Adolphs R (2005) Could a robot have emotions? Theoretical perspectives from social cognitive neuroscience. In: Arbib M, Fellous JM (eds) Who needs emotions: the brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–28 Google Scholar
Aggarwal P, McGill A (2007) Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. J Consum Res 34(4):468–479 Article Google Scholar
Allport GW (1954) The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley, Reading Google Scholar
Arbib MA, Fellous JM (2004) Emotions: from brain to robot. Trends Cogn Sci 8(12):554–561 Article Google Scholar
Austermann A, Yamada S, Funakoshi K, Nakano M (2010) How do users interact with a pet-robot and a humanoid. In: Conference on human factors in computing systems—Proceedings, Atlanta, pp 3727–3732
Baddoura R, Venture G, Matsukata R (2012) The familiar as a key-concept in regulating the social and affective dimensions of HRI. In: IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, Osaka, pp 234–241
Bae J, Kim M (2011) Selective visual attention occurred in change detection derived by animacy of robot’s appearance. In: Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on collaboration technologies and systems, CTS 2011, pp 190–193
Barrett J (2004) Why would anyone believe in god?. AltaMira Press, Lanham Google Scholar
Barrett J (2007) Cognitive science of religion: what is it and why is it? Relig Compass 1(6):768–786 Article Google Scholar
Barrett JL (2000) Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends Cogn Sci 4(1):29–34 Article Google Scholar
Bartneck C (2008) Who like androids more: Japanese or US americans? Proceedings of the 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, Munich, pp 553–557
Bartneck C (2013) Robots in the theatre and the media. In: Design & semantics of form & movement (DeSForM2013), Philips, pp 64–70
Bartneck C, Hue J (2008) Exploring the abuse of robots. Interact Stud 9(3):415–433 Article Google Scholar
Bartneck C, Rosalia C, Menges R, Deckers I (2005) Robot abuse: limitation of the media equation. In: Proceedings of the interact 2005 workshop on agent abuse, Rome
Bartneck C, Reichenbach J, Carpenter J (2006) Use of praise and punishment in human–robot collaborative teams. In: RO-MAN 2006: the 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (IEEE Cat No. 06TH8907), Piscataway
Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff? In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, Jeju, pp 368–373
Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) My robotic doppelganger - a critical look at the uncanny valley theory. In: 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN2009. IEEE, pp 269–276
Bartneck C, Bleeker T, Bun J, Fens P, Riet L (2010) The influence of robot anthropomorphism on the feelings of embarrassment when interacting with robots. Paladyn 1:1–7 Google Scholar
Becker-Asano C, Ogawa K, Nishio S, Ishiguro H (2010) Exploring the uncanny valley with geminoid HI-1 in a real-world application. In: Proceedings of the IADIS international conference interfaces and human computer interaction 2010, IHCI. Proceedings of the IADIS international conference game and entertainment technologies 2010, Part of the MCCSIS 2010, Freiburg, pp 121–128
Bering J (2005) Origins of the social mind: evolutionary psychology and child development. The Guildford Press, New York Google Scholar
Bering J (2010) The god instinct. Nicholas Brealey, London Google Scholar
Bering JM (2006) The folk psychology of souls. Behav Brain Sci 29(05):453–462 Google Scholar
Bethel CL, Salomon K, Murphy RR (2009) Preliminary results: humans find emotive non-anthropomorphic robots more calming. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI’09, pp 291–292
Bloom P (2005) Descartes’ baby: how the science of child development explains what makes us human. Basic Books, New York Google Scholar
Boyer P (2001) Religion explained. Basic Books, New York Google Scholar
Boyer P (2003) Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends Cogn Sci 7(3):119–124 Article Google Scholar
Breazeal C (1998) Early experiments using motivations to regulate human–robot interaction. In: AAAI fall symposium on emotional and intelligent: the tangled knot of cognition. Technical report FS-98-03, pp 31–36
Breazeal C (2000) Sociable machines: expressive social exchange between humans and robots. Dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Breazeal C (2001) Affective interaction between humans and robots. In: Kelemen J, Sosik P (eds) ECAL 2001. LNAI vol 2159. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 582–591
Breazeal C (2006) Human–robot partnership. IEEE Intell Syst 21(4):79–81 Google Scholar
Breazeal C, Fitzpatrick P (2000) That certain look: social amplification of animate vision. In: Proceedings of the AAAI fall symposium on society of intelligence agents the human in the loop
Breazeal C, Scassellati B (2000) Infant-like social interactions between a robot and a human caregiver. Adapt Behav 8(1):49–74 Article Google Scholar
Breazeal C, Scassellati B (2001) Challenges in building robots that imitate. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL (eds) Imitation in animals and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Breazeal C, Buchsbaum D, Gray J, Gatenby D, Blumberg B (2005) Learning from and about others: towards using imitation to bootstrap the social understanding of others by robots. Artif Life 11(1–2):31–62 Article Google Scholar
