpenIoT, EU FP7 project. http://www.openiot.eu/.
  49. Libelium Agriculture. http://www.libelium.com/case-studies/.
  50. Akyildiz, I. F., & Jornet, J. M. (2010). The internet of nano things. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(6), 58–63.
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Tseng, A., Chen, K., Chen, C., & Ma, K. (2003). Electron beam lithography in nanoscale fabrication: Recent development. IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 26(2), 141–149.
    Article Google Scholar
  52. Lee, H. H., Menard, E., Tassi, J. A. R. N. G., & Blanchet, G. B. (2005). Large area microcontact printing presses for plastic electronics. Materials Research Society Bulletin, 846, 731–736.
    Google Scholar
  53. Geim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007). The rise of graphene. Nature Materials, 6(3), 183–191.
    Article Google Scholar
  54. Geim, A. K. (2009). Graphene: Status and prospects. Science, 324(5934), 1530–1534.
    Article Google Scholar
  55. Balasubramaniam, S., & Kangasharju, J. (2013). Realizing the internet of nano things: Challenges, solutions, and applications. Computer, 46(2), 62–68.
    Article Google Scholar
  56. Akyildiz, I. F., Brunetti, F., & Blazquez, C. (2008). Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm. Computer Networks, 52, 2260–2279.
    Article Google Scholar
  57. Nakano, T., Eckford, A., & Haraguchi, T. (2013). Molecular communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Book Google Scholar
  58. Atakan, B. (2014). Molecular communication and nanonetworks: From nature to practical systems. Berlin: Springer.
    Book Google Scholar
  59. Pierobon, M., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2013). Fundamentals of diffusion-based molecular communication in nanonetworks. Founds and Trends in Networking, 8(1–2), 1–147.
    MATH Google Scholar
  60. Jornet, J. M., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2014). Femtosecond-long pulse-based modulation for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(5), 1742–1754.
    Article Google Scholar
  61. Akyildiz, I. F., Pierobon, M., Balasubramaniam, S., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2015). Internet of bio-nanothings. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(3), 32–40.
    Article Google Scholar
  62. Nakano, T. et al. (2008). Microplatform for intercellular communication. In 3rd IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems
  63. Mesiti, F., & Balasingham, I. (2012). Nanomachine-to-neuron communication interfaces for neuronal stimulation at nanoscale. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(12), 695–704.
    Article Google Scholar
  64. Jornet, J. M., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2012). The internet of multimedia nano-things. Nano Communication Networks, 3, 242–251.
    Article Google Scholar
  65. Vilajosana, X., Tuset, P., Watteyne, T., & Pister, K. (2015). OpenMote: Open-source prototyping platform for the industrial IoT. In International Conference on Ad Hoc Networks (AdHocNets), Sep 2015, San Remo, Italy (pp. 211–222).
  66. OpenMote platform. http://www.openmote.com/.
  67. Contiki OpenMote. https://github.com/OpenMote/contiki.
  68. OpenWSN project. http://www.openwsn.org/.
  69. Capossele, A., Cervo, V., De Cicco, G., & Petrioli, C. (2015). Security as a CoAP resource: An optimized DTLS implementation for the IoT. In 2015 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), London (pp. 549–554). doi:10.1109/ICC.2015.7248379.
  70. Lesjak, C., et al. (2015). Securing smart maintenance services: Hardware-security and TLS for MQTT. In 2015 IEEE 13th international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), Cambridge (pp. 1243–1250). doi:10.1109/INDIN.2015.7281913.
  71. Mosquitto project. http://www.mosquitto.org/.
  72. Hwang, H. C., Park, J., Shon, J. G. (2016). Design and implementation of a reliable message transmission system based on MQTT protocol in IoT. Wireless Personal Communications, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11277-016-3398-2.
  73. MQTT for Sensor Networks (MQTT-SN) Protocol Specifications (Ver. 1.2). http://mqtt.org/.

Download references