KLT-CRKCN: Hyperspectral Image Classification via Karhunen Loeve Transformation and Collaborative Representation-Based K Closest Neighbor (original) (raw)

References

  1. Landgrebe, D. A., Serpico, S. B., Crawford, M. M., & Singhroy, V. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on analysis of hyperspectral image data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(7), 1343–1345.
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Bruzzone, L., Chi, M., & Marconcini, M. (2006). A novel transductive SVM for semisupervised classification of remote-sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11), 3363–3373.
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Bo, C., Huchuan, Lu., & Wang, D. (2017). Weighted generalized nearest neighbor for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Access, 5, 1496–1509.
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Ham, J., Chen, Y., Crawford, M. M., & Ghosh, J. (2005). Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(3), 492–501.
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Zhou, N.-R., Liu, X.-X., Chen, Y.-L., & Ni-Suo, Du. (2021). Quantum K-nearest-neighbor image classification algorithm based on KL transform. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 60(3), 1209–1224.
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Samaniego, L., Bárdossy, A., & Schulz, K. (2008). Supervised classification of remotely sensed imagery using a modified $ k $-NN technique. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(7), 2112–2125.
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Pan, Z. B., Wang, Y. D., & Ku, W. P. (2017). A new general nearest neighbor classification based on the mutual neighborhood information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 142–152.
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Wang, J. G., Neskovic, P., & Cooper, L. N. (2006). Neighborhood size selection in the knearest- neighbor rule using statistical confidence. Pattern Recognit., 39(3), 417–423.
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Zhong, X.F., Guo, S.Z., Gao, L., Shan, H., Zheng, J.H. (2017). An improved k-NN classification with dynamic k. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing, pp. 211–216.
  10. Bulut, F., & Amasyali, M. F. (2017). Locally adaptive k parameter selection for nearest neighbor classifier: One nearest cluster. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 20(2), 415–425.
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  11. Zhang, S., Li, X., Zong, M., Zhu, X., & Cheng, D. (2017). Learning k for kNN classification. ACM Transaction Intelligent System Technology, 8(3), 43.
    Google Scholar
  12. Zhang, S. C., Li, X. L., Zong, M., Zhu, X. F., & Wang, R. L. (2018). Efficient knn classification with different numbers of nearest neighbors. IEEE Transaction Neural Network Learning System, 29(5), 1774–1785.
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  13. Chaudhuri, B. B. (1996). A new definition of neighbourhood of a point in multidimensional space. Pattern Recognition Letter, 17(1), 11–17.
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Su, H., Yu, Y., Wu, Z., Du, Q. (2020). Random subspace-based k-nearest class collaborative representation for hyperspectral image classification. In: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.
  15. Pan, Z. P., Wang, Y. D., & Ku, W. P. (2017). A new k-harmonic nearest neighbor classifier based on the multi-local means. Expert Systems with Applications, 67, 115–125.
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Gou, J. P., Ma, H., Ou, W., Zeng, S., Rao, Y., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2009). A generalized mean distance-based k-nearest neighbor classifier. Expert Systems with Applications, 115, 356–372.
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Gou, J. P., Zhang, Y., Du, L., & Xiong, T. S. (2012). A local mean-based k-nearest centroid neighbor classifier. Computer Journal, 55(9), 1058–1071.
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Roy, S. K., Chatterjee, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Chaudhuri, B. B., & Platoš, J. (2020). Lightweight spectral-spatial squeeze-and-excitation residual bag-of-features learning for hyperspectral classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(8), 5277–5290.
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Mitani, Y., & Hamamoto, Y. (2006). A local mean-based nonparametric classifier. Pattern Recognition Letter, 27(10), 1151–1159.
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Zeng, Y., Yang, Y. P., & Zhao, L. (2009). Nonparametric classification based on local mean and class statistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8443–8448.
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Gou, J. P., Zhan, Y. Z., Rao, Y. B., Shen, X. J., Wang, X. M., & He, W. (2014). Improved pseudo nearest neighbor classification. Knowledge-Based System, 70, 361–375.
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Zeng, Y., Yang, Y. P., & Zhao, L. (2009). Pseudo nearest neighbor rule for pattern classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 3587–3595.
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Gou, J.P., Qiu, W.M., Mao, Q.R., Zhan, Y.Z., Shen, X.Z., Rao, Y.B. (2017). A multi-local means based nearest neighbor classifier. In: 2017 IEEE 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). pp. 448–452.
  24. Li, W., Chen, C., Su, H., & Du, Q. (2015). Collaborative-representation-based nearest neighbor classifier for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(2), 389–393.
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Ma, H., Gou, J., Wang, X., Ke, J., & Zeng, S. (2017). Sparse coefficient-based-nearest neighbor classification. IEEE Access, 5, 16618–16634.
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Li, W., Tramel, E. W., Prasad, S., & Fowler, J. E. (2013). Nearest regularized subspace for hyperspectral classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(1), 477–489.
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Brown, D., Li, H., Gao, Y. (2012). Locality-regularized linear regression for face recognition. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012), IEEE, pp. 1586–1589.
  28. Zhang, Y., Ma, Y., Dai, X., Li, H., Mei, X., & Ma, J. (2021). Locality-constrained sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification. Information Sciences, 546, 858–870.
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  29. Zhou, C., Tu, B., Ren, Q., Chen, S. (2021). Spatial peak-aware collaborative representation for hyperspectral imagery classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.
  30. Mohan, A., Sapiro, G., & Bosch, E. (2007). SpatiallyCoherent Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction and Segmentation of Hyperspectral Images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 4(2), 206.
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Wang, J., & Chang, C. I. (2006). Independent component analysis- based dimensionality reduction with applications in hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(6), 1586.
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Bruce, L. M., Koger, C. H., & Li, J. (2002). Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral data using discrete wavelet transform feature extraction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(10), 2331.
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Gou, J., Yang, Y., Yi, Z., Lv, J., Mao, Q., & Zhan, Y. (2020). Discriminative globality and locality preserving graph embedding for dimensionality reduction. Expert Systems with Applications, 144, 113079.
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Wu, L., Shen, C. H., & Hengel, A. V. D. (2017). Deep linear discriminant analysis on fisher networks: A hybrid architecture for person re-identification. Pattern Recognition, 65, 238–250.
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Lee, J. L., Park, D., & Lee, C. H. (2017). Feature selection algorithm for intrusions detection system using sequential forward search and random forest classifier. Ksii Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 11(10), 5132–5148.
    Google Scholar
  36. Peker, M., Arslan, A., Şen, B., Çelebi, F.V., But A. (2015). A novel hybrid method for determining the depth of anesthesia level: Combining ReliefF feature selection and random forest algorithm (ReliefF+ RF). In: 2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), IEEE, pp. 1–8.
  37. Vergara, J. R., & Estévez, P. A. (2014). A review of feature selection methods based on mutual information. Neural computing and applications, 24(1), 175–186.
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Lu, C.-Y., Min, H., Gui, J., Zhu, L., & Lei, Y.-K. (2013). Face recognition via weighted sparse representation. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 24(2), 111–116.
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Gan, Le., Xia, J., Peijun, Du., & Zhigang, Xu. (2017). Dissimilarity-weighted sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(11), 1968–1972.
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Timofte, R., & Van Gool, L. (2014). Adaptive and weighted collaborative representations for image classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 43, 127–135.
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Boyd, S., Parikh, N., & Chu, E. (2011). Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Norwell: Now Publishers Inc.
    MATH Google Scholar
  42. Li, W., Du, Q., & Xion, M. (2015). Kernel collaborative representation with tikhonov regularization for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(1), 48–52.
    Article Google Scholar

Download references