Calverley DJ (2006) Android science and animal rights, does an analogy exist? Connect Sci 18(4):403–417 Article Google Scholar
Cheetham M, Suter P, Jancke L (2011) The human likeness dimension of the “Uncanny valley hypothesis”: behavioral and functional MRI findings. Front Hum Neurosci 5:126 Article Google Scholar
Chew S, Tay W, Smit D, Bartneck C (2010) Do social robots walk or roll? In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and Lecture notes in bioinformatics), LNAI, vol 6414. Springer, Singapore, pp 355–361
Chin M, Sims V, Clark B, Lopez G (2004) Measuring individual differences in anthropomorphism toward machines and animals. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 48. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 1252–1255
Choi J, Kim M (2009) The usage and evaluation of anthropomorphic form in robot design. In: Undisciplined! Design research society conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, 16–19 July 2008
Cohen PR (2005) If not turing’s test, then what? AI Mag 26(4):61 Google Scholar
Cooney M, Zanlungo F, Nishio S, Ishiguro H (2012) Designing a flying humanoid robot (FHR): effects of flight on interactive communication. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, Paris, pp 364–371
Darwin C (1872) 1998 The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar
Dasgupta N (2004) Implicit in group favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Soc Justice Res 17(2):143–169 Article Google Scholar
Dennett DC, Dretske F, Shurville S, Clark A, Aleksander I, Cornwell J (1994) The practical requirements for making a conscious robot. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 349(1689):133–146 Article Google Scholar
Dill V, Flach LM, Hocevar R, Lykawka C, Musse SR, Pinho MS (2012) Evaluation of the uncanny valley in CG characters. In: 12th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, IVA 2012, September 12, 2012–September 14, 2012. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and Lecture notes in bioinformatics) LNAI, vol 7502, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 511–513
DiSalvo C, Gemperle F (2003) From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, DPPI ’03, ACM, New York, pp 67–72
DiSalvo CF, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S (2002) All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In: Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. DIS, London, pp 321–326
Dovidio J, Gaertner S (1999) Reducing prejudice: combating intergroup biases. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 8(4):101–105 Article Google Scholar
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Saguy T (2009) Commonality and the complexity of “we” social attitudes and social change. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 13(1):3–20 Article Google Scholar
Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot Auton Syst 42(3—-4):177–190 ArticleMATH Google Scholar
Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4): 864–886
Epley N, Akalis S, Waytz A, Cacioppo J (2008) Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and hreyhounds: Research article. Psychol Sci 19(2):114–120 Article Google Scholar
Evers V, Maldonado HC, Brodecki TL, Hinds PJ (2008) Relational vs. group self-construal: untangling the role of national culture in HRI. In: HRI 2008: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction: living with robots, Amsterdam, pp 255–262
Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D (2011) Manipulating anthropomorphic inferences about NAO: the role of situational and dispositional aspects of effectance motivation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 467–472
Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D (2012) Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. Br J Soc Psychol 51(4):724–731 Article Google Scholar
Eyssel F, Loughnan S (2013) “It don’t matter if you’re black or white”? Effects of robot appearance and user prejudice on evaluations of a newly developed robot companion. In: 5th international conference on social robotics, ICSR 2013, October 27, 2013–October 29, 2013. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and Lecture notes in bioinformatics). LNAI, vol 8239. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 422–431
Eyssel F, Hegel F, Horstmann G, Wagner C (2010) Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication. Viareggio, pp 646–651
Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D, Bobinger S (2011) Effects of anticipated human–robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism. In: HRI 2011: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. Lausanne, pp 61–67
Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D, Bobinger S, De Ruiter L, Hegel F (2012) “If you sound like me, you must be more human”: on the interplay of robot and user features on human–robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In: HRI’12: Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 125–126
