Critiquing the Reno Model I-IV International Influence on Regulators and Governments (2004–2015)— the Distorted Reality of “Responsible Gambling” (original) (raw)
References
Adams, P. (2011). Editorial. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 145–152. Article Google Scholar
Alexius, S. (2011). Making up the responsible gambler (pp. 22–24). Stockholm: Paper presented at the Nordic Academy of Management Conference. Google Scholar
Astbury, G., & Thurstain-Goodwin, M. (2015). Contextualising machine gambling characteristics by location - final report. London: Geofutures. Google Scholar
Bakken, I., Øenl, A., & Götestam, G. (2015). Norway: The slot machine and problem Gambing. Oslo: SINTEF Health Research. Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. Article Google Scholar
Banks, G. (2002). The productivity Commission’s gambling inquiry: 3 years on. In Presentation to the 12th Annual Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies (NAGS). Canberra: Productivity Commission. Google Scholar
Banks, G. (2011). Guest editorial. International Gambling Studies, 11(1), 3–6. Article Google Scholar
Blaszczynski, A., & Gainsbury, S. (2014). Editor’s notes. International Gambling Studies., 14(3), 354–356. Article Google Scholar
Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 301–317. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., & Shaffer, H. (2005). Informed choice and gambling: Principles for consumer protection. Melbourne: Australian Gaming Council. Google Scholar
Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., & Shaffer, H. (2008). Informed choice and gambling: Principles for consumer protection. Journal of Gambling, Business and Economics, 2(1), 103–118. Google Scholar
Blaszczynski, A., Collins, P., Fong, D., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., Shaffer, H., Tavares, T., & Venisse, J. L. (2011). Responsible gambling: General principles and minimal requirements. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 565–573. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Browne, M. N., Kubasek, N. K., & Biksacky, L. (2014). Casinos and problem gamblers: The complexity of legal responsibility. Charlotte Law Review., 339–376.
Browne, M., Langham, E., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Li, E., Rose, J., Rockloff, M., Donaldson, P., Thorne, H., Goodwin, B., Bryden, G., & Best, T. (2016). Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: A public health perspective. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation. Google Scholar
Campbell, C., & Smith, G. (2003). Gambling in Canada—From vice to disease to responsibility: A negotiated history. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 20(1), 121–149. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Carter, S. (1998). Civility. New York: Harper Perennial. Google Scholar
Cassidy, R. (2014). Fair game? Producing and publishing gambling research. International Gambling Studies, 14(3), 345–353. Article Google Scholar
Chambers, K. (2011). Gambling for profit: Lotteries, gaming machines and casinos in cross-national focus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Book Google Scholar
Chandler, C., & Jones, J. (2011). Casino women: Courage in unexpected places. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Book Google Scholar
Collins, P., Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Shaffer, H., Fong, G., & Venisse, J.-L. (2015). Responsible gambling: Conceptual considerations. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 3, 594–599. Article Google Scholar
Collins, P., Barr, G., & Scott, L. (2016). Report on results of research into the likely effects of substantially reducing the maximum permitted stake of the effects of reducing the stake on a B2 machine in UK betting shops. In GambleAware Retrieved from: http://about.gambleaware.org/media/1390/peter-collins.pdf. Google Scholar
Crofts, P. (2003). Researching the link between gambling and crime (pp. 24–25). Trends and Methods Conference, Australian Institute of Criminology and Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra: Evaluation in Crime and Justice. Google Scholar
Dickerson, M. (2003a). Exploring the limits of “responsible gambling”: Harm minimization or consumer protection? Gambling Research, 15, 28–43. Google Scholar
Dow Schull, N. (2012). Addiction by design. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Eadington, W. (2003). Trends in gambling and responsible gambling in the United States and elsewhere.www.unr.edu/gaming, retrieved Feb. 8, 2009.
el-Guebaly N., Currie, S., Hodgins, D., Smith, G. & Williams, R. (2005). Adapting the Reno Model for Alberta. Report prepared for the Alberta Gambling Research Institute (AGRI), Edmonton: (AGRI).
Etzioni, A. (2004). The common good. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. (1962). Anti-Minotaur: The myth of a value-free sociology. Social Problems, 9(3), Winter, 199–213.
