Measuring Mindfulness: First Steps Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Mindfulness Scale (original) (raw)

References

• Acock, A. C. (2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1012–1028.
  Article Google Scholar
• Baer, R. (Ed.). (2010). Assessing mindfulness and acceptance processes in clients: Illuminating the theory and practice of change. Oakland: Context Press/New Harbinger.
  Google Scholar
• Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11, 191–206.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). In G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Bergomi, C. (2007). Achtsamkeit, buddhistische Meditation und psychische Gesundheit (Unpublished master’s thesis). Psychology Department, University of Bern, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.upd.unibe.ch/research/papers/Liz_Bergomi.pdf.
• Berking, M., & Znoj, H. (2008). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur standardisierten Selbsteinschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen (SEK-27). Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 56, 141–152.
  Article Google Scholar
• Berking, M., Wupperman, P., Reichardt, A., Pejic, T., Dippel, A., & Znoj, H. (2008). General emotion-regulation skills as a treatment target in psychotherapy. Behavior Research and Therapy, 46, 1230–1237.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241.
  Article Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
  Google Scholar
• Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Perils and promises in defining and measuring mindfulness: observations from experience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, Science & Practice, 11, 242–248.
  Article Google Scholar
• Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211–237.
  Article Google Scholar
• Brown, K. W., West, A. M., Loverich, T. M., & Biegel, G. M. (2011). Assessing adolescent mindfulness: Validation of an adapted mindful attention awareness scale in adolescent normative and psychiatric populations. Psychological Assessment, in press: Epub ahead of print retrieved May 10, 2011, doi: 10.1037/a0021338.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.
  Google Scholar
• Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: the development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1, 11–34.
  Google Scholar
• Burg, J., & Michalak, J. (2010). Assessing mindfulness: Is there an alternative to questionnaires? Talk given at the XL European Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies Congress, Milan, Italy.
• Cardaciotto, L. (2005). Assessing mindfulness: The development of a bi-dimensional measure of awareness and acceptance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia.
• Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia mindfulness scale. Assessment, 15, 204–223.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1974). Radial item parcel factoring vs. item factoring in defining personality structure in questionnaires: theory and experimental checks. Australian Journal of Psychology, 26, 103–119.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 451–455.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Christopher, M. S., Charoensuk, S., Gilbert, B. D., Neary, T. J., & Pearce, K. L. (2009). Mindfulness in Thailand and the United States: a case of apples versus oranges? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 590–612.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Coffey, K. A., & Hartman, M. (2008). Mechanisms of action in the inverse relationship between mindfulness and psychological distress. Complementary Health Practice Review, 13, 79–91.
  Google Scholar
• Collins, S. E., Chwala, N., Hsu, S. H., Grow, J., Otto, J. M., & Marlatt, G. A. (2009). Language-based measures of mindfulness: initial validity and clinical utility. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 743–749.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation: A Pear-reviewed Electronic Journal, 10, 1–9. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf.
• Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147–167.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dimidjian, S., & Linehan, M. M. (2003). Defining an agenda for future research on the clinical application of mindfulness practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 166–171.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dobkin, P. L. (2008). Mindfulness-based stress reduction: what processes are at work? Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 14, 8–16.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. S. (2002). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, 2nd Edition, CUP.
• Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
  Article Google Scholar
• Feldman, G. C., Hayes, A. M., Kumar, S. M., Greeson, J. G., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177–190.
  Article Google Scholar
• Franke, G. H. (2000). Brief symptom inventory (BSI). Göttingen: Beltz.
  Google Scholar
• Frewen, P. A., Evans, El M., Maraj, N., Dozois, D. J. A., & Partridge, K. (2008). Letting go: mindfulness and negative automatic thinking. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 758–774.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Greco, L. A., Baer, R. A., & Smith, G. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, in press: Epub ahead of print retrieved May 10, 2011, doi: 10.1037/a0022819.
• Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 35–43.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gunaratana, B. H. (2002). Mindfulness in plain English. Somerville: Wisdom.
  Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 255–262.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (2003). Mindfulness: method and process. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 161–165.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. D. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152–1168.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, T., Zarbock, G., Ströhle, G., & Michalak, J. (September, 2011). The German version of the five-facet mindfulness questionnnaire (FFMQ): Psychometric properties and relationship with the Schema Mode Inventory. Talk given at the 41st European Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies Congress, Reykjavík, Iceland.
• Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 169–183.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M., & Schneider, R. J. (1995). Personality traits, taxonomies, and applications in organizations. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individuals and behavior in organizations (pp. 31–88). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement: reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis &C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339–369). New York: Cambridge.
• Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis, Springer series in statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
  Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1999). How large can a standardized coefficient be? Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. Available at www.ssicentral.com.
• Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Dell.
  Google Scholar
• Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.
  Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
  Google Scholar
• Lau, M., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto mindfulness scale: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 1445–1467.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., & Tate, E. B. (2007). The multi-faceted nature of mindfulness. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 251–255. doi:10.1080/10478400701598355.
  Article Google Scholar
• Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse. Addict Behavior, 30, 1335–1341.
  Article Google Scholar
• Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive behavioral therapy of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.
  Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
  Article Google Scholar
• Malinowski, P. (2008). Mindfulness as psychological dimension: concepts and applications. Irish Journal of Psychology, 29, 153–164.
  Article Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and danger in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
  Article Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In Maydeu-Olivares, A. & McArdle, J. (Eds.), Contemporary Psychometrics: A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.
  Article Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., Dailey, R., & Lemus, D. (2002). The use of exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 562–577.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–76.
  Google Scholar
• Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: a new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford.
  Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L., Astin, J., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 373–36.
  Google Scholar
• Shigaki, C. L., Glass, B., & Schopp, L. H. (2006). Mindfulness-based stress reduction in medical settings. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 13, 209–216.
  Article Google Scholar
• Smith, G. T., & McCarthy, D. M. (1995). Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 300–308.
  Article Google Scholar
• Smith, G. T., Fischer, S., & Fister, S. M. (2003). Incremental validity principles in test construction. Psychological Assessment, 15, 467–477.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Teasdale, J. D. (1999). Metacognition, mindfulness and modification of mood disorders. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 5, 146–155.
  Article Google Scholar
• Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., & Williams, J. M. G. (1995). How does cognitive therapy prevent relapse and why should attentional control (mindfulness) training help? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 25–39.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. L., & Waltz, J. (2007). Everyday mindfulness and mindfulness meditation: overlapping constructs or not? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1875–1885.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31–65.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1543–1555.
  Article Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 57–75). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  Google Scholar
• Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Factors influencing five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references