Fasola J, Matarić MJ (2012) Using socially assistive human–robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proc IEEE 100:2512–2526 Article Google Scholar
Feil-Seifer D, Matarić MJ (2011) Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features. In: HRI 2011: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 323–330
Fischer K, Lohan KS, Foth K (2012) Levels of embodiment: Linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI. In: HRI’12: Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 463–470
Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. In: IROS 2002, September 30, 2002–September 30, 2002. Robotics and autonomous systems, vol 42. Elsevier, pp 143–166
Ford K, Hayes P (1998) On computational wings: rethinking the goals of artificial intelligence-the gold standard of traditional artificial intelligence-passing the so-called turing test and thereby appearing to be. Sci Am Presents 9(4):79 Google Scholar
Forster F, Weiss A, Tscheligi M (2011) Anthropomorphic design for an interactive urban robot—the right design approach? In: HRI 2011: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, Lausanne, pp 137–138
Fussell SR, Kiesler S, Setlock LD, Yew V (2008) How people anthropomorphize robots. In: HRI 2008: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction: living with robots, Amsterdam, pp 145–152
Giullian N, Ricks D, Atherton A, Colton M, Goodrich M, Brinton B (2010) Detailed requirements for robots in autism therapy. In: Conference Proceedings: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, pp 2595–2602
Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human–robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (ROMAN 2003), 2003, pp 55–60
Gold K, Scassellati B (2007) A bayesian robot that distinguishes “self” from “other”. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the cognitive science society
Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812):619 Article Google Scholar
Gray K, Wegner D (2012) Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125(1):125–130 Article Google Scholar
Greenwald A, Banaji M (1995) Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev 102(1):4–27 Article Google Scholar
Guthrie S (1995) Faces in the clouds: a new theory of religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JYC (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human–robot interaction. Hum Factors 53(5):517–527 Article Google Scholar
Hard R (2004) The routledge handbook of greek mythology: Based on HJ Rose’s “Handbook of Greek Mythology”. Psychology Press, New York
Haslam N (2006) Dehumanization: an integrative review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10(3):252–264 Article Google Scholar
Hayes P, Ford K (1995) Turing test considered harmful. In: IJCAI (1), pp 972–977.
Hegel F, Krach S, Kircher T, Wrede B, Sagerer G (2008) Understanding social robots: a user study on anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, pp 574–579
Hegel F, Gieselmann S, Peters A, Holthaus P, Wrede B (2011) Towards a typology of meaningful signals and cues in social robotics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 72–78
Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57(2):243–259 Article Google Scholar
Hewstone M, Rubin M, Willis H (2002) Intergroup bias. Annu Rev Psychol 53:575–604 Article Google Scholar
Hogg DW, Martin F, Resnick M (1991) Braitenberg creatures. Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge Google Scholar
Ishiguro H (2006) Android science: conscious and subconscious recognition. Connect Sci 18(4):319–332 Article Google Scholar
Kahn P, Ishiguro H, Friedman B, Kanda T (2006) What is a human? Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human–robot interaction. In: The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006, pp 364–371
Kahn PH Jr, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Gill BT, Ruckert JH, Shen S, Gary HE, Reichert AL, Freier NG, Severson RL (2012) Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? In: HRI’12: Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, Boston, pp 33–40
Kamide H, Kawabe K, Shigemi S, Arai T (2013) Development of a psychological scale for general impressions of humanoid. Adv Robot 27(1):3–17 Article Google Scholar
Kanda T, Miyashita T, Osada T, Haikawa Y, Ishiguro H (2005) Analysis of humanoid appearances in human–robot interaction. In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IROS, Edmonton, pp 62–69
Kiesler S, Goetz J (2002) Mental models and cooperation with robotic assistants. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 576–577
Kiesler S, Hinds P (2004) Introduction to this special issue on human–robot interaction. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1):1–8 Article Google Scholar
Kiesler S, Powers A, Fussell SR, Torrey C (2008) Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent. Soc Cogn 26(2):169–181 Article Google Scholar
Kuchenbrandt D, Eyssel F, Bobinger S, Neufeld M (2013) When a robot’s group membership matters. Int J Soc Robot 5(3):409–417 Article Google Scholar
Lee Sl, Lau I, Kiesler S, Chiu CY (2005) Human mental models of humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2005. ICRA 2005, pp 2767–2772
