Central administration of methotrexate reduces mechanical... : PAIN (original) (raw)
1. Introduction
Low back pain is a common problem that will affect approximately two thirds of the adult population (Deyo and Tsui-Wu, 1987). It is the second leading reason for ambulatory care in the United States and direct medical costs are estimated at over $20 billion per year (Frymoyer and Cats-Baril, 1991). Of these, a small but significant percentage will exhibit symptoms of radicular pain associated with a herniated disk(s). Current treatment for persistent lumbar radiculopathy includes, but is not limited to, invasive surgical procedures, pharmacology and physical therapy. The absence of an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain has impeded increased clinical efficacy of its treatment. In addition, until recently, the absence of animal models for low back pain associated with radiculopathy have hindered the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms that produce radicular pain.
Based on studies using various animal models to date, most researchers agree that two possible mechanisms produce radicular pain associated with herniated intervertebral discs (McCarron et al., 1987; Olmarker et al., 1989, 1993; Kawakami et al., 1994): a mechanical compression of the spinal root and a biological inflammatory effect on the root induced by the herniated nucleus pulposus. Recently, our laboratory has extended the development of animal models of chronic pain and theories of neuropathic hyperalgesia and allodynia from a peripheral nerve injury model to a spinal root injury model. We further characterized an animal model in which the L5 spinal root is loosely ligated with chromic gut (Hashizume et al., 2000). This model, which is a modification of the Bennett chronic constriction injury model of the sciatic nerve (Bennett and Xie, 1988), produces behavioral changes suggestive of thermal hypersensitivity and mechanical allodynia by day one following surgery. We demonstrated a graded, mechanical allodynia dependent on the type of root injury, i.e. ligation with inflammatory chromic gut, tight ligation with silk suture, or loose ligation with silk suture. The combination of the chromic gut and ligation evoked the most pronounced mechanical allodynia followed by tight ligation of silk suture and then loose ligation of silk suture. Therefore, an important determinant to predict robust pain behaviors in this model is the chemical stimulation released from chromic gut combined with the mechanical compression of the spinal root. Of interest, the radiculopathic symptoms resolve within 10 days when the root is loosely ligated with hypotoxic silk suture. Therefore, the root injury model using chromic gut is useful for the study of pathophysiologic mechanisms of radicular pain since the chromic gut models both the inflammatory component of herniated nucleus pulposus and the ligation models root compression.
We have put forth the hypothesis that central, neuroimmune mechanisms are an important factor for the development and maintenance of chronic neuropathic pain (Deleo and Colburn, 1996: DeLeo et al., 1996, 1997b). Supporting this hypothesis, we have demonstrated spinal glial cell (microglia and astrocytes) activation and increased cytokine (IL-1β) protein expression in the lumbar radiculopathy model used in the present study (Hashizume et al., 2000). Our present working hypothesis is that injury to a lumbar root from a herniated disk causes a central, neuroimmune process associated with elevated spinal proinflammatory cytokines and associated membrane glycoproteins such as Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)Class II that may manifest clinically as radiculopathy.
To examine this neuroimmune hypothesis and to develop a possible new treatment for chronic radicular pain, we undertook this study using the FDA approved pharmacological intervention, methotrexate (MTX). MTX is a folate antagonist originally developed for the treatment of malignancies and now widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis due to its potent, but selective, immunosuppresive actions. We designed a two phase study to address the effect of centrally administered MTX on both the prevention of mechanical allodynia as well as the efficacy of MTX on the reduction of existing mechanical allodynia following lumbar root injury. In order to begin to address possible mechanisms of action of MTX in this system, we also utilized immunohistochemistry to determine whether MTX altered spinal glial activation and MHC II expression.
2. Methods
Experiments were performed using a total of 58 male Holtzman-strain rats, each weighing 200–250 g at the start of surgery, housed individually under USDA and AAALAC-approved condition with 12/12 h light-dark cycle and free access to food and water. All experimental procedures were approved by Dartmouth College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
2.1. Surgical procedure
All surgical procedures were performed using aseptic technique as mandated by AAALAC and our IACUC. Rats were deeply anesthetized using inhalation anesthesia (induced at 4% and maintained at 2% halothane in 100% O2). The radiculopathy/sciatica model has been previously described (Hashizume et al., 2000). Briefly, the spinal root, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and the adjacent dura mater on the left side at L5 were carefully exposed by hemilaminectomy in all rats using a surgical microscope. Five 0.3 cm pieces of 4-0 chromic gut ligature were laid adjacent to the root and secured by two loose ligatures of 5-0 chromic gut (Fig. 1). The muscle layers and incision were closed with 3-0 silk suture and staples, respectively.
