Using frame-based resources for sentiment analysis within the financial domain (original) (raw)

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., Passonneau, R.: Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, LSM ’11, pp. 30–38. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2011). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2021109.2021114. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
  2. Allan, K.: Natural Language Semantics. Wiley, London (2001)
    Google Scholar
  3. Atzeni, M., Dridi, A., Recupero, D.R.: Fine-grained sentiment analysis on financial microblogs and news headlines. In: Dragoni, M., Solanki, M., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) Semantic Web Challenges-4th SemWebEval Challenge at ESWC 2017, Portoroz, Slovenia, May 28–June 1, 2017, Revised Selected Papers, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 769, pp. 124–128. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69146-6_11
    Chapter Google Scholar
  4. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: A Nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.I., Nixon, L., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) The Semantic Web: 6th International Semantic Web Conference, Proceedings of the 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, 11–15 November 2007, pp. 722–735. Springer, Berlin (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52
    Chapter Google Scholar
  5. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S., Rosner, M., Tapias, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), pp. 2200–2204. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta, Malta (2010)
  6. Baker, C.F., Fillmore, C.J., Lowe, J.B.: The Berkeley FrameNet project. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, COLING ’98, pp. 86–90. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (1998). https://doi.org/10.3115/980451.980860
  7. Barbosa, L., Feng, J.: Robust sentiment detection on twitter from biased and noisy data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, COLING ’10, pp. 36–44. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2010). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1944566.1944571
  8. Blei, D.M.: Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 55(4), 77–84 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Cambria, E., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: SenticNet 2: a semantic and affective resource for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Youngblood, G.M., McCarthy, P.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pp. 202–207. AAAI Press (2012). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/flairs/flairs2012.html#CambriaHH12. Accessed 29 Jan 2018
  10. Cambria, E., Hussain, A.: Sentic Computing: Techniques, Tools, and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2012)
    Book Google Scholar
  11. Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: SenticNet: a publicly available semantic resource for opinion mining. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: Commonsense Knowledge, AAAI Technical Report, vol. FS-10-02, pp. 14–18. AAAI (2010). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/aaaifs/aaaifs2010-02.html#CambriaSHH10. Accessed 5 Mar 2018
  12. Cortis, K., Freitas, A., Daudert, T., Huerlimann, M., Zarrouk, M., Handschuh, S., Davis, B.: Semeval-2017 task 5: Fine-grained sentiment analysis on financial microblogs and news. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017), pp. 519–535 (2017)
  13. da Silva, N.F., Hruschka, E.R., Hruschka, E.R.: Tweet sentiment analysis with classifier ensembles. Decis. Support Syst. 66(C), 170–179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.07.003
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Dessì, D., Recupero, D.R., Fenu, G., Consoli, S.: Exploiting cognitive computing and frame semantic features for biomedical document clustering. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Web Solutions for Large-scale Biomedical Data Analytics co-located with 14th Extended Semantic Web Conference, SeWeBMeDA@ESWC 2017, Portoroz, Slovenia, 28 May 2017, pp. 20–34 (2017). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1948/paper3.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  15. Devitt, A., Ahmad, K.: Sentiment polarity identification in financial news: a cohesion-based approach, pp. 984–991. Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, CZ (2007). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/sentiment-polarity-identification-in-financial-news-a-cohesion-based-approach/
  16. Di Rosa, E., Durante, A.: Evaluating industrial and research sentiment analysis engines on multiple sources. In: Esposito, F., Basili, R., Ferilli, S., Lisi, F.A. (eds.) AI*IA 2017 Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 141–155. Springer, Cham (2017)
    Chapter Google Scholar
