Block-based versus text-based programming: a comparison of learners’ programming behaviors, computational thinking skills and attitudes toward programming (original) (raw)
Alshaigy, B., Kamal, S., Mitchell, F., Martin, C., & Aldea, A. (2015). Pilet: an interactive learning tool to teach python. In Judith, G. E., Sue, S., & Jan, V. (Eds.), WiPSCE’15: Proceedings of the workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp. 76–79). ACM.
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology & Society,19(3), 47–57. Google Scholar
Bai, X. M., & Gu, X. Q. (2019). Research on the construction and application of the computational thinking instrument in K12. China Educational Technology,10, 83–90. Google Scholar
Bey, A., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Broisin, J. (2019). Unsupervised automatic detection of learners’ programming behavior. In Scheffel, M., Broisin, J., Pammer-Schindler, V., Ioannou, A., & Schneider, J. (Eds.), EC-TEL 2021: Proceedings of the European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 69–82). Springer.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Arnetha, F. B., & Cynthia, A. T. (Eds.), AERA’ 12: Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American educational research association (pp. 1–25). AERA.
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: Exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education,4(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9 Article Google Scholar
Duncan, C., Bell, T., & Tanimoto, S. (2014). Should your 8-year-old learn coding? In Carsten, S., Michael, E. C., & Judith, G. E. (Chairs), WiPSE’13: Proceedings of the 9th workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp.60–69). ACM.
Dutt, A., Aghabozrgi, S., Ismail, M. A. B., & Mahroeian, H. (2015). Clustering algorithms applied in educational data mining. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering,5(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIEE.2015.V5.513 Article Google Scholar
Eid, C., & Millham, R. (2012). Which introductory programming approach is most suitable for learners: Procedural or visual programming. American Journal of Business Education,5(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v5i2.6819 Article Google Scholar
Estey, A., & Coady, Y. (2016). Can interaction patterns with supplemental study tools predict outcomes in CS1? In Alison, C., Ernesto, C. V. (Chairs), ITiCSE’16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 236–241). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2899415.2899428
Falloon, G. (2016). An analysis of young learners’ thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. on the iPad. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,32(6), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12155 Article Google Scholar
Fay, M. P., & Proschan, M. A. (2010). Wilcoxon-mann-whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. Statistics Surveys,4, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS051 Article Google Scholar
Garneli, V., & Chorianopoulos, K. (2018). Programming video games and simulations in science education: Exploring computational thinking through code analysis. Interactive Learning Environments,26(3), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1337036 Article Google Scholar
Giannakos, M. N., Koilias, C., Vlamos, P., & Doukakis, S. (2013). Measuring students’ acceptance and confidence in algorithms and programming: The impact of engagement with CS on greek secondary education. Informatics in Education,12(2), 207–219. Article Google Scholar
Grover, S. (2021). Teaching and assessing for transfer from block-to-text programming in middle school computer science. In C. Hohensee & J. Lobato (Eds.), Transfer of learning. Research in mathematics education. Springer. Google Scholar
Grover, S., & Basu, S. (2017). Measuring student learning in introductory block-based programming: Examining misconceptions of loops, variables, and boolean logic. In Michael, E. C., & Stephen, H. E. (Eds.), SIGCSE’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 267–272). ACM.
Jocius, R., O’Byrne, W. I., Albert, J., Joshi, D., Robinson, R., & Andrews, A. (2021). Infusing computational thinking into STEM teaching: From professional development to classroom practice. Educational Technology & Society,24(4), 166–179. Google Scholar
Katai, Z. (2015). The challenge of promoting algorithmic thinking of both sciences-and humanities-oriented learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,31(4), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12070 Article Google Scholar
Kölling, M., Brown, N., & Altadmri, A. (2015). Frame-based editing: Easing the transition from blocks to text-based programming. In Judith, G. E., Sue, S., & Jan, V. (Eds.), WiPSCE '15: Proceedings of the workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp. 29–38). ACM.
Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior,72, 558–569. Article Google Scholar
Lin, Y., & Weintrop, D. (2021). The landscape of Block-based programming: Characteristics of block-based environments and how they support the transition to text-based programming. Journal of Computer Languages, 67, 101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cola.2021.101075 Article Google Scholar
Ma, H., Zhao, M., Wang, H., Wan, X., Cavanaugh, T. W., & Liu, J. (2021). Promoting pupils’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy: A problem-solving instructional approach. Educational Technology Research and Development,69(3), 1599–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10016-5 Article Google Scholar
MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Lucien, M. L. C., & Jerzy, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (pp. 281–297). Berkeley.
Mannila, L., Dagiene, V., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Mirolo, C., Rolandsson, L., et al. (2014). Computational thinking in K-9 education. Proceedings of the working group reports of the 2014 on innovation & technology in computer science education conference, ITiCSE-WGR 2014 (1–29). ACM.
