No association of Angiotensin-Converting enzyme 2 gene (ACE2) polymorphisms with essential hypertension* (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
1
Basic Clinical Genomics Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedical Research, The University of Sydney
,
Sydney
,
Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
,
2
Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge
,
Cambridge
,
UK United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
1
Basic Clinical Genomics Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedical Research, The University of Sydney
,
Sydney
,
Australia
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Brian J. Morris,
Basic Clinical Genomics Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences and Institute of Biomedical Research
,
Building F13, The University of Sydney NSW 2006
,
Australia
; e-mail: brianm@physiol.usyd.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
This study was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
Accepted:
26 February 2004
Cite
Adam V. Benjafield, William Y.S. Wang, Brian J. Morris, No association of Angiotensin-Converting enzyme 2 gene (ACE2) polymorphisms with essential hypertension, American Journal of Hypertension, Volume 17, Issue 7, July 2004, Pages 624–628, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.02.022
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
Recent intriguing findings from genetic linkage, knockout, and physiologic studies in mice and rats led us to conduct the first investigation of the novel angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 gene (ACE2) in human hypertension (HT). We genotyped four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) (A⇒G at nucleotide 1075 in intron 1, G⇒A at nucleotide 8790 in intron 3, C⇒G at nucleotide 28330 in intron 11, and G⇒C at nucleotide 36787 in intron 16) in HT (n = 152) and normotensive (NT, n = 193) groups having inherently high biological power (>80%) due to our inclusion only of subjects whose parents had the same BP status as themselves. The SNPs were in linkage disequilibrium (D′ = 54% to 100%, P = .05 to 0.0001). Because ACE2 is on the X chromosome, data for each sex were analyzed separately. Minor allele frequencies in HT versus NT were as follows: for the intron 1 variant 0.21 versus 0.17 in female subjects (P = .31) and 0.25 versus 0.29 in male subjects (P = .60); intron 3 variant 0.22 versus 0.18 in female subjects (P = .35) and 0.15 versus 0.20 in male subjects (P = .47); intron 11 variant 0.39 versus 0.46 in male subjects (P = 0.17) and 0.31 versus 0.30 in male subjects (P = .96); intron 16 variant 0.20 versus 0.19 in female subjects (P = .72) and 0.17 versus 0.17 in male subjects (P = .95). Haplotype analysis was also negative. These data provide little support for ACE2 in genetic predisposition to HT. Am J Hypertens 2004;17:624–628 © 2004 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.
Many association studies of renin-angiotensin system gene variants have been conducted in essential hypertension. In the case of the angiotensin I–converting enzyme gene (ACE), despite occasional reports of a possible role the ACE locus in blood pressure (BP) variation1 or association with hypertension (HT),2,3 by far the majority of studies have been negative.4–9
Recently, a homologue, ACE2,10,11 has been discovered, whose catalytic domain is 42% identical with ACE.11 Whereas ACE is expressed ubiquitously in the vasculature, ACE2 is expressed predominantly in the kidney,10,11 but also in cardiovascular and gastrointestinal12 tissues. Notably ACE2 cleaves a single residue from angiotensin I (Ang I) to generate angiotensin 1–9 (Ang 1–9), which has no known function. Angiotensin 1–9 cannot be converted to Ang II by ACE2, but can be converted by ACE to Ang 1–7, a vasodilator.11 Angiotensin 1–7 can also be generated directly from Ang I by endopeptidases other than ACE2 and ACE, including neprilsyn, prolyl endopeptidase, and thimet oligopeptidase.13 In contrast to ACE, ACE2 does not hydrolyze bradykinin,14 nor is it inhibited by typical ACE inhibitors.10,15 Moreover, ACE2 is clearly multifunctional, having been reported recently to be the functional receptor for the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus.16
It has been suggested that ACE2 might negatively regulate the activated renin-angiotensin system by diverting the generation of vasoconstrictor Ang II towards the inactive Ang 1–9 and vasodilatatory Ang 1–7 peptides.17 Competition between ACE and ACE2 for the same substrate, Ang I, could thereby serve a counterbalancing function.
The gene ACE2 maps to a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for BP on the X chromosome in three strains of genetically HT rats—SHR, SHR-SP, and Sabra SBH/y.18 In each strain ACE2 mRNA and protein levels were greatly reduced in the kidney and inversely correlated with elevation in BP.18 Moreover, in the SBH/y strain, salt loading reduced ACE2 further and raised BP even more, whereas no changes were seen in the normotensive (NT) SBN/y strain.18 These data are consistent with a protective effect of ACE2 in the salt-resistant strain, with this effect being lost in the HT strain that lacks ACE2. Furthermore, _Ace2_-knockout mice have 10 mm Hg lower BP and an enhanced response to Ang II infusion.13
In their article in Nature, Crackower et al18 state, “It will be interesting to determine whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the human ACE2 locus correlate with changes in blood pressure.” To address this question, we therefore conducted a case-control study of ACE2 polymorphisms in essential HT.