Griffiths, M., & Auer, M. (2015). Research funding in gambling studies: Some further observations. International Gambling Studies, 15(1), 15–19. Article Google Scholar
Hancock, L. (2011). Regulatory failure. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing. Google Scholar
Hancock, L. (2013). Giving Dracula the keys to the blood bank? Interrogating the fifth crown casino licensing regulatory review. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 8(1), 1–21 2. Article Google Scholar
Hancock, L., & Hanrahan, S. (2015). Review of the Responsible Gambling Trust machines research Programme. London: Campaign for Fairer Gambling. Google Scholar
Hancock, L., & Hao, Z. (2016). Gambling regulatory regimes and the framing of “responsible gambling” by transnational casino corporations: Asia-Pacific regimes in comparative perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 139–153. Article Google Scholar
Hancock, L., Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2008). Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management. Policy and Society, 27, 55–67. Article Google Scholar
Hao, Z., Hancock, L., & Thompson, W. (2014). In search of best practices in responsible gaming (RG): A comparative study of RG among Macau, Las Vegas, and Melbourne casinos. Gambling Law Review and Economics, 18(4), 361–368. Article Google Scholar
Henry, A. (2011). Ideology, power, and the structure of policy networks. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 361–383.
Hing, N. (2010). The evolution of responsible gambling policy and practice: Insights for Asia from Australia. Asian Journal of gambling issues and Public Health, 1(1), 19–33. Article Google Scholar
Hing, N., & Gainsbury, S. (2011). Risky business: Gambling problems amongst gaming venue employees in Queensland Australia. Journal of Gambling Issues, 25, 4–23. Article Google Scholar
Hing, N., Sproston, K., Tran, K., & Russell, A. (2016). Gambling responsibly: Who does it and to what end? Journal of Gambling Studies, On-line, 1–17.
Jubinville, G. (2012). Dismissed. Sturgeon County, AB: ADIGI Books. Google Scholar
Kingma, S. (2008). The liberalization and (re)regulation of Dutch gambling markets: National consequences of the changing European context. Regulation & Governance, 2, 445–458. Article Google Scholar
Korn, D., Reynolds, J., & Skinner, H. (2006). The Reno model – A public health discussion. In Presentation to the 13th International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking. Lake Tahoe: Nevada. Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Shaw, R. (2014). Despite tougher rules, reports of possible money laundering up at BC casinos. Vancouver Sun, 14.
Livingstone, C., & Adams, P. (2015). Clear principles are needed for integrity in gambling research. Addiction, 111(1), 5–10.
Livingstone, C., & Woolley, R. (2007). Risky business: A few provocations on the regulation of electronic gambling machines. International Gambling Studies, 7, 361–376. Article Google Scholar
Livingstone, C., Woolley, R., & Keleher, H. (2010). Productivity commission inquiry into Australia’s gambling industry. Canberra: Productivity Commission. Google Scholar
Livingstone, C., Rintoul, A., & Francis, L. (2014). What is the evidence for harm minimisation measures in gambling venues? Evidence Base, 2, 1–24. Google Scholar
Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. Article Google Scholar
Ma v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police. (2016). VSC 553. Melbourne: Victorian Supreme Court. Google Scholar
MacLaren, V. (2016). Video lottery is the most harmful form of gambling in Canada. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(2), 459–485. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Markham, F., & Young, M. (2015). Big gambling: The rise of the global industry-state gambling complex. Addiction Research & Theory, 23(1), 1–4. Article Google Scholar
Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 4, 4–21. Article Google Scholar
McAllister, I. (2014). Public opinion toward gambling and gambling regulation in Australia. International Gambling Studies, 14(1), 146–160. Article Google Scholar
McMillen, J., & McAllister, G. (2000). Responsible gambling: Legal and policy issues. In Presentation to 3rd National Gambling Regulation Conference, Sydney, may 11–12. Australian Institute of Criminology and Australian Institute of Gambling: Research. Google Scholar
Meirs, D. (2016). Social responsibility and harm minimization in commercial gambling in great Britain. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 20(2), 164–176. Article Google Scholar
Miedema, D. (2012). Government-Gambling’s biggest addict. Ottawa: Institute of Marriage and Family Canada. Google Scholar
Mutari, E., & Figart, D. (2015). Just one more hand: Life in the casino economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar
O’Connor, J., & Dickerson, M. (2003). Impaired control over gambling in gaming machine and off-course gamblers. Addiction, 98, 53–60. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Orford, J. (2011). An unsafe bet: The dangerous rise of gambling and the debate we should be having. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar
Orford, J., Griffiths, M., Wardle, H., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Negative public attitudes toward gambling: Findings from the 2007 British gambling prevalence survey using a new attitude scale. International Gambling Studies, 9, 39–54. Article Google Scholar
Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Google Scholar
Productivity Commission. (2009). Gambling, draft report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Google Scholar
Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Google Scholar
R v Jamieson, Kate (2006). County Court of Victoria, Melbourne [2006] VCC 1649.
