Reliability estimation for inverse Pareto lifetime model based on unified hybrid censored data (original) (raw)
Abstract
Censoring plays an important role in the reliability and life testing trials due to its cost optimality and time reduction properties. The unified hybrid censoring scheme is the combination of the generalized type-I and type-II hybrid censoring schemes. In this paper, our objective is to study the classical and Bayesian estimation methods of the parameter and reliability characteristics from the inverse Pareto lifetime model under the unified hybrid censoring scheme. In the classical estimation methods, the maximum likelihood and associated asymptotic confidence interval estimators are derived. In Bayesian estimation, the Bayes estimators under squared error loss function and the highest posterior density (HPD) credible intervals based on the informative and non-informative priors are developed. For the Bayesian computations, the Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques are used to compute Bayes and HPD credible interval estimates. A quantitative outcome of the objectives has been shown by a Monte Carlo simulation and with the help of a real-life application.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Arasteh B, Khosroshahizadeh S (2020) Software reliability enhancement against hardware transient errors using inherently reliable data structures. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11:883–898
Article Google Scholar - Arasteh B, Miremadi SG, Rahmani AM (2014) Developing inherently resilient software against soft-errors based on algorithm level inherent features. J Electron Test 30:193–212
Article Google Scholar - Balakrishnan N, Kundu D (2013) Hybrid censoring: models, inferential results and applications. Comput Stat Data Anal 57(1):166–209
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Balakrishnan N, Rasouli A, Sanjari Farsipour N (2008) Exact likelihood inference based on an unified hybrid censored sample from the exponential distribution. J Stat Comput Simul 78(5):475–488
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Bhattacharya R, Pradhan B, Dewanji A (2014) Optimum life testing plans in presence of hybrid censoring: a cost function approach. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind 30(5):519–528
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Chakrabarty JB, Chowdhury S, Roy S (2021) Optimum reliability acceptance sampling plan using type-i generalized hybrid censoring scheme for products under warranty. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 38(3):780–799
Article Google Scholar - Chandrasekar B, Childs A, Balakrishnan N (2004) Exact likelihood inference for the exponential distribution under generalized Type-I and Type-II hybrid censoring. Nav Res Logist 51(7):994–1004
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Chen M-H, Shao Q-M (1999) Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat 8(1):69–92
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Dutta S, Lio Y, Kayal S (2023) Parametric inferences using dependent competing risks data with partially observed failure causes from MOBK distribution under unified hybrid censoring. J Stat Comput Simul 1–24
- Efron B (1988) Logistic regression, survival analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier curve. J Am Stat Assoc 83(402):414–425
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Epstein B (1954) Truncated life tests in the exponential case. Ann Math Stat 25(3):555–564
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Garg R, Kumar K (2021) On estimation of \({P(Y < X)}\) for generalized inverted exponential distribution based on hybrid censored data. Statistica (Bologna) 81(3):335–361
Google Scholar - Ghazal M, Hasaballah H (2017) Bayesian estimations using MCMC approach under exponentiated Rayleigh distribution based on unified hybrid censored scheme. J Stat Appl Probab 6:329–344
Article Google Scholar - Guo L, Gui W (2018) Bayesian and classical estimation of the inverse Pareto distribution and its application to strength-stress models. Am J Math Manag Sci 37(1):80–92
Google Scholar - Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 25(1):97–109
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Helmy BA, Hassan AS, El-Kholy AK (2021) Analysis of uncertainty measure using unified hybrid censored data with applications. J Taibah Univ Sci 15(1):1130–1143
Article Google Scholar - Kumar K, Kumar I (2020) Parameter estimation for inverse Pareto distribution with randomly censored life time data. Int J Agric Stat Sci 16(1):419–430
Google Scholar - Kumar I, Kumar K (2022) On estimation of \({P (V< U)}\) for inverse Pareto distribution under progressively censored data. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 13(1):189–202
Article Google Scholar - Kumar K, Kumari A (2023) Bayesian and likelihood estimation in two inverse Pareto populations under joint progressive censoring. J Indian Soc Probab Stat 24(2):283–310
Article Google Scholar - Kumar I, Kumar K, Ghosh IG (2023) Reliability estimation in inverse Pareto distribution using progressively first failure censored data. Am J Math Manag Sci 42(2):126–147
Google Scholar - Mahmoud M, Diab L, Ghazal M (2019) On study of exponentiated gamma distribution based on unified hybrid censored data. Al-Azhar Bull Sci 30(2–B):13–27
Article Google Scholar - Mustafa G, Ijaz M, Jamal F (2022) Order statistics of inverse Pareto distribution. Comput J Math Stat Sci 1(1):51–62
Google Scholar - Natzoufras I (2009) Bayesian modeling using WinBugs. Series B. Wiley, New York
Book Google Scholar - Panahi H, Sayyareh A (2016) Estimation and prediction for a unified hybrid-censored Burr Type XII distribution. J Stat Comput Simul 86(1):55–73
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Safari MAM, Masseran N, Ibrahim K, Hussain SI (2019) A robust and efficient estimator for the tail index of inverse Pareto distribution. Phys A 517:431–439
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Sen T, Bhattacharya R, Pradhan B, Tripathi YM (2021) Statistical inference and Bayesian optimal life-testing plans under Type-II unified hybrid censoring scheme. Qual Reliab Eng Int 37(1):78–89
Article Google Scholar - Soni S, Shukla A, Kumar K (2023) Estimation and prediction in generalized half logistic lifetime model using hybrid censored data. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 40(9):2041–2063
Article Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editor and two anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions, which led to the improved version of the earlier manuscript.
Funding
There is no specific funding obtained for this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Department of Statistics, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh, 123031, India
Kapil Kumar - Department of Statistics, Kirori Mal College, New Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
Shrawan Kumar - Department of Statistics, Ramanujan College, New Delhi, Delhi, 110019, India
Renu Garg - Department of Statistics, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya, 824236, India
Indrajeet Kumar
Authors
- Kapil Kumar
- Shrawan Kumar
- Renu Garg
- Indrajeet Kumar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toIndrajeet Kumar.
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, K., Kumar, S., Garg, R. et al. Reliability estimation for inverse Pareto lifetime model based on unified hybrid censored data.Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 15, 2473–2482 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02265-3
- Received: 20 May 2022
- Revised: 06 November 2023
- Accepted: 22 January 2024
- Published: 21 February 2024
- Version of record: 21 February 2024
- Issue date: June 2024
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02265-3