Methods
Subjects
All subjects were Australian individuals of white Anglo-Celtic origin. The subjects with HT (BP >140/90 mm Hg) were the offspring of parents who both had HT. A qualified individual using a cuff sphygmomanometer on three different occasions spanning 2 weeks measured blood pressure. Secondary HT, renal disease, and heart disease were excluded by the patients’ general practitioners (GP). All subjects had normal renal function and no evidence of secondary HT by standard clinical evaluation carried out to the satisfaction of the GP. Normotensive subjects (NT) were required to have a BP <130/90 mm Hg and parents who were both normotensive past the age of 50 years. In addition, subjects could not have heart or kidney disease. These individuals were recruited at the Sydney Red Cross Blood Bank. Clinical history was obtained by a standardized questionnaire and examination by a qualified health professional for both groups. The University of Sydney Ethics Committee approved the study and the subjects gave informed consent. Demographic characteristics (mean ± SD or mean ± SE, as appropriate) for the 152 HT and 193 NT subjects are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics
Characteristic | NT | HT |
---|---|---|
n | 193 | 152 |
Male:female (%) | 52:48 | 36:64 |
Age (y) | 45 ± 12 | 56 ± 12 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 25 ± 4 | 27 ± 5 |
SBP (mm Hg) | 119 ± 10 | 172 ± 27 |
DBP (mm Hg) | 72 ± 7 | 105 ± 14 |
Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.8 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.2 |
Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
HDL (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
LDL (mmol/L) | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.1 |
Characteristic | NT | HT |
---|---|---|
n | 193 | 152 |
Male:female (%) | 52:48 | 36:64 |
Age (y) | 45 ± 12 | 56 ± 12 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 25 ± 4 | 27 ± 5 |
SBP (mm Hg) | 119 ± 10 | 172 ± 27 |
DBP (mm Hg) | 72 ± 7 | 105 ± 14 |
Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.8 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.2 |
Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
HDL (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
LDL (mmol/L) | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.1 |
Data are mean ± SD or mean ± SE, as appropriate.
BMI = body mass index; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HT = hypertensive subjects; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; NT = normotensive subjects; SBP = systolic blood pressure.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics
Characteristic | NT | HT |
---|---|---|
n | 193 | 152 |
Male:female (%) | 52:48 | 36:64 |
Age (y) | 45 ± 12 | 56 ± 12 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 25 ± 4 | 27 ± 5 |
SBP (mm Hg) | 119 ± 10 | 172 ± 27 |
DBP (mm Hg) | 72 ± 7 | 105 ± 14 |
Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.8 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.2 |
Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
HDL (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
LDL (mmol/L) | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.1 |
Characteristic | NT | HT |
---|---|---|
n | 193 | 152 |
Male:female (%) | 52:48 | 36:64 |
Age (y) | 45 ± 12 | 56 ± 12 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 25 ± 4 | 27 ± 5 |
SBP (mm Hg) | 119 ± 10 | 172 ± 27 |
DBP (mm Hg) | 72 ± 7 | 105 ± 14 |
Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.8 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.2 |
Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
HDL (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
LDL (mmol/L) | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.1 |
Data are mean ± SD or mean ± SE, as appropriate.
BMI = body mass index; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HT = hypertensive subjects; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; NT = normotensive subjects; SBP = systolic blood pressure.
In addition, the subjects participating in the study had been shown to be capable of demonstrating a genetic association with HT,19,20 should this be present. This has been aided by the enhanced biological power our study design conferred by restricting our choice of subjects to those with a strong family history (two HT parents).
Genotyping
DNA was isolated from whole blood using a QIAamp Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). he genomic sequence and SNPs for ACE2 (chromosome Xp22.3)21 were determined from the Ensembl Human Genome Browser (http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/). Nineteen putative SNP have been identified in ACE2.
Two of these were amenable to testing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, namely, an A⇒G variant at nt 1075 in intron 1 and a G⇒A variant at nt 8790 in intron 3. Primers for genotyping of these were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys (Sydney, Australia) (Table 2). The PCR protocol was the same for both SNPs. The 22 μL PCR mixture contained 100 ng genomic DNA, 0.25 pmol each of primer, 0.1 mmol/L each of dNTP, 1 U HotstarTaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen), 50 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, and 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2. After an initial denaturation step of 94°C for 10 min, 10 cycles were performed at 94°, 65°, and 72°C for 1 min each, then 15 cycles at 94°, 60°, and 72°C for 1 min each, and finally 20 cycles at 94°, 58°, and 72°C for 1 min each, finishing with a 20-min extension step at 72°C. The PCR products were digested at 37°C for 3 h with 1.9 U of either _Ava_II (MBI Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) for the intron 1 SNP or _Alu_I (MBI Fermentas) for the intron 3 SNP, using the buffers supplied and sterile water (19 μL total volume). The sites where the enzymes cut are listed in Table 2. The intron 1 variant gave two fragments of 305 and 166 bp (G allele) when cut, or a single band of 471 bp (A allele) for the uncut product. For the intron 3 variant, fragments of 281 and 185 bp (A allele) or 466 bp (G allele) were generated. Bands were visualized on ethidium bromide–stained agarose gels after electrophoresis.