Levin D, Killingsworth S, Saylor M, Gordon S, Kawamura K (2013) Tests of concepts about different kinds of minds: predictions about the behavior of computers, robots, and people. Hum Comput Interact 28(2):161–191 Google Scholar
Lohse M (2011) Bridging the gap between users’ expectations and system evaluations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 485–490
MacDorman KF, Green RD, Ho CC, Koch CT (2009) Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Comput Hum Behav 25(3):695–710 Article Google Scholar
McDermott D (1976) Artificial intelligence meets natural stupidity. ACM SIGART Bull 57:4–9 Article Google Scholar
Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35 Google Scholar
Mutlu B, Yamaoka F, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) Nonverbal leakage in robots: Communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, HRI ’09. ACM, New York, pp 69–76
Oestreicher L, Eklundh KS (2006) User expectations on human-robot co-operation. In: Robot and human interactive communication, 2006. The 15th IEEE international symposium on ROMAN 2006. IEEE, pp 91–96
Ogawa K, Bartneck C, Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ono T, Ishiguro H (2009) Can an android persuade you? In: RO-MAN 2009: the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Piscataway, pp 516–521
Oh JH, Hanson D, Kim WS, Han IY, Kim JY, Park IW (2006) Design of android type humanoid robot albert HUBO. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 1428–1433
Oztop E, Chaminade T, Franklin D (2004) Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? In: 2004 4th IEEE/RAS international conference on humanoid robots, vol 2, pp 830–841
Paluck E (2009) Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: a field experiment in Rwanda. J Pers Soc Psychol 96(3):574–587 Article Google Scholar
Pettigrew T (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annu Rev Psychol 49:65–85 Article Google Scholar
Pettigrew T, Tropp L (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 90(5):751–783 Article Google Scholar
Powers A, Kramer ADI, Lim S, Kuo J, Lee SL, Kiesler S (2005) Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, vol 2005. Nashville, pp 158–163
Proudfoot D (2011) Anthropomorphism and AI: turing’s much misunderstood imitation game. Artif Intell 175(5):950–957 ArticleMathSciNet Google Scholar
Proudfoot D (2013a) Can a robot smile? Wittgenstein on facial expression. In: Racine TP, Slaney KL (eds) A Wittgensteinian perspective on the use of conceptual analysis in psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 172–194 Google Scholar
Proudfoot D (2013b) Rethinking turing’s test. J Philos 110(7):391–411 Google Scholar
Proudfoot D (2015) Turing’s child-machines. In: Bowen J, Copeland J, Sprevak M, Wilson R (eds) The turing guide: life, work, legacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Proudfoot D (2014) Turing’s three senses of ”Emotional”. Int J Synth Emot 5(2):7–20 Article Google Scholar
Pyysiäinen I (2004) Religion is neither costly nor beneficial. Behav Brain Sci 27(06):746–746 Article Google Scholar
Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar
Rehm M, Krogsager A (2013) Negative affect in human robot interaction—impoliteness in unexpected encounters with robots. In: 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, pp 45–50
Reichenbach J, Bartneck C, Carpenter J (2006) Well done, robot! - The importance of praise and presence in human–robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, Hatfield, pp 86–90
Riek LD, Rabinowitch TC, Chakrabarti B, Robinson P (2008) How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI’09, San Diego, pp 245–246
Riether N, Hegel F, Wrede B, Horstmann G (2012) Social facilitation with social robots? In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, Boston, HRI ’12, pp 41–48
Saerbeck M, Schut T, Bartneck C, Janse MD (2010) Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, vol 3, pp 1613–1622
Salem M, Eyssel F, Rohlfing K, Kopp S, Joublin F (2011) Effects of gesture on the perception of psychological anthropomorphism: a case study with a humanoid robot, Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and Lecture notes in bioinformatics). LNAI, vol 7072. Springer, Berlin
Saver JL, Rabin J (1997) The neural substrates of religious experience. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 9(3):498–510 Article Google Scholar
Saygin AP, Chaminade T, Ishiguro H, Driver J, Frith C (2012) The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 7(4):413–422 Article Google Scholar
Scassellati B (2000) How robotics and developmental psychology complement each other. In: NSF/DARPA workshop on development and learning
Scassellati B (2002) Theory of mind for a humanoid robot. Auton Robots 12(1):13–24 ArticleMATH Google Scholar
Scassellati B (2007) How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and understand autism. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 28, pp 552–563
Scassellati B, Crick C, Gold K, Kim E, Shic F, Sun G (2006) Social development [robots]. Comput Intell Mag IEEE 1(3):41–47 Article Google Scholar
Schmitz M (2011) Concepts for life-like interactive objects. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, TEI ’11. ACM, New York, pp 157–164