  17. Dragoni, M., Recupero, D.R.: Challenge on fine-grained sentiment analysis within ESWC2016. In: Semantic Web Challenges-Third SemWebEval Challenge at ESWC 2016, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29-June 2, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 79–94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46565-4_6
    Chapter Google Scholar
  18. Dragoni, M., Recupero, D.R. (eds.): Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop at ESWC on Emotions, Modality, Sentiment Analysis and the Semantic Web Co-located with 14th ESWC 2017, Portroz, Slovenia, 28 May 2017, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1874. CEUR-WS.org (2017). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1874
  19. Dragoni, M., Recupero, D.R., Denecke, K., Deng, Y., Declerck, T. (eds.): Joint Proceedings of the 2th Workshop on Emotions, Modality, Sentiment Analysis and the Semantic Web and the 1st International Workshop on Extraction and Processing of Rich Semantics from Medical Texts co-located with ESWC 2016, Heraklion, Greece, 29 May 2016, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1613. CEUR-WS.org (2016). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1613
  20. Drake, A., Ringger, E.K., Ventura, D.: Sentiment regression: using real-valued scores to summarize overall document sentiment. In: Proceedings of the 2th IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2008), pp. 152–157. Santa Clara, California, USA, 4–7 August 2008 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2008.67
  21. Dridi, A., Atzeni, M., Recupero, D.R.: Bearish-bullish sentiment analysis on financial microblogs. In: Dragoni, M., Recupero, D.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop at ESWC on Emotions, Modality, Sentiment Analysis and the Semantic Web Co-located with 14th ESWC 2017, Portroz, Slovenia, 28 May 2017, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1874. CEUR-WS.org (2017). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1874/paper_2.pdf
  22. Dridi, A., Atzeni, M., Reforgiato Recupero, D.: Finenews: fine-grained semantic sentiment analysis on financial microblogs and news. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybernet. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0805-x
  23. Dridi, A., Reforgiato Recupero, D.: Leveraging semantics for sentiment polarity detection in social media. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybernet. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0727-z
  24. Du, J., Xu, H., Huang, X.: Box office prediction based on microblog. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(4), 1680–1689 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.065
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Federici, M., Dragoni, M.: A knowledge-based approach for aspect-based opinion mining. In: Sack, H., Dietze, S., Tordai, A., Lange, C. (eds.) Semantic Web Challenges, pp. 141–152. Springer, Cham (2016)
    Chapter Google Scholar
  26. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
    MATH Google Scholar
  27. Feuerriegel, S., Ratku, A., Neumann, D.: Analysis of how underlying topics in financial news affect stock prices using latent dirichlet allocation. In: Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), HICSS ’16, pp. 1072–1081. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.137
  28. Fillmore, C.J.: Frame semantics and the nature of language. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. Conf. Orig. Dev. Lang. Speech 280(1), 20–32 (1976)
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Gaillat, T., Zarrouk, M., Freitas, A., Davis, B.: The ssix corpus: a trilingual gold standard corpus for sentiment analysis in financial microblogs. In: Proceedings of the 11th Edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, May 7–12 Miyazaki (Japan) (2018)
  30. Gangemi, A.: What’s in a schema? A formal metamodel for ECG and FrameNet. In: Huang, C.R., Calzolari, N., Gangemi, A., Lenci, A., Oltramari, A., Prévot, L. (eds.) Ontology and the Lexicon: A Natural language Processing Perspective, Studies in Natural Language Processing, pp. 144–181. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
  31. Gangemi, A., Alam, M., Asprino, L., Presutti, V., Recupero, D.R.: Framester: A Wide Coverage Linguistic Linked Data Hub. In: Proceedings of the Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management-20th International Conference, EKAW 2016, Bologna, Italy, 19–23 November 2016, pp. 239–254 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_16
    Google Scholar
  32. Gangemi, A., Alani, H., Nissim, M., Cambria, E., Recupero, D.R., Lanfranchi, V., Kauppinen, T. (eds.): Joint Proceedings of the 1th Workshop on Semantic Sentiment Analysis (SSA2014), and the Workshop on Social Media and Linked Data for Emergency Response (SMILE 2014) Co-located with 11th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2014), Crete, Greece, May 25th, 2014, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1329. CEUR-WS.org (2015). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1329
