Perils and Potentials in Qualitative Psychology (original) (raw)

Abstract

Famously, Ebbinghaus declared that psychology has a long past, but only a short history. Psychology, as something implicit to human conduct, is as old as the human race, but the science, as an explicit investigative reflection upon that conduct, is a recent invention. Within the short history of psychology, we find an even shorter history of qualitative psychology specifically. Although most founding fathers (Freud, Piaget, Bartlett etc.) worked as “qualitative psychologists”, they found no need to thematize their methods of inquiry in this manner. Since around 1980, however, a field has established itself that can be called qualitative psychology. In this paper, I discuss how this field can move sensibly into the future, and I highlight two perils and two potentials. The perils stem from neo-positivism and a threatening “McDonaldization” of qualitative research, while the potentials are related to proliferation of new forms of inquiry and a transcending of disciplinary boundaries.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The members of the research group include Anders Petersen, Mette Rønberg, Mikka Nielsen, and Ester Holte Kofod in addition to myself. The members’ backgrounds are in psychology, sociology, and social anthropology.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication and Psychology, University of Aalborg, Kroghstræde 3, 9220, Aalborg Ø, Denmark
    Svend Brinkmann

Corresponding author

Correspondence toSvend Brinkmann.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brinkmann, S. Perils and Potentials in Qualitative Psychology.Integr. psych. behav. 49, 162–173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9293-z

Download citation

Keywords