Table 2
Primers and restriction enzyme sites
Polymorphism and primers | Restriction site* |
---|---|
Intron 1 A⇒G (nt 1075) | _Ava_II: G↓GT/ACC |
Sense 5′-TAA CAA GTG CAA GGA TTT AGG-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-AAG CTG CAA TGA ATC ATG AT-3′ | |
Intron 3 G⇒A (nt 8790) | _Alu_I: AG↓CT |
Sense 5′-CAT GTG GTC AAA AGG ATA TCT-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-AAA GTA AGG TTG GCA GAC AT-3′ | |
Intron 11 C⇒G (nt 28330) | |
Sense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGG CAG TTT ATT GTA CAT TGT G-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGC TCC AGC AAA TTC AAG GAC-3′ | |
Intron 16 G⇒C (nt 36787) | |
Sense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GAA TTC CCC AGC ATT TCA GCC-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGA CTT TCT TCA ACC AGC ACC-3′ |
Polymorphism and primers | Restriction site* |
---|---|
Intron 1 A⇒G (nt 1075) | _Ava_II: G↓GT/ACC |
Sense 5′-TAA CAA GTG CAA GGA TTT AGG-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-AAG CTG CAA TGA ATC ATG AT-3′ | |
Intron 3 G⇒A (nt 8790) | _Alu_I: AG↓CT |
Sense 5′-CAT GTG GTC AAA AGG ATA TCT-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-AAA GTA AGG TTG GCA GAC AT-3′ | |
Intron 11 C⇒G (nt 28330) | |
Sense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGG CAG TTT ATT GTA CAT TGT G-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGC TCC AGC AAA TTC AAG GAC-3′ | |
Intron 16 G⇒C (nt 36787) | |
Sense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GAA TTC CCC AGC ATT TCA GCC-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGA CTT TCT TCA ACC AGC ACC-3′ |
*
Underlining indicates the location of the single nucleotide polymorphism.
Table 2
Primers and restriction enzyme sites
Polymorphism and primers | Restriction site* |
---|---|
Intron 1 A⇒G (nt 1075) | _Ava_II: G↓GT/ACC |
Sense 5′-TAA CAA GTG CAA GGA TTT AGG-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-AAG CTG CAA TGA ATC ATG AT-3′ | |
Intron 3 G⇒A (nt 8790) | _Alu_I: AG↓CT |
Sense 5′-CAT GTG GTC AAA AGG ATA TCT-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-AAA GTA AGG TTG GCA GAC AT-3′ | |
Intron 11 C⇒G (nt 28330) | |
Sense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGG CAG TTT ATT GTA CAT TGT G-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGC TCC AGC AAA TTC AAG GAC-3′ | |
Intron 16 G⇒C (nt 36787) | |
Sense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GAA TTC CCC AGC ATT TCA GCC-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGA CTT TCT TCA ACC AGC ACC-3′ |
Polymorphism and primers | Restriction site* |
---|---|
Intron 1 A⇒G (nt 1075) | _Ava_II: G↓GT/ACC |
Sense 5′-TAA CAA GTG CAA GGA TTT AGG-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-AAG CTG CAA TGA ATC ATG AT-3′ | |
Intron 3 G⇒A (nt 8790) | _Alu_I: AG↓CT |
Sense 5′-CAT GTG GTC AAA AGG ATA TCT-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-AAA GTA AGG TTG GCA GAC AT-3′ | |
Intron 11 C⇒G (nt 28330) | |
Sense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGG CAG TTT ATT GTA CAT TGT G-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGC TCC AGC AAA TTC AAG GAC-3′ | |
Intron 16 G⇒C (nt 36787) | |
Sense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GAA TTC CCC AGC ATT TCA GCC-3′ | |
Antisense 5′-ACG TTG GAT GGA CTT TCT TCA ACC AGC ACC-3′ |
*
Underlining indicates the location of the single nucleotide polymorphism.
A further 2 SNPs were tested using the MassARRAY system (Sequenom, San Diego, CA) by the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF, Brisbane, Australia). These were a C⇒G variant at nt 28330 in intron 11, and a G⇒C variant at nt 36787 in intron 16. The methodology developed used MassArray Assay Design version 2.0.0.1.6 software and primer shown in Table 2. Genotypes were determined using a Bruker (Täby, Sweden) Autoflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer by AGRF.
Statistical analysis
The χ2 test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed using StatView (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). Linkage disequilibrium was tested in the largest group (that is, normotensive individuals) by the method of Hill.22 Haplotype frequencies for NT and HT were estimated by the program Lindeq developed by one of the present investigators (W.Y.S.W.), and they were compared by χ2 analysis.