Mladenović, M., Boljat, I., & Žanko, Ž. (2018). Comparing loops misconceptions in block-based and text-based programming languages at the K-12 level. Education and Information Technologies,23(4), 1483–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9673-3 Article Google Scholar
Munson, J. P., & Zitovsky, J. P. (2018). Models for early identification of struggling novice programmers. In Tiffany, B., & Daniel, G. (Chairs), SIGCSE’18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 699–704). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159476
Nolan, K., & Bergin, S. (2016). The role of anxiety when learning to program: A systematic review of the literature. In Judy, S., & Calkin, S. M. (Eds.), Koli Calling’16: Proceedings of the 16th koli calling international conference on computing education research (pp. 61–70). ACM.
Ochoa, X. (2017). Chapter 11: multimodal learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (1st ed., pp. 143–150). Creative Commons License. Google Scholar
Pellas, N., & Vosinakis, S. (2018). The effect of simulation games on learning computer programming: A comparative study on high school students’ learning performance by assessing computational problem-solving strategies. Education and Information Technologies,23(6), 2423–2452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639018-9724-4 Article Google Scholar
Pereira, F. D., Oliveira, E., Cristea, A., Fernandes, D., Silva, L., Aguiar, G., Alamri, A., & Alshehri, M. (2019). Early dropout prediction for programming courses supported by online judges. In I. Seiji, M. A. O. Eva, H. Peter, M. Bruce, & L. Rose (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 67–72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_13 Chapter Google Scholar
Pereira, F. D., Oliveira, E. H. T., Oliveira, D. B. F., Cristea, A. I., Carvalho, L. S. G., Fonseca, S. C., Toda, A., & Isotani, S. (2020). Using learning analytics in the Amazonas: Understanding students’ behaviour in introductory programming. British Journal of Educational Technology,51(4), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12953 Article Google Scholar
Price, T.W., & Barnes, T. (2015) Comparing textual and block interfaces in a novice programming environment. In Brian, D. (Eds.), ICER'15: Proceedings of the eleventh annual international conference on international computing education research (pp.91–99). ACM.
Riley, D. D., & Hunt, K. A. (2014). Computational thinking for the modern problem Solver. CRC Press. Book Google Scholar
Rojas-López, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Learning scenarios for the subject methodology of programming from evaluating the computational thinking of new students. Revista Iberoamericana De Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje,13(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2018.2809941 Article Google Scholar
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior,72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047 Article Google Scholar
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,20, 53–65. Article Google Scholar
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez Viveros, B. (2020). A meta-analysis of teaching and learning computer programming: Effective instructional approaches and conditions. Computers in Human Behavior,109, 106349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.MoB.2020.106349 Article Google Scholar
Sherin, B. L. (2001). A comparison of programming languages and algebraic notation as expressive languages for physics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,6(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011434026437 Article Google Scholar
Shi, L., & Cristea, A. I. (2018). In-depth exploration of engagement patterns in MOOCs. In Hakim, H., Wojciech, C., Hua, M., Hye-Young, P., & Rui, Zhou. (Eds.), ICWE 2019: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on web information systems engineering (pp. 395–409). Springer.
Shi, L., Cristea, A. I., Toda, A. M., & Oliveira, W. (2019). Revealing the hidden patterns: A comparative study on profiling subpopulations of MOOC learners. In Siarheyeva. A., Barry. C., Lang, M., Linger, H., & Schneider, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th international conference on information systems development. Springer.
Sun, D., Ouyang, F., Li, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Three contrasting pairs’ collaborative programming processes in China’s secondary education. Journal of Educational Computing Research,1(8), 54. Google Scholar
Taub, R., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2012). CS unplugged and middle-school learners’ views, attitudes, and intentions regarding CS. ACM Transactions on Computing Education,12(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2160547.2160551 Article Google Scholar
Tempel, M. (2013). Blocks programming. CSTA Voice. Google Scholar
Weintrop, D. (2015). Comparing text-based, blocks-based, and hybrid blocks/text programming tools. Brian, D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the eleventh annual international conference on international computing education research (pp. 283–284). ACM.
Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2015). To block or not to block, that is the question: Learners’ perceptions of blocks-based programming. In Marina, U. B., & Glenda, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 199–208). ACM.
Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Comparing block-based and text-based programming in high school computer science classrooms. ACM Transactions on Computing Education,18(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3089799 Article Google Scholar
Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2019). Transitioning from introductory block-based and text-based environments to professional programming languages in high school computer science classrooms. Computers & Education,142(103646), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103646 Article Google Scholar
Wu, B., Hu, Y., Ruis, A. R., & Wang, M. (2019). Analysing computational thinking in collaborative programming: A quantitative ethnography approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,35(3), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12348 Article Google Scholar
Yucer, Y., & Rizvanoglu, K. (2019). Battling gender stereotypes: A user study of a code-learning game, “Code combat”, with middle school children. Computers in Human Behavior,99, 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.MoB.2019.05.029 Article Google Scholar