Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images (original) (raw)

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
• Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
• Cancel anytime View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

1. Abraham AM, Goff I, Pearce MS, Francis RM, Birrell F (2011) Reliability and validity of ultrasound imaging of features of knee osteoarthritis in the community. BMC Muscuskelet Disord 70(12):1471–2474
   Google Scholar
2. Aisen AM, McCune WJ, MacGuire A, Carson PL, Silver TM, Jafri SZ, Martel W (1984) Sonographic evaluation of the cartilage of the knee. Radiology 153(3):781–784
   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
3. Buckland-Wright JC (1994) Quantitative radiography of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 53:268–275
   Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
4. Chan TF, Vese LA (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(2):266–277
   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
5. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):37–46
   Article Google Scholar
6. Dodin P, Pelletier JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Abram F (2010) Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3-D magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(11):2699–2711
   Article Google Scholar
7. Folkesson J, Dam EB, Olsen OF, Pettersen PC, Christiansen C (2007) Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 26(1):106–115
   Google Scholar
8. Fripp J, Crozier S, Warfield SK, Ourselin S (2010) Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance images of the knee. IEEE Trans Med Imag 29(1):55–63
   Article Google Scholar
9. Graichen H, Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F (2004) Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 50:811–816
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
10. Heuer F, Sommer M, III JBR, Bottlang M (2001) Estimation of cartilage thickness from joint surface scans: comparative analysis of computational methods. In: Proceedings 2001 ASME bioengineering Conference, vol 50, pp 569–570
11. Iagnocco A, Coari G, Zoppini A (1992) Sonographic evaluation of femoral condylar cartilage in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 21(4):201–203
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
12. Jackson D, Simon T, Aberman H (2001) Symptomatic articular cartilage degeneration: the impact in the new millennium. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:14–15
    Article Google Scholar
13. Kazam JK, Nazarian LN, Miller TT, Sofka CM, Parker L, Adler RS (2011) Sonographic evaluation of femoral trochlear cartilage in patients with knee pain. J Ultrasound Med 30(6):797–802
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
14. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1):159–174
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
15. Li C, Huang R, Ding Z, Gatenby C, Metaxas DN, Gore JC (2011) A level set method for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities with application to MRI. IEEE Trans Image Process 20 (7):2007–2016
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
16. Maurer CR, Qi R, Raghavan V (2003) A linear time algorithm for computing exact Euclidean distance transforms of binary images in arbitrary dimensions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 25(2):265–270
    Article Google Scholar
17. Moller I, Bong D, Naredo E, Filippucci E, Carrasco I, Moragues C, Iagnocco A (2008) Ultrasound in the study and monitoring of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:S4–S7
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
18. Mukherjee S, Acton ST (2015) Region based segmentation in presence of intensity inhomogeneity using legendre polynomials. IEEE Signal Process Lett 22(3):298–302
    Article Google Scholar
19. Naredo E, Acebes C, Moller I, Canillas F, de Agustin JJ, de Miguel E, Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Moragues C, Tuneu R, Uson J, Garrido J, Delgado-Baeza E, Saenz-Navarro I (2009) Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1322–1327
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
20. Pakin SK, Tamez-Pena JG, Totterman S, Parker KJ (2002) Segmentation, surface extraction, and thickness computation of articular cartilage. In: Proceedings SPIE Medical Imaging 2002: Image Processing, San Diego, USA, vol 4686, pp 155–166
21. Roemer FW, Crema MD, Trattnig S, Guermazi A (2011) Advances in imaging of osteoarthritis and cartilage. Radiology 260(2):332–354
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
22. Solloway S, Hutchison C, Waterton J, Taylor C (1993) The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images. Magn Reson Med 13(5):943–952
    Google Scholar
23. Tang J, Millington S, Acton ST, Crandall J, Hurwitz S (2006) Surface extraction and thickness measurement of the articular cartilage from MR images using directional gradient vector flow snakes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(5):896–907
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
24. Wang J, Cheng Y, Guo C, Wang Y, Tamura S (2016) Shape-intensity prior level set combining probabilistic atlas and probability map constrains for automatic liver segmentation from abdominal CT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(5):817–826
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
25. Wang L, He L, Mishra A, Li C (2009) Active contours driven by local Gaussian distribution fitting energy. Signal Process 89(12):2435–2447
    Article Google Scholar
26. Wang XF, Min H, Zou L, Zhang YG (2015) A novel level set method for image segmentation by incorporating local statistical analysis and global similarity measurement. Pattern Recogn 48(1):189–204
    Article Google Scholar
27. Xiao G, Brady M, Noble JA, Zhang Y (2002) Segmentation of ultrasound B-mode images with intensity inhomogeneity correction. IEEE Trans Med Imag 21(1):48–57
    Article Google Scholar
28. Yezzi A, Prince J (2003) An eulerian PDE approach for computing tissue thickness. IEEE Trans Med Imag 22(10):1332–1339
    Article Google Scholar
29. Yin Y, Zhang X, Williams R, Wu X, Anderson DD, Sonka M (2010) LOGISMOS–Layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint. IEEE Trans Med Imag 29(12):2023–2037
    Article Google Scholar
30. Zhang K, Zhang L, Zhang S (2010) A variational multiphase level set approach to simultaneous segmentation and bias correction. In: Proceedings IEEE International Conference Image Processing, Hong Kong, pp 4105–4108
31. Zhang K, Zhang L, Song H, Zhang D (2013) Reinitialization-free level set evolution via reaction diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(1):258–271
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
32. Zhang K, Zhang L, Lam KM, Zhang D (2016) A level set approach to image segmentation with intensity inhomogeneity. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(2):546–557
    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references