Results
Association with hypertension
Because ACE2 is on the X chromosome, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium could be tested only in the female population and was in accordance with expectations for each polymorphism. Genotype and allele frequencies for each polymorphism in female subjects and allele data for male subjects are listed in Table 3. None of the polymorphisms showed an association with HT (Table 3). Our study design provided at least 80% power to detect an existing association with HT in the female subjects with HT, with a two-tailed type 1 error of 0.05 and an allelic odds ratio of 2.0. Thus, if an association with HT were present, we should have been able to detect it. When the analysis was restricted to overweight subjects with HT (BMI >25 kg/m2), again there was no association with HT in either female subjects (χ2 = 2.7, 0.14, 2.1, and 2.5; P = .26, .93, .15, and .11 for the intron 1, 3, 11, and 16 variants, respectively) or male subjects (χ2 = 0.24, 0.16, 0.30, and 1.6; P = .62, .69, .58 and .20, respectively). Similarly, for lean subjects with HT (BMI ≤25 kg/m2), results were negative for female subjects (χ2 = 0.29, 2.9, 0.41, and 0.01; P = .86, .24, .52, and .91, respectively) and male subjects (χ2 = 0.47, 2.9, 0.05, and 2.6; P = .49, .087, .82, and .11, respectively).
Table 3
Genotype and allele frequencies of ACE2 polymorphisms in hypertensive (HT) and normotensive (NT) groups
Genotype frequencies | Allele frequencies | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | n | MM | Mm | mm | χ2 | P | M | m | _χ_2 | P |
Intron 1 A⇒G variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 81 | 55 (0.68) | 25 (0.31) | 1 (0.01) | 2.9 | 0.23 | 135 (0.83) | 27 (0.17) | 1.1 | 0.31 |
HT | 78 | 50 (0.64) | 23 (0.30) | 5 (0.06) | 123 (0.79) | 33 (0.21) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 96 | —* | — | — | 68 (0.71) | 28 (0.29) | 0.28 | 0.60 | ||
HT | 48 | — | — | — | 36 (0.75) | 12 (0.25) | ||||
Intron 3 G⇒A variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | 63 (0.71) | 20 (0.22) | 6 (0.07) | 1.9 | 0.39 | 146 (0.82) | 32 (0.18) | 0.89 | 0.35 |
HT | 65 | 40 (0.62) | 21 (0.32) | 4 (0.06) | 101 (0.78) | 29 (0.22) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 104 | —* | — | — | 83 (0.80) | 21 (0.20) | 0.52 | 0.47 | ||
HT | 46 | — | — | — | 39 (0.85) | 7 (0.15) | ||||
Intron 11 C⇒G variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | 23 (0.26) | 50 (0.56) | 16 (0.18) | 2.2 | 0.33 | 96 (0.54) | 82 (0.46) | 1.9 | 0.17 |
HT | 100 | 34 (0.34) | 54 (0.54) | 12 (0.12) | 122 (0.61) | 78 (0.39) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | —* | — | — | 62 (0.70) | 27 (0.30) | 0.0029 | 0.96 | ||
HT | 52 | — | — | — | 36 (0.69) | 16 (0.31) | ||||
Intron 16 G⇒C variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 85 | 57 (0.67) | 24 (0.28) | 4 (0.05) | 1.5 | 0.46 | 138 (0.81) | 32 (0.19) | 0.13 | 0.72 |
HT | 91 | 62 (0.68) | 21 (0.23) | 8 (0.09) | 145 (0.80) | 37 (0.20) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 103 | —* | — | — | 85 (0.83) | 18 (0.17) | 0.0017 | 0.95 | ||
HT | 47 | — | — | — | 39 (0.83) | 8 (0.17) |
Genotype frequencies | Allele frequencies | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | n | MM | Mm | mm | χ2 | P | M | m | _χ_2 | P |
Intron 1 A⇒G variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 81 | 55 (0.68) | 25 (0.31) | 1 (0.01) | 2.9 | 0.23 | 135 (0.83) | 27 (0.17) | 1.1 | 0.31 |
HT | 78 | 50 (0.64) | 23 (0.30) | 5 (0.06) | 123 (0.79) | 33 (0.21) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 96 | —* | — | — | 68 (0.71) | 28 (0.29) | 0.28 | 0.60 | ||
HT | 48 | — | — | — | 36 (0.75) | 12 (0.25) | ||||
Intron 3 G⇒A variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | 63 (0.71) | 20 (0.22) | 6 (0.07) | 1.9 | 0.39 | 146 (0.82) | 32 (0.18) | 0.89 | 0.35 |
HT | 65 | 40 (0.62) | 21 (0.32) | 4 (0.06) | 101 (0.78) | 29 (0.22) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 104 | —* | — | — | 83 (0.80) | 21 (0.20) | 0.52 | 0.47 | ||
HT | 46 | — | — | — | 39 (0.85) | 7 (0.15) | ||||
Intron 11 C⇒G variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | 23 (0.26) | 50 (0.56) | 16 (0.18) | 2.2 | 0.33 | 96 (0.54) | 82 (0.46) | 1.9 | 0.17 |
HT | 100 | 34 (0.34) | 54 (0.54) | 12 (0.12) | 122 (0.61) | 78 (0.39) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | —* | — | — | 62 (0.70) | 27 (0.30) | 0.0029 | 0.96 | ||
HT | 52 | — | — | — | 36 (0.69) | 16 (0.31) | ||||
Intron 16 G⇒C variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 85 | 57 (0.67) | 24 (0.28) | 4 (0.05) | 1.5 | 0.46 | 138 (0.81) | 32 (0.19) | 0.13 | 0.72 |
HT | 91 | 62 (0.68) | 21 (0.23) | 8 (0.09) | 145 (0.80) | 37 (0.20) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 103 | —* | — | — | 85 (0.83) | 18 (0.17) | 0.0017 | 0.95 | ||
HT | 47 | — | — | — | 39 (0.83) | 8 (0.17) |
M = major allele, m = minor allele, of each polymorphism.