  33. Gangemi, A., Navigli, R., Velardi, P.: The OntoWordNet Project: Extension and Axiomatization of Conceptual Relations in WordNet. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE: OTM Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE 2003, Catania, Sicily, Italy, 3–7 November 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2888, pp. 820–838. Springer, Berlin (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_52
    Chapter Google Scholar
  34. Gangemi, A., Presutti, V., Recupero, D.R.: Frame-based detection of opinion holders and topics: a model and a tool. IEEE Comput. Int. Mag. 9(1), 20–30 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2013.2291688
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Gatti, L., Guerini, M., Turchi, M.: Sentiwords: deriving a high precision and high coverage lexicon for sentiment analysis. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 7(4), 409–421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2476456
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Ghiassi, M., Skinner, J., Zimbra, D.: Twitter brand sentiment analysis: a hybrid system using N-gram analysis and dynamic artificial neural network. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(16), 6266–6282 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.057
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Ghosh, A., Li, G., Veale, T., Rosso, P., Shutova, E., Barnden, J., Reyes, A.: SemEval-2015 Task 11: sentiment analysis of figurative language in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 470–478. Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver, Colorado (2015). http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/S15-2080
  38. Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L.: Twitter Sentiment Classification using Distant Supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford University (2009)
  39. Goonatilake, R., Herath, S.: The volatility of the stock market and news. Int. Res. J. Finance Econ. 3(11), 53–66 (2007)
    Google Scholar
  40. Kalyani, J., Bharathi, H.N., Jyothi, R.: Stock trend prediction using news sentiment analysis. CoRR abs/1607.01958 (2016). arXiv:1607.01958
  41. Khadjeh Nassirtoussi, A., Aghabozorgi, S., Ying Wah, T., Ngo, D.C.L.: Review: text mining for market prediction: a systematic review. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(16), 7653–7670 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.009
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Khadjeh Nassirtoussi, A., Aghabozorgi, S., Ying Wah, T., Ngo, D.C.L.: Text mining of news-headlines for FOREX market prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(1), 306–324 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.004
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Kipper, K., Dang, H.T., Palmer, M.: Class-based construction of a verb lexicon. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 691–696. AAAI Press (2000). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=721573. Accessed 1 Mar 2018
  44. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.D.: Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the OMG! In: Adamic, L.A., Baeza-Yates, R.A., Counts, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 538–541. The AAAI Press (2011)
  45. Lando, P., Lapujade, A., Kassel, G., Frst, F.: Towards a general ontology of computer programs. In: Filipe, J., Shishkov, B., Helfert, M. (eds.) ICSOFT (PL/DPS/KE/MUSE), pp. 163–170. INSTICC Press (2007). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icsoft/icsoft2007-1.html#LandoLKF07. Accessed 11 Feb 2018
  46. Li, X., Xie, H., Chen, L., Wang, J., Deng, X.: News impact on stock price return via sentiment analysis. Knowl. Based Syst. 69(Supplement C), 14–23 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.04.022
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Li, X., Xie, H., Song, Y., Zhu, S., Li, Q., Wang, F.L.: Does summarization help stock prediction? A news impact analysis. IEEE Intell. Syst. 30(3), 26–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2015.1
    Article Google Scholar
  48. Liu, H., Singh, P.: ConceptNet: a practical commonsense reasoning tool-kit. BT Technol. J. 22(4), 211–226 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047600.45421.6d
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Loughran, T., McDonald, B.: When Is a liability not a liability? textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. J. Finance 66(1), 35–65 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Maas, A.L., Daly, R.E., Pham, P.T., Huang, D., Ng, A.Y., Potts, C.: Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1, HLT ’11, pp. 142–150. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2011). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2002472.2002491. Accessed 2 Mar 2018
  51. Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J.R., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014, 22–27 June 2014, Baltimore, MD, USA, System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60 (2014). http://aclweb.org/anthology/P/P14/P14-5010.pdf
