The effects of the regulated learning-supported flipped classroom on student performance (original) (raw)

References

• Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
  Article Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
  Article Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
  Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.
• Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers and Education, 115, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
  Article Google Scholar
• Braun, I., Rittter, S., & Vasko, M. (2014). Inverted classroom by topic: A study in mathematics for electrical engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3299
  Article Google Scholar
• Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693487
  Article Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. K. (2012). Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A discussion. Metacognition Learning, 7, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9086-z
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
  Article Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3
  Article Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y.-H., & Wang, H.-C. (2015). Effects of the in-flipped classroom on the learning environment of database engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(2), 454–460.
  Google Scholar
• Chuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12530
  Article Google Scholar
• Filiz, O., & Kurt, A. (2015). Flipped learning: Misunderstandings and the truth. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5, 215–229.
  Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., Perényi, Á., & Birdthistle, N. (2018). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702
  Article Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616726
  Article Google Scholar
• Galway, L. P., Corbett, K. K., Takaro, T. K., Tairyan, K., & Frank, E. (2014). A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC Medical Education, 14, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-181
  Article Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 65–84). Routledge.
  Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 83–106). Routledge.
  Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.
  Article Google Scholar
• Halili, S. H., Razak, R. A., & Zainuddin, Z. (2014). Enhancing collaborative learning in flipped classroom. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(7), 147–149.
  Google Scholar
• Hao, Y. W. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032
  Article Google Scholar
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
  Google Scholar
• Hsu, T.-C. (2018). Behavioural sequential analysis of using an instant response application to enhance peer interactions in a flipped classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1283332
  Article Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
  Article Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374.
  Article Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Koivuniemi, M. (2016). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 42, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006
  Article Google Scholar
• Jo, K. J., & Kim, J. D. (2016). Tendencies action of college students in flipped learning instruction. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 10(4), 203–214.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kalman, Y., & Blau, I. (2017, June). The implications of a national high-stakes MOOC on the business models of academic institutions, and on their faculty and students. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Distance and E-learning Network (EDEN), Jönköping, Sweden.
• Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Oigara, J. N. (2014). Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model. IGI Global.
  Book Google Scholar
• Kim, H. (2010). Developments and effects of collaboration scripts for argumentation based on activity theory in computer supported collaborative learning [Doctoral dissertation, Hanyang University]. dCollection. http://dcollection.hanyang.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000058551
• Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
  Article Google Scholar
• Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers and Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
  Article Google Scholar
• Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  Article Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Kang, S., & Kim, C. (2016). Analysis of the structural relationship among factors related to the effects of flipped learning. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(1), 87–100.
  Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H. (2017). Scripting to enhance university students’ critical thinking in flipped learning: Implications of the delayed effect on science reading literacy. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1372483
  Article Google Scholar
• Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002
  Article Google Scholar
• Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8
  Article Google Scholar
• Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56, 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2249066
  Article Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. D., Brown, B., & Jacobsen, M. (2015). Learning designs using flipped classroom instruction. Conception D’apprentissage à L’aide De L’instruction En Classe Inversee, 41, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2PG7P
  Article Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
  Article Google Scholar
• Palmer, K. (2015). Flipping a calculus class: One instructor’s experience. Primus, 25(9–10), 886–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1050618
  Article Google Scholar
• Patanwala, A. E., Erstad, B. L., & Murphy, J. E. (2017). Student use of flipped classroom videos in a therapeutics course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.043
  Article Google Scholar
• Pauli, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Bray, D., Michie, F., & Street, B. (2007). Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701413746
  Article Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Educational psychology at the millennium: A look back and a look forward. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_01
  Article Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
  Article Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components in classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
  Article Google Scholar
• Popov, V., Brinkman, D., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., Kuznetsov, A., & Noroozi, O. (2012). Multicultural student group work in higher education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.09.004
  Article Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (2008). Explanation giving and receiving in cooperative learning groups. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 227–242). Springer.
  Google Scholar
• Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction-what can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.199
  Article Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2000). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Prentice-Hall.
  Google Scholar
• Shibukawa, S., & Taguchi, M. (2019). Exploring the difficulty on students’ preparation and the effective instruction in the flipped classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09220-3
  Article Google Scholar
• Sletten, S. R. (2017). Investigating flipped learning: Student self-regulated learning, perceptions, and achievement in an introductory biology course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9683-8
  Article Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C. Y., Wu, Y. T., & Lee, W. I. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students’ self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12444
  Article Google Scholar
• Sun, Z. (2015). The role of self-regulation on students’ learning in an undergraduate flipped math class [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
• Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.003
  Article Google Scholar
• Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009a). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
  Article Google Scholar
• Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009b). Self-and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213584
  Article Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Perry, N. E. (2013). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O’Donnell, C. Chan, & C. Chinn (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462–479). Taylor & Francis.
  Google Scholar
• Wolters, C., Pintrich, P., & Karabenick, S. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In K. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? (pp. 251–270). Springer.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Wong, B. Y. L., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510290
  Article Google Scholar
• Yang, I., Lee, H., Lee, H., & Cho, H. (2009). The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(2), 203–220.
  Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1999). Commentary: Toward a cyclically interactive view of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00021-X
  Article Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
  Article Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
  Article Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Developing a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated Learning Strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614
  Article Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Download references