Experimental quantum randomness certification via Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in prepare-and-measure scenario (original) (raw)

References

  1. Herrero-Collantes M, Garcia-Escartin J C. Quantum random number generators. Rev Mod Phys, 2017, 89: 015004
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  2. Ma X, Yuan X, Cao Z, et al. Quantum random number generation. npj Quantum Inf, 2016, 2: 16021
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Ossola G, Sokal A D. Systematic errors due to linear congruential random-number generators with the Swendsen-Wang algorithm: a warning. Phys Rev E, 2004, 70: 027701
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Vincent C H. The generation of truly random binary numbers. J Phys E-Sci Instrum, 1970, 3: 594–598
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Schmidt H. Quantum-mechanical random-number generator. J Appl Phys, 1970, 41: 462–468
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Jennewein T, Achleitner U, Weihs G, et al. A fast and compact quantum random number generator. Rev Sci Instruments, 2000, 71: 1675–1680
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Gräfe M, Heilmann R, Perez-Leija A, et al. On-chip generation of high-order single-photon W-states. Nat Photon, 2014, 8: 791–795
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Stipčević M, Bowers J E. Spatio-temporal optical random number generator. Opt Express, 2015, 23: 11619–11631
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Ren M, Wu E, Liang Y, et al. Quantum random-number generator based on a photon-number-resolving detector. Phys Rev A, 2011, 83: 023820
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Guo H, Tang W, Liu Y, et al. Truly random number generation based on measurement of phase noise of a laser. Phys Rev E, 2010, 81: 051137
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Qi B, Chi Y M, Lo H K, et al. High-speed quantum random number generation by measuring phase noise of a single-mode laser. Opt Lett, 2010, 35: 312–314
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Hu Y Y, Lin X, Wang S, et al. Quantum random number generation based on spontaneous Raman scattering in standard single-mode fiber. Opt Lett, 2020, 45: 6038–6041
    Article Google Scholar
  13. de la Torre G, Hoban M J, Dhara C, et al. Maximally nonlocal theories cannot be maximally random. Phys Rev Lett, 2015, 114: 160502
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  14. Woodhead E, Kaniewski J, Bourdoncle B, et al. Maximal randomness from partially entangled states. Phys Rev Res, 2020, 2: 042028
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Skrzypczyk P, Cavalcanti D. Maximal randomness generation from steering inequality violations using qudits. Phys Rev Lett, 2018, 120: 260401
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  16. Zhang C, Cheng S, Li L, et al. Experimental validation of quantum steering ellipsoids and tests of volume monogamy relations. Phys Rev Lett, 2019, 122: 070402
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Tran M C, Ramanathan R, McKague M, et al. Bell monogamy relations in arbitrary qubit networks. Phys Rev A, 2018, 98: 052325
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  18. Woodhead E, Bourdoncle B, Acín A. Randomness versus nonlocality in the Mermin-Bell experiment with three parties. Quantum, 2018, 2: 82
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Wooltorton L, Brown P, Colbeck R. Tight analytic bound on the trade-off between device-independent randomness and nonlocality. Phys Rev Lett, 2022, 129: 150403
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  20. Sarkar S, Borkała J J, Jebarathinam C, et al. Self-testing of any pure entangled state with the minimal number of measurements and optimal randomness certification in a one-sided device-independent scenario. Phys Rev Appl, 2023, 19: 034038
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Uola R, Costa A C S, Nguyen H C, et al. Quantum steering. Rev Mod Phys, 2020, 92: 015001
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  22. Cavalcanti D, Skrzypczyk P. Quantum steering: a review with focus on semidefinite programming. Rep Prog Phys, 2016, 80: 024001
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  23. Xiang Y, Cheng S, Gong Q, et al. Quantum steering: practical challenges and future directions. PRX Quantum, 2022, 3: 030102
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Guo Y, Lin L J Z, Cao H, et al. Experimental entanglement quantification for unknown quantum states in a semi-device-independent manner. Sci China Inf Sci, 2023, 66: 180506
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Horodecki R, Horodecki P, Horodecki M, et al. Quantum entanglement. Rev Mod Phys, 2009, 81: 865–942
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  26. Hensen B, Bernien H, Dréau A E, et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature, 2015, 526: 682–686
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Giustina M, Versteegh M A M, Wengerowsky S, et al. Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons. Phys Rev Lett, 2015, 115: 250401