Shic F, Scassellati B (2007) Pitfalls in the modeling of developmental systems. Int J Hum Robot 4(2):435–454 Article Google Scholar
Short E, Hart J, Vu M, Scassellati B (2010) No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot. In: 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI 2010, Osaka, pp 219–226
Sims VK, Chin MG, Lum HC, Upham-Ellis L, Ballion T, Lagattuta NC (2009) Robots’ auditory cues are subject to anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society, vol 3, pp 1418–1421
Spexard T, Haasch A, Fritsch J, Sagerer G (2006) Human-like person tracking with an anthropomorphic robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vol 2006. Orlando, pp 1286–1292
Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Woods SN, Walters ML, Koay KL (2007) Looking good? appearance preferences and robot personality inferences at zero acquaintance. In: AAAI spring symposium—Technical report, vol SS-07-07. Stanford, pp 86–92
Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Walters ML, Koay KL (2008) Sharing spaces with robots in a home scenario—anthropomorphic attributions and their effect on proxemic expectations and evaluations in a live HRI trial. In: AAAI fall symposium—Technical report, vol FS-08-02, Arlington, pp 116–123
Tapus A, Matari MJ, Scassellati B (2007) Socially assistive robotics [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robotics Autom Mag 14(1):35–42 Article Google Scholar
Torta E, Van Dijk E, Ruijten PAM, Cuijpers RH (2013) The ultimatum game as measurement tool for anthropomorphism in human–robot interaction. In: 5th international conference on social robotics, ICSR 2013, October 27, 2013–October 29, 2013. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and Lecture notes in bioinformatics). LNAI, vol 8239. Springer Verlag, pp 209–217
Trimble M, Freeman A (2006) An investigation of religiosity and the Gastaut-Geschwind syndrome in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 9(3):407–414 Article Google Scholar
Turing A (2004a) Can digital computers think? In: Copeland BJ (ed) The essential turing. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Turing A (2004b) Intelligent machinery. In: Copeland BJ (ed) The essential turing. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Turing A (2004c) Lecture on the automatic computing engine. In: Copeland BJ (ed) The essential turing. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Turing A, Braithwaite R, Jefferson G, Newman M (2004) Can automatic calculating machines be said to think? In: Copeland J (ed) The essential turing. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Turkle S (2010) In good company? On the threshold of robotic companions. In: Wilks Y (ed) Close engagements with artifical companions: key social, psychological, ethical and design issues. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, pp 3–10 Chapter Google Scholar
Verkuyten M (2006) Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: a social identity perspective. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 17(1):148–184 Article Google Scholar
Vorauer J, Gagnon A, Sasaki S (2009) Salient intergroup ideology and intergroup interaction. Psychol Sci 20(7):838–845 Article Google Scholar
Wade E, Parnandi AR, Matari MJ (2011) Using socially assistive robotics to augment motor task performance in individuals post-stroke. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 2403–2408
Walters ML, Syrdal DS, Koay KL, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R (2008) Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, pp 707–712
Walters ML, Koay KL, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R (2009) Preferences and perceptions of robot appearance and embodiment in human–robot interaction trials. Adaptive and emergent behaviour and complex systems—proceedings of the 23rd Convention of the society for the study of artificial intelligence and simulation of behaviour, AISB 2009, Edinburgh, pp 136–143
Wang E, Lignos C, Vatsal A, Scassellati B (2006) Effects of head movement on perceptions of humanold robot behavior. In: HRI 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM conference on human–robot interaction, vol 2006, pp 180–185
Wilson EO (2006) The creation: an appeal to save life on earth. Wiley Online Library, Hoboken Google Scholar
Wittenbrink B, Judd C, Park B (2001) Spontaneous prejudice in context: variability in automatically activated attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol 81(5):815–827 Article Google Scholar
Yamamoto M (1993) Sozzy: a hormone-driven autonomous vacuum cleaner. In: International Society for Optical Engineering, vol 2058, pp 212–213
Yogeeswaran K, Dasgupta N (2014) The devil is in the details: abstract versus concrete construals of multiculturalism differentially impact intergroup relations. J Pers Soc Psychol 106(5):772–789
von Zitzewitz J, Boesch PM, Wolf P, Riener R (2013) Quantifying the human likeness of a humanoid robot. Int J Soc Robot 5(2):263–276
Złotowski J, Strasser E, Bartneck C (2014) Dimensions of anthropomorphism: from humanness to humanlikeness. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI ’14. ACM, New York, pp 66–73