Fourth-order partial differential diffusion model with adaptive Laplacian kernel for low-dose CT image processing (original) (raw)

References

1. Hart, D., Wall, B.F.: UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur. J. Radiol. 50, 285–291 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00178-5
   Article Google Scholar
2. Slovis, T.L.: Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) concept. Pediatrics 112(4), 971–972 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.4.971
   Article Google Scholar
3. Limin, L., Yining, H., Yang, C.: Research status and prospect for low-dose CT image. J. Data Acquis. Proc. 30, 24–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.16337/j.1004-9037.2015.01.002
   Article Google Scholar
4. Balda, M., Hornegger, J., Heismann, B.: Ray contribution masks for structure adaptive sinogram filtering. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(5), 1116–1128 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2012.2187213
   Article Google Scholar
5. Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Lin, F., Pu, Y., Zhou, J.: Statistical iterative reconstruction using adaptive fractional order regularization. Biomed. Opt. Express 7(3), 1015–1029 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.001015
   Article Google Scholar
6. Mohd Sagheer, S.V., George, S.N.: Denoising of low-dose CT images via low-rank tensor modeling and total variation regularization. Artif. Intell. Med. 94, 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2018.12.006
   Article Google Scholar
7. Chen, W., Shao, Y., Wang, Y., et al.: A novel total variation model for low-dose CT image denoising. IEEE Access 6(1), 78892–78903 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885514
   Article Google Scholar
8. Feruglio, P.F., Vinegoni, C., Gros, J., Sbarbati, A., Weissleder, R.: Block matching 3D random noise filtering for absorption optical projection tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 55(18), 5401–5415 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/18/009
   Article Google Scholar
9. Kang, J., Gui, Z., Liu, Y., et al.: LDCT image quality improvement algorithm based on optimal wavelet basis and MCA. SIViP 16, 2303–2311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02196-1
   Article Google Scholar
10. Trung, N.T., Trinh, D.H., Trung, N.L., et al.: Low-dose CT image denoising using deep convolutional neural networks with extended receptive fields. SIViP 16, 1963–1971 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02157-8
    Article Google Scholar
11. Kang, E., Chang, W., Yoo, J., Ye, J.C.: Deep convolutional framelet denosing for low-dose CT via wavelet residual network. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(6), 1358–1369 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2823756
    Article Google Scholar
12. The 2016 NIH-AAPM-Mayo Clinic Low Dose CT Grand Challenge. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.aapm.org/GrandChallenge/LowDoseCT.
13. Perona, P., Malik, J.: Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12(7), 629–639 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/34.56205
    Article Google Scholar
14. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys. D, Nonlinear Phenomena. 60, 259–268 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
15. Wang, Y.Q., Guo, J., Chen, W., Zhang, W.: Image denoising using modified Perona-Malik model based on directional Laplacian. Signal Process. 93(9), 2548–2558 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.02.020
    Article Google Scholar
16. Lu, W., Duan, J., Qiu, Z., Pan, Z., Liu, R.W., Bai, L.: Implementation of high-order variational models made easy for image processing. Math. Method. Appl. Sci. 39(14), 4208–4233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3858
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
17. Duan, J., Qiu, Z., Lu, W., Wang, G., Pan, Z., Bai, L.: An edge-weighted second order variational model for image decomposition. Digit. Signal Proc. 49, 162–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2015.10.010
    Article Google Scholar
18. You, Y.L., Kaveh, M.: Fourth-order partial differential equations for noise removal. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9(10), 1723–1730 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/83.869184]
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
19. Hajiaboli, M.R.: An anisotropic fourth-order diffusion filter for image noise removal. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 92, 177–191 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-010-0330-1
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
20. Lysaker, M., Lundervold, A., Tai, X.-C.: Noise removal using fourth-order partial differential equation with applications to medical magnetic resonance images in space and time. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 12(12), 1579–1590 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819229
    Article Google Scholar
21. Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, P., Qiao, Z., Gui, Z.: Artifact suppressed nonlinear diffusion filtering for low-dose CT image processing. IEEE Access. 7, 109856–109869 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933541
    Article Google Scholar
22. Hajiaboli, M.R.: A self-governing fourth-order nonlinear diffusion filter for image noise removal. IPSJ Trans. Comput. Vis. Appl. 2, 94–103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjtcva.2.94
    Article Google Scholar
23. He, K., Sun, J., Tang, X.: Guided image filtering. IEEE Trans. Pattern anal. Mach. Intell. 35(6), 1397–1409 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.213
    Article Google Scholar
24. Chao, S.M., Tsai, D.M.: An improved anisotropic diffusion model for detail- and edge-preserving smoothing. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 31(13), 2012–2023 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2010.06.004
    Article Google Scholar
25. Rafsanjani, H.K., Sedaaghi, M.H., Saryazdi, S.: An adaptive diffusion coefficient selection for image denoising. Digit. Signal Process. 64, 71–82 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2017.02.004
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
26. Tebini, S., Seddik, H., Braiek, E.B.: An advanced and adaptive mathematical function for an efficient anisotropic image filtering. Comput. Math. Appl. 72(5), 1369–1385 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.07.004]
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
27. Hajiaboli, M.R., Ahmad, M.O., Wang, C.: An edge-adapting laplacian kernel for nonlinear diffusion filters. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(4), 1561–1572 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.2172803
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
28. Alvarez, L., Mazorra, L.: Signal and image restoration using shock filters and anisotropic diffusion. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31(2), 590–605 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1137/0731032
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
29. Fu, S.J., Zhang, C.M., Tai, X.C.: Image denoising and deblurring: non-convex regularization, inverse diffusion and shock filter. SCIENCE CHINA Inf. Sci. 54, 1184–1198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4239-2
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
30. Chen, Y., Dai, X., Duan, H., Gao, L., Sun, X., Nie, S.: A quality improvement method for lung LDCT images. J. Xray Sci. Technol. 28(2), 255–270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-190605
    Article Google Scholar
31. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861
    Article Google Scholar
32. Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X., Zhang, D.: FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(8), 2378–2386 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
33. Xue, W., Zhang, L., Mou, X., Bovik, A.C.: Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: a highly efficient perceptual image quality index. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(2), 684–695 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2013.2293423
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
34. Canny, J.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8(6), 679–698 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851]
    Article Google Scholar

Download references