Reith, G. (2004). Consumption and its discontents: Addiction, identity and the problems of freedom. British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 283–300. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Reith, G. (2013). Techno economic systems and excessive consumption: A political economy of ‘pathological’ gambling. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(4), 717–738. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Room, R. (2005). The wheel of fortune: Cycles and reactions in gambling policies. Addiction, 100, 1226–1227. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. (1999). The need for better theories. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 3–17). Boulder: Westview Press. Google Scholar
Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. Sebatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Westview Press: Boulder. Google Scholar
Savell, E., Gilmore, A. B., & Fooks, G. (2014). How does the tobacco industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review. PloS One, 9(2), 1–10. Article Google Scholar
Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2004a). From Reno to Halifax: Building on the framework for a global gambling strategy, responsible gambling policy and research. Halifax: Focal research. Google Scholar
Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2004b). Identifying problem gamblers at the gambling venue: Finding combinations of high confidence indicators. Gambling Research, 16(1), 8–24. Google Scholar
Schellinck, T., Schrans, T. & Yi, Z. (2009). Informing the Debate: Specifications for an Effective Gambling Risk Assessment System Based on Loyalty Tracking Data, The 6th International Conference on Gaming Industry and Public Welfare 2009, Macao, China, 149–186.
Schrans, T., & Schellinck, T. (2014). Hedging your bets: Using loyalty data & player tracking data to identify & manage risk. Banff: Alberta Gambling Research Institute annual conference. Google Scholar
Shaffer, H., Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Whyte, K. (2015). Extending the Reno model: Clinical and ethical applications. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(3), 297–309. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Skolnick, J. (1978). House of cards: The legalization and control of casino gambling. Boson: Little Brown and Co.. Google Scholar
Skolnick, J., & Dombrink, J. (1979). The limits of gaming control. Connecticut Law Review, 12(762–784), 784. Google Scholar
Smith, G. (2015). The corrupting influence of gambling on governments, research and charities. Paper presented at the Alberta Gambling Research Institute Conference, Banff.
Smith, G., & Rubenstein, D. (2009). Socially responsible and accountable gambling in the public interest. Journal of Gambling Issues, 25, 54–67. Article Google Scholar
Smith, G., & Simpson, R. (2014). Gambling addiction defence on trial: Canadian expert witness perspectives. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 3, 319–326. Article Google Scholar
Smith, G., Schopflocher, D., el-Guebaly, N., Casey, D., Hodgins, D., Williams, R., & Wood, R. T. (2011). Community attitudes toward legalized gambling in Alberta. International Gambling Studies, 11(1), 57–79.
Storer, J., Abbott, M., & Stubbs, J. (2009). Access or adaptation? A meta-analysis of surveys of problem gambling prevalence in Australia and New Zealand with respect to concentration of EGMs. International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–244. Article Google Scholar
Warfield, B. (2014). Gambling motivated fraud in Australia 1998–2007. Sydney: Warfield and Assoc. Google Scholar
Weible, M., Sabatier, P., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140. Article Google Scholar
Williams, R., Belanger, Y., & Arthur, J. (2011a). Gambling in Alberta: History, current status, and socioeconomic impacts. Edmonton: Final Report to the Alberta Gambling Research Institute. Google Scholar
Williams, R.J., Rehm, J., & Stevens, R.M.G. (2011b). The social and economic impacts of gambling. Final report prepared for the Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research, p. 42. Retrieved from: http://www.ccsa.ca/2011 CCSA Documents/SEIG FINAL REPORT.pdf.
Williams, R., Volberg, R. & Stevens, R. (2012a). The population prevalence of problem gambling. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre (OPGRC). Guelph: (OPGRC).
Williams, R., West, B. & Simpson, R. (2012b). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence and identified best practices. The Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph: (OPGRC).
Wohl, M., & Wood, R. (2015). Is gambling industry-funded research necessarily a conflict of interest? A reply to Cassidy (2014). International Gambling Studies, 15(1), 12–14. Article Google Scholar
Woolley, R., Livingstone, C., Harrigan, K., & Rintoul, A. (2013). House edge: Hold percentage and the cost of EGM gambling. International Gambling Studies, 13(3), 388–402. Article Google Scholar