Values in parentheses are fractions.
*
As ACE2 is on the X chromosome (one copy), it is inappropriate to present genotype data.
Table 3
Genotype and allele frequencies of ACE2 polymorphisms in hypertensive (HT) and normotensive (NT) groups
Genotype frequencies | Allele frequencies | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | n | MM | Mm | mm | χ2 | P | M | m | _χ_2 | P |
Intron 1 A⇒G variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 81 | 55 (0.68) | 25 (0.31) | 1 (0.01) | 2.9 | 0.23 | 135 (0.83) | 27 (0.17) | 1.1 | 0.31 |
HT | 78 | 50 (0.64) | 23 (0.30) | 5 (0.06) | 123 (0.79) | 33 (0.21) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 96 | —* | — | — | 68 (0.71) | 28 (0.29) | 0.28 | 0.60 | ||
HT | 48 | — | — | — | 36 (0.75) | 12 (0.25) | ||||
Intron 3 G⇒A variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | 63 (0.71) | 20 (0.22) | 6 (0.07) | 1.9 | 0.39 | 146 (0.82) | 32 (0.18) | 0.89 | 0.35 |
HT | 65 | 40 (0.62) | 21 (0.32) | 4 (0.06) | 101 (0.78) | 29 (0.22) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 104 | —* | — | — | 83 (0.80) | 21 (0.20) | 0.52 | 0.47 | ||
HT | 46 | — | — | — | 39 (0.85) | 7 (0.15) | ||||
Intron 11 C⇒G variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | 23 (0.26) | 50 (0.56) | 16 (0.18) | 2.2 | 0.33 | 96 (0.54) | 82 (0.46) | 1.9 | 0.17 |
HT | 100 | 34 (0.34) | 54 (0.54) | 12 (0.12) | 122 (0.61) | 78 (0.39) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | —* | — | — | 62 (0.70) | 27 (0.30) | 0.0029 | 0.96 | ||
HT | 52 | — | — | — | 36 (0.69) | 16 (0.31) | ||||
Intron 16 G⇒C variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 85 | 57 (0.67) | 24 (0.28) | 4 (0.05) | 1.5 | 0.46 | 138 (0.81) | 32 (0.19) | 0.13 | 0.72 |
HT | 91 | 62 (0.68) | 21 (0.23) | 8 (0.09) | 145 (0.80) | 37 (0.20) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 103 | —* | — | — | 85 (0.83) | 18 (0.17) | 0.0017 | 0.95 | ||
HT | 47 | — | — | — | 39 (0.83) | 8 (0.17) |
Genotype frequencies | Allele frequencies | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | n | MM | Mm | mm | χ2 | P | M | m | _χ_2 | P |
Intron 1 A⇒G variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 81 | 55 (0.68) | 25 (0.31) | 1 (0.01) | 2.9 | 0.23 | 135 (0.83) | 27 (0.17) | 1.1 | 0.31 |
HT | 78 | 50 (0.64) | 23 (0.30) | 5 (0.06) | 123 (0.79) | 33 (0.21) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 96 | —* | — | — | 68 (0.71) | 28 (0.29) | 0.28 | 0.60 | ||
HT | 48 | — | — | — | 36 (0.75) | 12 (0.25) | ||||
Intron 3 G⇒A variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | 63 (0.71) | 20 (0.22) | 6 (0.07) | 1.9 | 0.39 | 146 (0.82) | 32 (0.18) | 0.89 | 0.35 |
HT | 65 | 40 (0.62) | 21 (0.32) | 4 (0.06) | 101 (0.78) | 29 (0.22) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 104 | —* | — | — | 83 (0.80) | 21 (0.20) | 0.52 | 0.47 | ||
HT | 46 | — | — | — | 39 (0.85) | 7 (0.15) | ||||
Intron 11 C⇒G variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | 23 (0.26) | 50 (0.56) | 16 (0.18) | 2.2 | 0.33 | 96 (0.54) | 82 (0.46) | 1.9 | 0.17 |
HT | 100 | 34 (0.34) | 54 (0.54) | 12 (0.12) | 122 (0.61) | 78 (0.39) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 89 | —* | — | — | 62 (0.70) | 27 (0.30) | 0.0029 | 0.96 | ||
HT | 52 | — | — | — | 36 (0.69) | 16 (0.31) | ||||
Intron 16 G⇒C variant | ||||||||||
Female | ||||||||||
NT | 85 | 57 (0.67) | 24 (0.28) | 4 (0.05) | 1.5 | 0.46 | 138 (0.81) | 32 (0.19) | 0.13 | 0.72 |
HT | 91 | 62 (0.68) | 21 (0.23) | 8 (0.09) | 145 (0.80) | 37 (0.20) | ||||
Male | ||||||||||
NT | 103 | —* | — | — | 85 (0.83) | 18 (0.17) | 0.0017 | 0.95 | ||
HT | 47 | — | — | — | 39 (0.83) | 8 (0.17) |
M = major allele, m = minor allele, of each polymorphism.
