Developing an Online Data Ethics Module Informed by an Ecology of Data Perspective (original) (raw)

References

• American Physical Society (APS). (2020). Publication practices case study: Authorship and collaboration. https://www.aps.org/programs/education/ethics/upload/Ethics-Case-Studies-Student-Edition.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2020.
• Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ashford, E. (2000). Utilitarianism, integrity and partiality. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(8), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil200097834
  Article Google Scholar
• Baker, K. S., & Bowker, G. C. (2007). Information ecology: Open system environment for data, memories, and knowing. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 29, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-006-0035-7
  Article Google Scholar
• Bero, B., & Kuhlman, A. (2011). Teaching ethics to engineers: Ethical decision making parallels the engineering design process. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9213-7
  Article Google Scholar
• Bero, L. A. (2005). Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Reports, 120, 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.016
  Article Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (1995). Standing for something. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(5), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940917
  Article Google Scholar
• Columbia University. (2004) Data acquisition and management. Retrieved from http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/rcr/rcr_data/winResources.html.
• Columbia University. (2018). The research and data integrity (ReaDI) program. Retrieved from https://research.columbia.edu/ReaDI-Program.
• Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000613492542
  Article Google Scholar
• Cox, D., La Caze, M., & Levine, M. (2017) “Integrity” in The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/integrity/. Accessed November 17, 2020.
• Cushman, R. (2018). “Data management” in responsible conduct of research [RCR] (Social and behavioral). Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI). Retrieved from https://www.citiprogram.org/members/index.cfm?pageID=147.
• Cutler, S., Xia, Y., Lissenden, C. J., Costanzo, F., Gluckman, B., & Litzinger, T. A. (2020). A problem-based curriculum in support of structured learning experiences to prepare Ph. D. candidates for independent research. 2020 American Society for Engineering Education Virtual Annual Conference, online.
• Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1997). Information ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge environment. Oxford University Press.
• DeMets, D. L. (1999). Statistics and ethics in medical research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 5(1), 97–117.
  Article Google Scholar
• Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB). (2006). Shared responsibility, individual integrity: Scientists addressing conflicts of interest in biomedical research. Report. http://www.faseb.org/portals/2/pdfs/opa/faseb_coi_paper.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2020.
• Frugoli, J., Etgen, A. M., & Kuhar, M. (2010). Developing and communicating responsible data management policies to trainees and colleagues. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9219-1
  Article Google Scholar
• Giffels, J., Vollmer, S. H., & Bird, S. J. (2010). Editors’ overview: Topics in the responsible management of research data. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9243-1
  Article Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
  Article Google Scholar
• Harris, C. E. (2009). Is moral theory useful in practical ethics? Teaching Ethics, 10(1), 51–67.
  Article Google Scholar
• Higgins, S. (2008). The DCC curation lifecycle model. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v2i2.30
  Article Google Scholar
• Hollander, R., & Arenberg, C. R. (2009). Ethics education and scientific and engineering research: What’s been learned? What should be done? Summary of a workshop. The National Academies Press.
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845
  Article Google Scholar
• Joshi, M., & Krag, S. S. (2010). Issues in data management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 743–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9223-5
  Article Google Scholar
• Kaiser, D., & Wasserman, L. (2016, December). The Rockefeller Family Fund vs. Exxon. The New York Review of Books. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/12/08/the-rockefeller-family-fund-vs-exxon/. Accessed March 28, 2020.
• Litzinger, T. A., & Lattuca, L. R. (2014). Translating research to widespread practice in engineering education. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 375–392). Cambridge University Press.
• Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861
  Article Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
• Metcalf, J., Keller, E. F., and Boyd, D. (2016). Perspectives on big data, ethics, and society. Retrieved from http://bdes.datasociety.net/council-output/perspectives-on-big-data-ethics-and-society/
• Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Watts, L. L., Medeiros, K. E., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. (2017). Review of instructional approaches in ethics education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(3), 883–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9803-0
  Article Google Scholar
• Muskavitch, K. (2001). What is it and how is it investigated? Scientific misconduct. Research cases for use by the NIH community. https://oir.nih.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/sourcebook/documents/ethical_conduct/case_studies-2001.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2020.
• Nadim, T. (2016). Data labours: How the sequence databases GenBank and EMBL-Bank make data. Science as Culture, 25(June), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1189894
  Article Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1999). How people learning: Bridging research and practice. National Academy Press.
• O’Rourke, M., & Crowley, S. J. (2013). Philosophical intervention and cross-disciplinary science: The story of the Toolbox Project. Synthese, 190(11), 1937–1954.