  52. Maynard, D., Funk, A.: Automatic detection of political opinions in tweets. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on The Semantic Web, ESWC’11, pp. 88–99. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25953-1_8
    Google Scholar
  53. Momtazi, S.: Fine-grained German sentiment analysis on social media. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012, Istanbul, Turkey, 23–25 May 2012, pp. 1215–1220 (2012). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/summaries/999.html
  54. Mostafa, M.M.: More than words: social networks’ text mining for consumer brand sentiments. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(10), 4241–4251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.019
    Article Google Scholar
  55. Mukherjee, S., Bhattacharyya, P.: Wikisent: Weakly supervised sentiment analysis through extractive summarization with wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2012th European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, vol. Part I, ECMLPKDD’12, pp. 774–793. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33460-3_55
    Chapter Google Scholar
  56. Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.P.: BabelNet: the automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network. Artif. Intell. 193, 217–250 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.07.001
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  57. O’Hare, N., Davy, M., Bermingham, A., Ferguson, P., Sheridan, P., Gurrin, C., Smeaton, A.F.: Topic-dependent sentiment analysis of financial blogs. In: Proceedings of the 1st International CIKM Workshop on Topic-sentiment Analysis for Mass Opinion, TSA ’09, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1651461.1651464
  58. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S., Rosner, M., Tapias, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), vol. 10, pp. 1320–1326. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta, Malta (2010)
  59. Paul, F., Neil, O., Michael, D., Adam, B., Scott, T., Paraic, S., Cathal, G., Alan, F.S.: Exploring the use of Paragraph-level annotations for sentiment analysis of financial blogs. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis (WOMSA 2009), WOMSA 2009, pp. 42–52 (2009)
  60. Pouransari, H., Ghili, S.: Deep learning for sentiment analysis of movie reviews. Technical Report, Stanford University (2014). https://cs224d.stanford.edu/reports/PouransariHadi.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2018
  61. Raina, P.: Sentiment analysis in news articles using sentic computing. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW ’13, pp. 959–962. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2013.27
  62. Recupero, D.R., Cambria, E.: Eswc’14 challenge on concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Semantic Web Evaluation Challenge-SemWebEval 2014 at ESWC 2014, Anissaras, Crete, Greece, 25–29 May 2014, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 3–20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12024-9_1
    Google Scholar
  63. Recupero, D.R., Cambria, E., Rosa, E.D.: Semantic sentiment analysis challenge at ESWC2017. In: Semantic Web Challenges-4th SemWebEval Challenge at ESWC 2017, Portoroz, Slovenia, May 28–June 1, 2017, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 109–123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69146-6_10
    Chapter Google Scholar
  64. Recupero, D.R., Consoli, S., Gangemi, A., Nuzzolese, A.G., Spampinato, D.: A semantic web based core engine to efficiently perform sentiment analysis. In: The Semantic Web: ESWC 2014 Satellite Events-ESWC 2014 Satellite Events, Anissaras, Crete, Greece, 25–29 May 2014, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 245–248 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11955-7_28
    Google Scholar
  65. Recupero, D.R., Dragoni, M., Buscaldi, D., Alam, M., Cambria, E. (eds.): Proceedings of 4th Workshop on Sentic Computing, Sentiment Analysis, Opinion Mining, and Emotion Detection (EMSASW 2018), Heraklion, Greece, 4 June 2018, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2111. CEUR-WS.org (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2111
  66. Recupero, D.R., Dragoni, M., Presutti, V.: ESWC 15 challenge on concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Semantic Web Evaluation Challenges-Second SemWebEval Challenge at ESWC 2015, Portorož, Slovenia, May 31–June 4, 2015, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 211–222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25518-7_18
    Chapter Google Scholar
  67. Recupero, D.R., Presutti, V., Consoli, S., Gangemi, A., Nuzzolese, A.G.: Sentilo: frame-based sentiment analysis. Cognit. Comput. 7(2), 211–225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9302-z
    Article Google Scholar