Values in parentheses are fractions.
*
As ACE2 is on the X chromosome (one copy), it is inappropriate to present genotype data.
Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analysis
Each polymorphism was in linkage disequilibrium (LD) (D′ = 54% to 100%, P = .05 to .0001), that is, all were part of the same LD block. None of the haplotypes showed an association with HT. Table 4 illustrates this for haplotypes from SNPs in introns 1 and 3. The entire data set for combinations arising from all four SNP is not shown.
Table 4
Haplotype results for two of the ACE2 polymorphisms
Intron 1 A⇒G | Intron 3 G⇒A | χ2 | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
M | v | M | 0.11 | .74 |
m | ||||
m | v | M | 3.6 | .057 |
m | ||||
M | v | M | 0.01 | .92 |
m | ||||
M | v | m | 3.6 | .059 |
m |
Intron 1 A⇒G | Intron 3 G⇒A | χ2 | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
M | v | M | 0.11 | .74 |
m | ||||
m | v | M | 3.6 | .057 |
m | ||||
M | v | M | 0.01 | .92 |
m | ||||
M | v | m | 3.6 | .059 |
m |
M = major allele, m = minor allele, of each polymorphism.
Table 4
Haplotype results for two of the ACE2 polymorphisms
Intron 1 A⇒G | Intron 3 G⇒A | χ2 | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
M | v | M | 0.11 | .74 |
m | ||||
m | v | M | 3.6 | .057 |
m | ||||
M | v | M | 0.01 | .92 |
m | ||||
M | v | m | 3.6 | .059 |
m |
Intron 1 A⇒G | Intron 3 G⇒A | χ2 | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
M | v | M | 0.11 | .74 |
m | ||||
m | v | M | 3.6 | .057 |
m | ||||
M | v | M | 0.01 | .92 |
m | ||||
M | v | m | 3.6 | .059 |
m |
M = major allele, m = minor allele, of each polymorphism.
Genotype–Phenotype interactions
Diastolic BP was higher in lean male subjects with HT having the minor (G) allele of the intron 1 variant (mean ± SD, 99 ± 7 v 120 ± 10 for A v G, respectively; F = 9.8, P = .0088), noting that there is only one copy (either A or G) in each individual because male subjects have only one X chromosome. Tracking with genotype was not seen in female subjects with HT. Body mass index in male subjects with HT was marginally higher in those with the minor (A) allele of the intron 3 variant (26 ± 4 v 30 ± 6 [mean ± SD] for G v A, respectively; F = 4.2, P = .048). Systolic BP was slightly higher in overweight male subjects with HT (160 ± 16 v 183 ± 22 [mean ± SD] for G v A, respectively; F = 6.5, P = .020). Body mass index was also higher in male subjects with HT having the intron 16 variant (27 ± 4 v 23 ± 2 [mean ± SD] for G v C, respectively; F = 9.4, P = .0036). However, Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons rendered all of these associations nonsignificant.
