Correction: Introspection Dynamics in Asymmetric Multiplayer Games (original) (raw)

Correction to: Dynamic Games and Applications (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-023-00525-8

In the original publication of the article, the author noticed the errors in the panel of Fig. 4.

The figure titles and axes labels of panels (b) and (c) have turned out to be unrecognizable format in this article. Figure 4 should have appeared as shown below.

Fig. 4

Introspection dynamics in the linear public goods game with peer rewarding. Here, a game with three asymmetric players, each having 16 possible strategies, is studied. Players cooperate in a linear public goods and then reward each other in the next stage after everyone’s contribution is revealed. In the first stage, players can condition their cooperation on the information they have about their co-players’ rewarding strategies. For a full description of the model, please see the section on rewarding. In this example, players 1 and 2 are identical in all aspects while player 3 differs from them in only a single aspect. Here, Eq. (7) is used to plot the exact probability with which players cooperate and reward cooperation in the long run. There are three types of asymmetry for player 3. a First, the case where player 3 has a high cost of rewarding compared to players 1 and 2, 0.7 = _γ_3 > _γ_1 = 0.1. b Then, the case where player 3 is less productive than their co-players, 1.2 = _r_3 < _r_1 = 2. c Finally, the case where player 3 has less information about co-players’ rewarding strategies than the others, that is, 0.1 = _λ_3 < _λ_1 = 0.9. For all plots, a high value for the selection strength, β = 10, is considered. Unless otherwise mentioned, the following parameters are maintained for all panels: c i = 1 (individual cost of cooperation), r i = 2 (individual productivity), γ i = 0.1 (individual cost of rewarding), and λ i = 0.9 (individual information about co-players’ strategies). In panels (a) and (b), the reward value is ρ = 0.3 while for panel (c), the reward value ρ = 1

The original article has been corrected.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Research Group Dynamics of Social Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306, Ploen, Germany
    Marta C. Couto & Saptarshi Pal

Authors

  1. Marta C. Couto
  2. Saptarshi Pal

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMarta C. Couto.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Couto, M.C., Pal, S. Correction: Introspection Dynamics in Asymmetric Multiplayer Games.Dyn Games Appl 13, 1286–1287 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-023-00538-3

Download citation