  68. Rothfels, J., Tibshirani, J.: Unsupervised sentiment classification of English movie reviews using automatic selection of positive and negative sentiment items. Technical Report, Stanford University (2010). http://nlp.stanford.edu/courses/cs224n/2010/reports/rothfels-jtibs.pdf
  69. Saif, H., Bashevoy, M., Taylor, S., Fernández, M., Alani, H.: SentiCircles: A platform for contextual and conceptual sentimen analysis. In: The Semantic Web-ESWC 2016 Satellite Events, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29–June 2, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 140–145 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47602-5_28
    Chapter Google Scholar
  70. Saif, H., He, Y., Fernandez, M., Alani, H.: Semantic patterns for sentiment analysis of Twitter. In: Mika, P., Tudorache, T., Bernstein, A., Welty, C., Knoblock, C., Vrandečić, D., Groth, P., Noy, N., Janowicz, K., Goble, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Semantic Web–ISWC 2014: 13th International Semantic Web Conference, Part II, Riva del Garda, Italy, 19–23 October 2014, pp. 324–340. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11915-1_21
    Google Scholar
  71. Saif, H., He, Y., Fernández, M., Alani, H.: Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter. Inf. Process. Manage. 52(1), 5–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.01.005
    Article Google Scholar
  72. Schulz, A., Thanh, T.D., Paulheim, H., Schweizer, I.: A Fine-grained sentiment analysis approach for detecting crisis related microposts. In: 10th Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Baden-Baden, Germany, 12–15 May 2013, pp. 846–851 (2013). http://idl.iscram.org/files/schulz/2013/927_Schulz_etal2013.pdf
  73. Smith, T.C., Frank, E.: Statistical Genomics: Methods and Protocols, Chap. Introducing Machine Learning Concepts with WEKA, pp. 353–378. Springer, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_17
    Google Scholar
  74. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C.D., Ng, A., Potts, C.: Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1631–1642. Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, Washington, USA (2013). http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D13-1170
  75. Sprenger, T.O., Tumasjan, A., Sandner, P.G., Welpe, I.M.: Tweets and trades: the information content of stock microblogs. Eur. Financ. Manag. 20(5), 926–957 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2013.12007.x
    Article Google Scholar
  76. Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: Yago: A core of semantic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’07, pp. 697–706. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242667
  77. Sun, D.: A Large-Scale Linear Regression Sentiment Model. Technical Report, University of California, Berkeley (2012). https://ai2-s2-pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com/b1bb/5cee34a934af2e13c8a17f324909fe961ebf.pdf
  78. Sun, F., Belatreche, A., Coleman, S., McGinnity, T.M., Li, Y.: Pre-processing online financial text for sentiment classification: A natural language processing approach. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering Economics (CIFEr), pp. 122–129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFEr.2014.6924063
  79. Takala, P., Malo, P., Sinha, A., Ahlgren, O.: Gold-standard for topic-specific sentiment analysis of economic texts. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Loftsson, H., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Moreno, A., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), pp. 2152–2157. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Reykjavik, Iceland (2014)
  80. Van de Kauter, M., Breesch, D., Hoste, V.: Fine-grained analysis of explicit and implicit sentiment in financial news articles. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(11), 4999–5010 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.007
    Article Google Scholar
  81. Wan, Y., Gao, Q.: An ensemble sentiment classification system of twitter data for airline services analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop, ICDMW 2015, Atlantic City, NJ, USA, 14–17 November 2015, pp. 1318–1325 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2015.7
  82. Zagibalov, T., Carroll, J.: Automatic seed word selection for unsupervised sentiment classification of Chinese text. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, COLING ’08, pp. 1073–1080. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2008). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1599081.1599216. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
  83. Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Franklin, M.J., Shenker, S., Stoica, I.: Spark: cluster computing with working sets. In: Proceedings of the 2Nd USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, HotCloud’10, pp. 10–10. USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA (2010). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1863103.1863113. Accessed 27 Jan 2018

Download references