Discussion
The present study found that an A⇒G SNP in intron 1, a G⇒A SNP in intron 3, a C⇒G SNP in intron 11 and a G⇒C SNP in intron 16 of ACE2 were in linkage disequilibrium, but none were associated with HT. Our study design (using the offspring of two HT parents) meant that the subjects with HT used were drawn from a general hypertensive population (∼1520 individuals) that was 10 times greater than the number of subjects studied.6 Such a study design also leads to a considerable reduction in sample size requirements for detection of the same population effect of genetic variants (W.Y.S. Wang, unpublished observation). For example, assuming a multiplicative effect of alleles and the absence of gene–gene and gene–environment interactions, in the case of an autosomal disease allele with population frequency of 0.20 that contributes to HT with a disease odds ratio of 1.5, sampling based on disease status alone would require at least 267 case subjects and control subjects to provide 80% power for a significant threshold of P = .05; however, when considering the disease status of both parents as being affected, only 64 samples might be required in each group to detect the same effect. The reason for this is the disease allele frequency of the specially sampled case subjects would be higher than that of their affected parents. The opposite is true for the control subjects. Therefore, despite having the same underlying effect in the population, the disease odds ratio between the two selected groups is increased. As a practical demonstration of increased power when sampling is based on family history of HT, we reanalyzed data in one of our reports20 using a test for trend that allows the expectation for increased risks in different groups, that is, subjects with HT with two HT parents should have more genetic risk than subjects with HT with only one HT parent. This gave a P value of .0066, as can be seen below:
ptrend var2 var3 var1
+----------------------------+
| Allele1 Allele2_Freq Status
|----------------------------|
1. | 8470.0771 | HT with 2 HT parents
2. | 7730.0382 | HT with 1 HT parent
3. | 19840.0203 | HT with 1 HT sibling
4. | 8910.0114 | Normotensive (NT)
+----------------------------+
Trend analysis for proportions
------------------------------
Regression of p = Allele1/(Allele1+Allele2) on Status:
Slope = –.022, std. error = .0082, Z = 2.72
Overall χ2(3) = 8.1, pr > χ2 = 0.043 (independent of trend)
χ2(1) for trend = 7.4, pr > χ2 = 0.0066
Despite finding no association of ACE2 variants with HT, we did, however, note higher diastolic BP for the G allele of the intron 1 SNP in lean male subjects with HT and higher systolic BP for the A allele of the intron 3 SNP in obese male subjects with HT. These were nonetheless weak and became nonsignificant after correction for multiple comparisons by the Bonferroni method. The latter is regarded as overly severe, thus risking the elimination of a true positive finding.23
The physiologic function of ACE2 is still being unraveled. As well as the effects described earlier, Ace2 knockout mice exhibit cardiac abnormalities18 resembling cardiac stunning (reversible decline in cardiac contractility under ischemic conditions) in humans.24 Loss of Ace2 is also associated with upregulation of hypoxia-inducible genes,18 suggesting a possible role for ACE2 in response to cardiac ischemia.24 As well, Ang II is increased and could contribute to cardiac dysfunction via induction of oxidative stress unrelated to BP. Elevated Ang II could be blunted by compensatory changes in Ang 1–7, kinin metabolites, the apelin system,17 or nitric oxide.25
In conclusion, the present study provides no evidence for an association of ACE2 polymorphisms with essential HT in an Anglo-Celtic Australian population. However, this does not totally exclude a role for ACE2 in the causation of essential HT. The testing of additional polymorphisms in ACE2 and association analyses in other settings and ethnic groups is needed before eliminating ACE2 completely. A role in heart failure and coronary artery disease also remain to be examined.
Acknowledgments
We thank Judith O’Neill, RN, for help in collection of patient samples and Helen Speirs, PhD, for help with DNA extractions and other technical assistance.
References
, , , , , , , :
Evidence for association and genetic linkage of the angiotensin-converting enzyme locus with hypertension and blood pressure in men but not women in the Framingham Heart Study
.
Circulation
1998
;
97
:
1766
–
1772
.
, , , , :
Frequency of a deletion polymorphism in the gene for angiotensin converting enzyme is increased in African-Americans with hypertension
.
Am J Hypertens
1994
;
7
:
759
–
762
.
, , , , , , , , :
Angiotensin converting enzyme gene I/D polymorphism, blood pressure and the renin-angiotensin system in Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean peoples
.
J Hum Hypertens
1996
;
10
:
31
–
35
.
, , , , , , , :
The angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene and predisposition to high blood pressure
.
Hypertension
;
1993
;
21
:
455
–
4
, :
Polymorphism of the angiotensin I converting enzyme gene is apparently not related to high blood pressure: Dutch hypertension and offspring study
.
J Hypertens
1993
;
11
:
345
–
348
.
, , :
Different frequencies of angiotensin-converting enzyme genotypes in older hypertensive individuals
.
J Clin Invest
1994
;
94
:
1085
–
1089
.
, , , , , :
I/D polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene does not predict isolated systolic or systolic-diastolic hypertension in the elderly
.
J Hum Hypertens
1996
;
10
:
167
–
169
.
, , , , , , , :
Angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphism is not related to essential hypertension in a Greek population
.
Am J Hypertens
1996
;
9
:
700
–
702
.
, , , , , , , , :
Associations of candidate loci angiotensinogen and angiotensin-converting enzyme with severe hypertension: The nhlbi family heart study
.
Ann Epidemiol
1997
;
7
:
13
–
21
.
, , , , , :
A human homolog of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Cloning and functional expression as a captopril-insensitive carboxypeptidase
.