  Article Google Scholar
• Olsthoorn, P. (2009). A critique of integrity: Has a commander a moral obligation to uphold his own principles? Journal of Military Ethics, 8(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570903037868
  Article Google Scholar
• Oxford University Press. (2018). “Integrity.” English Oxford living dictionaries. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/integrity
• Pennsylvania State University. (2022). Scholarship and research integrity. Retrieved from https://online.stat.psu.edu/statprogram/ethics/research-integrity.
• Phillips, T., Nestor, F., Beach, G., & Heitman, E. (2018). America COMPETES at 5 years: An analysis of research-intensive universities’ RCR training plans. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(1), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9883-5
  Article Google Scholar
• Pritchard, M. (2005). Teaching research ethics and working together—commentary on “Pedagogical objectives in teaching research ethics in science and engineering”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 367–371. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16190277
• Raghavan, S. (2016) All in the interpretation. Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. https://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/Interpretation.aspx. Accessed March 28, 2020.
• Rasko, J., & Power, C. (2015). What pushes scientists to lie? The disturbing but familiar story of Haruko Obokata. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/feb/18/haruko-obokata-stap-cells-controversy-scientists-lie
• Resnik, D. B. (2008) Who owns your data?: Ethical issues in data management. Retrieved from https://www.ncsu.edu/grad/preparing-future-leaders/docs/Ethical_Issues_in_Data_Management_Handout.pdf
• Ribes, D., & Jackson, S. J. (2013). Data bite man: The work of sustaining a long-term study. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), “Raw data” is an oxymoron (pp. 147–166). The MIT Press.
• Ripley, E., Markowitz, M., Nichols-Casebolt, A., Williams, L., & Macrina, F. (2012). Guiding the next generation of NIH investigators in responsible conduct of research: The role of the mentor. Accountability in Research, 19(4), 209–219.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rozier, K. Y., & Rozier, E. W. D. (2014). Reproducibility, correctness, and buildability: The three principles for ethical public dissemination of computer science and engineering research. In: IEEE international symposium on ethics in science, technology and engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893384
• Schienke, E. W., Baum, S. D., Tuana, N., Davis, K. J., & Keller, K. (2011). Intrinsic ethics regarding integrated assessment models for climate management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9209-3
  Article Google Scholar
• Schienke, E. W., Tuana, N., Brown, D. A., Davis, K. J., Keller, K., Shortle, J. S., Stickler, M., & Baum, S. D. (2009). The role of the national science foundation broader impacts criterion in enhancing research ethics pedagogy. Social Epistemology, 23(3–4), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720903364282
  Article Google Scholar
• Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. Broadway Books.
• Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111
  Article Google Scholar
• Tang, X., Mendieta, E., & Litzinger, T. A. (2017). Building a community of ethics educators in graduate engineering programs: Developing an ethics workshop following a user-oriented approach. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference 2017. Columbus, OH, USA.
• Tang, X., Mendieta, E., & Litzinger, T. A. (2022). The ethics of data management. Retrieved from https://sites.psu.edu/ethicsofdatamanagement/.
• Tene, O., & Polenetsky, J. (2013). Big data for all: Privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_39
  Article Google Scholar
• Todd, E. M., Torrence, B. S., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). Effective practices in the delivery of research ethics education: A qualitative review of instructional methods. Accountability in Research, 24(5), 297–321.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tractenberg, R. E., Russell, A. J., Morgan, G. J., FitzGerald, K. T., Collmann, J., Vinsel, L., Steinmann, M., & Dolling, L. M. (2015). Using ethical reasoning to amplify the reach and resonance of professional codes of conduct in training big data scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(6), 1485–1507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9613-1
  Article Google Scholar
• Tuana, N. (2007). Conceptualizing moral literacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710762409
  Article Google Scholar
• Tuana, N., & Vasko, S. (2022). STEM modules: Moral literacy. Retrieved from https://rockethics.psu.edu/stem-modules/moral-literacy/.
• Turns, J., Atman, C. J., & Adams, R. (2000). Concept maps for engineering education: A cognitively motivated tool supporting varied assessment functions. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2), 164–173.
  Article Google Scholar
• Vardeman, S. B., & Morris, M. D. (2003). Statistics and ethics. The American Statistician, 57(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1198/0003130031072
• Watts, L. L., Medeiros, K. E., Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). Are ethics training programs improving? A meta-analytic review of past and present ethics instruction in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 27(5), 351–384.
  Article Google Scholar
• Whitbeck, C. (1995). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 299–308.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references