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Rosenfeld W, Burchardt D, Garthoff R, et al. Event-ready bell test using entangled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes. Phys Rev Lett, 2017, 119: 010402
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Qu R, Wang Y, An M, et al. Retrieving high-dimensional quantum steering from a noisy environment with N measurement settings. Phys Rev Lett, 2022, 128: 240402
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Qu R, Wang Y, Zhang X, et al. Robust method for certifying genuine high-dimensional quantum steering with multimeasurement settings. Optica, 2022, 9: 473–478
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Passaro E, Cavalcanti D, Skrzypczyk P, et al. Optimal randomness certification in the quantum steering and prepare-and-measure scenarios. New J Phys, 2015, 17: 113010
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Li Y, Xiang Y, Yu X D, et al. Randomness certification from multipartite quantum steering for arbitrary dimensional systems. Phys Rev Lett, 2024, 132: 080201
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  33. Zhang J, Li Y, Zhao M, et al. One-sided device-independent random number generation through fiber channels. Light Sci Appl, 2025, 14: 25
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Qu R, Zhang C, Chang Z H, et al. Observation of diverse asymmetric structures in high-dimensional Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Phys Rev Lett, 2024, 132: 210202
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  35. Yan P S, Zhou L, Zhong W, et al. Advances in quantum entanglement purification. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2023, 66: 250301
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Zhao P, Yang M Y, Zhu S, et al. Generation of hyperentangled state encoded in three degrees of freedom. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2023, 66: 100311
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Ren S Y, Han D M, Wang M H, et al. Continuous variable quantum teleportation and remote state preparation between two space-separated local networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2024, 67: 142502
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Wang J, Paesani S, Ding Y, et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science, 2018, 360: 285–291
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  39. Guo Y, Cheng S, Hu X, et al. Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum steering and randomness generation beyond qubits. Phys Rev Lett, 2019, 123: 170402
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Zhang C, Li Y, Hu X M, et al. Randomness versus nonlocality in multiple-input and multiple-output quantum scenario. Phys Rev Lett, 2025, 134: 090201
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Mironowicz P, Grünfeld M, Bourennane M. Generalized measurements on qubits in quantum randomness certification and expansion. Phys Rev Appl, 2024, 22: 044041
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Nath P P, Saha D, Home D, et al. Single-system-based generation of certified randomness using Leggett-Garg inequality. Phys Rev Lett, 2024, 133: 020802
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  43. Senno G, Strohm T, Acín A. Quantifying the intrinsic randomness of quantum measurements. Phys Rev Lett, 2023, 131: 130202
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  44. Poderini D, Brito S, Nery R, et al. Criteria for nonclassicality in the prepare-and-measure scenario. Phys Rev Res, 2020, 2: 043106
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Luo M, Zhang X, Zhou X. Experimental demonstration of the criterion for the prepare-and-measure nonclassicality. Phys Scr, 2024, 99: 035104
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Tavakoli A. Semi-device-independent framework based on restricted distrust in prepare-and-measure experiments. Phys Rev Lett, 2021, 126: 210503
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  47. Wang Q K, Wang F X, Liu J, et al. High-dimensional quantum cryptography with hybrid orbital-angular-momentum states through 25 km of ring-core fiber: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Phys Rev Appl, 2021, 15: 064034
    Article Google Scholar
  48. Sit A, Bouchard F, Fickler R, et al. High-dimensional intracity quantum cryptography with structured photons. Optica, 2017, 4: 1006–1010
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Bouchard F, Sit A, Hufnagel F, et al. Quantum cryptography with twisted photons through an outdoor underwater channel. Opt Express, 2018, 26: 22563–22573
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Wang F X, Lu Q H, Chen W, et al. Hybrid high-dimensional quantum key distribution for a composable quantum network. Phys Rev Appl, 2023, 19: 054060
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Fang K, Zhao J T, Li X F, et al. Quantum NETwork: from theory to practice. Sci China Inf Sci, 2023, 66: 180509
    Article Google Scholar

Download references