J Biol Chem
2000
;
275
:
33238
–
33243
.
, , , , , , , , , , , :
A novel angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase (ACE2) converts angiotensin I to angiotensin 1–9
.
Circ Res
2000
;
87
:
E1
–
E9
.
, , , :
Quantitative mRNA expression profiling of ACE 2, a novel homologue of angiotensin converting enzyme
.
FEBS Lett
2002
;
532
:
107
–
110
.
, :
Hypothesis: Ace2 modulates blood pressure in the mammalian organism
.
Hypertension
2003
;
41
:
871
–
873
.
, , , , :
ACEH/ACE2 is a novel mammalian metallocarboxypeptidase and a homologue of angiotensin-converting enzyme insensitive to ACE inhibitors
.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
2002
;
80
:
346
–
353
.
, :
The angiotensin-converting enzyme gene family: Genomics and pharmacology
.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
2002
;
23
:
177
–
183
.
, , , , , , , , , , , :
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus
.
Nature
2003
;
426
:
450
–
454
.
, , :
Just the beginning: Novel functions for angiotensin-converting enzymes
.
Curr Biol
2002
;
12
:
R745
–
R752
.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , :
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function
.
Nature
2002
;
417
:
822
–
828
.
, :
Glucagon receptor gene mutation in essential hypertension
.
Nat Genet
1996
;
12
:
122
.
, , , , :
G-protein β3 subunit gene (GNB3) variant in causation of essential hypertension
.
Hypertension
1998
;
32
:
1094
–
1097
.
:
Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in randomly mating populations
.
Heredity
1974
;
33
:
229
–
239
.
:
On making multiple comparisons in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology
.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
1991
;
18
:
379
–
392
.
, :
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2—a new cardiac regulator
.
N Engl J Med
2002
;
347
:
1795
–
1797
.
, , , :
A story of two ACEs
.
J Mol Med
2003
;
81
:
227
–
234
.
Author notes
*
This study was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
© American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. 2004
Topic:
- hypertension
- angiotensin-converting enzyme
- hypertension, essential
- polymorphism
- gene frequency
- genes
- genetic predisposition to disease
- haplotypes
- introns
- genetic linkage
- linkage disequilibrium
- nucleotides
- parent
- single nucleotide polymorphism
- x chromosomes
- mice
- rats
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 2,739
2,162 Pageviews
577 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2016
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2016 | 1 |
January 2017 | 2 |
February 2017 | 3 |
March 2017 | 1 |
April 2017 | 1 |
July 2017 | 2 |
August 2017 | 3 |
October 2017 | 2 |
November 2017 | 7 |
December 2017 | 26 |
January 2018 | 13 |
February 2018 | 7 |
March 2018 | 14 |
April 2018 | 10 |
May 2018 | 6 |
June 2018 | 9 |
July 2018 | 17 |
August 2018 | 13 |
September 2018 | 1 |
October 2018 | 12 |
November 2018 | 14 |
December 2018 | 6 |
January 2019 | 7 |
February 2019 | 3 |
March 2019 | 11 |
April 2019 | 8 |
May 2019 | 6 |
June 2019 | 15 |
July 2019 | 6 |
August 2019 | 3 |
September 2019 | 15 |
October 2019 | 14 |
November 2019 | 11 |
December 2019 | 8 |
January 2020 | 28 |
February 2020 | 72 |
March 2020 | 230 |
April 2020 | 721 |
May 2020 | 165 |
June 2020 | 110 |
July 2020 | 53 |
August 2020 | 47 |
September 2020 | 49 |
October 2020 | 62 |
November 2020 | 26 |
December 2020 | 29 |
January 2021 | 28 |
February 2021 | 42 |
March 2021 | 31 |
April 2021 | 29 |
May 2021 | 24 |
June 2021 | 23 |
July 2021 | 10 |
August 2021 | 14 |
September 2021 | 23 |
October 2021 | 40 |
November 2021 | 29 |
December 2021 | 28 |
January 2022 | 15 |
February 2022 | 13 |
March 2022 | 18 |
April 2022 | 22 |
May 2022 | 12 |
June 2022 | 23 |
July 2022 | 24 |
August 2022 | 23 |
September 2022 | 18 |
October 2022 | 7 |
November 2022 | 10 |
December 2022 | 18 |
January 2023 | 9 |
February 2023 | 13 |
March 2023 | 11 |
April 2023 | 9 |
May 2023 | 8 |
June 2023 | 10 |
July 2023 | 27 |
August 2023 | 18 |
September 2023 | 15 |
October 2023 | 13 |
November 2023 | 16 |
December 2023 | 14 |
January 2024 | 29 |
February 2024 | 30 |
March 2024 | 19 |
April 2024 | 12 |
May 2024 | 15 |
June 2024 | 12 |
July 2024 | 15 |
August 2024 | 7 |
September 2024 | 8 |
October 2024 | 21 |
November 2024 | 15 |
Citations
74 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic