A new impact pathway towards ecosystem quality in life cycle assessment: characterisation factors for fisheries (original) (raw)

• Azevedo LB, Huijbregts MAJ, Bobbink R et al (2012) Global assessment of the effects of terrestrial acidification on plant species richness. Environ Pollut 174:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.11.001
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bach V, Hélias A, Muhl M et al (2022) Assessing overfishing based on the distance-to-target approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02042-z
  Article Google Scholar
• Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02691
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Berger M, Sonderegger T, Alvarenga R et al (2020) Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment: part II – recommendations on application-dependent use of existing methods and on future method development needs. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:798–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01737-5
  Article Google Scholar
• Bijster M, Guignard C, Hauschild M et al (2018) USEtox® 2.0 documentation (version 1.1). USEtox® International Center hosted at the Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
• Cashion T, Hornborg S, Ziegler F et al (2016) Review and advancement of the marine biotic resource use metric in seafood LCAs: a case study of Norwegian salmon feed. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1106–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1092-y
  Article Google Scholar
• Chaudhary A, Brooks TM (2018) Land use intensity-specific global characterization factors to assess product biodiversity footprints. Environ Sci Technol 52:5094–5104. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05570
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chaudhary A, Verones F, de Baan L, Hellweg S (2015) Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species–area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ Sci Technol 49:9987–9995. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02507
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cosme N, Mayorga E, Hauschild MZ (2018) Spatially explicit fate factors of waterborne nitrogen emissions at the global scale. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1349-0
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Crespo-Mendes N, Laurent A, Hauschild MZ (2019) Effect factors of terrestrial acidification in Brazil for use in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1560-7
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Curran M, De Baan L, De Schryver AM et al (2011) Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101444k
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Curran M, Hellweg S, Beck J (2014) Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy? Ecol Appl 24:617–632. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0243.1
  Article Google Scholar
• Curran MA (ed) (2017) Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht
  Google Scholar
• de Baan L, Alkemade R, Koellner T (2013a) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1216–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0412-0
  Article Google Scholar
• de Baan L, Mutel CL, Curran M et al (2013b) Land use in life cycle assessment: global characterization factors based on regional and global potential species extinction. Environ Sci Technol 47:9281–9290. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400592q
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dorber M, Kuipers K, Verones F (2020) Global characterization factors for terrestrial biodiversity impacts of future land inundation in life cycle assessment. Sci Total Environ 712:134582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134582
• Ellis EC, Kaplan JO, Fuller DQ et al (2013) Used planet: a global history. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:7978–7985. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217241110
  Article Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson A, Ziegler F, Pihl L et al (2014) Accounting for overfishing in life cycle assessment: new impact categories for biotic resource use. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1156–1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0684-z
  Article Google Scholar
• FAO (2022) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. FAO
• FAO (2017) Fishery Statistical Collections - Global Capture Production
• FAO (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources
• Frischknecht R, Jolliet O (eds) (2016) Global guidance for life cycle impact assessment indicators:, vol 1. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris
  Google Scholar
• Froese R, Demirel N, Coro G et al (2017) Estimating fisheries reference points from catch and resilience. Fish Fish 18:506–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12190
  Article Google Scholar
• Froese R, Pauly D (eds) (2016) FishBase. World wide web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org
• Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The eco-indicator 99 a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment methodology - methodology report. Pré Consutant, Amersfoort, Netherland
• Guinée JB, Heijungs R (1995) A proposal for the definition of resource equivalency factors for use in product life-cycle assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:917–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620140525
  Article Google Scholar
• Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MAJ (eds) (2015) Life cycle impact assessment. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht
  Google Scholar
• Hélias A (2019) Data for fish stock assessment obtained from the CMSY algorithm for all global FAO datasets. Data 4:78. https://doi.org/10.3390/data4020078
  Article Google Scholar
• Hélias A, Heijungs R (2019) Resource depletion potentials from bottom-up models: population dynamics and the Hubbert peak theory. Sci Total Environ 650:1303–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.119
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hélias A, Langlois J, Fréon P (2018) Fisheries in life cycle assessment: operational factors for biotic resources depletion. Fish Fish 19:951–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12299
  Article Google Scholar
• Hillebrand H, Blasius B, Borer ET et al (2018) Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: consequences for conservation and monitoring. J Appl Ecol 55:169–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12959
  Article Google Scholar
• Horton T, Kroh A, Ahyong S et al (2019) World register of marine species (WoRMS)
• Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF et al (2016) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Report I: characterization. RIVM Report 2016–0104. Bilthoven, The Netherlands
• Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF et al (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
  Article Google Scholar
• IPBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany
• IUCN (2017) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017–3
• IUCN red list Table 1a : number of species evaluated in relation to the overall number of described species, and number of threatened species by major groups of organisms
• Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH et al (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science (80-) 293:629–637. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059199
• Kuipers KJJ, Hellweg S, Verones F (2019) Potential consequences of regional species loss for global species richness: a quantitative approach for estimating global extinction probabilities. Environ Sci Technol 53:4728–4738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06173
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Langlois J, Fréon P, Delgenes J-P et al (2014a) New methods for impact assessment of biotic-resource depletion in life cycle assessment of fisheries: theory and application. J Clean Prod 73:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.087
  Article Google Scholar
• Langlois J, Fréon P, Steyer J-P et al (2014b) Sea-use impact category in life cycle assessment: state of the art and perspectives. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0700-y
  Article Google Scholar
• Langlois J, Fréon P, Steyer J-P et al (2015) Sea use impact category in life cycle assessment: characterization factors for life support functions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:970–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0886-7
  Article Google Scholar
• Lindner J, Fehrenbach H, Winter L et al (2019) Valuing biodiversity in life cycle impact assessment. Sustainability 11:5628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205628
  Article Google Scholar
• McGill BJ, Dornelas M, Gotelli NJ, Magurran AE (2015) Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the anthropocene. Trends Ecol Evol 30:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.006
  Article Google Scholar
• Milà i Canals L, Romanyà J, Cowell SJ (2007) Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in life cycle assessment (LCA). J Clean Prod 15:1426–1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.005
  Article Google Scholar
• Müller-Wenk R (1998) Land Use – The Main Threat to Species. How to Include Land Use in LCA. IWÖ – Diskussionsbeitrag No. 64, IWÖ, Universität St. Gallen, Switzerland
• Pauly D (1998) Fishing down marine food webs. Science (80- ) 279:860–863. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5352.860
• Pereira HM, Ziv G, Mirande M (2014) Countryside species-area relationship as a valid alternative to the matrix-calibrated species-area model. Conserv Biol 28:874–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12289
  Article Google Scholar
• Posthuma L, de Zwart D (2012) Predicted mixture toxic pressure relates to observed fraction of benthic macrofauna species impacted by contaminant mixtures. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2175–2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.1923
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum RK, Margni M, Jolliet O (2007) A flexible matrix algebra framework for the multimedia multipathway modeling of emission to impacts. Environ Int 33:624–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.01.004
  Article Google Scholar
• Schaefer M (1954) Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bull Inter-American Trop Tuna Comm 1:27–56
  Google Scholar
• Sonderegger T, Berger M, Alvarenga R et al (2020) Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment—part I: a critical review of existing methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:784–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01736-6
  Article Google Scholar
• Steneck RS, Graham MH, Bourque BJ et al (2002) Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ Conserv 29:436–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000322
  Article Google Scholar
• Verones F, Bare J, Bulle C et al (2017) LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. J Clean Prod 161:957–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.206
  Article Google Scholar
• Verones F, Hellweg S, Antón A et al (2020) LC-IMPACT: a regionalized life cycle damage assessment method. J Ind Ecol 24:1201–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13018
  Article Google Scholar
• Verones F, Huijbregts MAJ, Chaudhary A et al (2015) Harmonizing the assessment of biodiversity effects from land and water use within LCA. Environ Sci Technol 49:3584–3592. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504995r
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Verones F, Kuipers K, Núñez M et al (2022) Global extinction probabilities of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine species groups for use in life cycle assessment. Ecol Indic 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109204
• Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B et al (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
  Article Google Scholar
• Winter L, Pflugmacher S, Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2018) Biodiversity impact assessment (BIA+) - methodological framework for screening biodiversity. Integr Environ Assess Manag 14:282–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.2006
  Article Google Scholar
• Woods JS, Damiani M, Fantke P et al (2018) Ecosystem quality in LCIA: status quo, harmonization, and suggestions for the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1995–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1422-8
  Article Google Scholar
• Woods JS, Veltman K, Huijbregts MAJ et al (2016) Towards a meaningful assessment of marine ecological impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA). Environ Int 89–90:48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.033
  Article Google Scholar
• Woods JS, Verones F (2019) Ecosystem damage from anthropogenic seabed disturbance: a life cycle impact assessment characterisation model. Sci Total Environ 649:1481–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.304
  Article CAS Google Scholar