Schematic of the spinal root injury model: the spinal root, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and the adjacent dura mater on the left side at L5 were exposed by hemilaminectomy. Five 0.3 cm pieces of 4-0 chromic gut ligature were laid adjacent to the root and secured by two loose ligatures of 5-0 chromic gut.
2.1.1. Phase I protocol
Three distinct combinations of treatments were investigated in phase I of the study. Methotrexate (4-Amino-10-methylfolic acid, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was reconstituted to 10 mg/ml in saline and pH adjusted to 7.4. Group A (_n_=10, root injury + MTX treatment): immediately following the surgical procedure and prior to incision closure, 1 mg/kg of MTX (volume 100 μl/kg) was intrathecally injected by passing a PE-10 catheter through an incision in the exposed dura mater to the position 3 cm central to the incision. The PE-10 catheter was pulled out and the same dose and volume of MTX (1 mg/kg) was administrated around the injured roots (total dose 2 mg/kg) (DeLeo et al., 1997a). Drug administration was performed under direct visualization based on the need to verify an intrathecal site of delivery. Standard incision closing procedures followed. Under deep inhalation anesthesia, MTX was administered again at 2 and 4 days post surgery by opening the surgical wound and repeating the delivery method performed during surgery. Group B (_n_=10, root injury+saline treatment): 100 μl/kg of saline was intrathecally and perineurally administered in the same manner as group A (total volume 200 μl/kg) at surgery and at days 2 and 4 following surgery. Group C (_n_=10, sham operation+MTX treatment): the L5 nerve roots were exposed but not injured. MTX was administered using the same dose, protocol, and time points as in group A. Gait disturbance and mechanical allodynia were assessed in all rats daily until euthanization at day 7 postsurgery.
2.1.2. Phase II protocol
The phase I protocol was extended to day 14 with the surgery, delivery method, volume and dose being identical to the phase I study. The rats were divided into three groups: Group D (_n_=10, saline: MTX): saline was administered at the time of surgery and at days 2 and 4 postsurgery. MTX was administered in the second week at days 7, 9, and 11 postsurgery. Group E (_n_=8, saline: saline): saline was administered throughout the 2 weeks at the same time points as in Group D. Group F (_n_=10, MTX: saline): MTX was administered during surgery and at days 2 and 4 postsurgery. Saline was administered on days 7, 9 and 11 postsurgery. Gait disturbance and mechanical allodynia were assessed in all rats before the surgery and at days 2, 4, 7, 9, 11 and 14 until euthanization.
2.2. Behavioral tests
The animals were tested for 3 days pre-operatively to acclimate them to the behavioral testing apparatus, the experimenter and to obtain baseline values. All behavioral testings were performed by an experimenter blinded to the treatment.
2.2.1. Gait disturbance and hind paw eversion
Gait disturbance was scored using the following rating scale: normal gait (−), slight gait disturbance with motor weakness (+), severe gait disturbance with motor paresis of the ipsilateral hind paw (++). The presence or absence of hind paw eversion described as planter flexion of the toes and/or the presence of an inverted hind paw (the toes were held together or retroflexed on the hind paw) was also recorded.
2.2.2. Hind paw withdrawal to mechanical stimulation
Tactile sensitivity (mechanical allodynia) was measured as the frequency of foot-withdrawals elicited by a defined mechanical stimulus (DeLeo et al., 1996; Colburn et al., 1997, 1999). In each blinded testing session, rats were subjected to three sequential series of ten tactile stimulations to the plantar surface of the ipsilateral (nerve root injured) hind paw using 2 and 12 g von Frey filaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL). Baseline (pre-lesion) responsiveness was minimal as confirmed from testing sessions prior to the surgery. Mechanical allodynia was assessed by recording the total number of responses elicited during three successive trials (ten stimulations/each filament) separated by at least 10 min for a total possible score of 30. The terms for the allodynic condition were defined retrospectively based on the average responses to 12 g von Frey stimulation in each group as follows: minimal (0–5), mild (5–10), moderate (10–15), robust (15 and more).
2.3. Histological examination
2.3.1. Tissue preparation
All animals were perfusion fixed for immunohistochemistry. Under deep anesthesia (sodium pentobarbital, 50 mg/kg, i.p.) rats were euthanized by transcardiac perfusion. Rats were then perfused with 300 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 500 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS. Following perfusion and laminectomy, the lesioned L5 roots were verified and traced to their site of entry into the spinal cord. Appropriate L5 spinal cord segments were harvested and post fixed for 4 h in fixative and then cryoprotected 2–3 days in 30% sucrose/PBS at 4°C. The segments were then freeze-mounted in OCT embedding medium on cork blocks for cryostat sectioning.
2.3.2. Immunohistochemistry
Optimal dilutions and incubation time periods for each antibody and lot were determined prior to this study. Immunohistochemistry was performed by the avidin-biotin technique (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) on free floating 20 μm sections. Elimination of the primary antibody was performed in each run as a negative control. Monoclonal antibodies OX-42 (labels complement receptor (CR3, CD11b)) and anti-MHC II were used as a microglial marker and for MHC II expression respectively, at a dilution of 1:2 (provided from Dr. William F. Hickey, Dartmouth Medical School, NH). A rabbit polyclonal antibody to glial fibrillary acidic protein (anti-GFAP, DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) was used as an astrocytic marker at the dilution of 1:20 000. Five or more sections per animal were prepared from the L5 segments in each run.
Assessment of spinal glial activation and MHC II expression was performed by two experimenters blinded to the treatment groups. Following staining of lumbar spinal cord, all the sections from each animal were surveyed under low (10×) and medium (40×) magnification to arrive at a score based on a previously described scale for glial activation (Colburn et al., 1997). Briefly, the scale is as follows: baseline (·), mild response (+), moderate response (++), intense response (+++). The final score was based on the average reactivity of all sections per animal. The expression of MHC II-like immunoreactivity was based on the presence or absence of specific, cellular staining throughout the gray matter of the spinal cord.
2.4. Statistical analysis
All data obtained from the observations of motor paresis and mechanical sensitivity were presented as the mean of eight or ten animals per treatment group±SEM. To compare the time-dependent curves among the groups, a repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Bonferroni multiple comparison was used. The experimental period of Phase II study was separated into the first 7 days and the second 7 days according to the changes of treatment. Additionally, the data from the tactile stimulation were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA at each time point. Differences between individual means were determined using a Sheffe's multiple comparison test. P<0.05 for intergroup differences and P<0.02 for post-hoc test were defined as significant.
3. Results
3.1. Phase I
3.1.1. Hind paw eversion and gait disturbance
All rats in group A and B which underwent lumbar root injury demonstrated eversion of the ipsilateral hind paw. Forty percent of rats in these groups also showed a slight gait disturbance (scores of +). The gait disturbance improved and all rats in both groups showed normal gait by day 7 postsurgery. There was no statistical difference in the postoperative change in hind paw eversion or gait disturbance between groups A and B (repeated measured ANOVA). The sham group treated with MTX (group C) did not demonstrate any hind paw eversion or gait disturbance. The postoperative changes in group C were significantly different from groups A and B (P<0.0001).
3.1.2. Hind paw withdrawal to mechanical stimulation
The rats rarely demonstrated baseline stimulation responses with 2 or 12 g von Frey filament before the surgery. The rats in group B (L5 root injury+saline treatment) demonstrated mechanical allodynia from one day postsurgery to the time of euthanization (at day 7). In contrast, allodynia was reduced in group A (L5 root injury+MTX treatment) toward the baseline after the peak response at day 2 post surgery. The rats in group C (sham operation+MTX treatment) demonstrated only a minimal response after the surgery. The difference in allodynia was statistically significant by repeated measures ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni (2 g VF, _P_A–B=0.0138, _P_B–C=N.S., _P_C–A=0.0014; 12 g VF, _P_A–B=0.0034, _P_B–C=0.0045, _P_C–A<0.0001; Fig. 2a).
Time course of tactile sensitivity using 12 g von Frey filament at the ipsilateral hind paw following L5 nerve root injuries. For each time point, all animals were exposed to a total of 30 stimulations. The average number of evoked foot withdrawal responses is recorded for each animal group. (a) Phase I study: arrows indicate the time points that MTX or saline was administered. In group A, MTX was administered intrathecally (1 mg/kg) and around the spinal root (1 mg/kg) at surgery and at days 2 and 4 postsurgery. Saline injection was employed as a control in group B. In group C, sham operated animals were administered MTX to determine the potential for behavioral /neural side effects. The difference in allodynia was statistically significant between the three treatment groups by repeated measures ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni (P A – B=0.0034, P B – C=0.0045, P C – A<0.0001). (b) Phase II study: arrows (1) and (2) indicate the time points that the same numbered solution was administered in the first week and the second week, respectively. In group D, the same dose and method of delivery of MTX was performed as in Phase I with the exception that MTX was administered at days 7, 9, and 11 postsurgery following saline administration in the first week. Saline injection was continued in group E. For examining the recurrence of pain after MTX termination, saline was injected in the second week following MTX administration in group F. In the second week, mechanical allodynia significantly decreased in the MTX treated group D, while mechanical allodynia continued in the saline treated group E (repeated ANOVA with Bonferroni, 12 g: _P_=0.0121). Allodynia was significantly attenuated in group F as compared to the response in groups D and E at day 7 (one-way ANOVA, P<0.0001) and remained significantly lower as compared to group E up to day 11 postsurgery (one-way ANOVA, _P_9=0.0013: _P_11=0.0048).
3.2. Phase II
3.2.1. Hind paw eversion and gait disturbance
The rats in all three groups demonstrated a similar time course in gait disturbance regardless of their postoperative treatments (repeated measured ANOVA). The slight gait disturbance observed at day 2 postsurgery gradually recovered and all the animals had normal gait at the time of euthanization (day 14 postsurgery).
3.2.2. Hind paw withdrawal to mechanical stimulation
The rats in groups D and E, treated with intrathecal saline injection for the first week after the L5 nerve root injury (at the surgery, and days 2 and 4 after surgery), showed a robust allodynic response which developed by day 2 postsurgery and continued up to day 7 postsurgery. At day 7 postsurgery, there was not a significant difference in the response scores between groups D and E (one-way ANOVA). The scores were: 2 g von Frey: 8.5±3.9, 12 g von Frey: 21.6±4.0 and 2 g von Frey: 8.0±4.4, 12 g von Frey: 20.7±6.0, groups D and E, respectively. In the second week, mechanical allodynia significantly decreased in the MTX treated group D, while mechanical allodynia continued in the saline treated group E (repeated ANOVA with Bonferroni, 12 g: _P_=0.0121). The mean response scores at day 14 postsurgery in groups D and E were: 2 g von Frey: 3.9±4.2, 12 g von Frey: 10.7±6.4 and 2 g von Frey: 11.38±5.5, 12 g von Frey: 22.1±5.0, respectively. The animals in group F, which were treated with MTX after the L5 root injury in the first week, demonstrated allodynia which was gradually decreased after the peak at day 2 postsurgery. At day 7 postsurgery, allodynia was significantly attenuated in group F as compared to the response in the saline treated groups D and E (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni, 2 g von Frey: _P_7D–F=0.0016, _P_7E–F=0.0020, 12 g von Frey: _P_7D–F<0.0001, _P_7E–F<0.0001). In the second week when the animals were treated with saline instead of MTX, the allodynic response remained significantly lower as compared to group E up to day 11 postsurgery; 7 days from the last MTX administration (12 g von Frey: _P_9E–F=0.0013, _P_11E–F=0.0048; Fig. 2b).
3.3. Gross pathology
Gross anatomical inspection following perfusion demonstrated no evidence of suppurative inflammation around the nerve roots or DRGs. In all groups except the sham operated (group C), the treated nerve roots were encapsulated with dense granulation tissue and fibrous adhesions. Of interest, granulation and adhesions around the injured nerve root were markedly decreased in the MTX treated groups (A, D, and F) as compared to the saline treated groups (B and E).
3.4. Immunohistochemistry
OX-42 and GFAP expression were elevated in the gray matter of the L5 spinal section in all groups that underwent the root ligature with chromic gut (Groups A, B, D–F). All rats in these groups demonstrated intense microglial and astrocytic activation (+++). There was no significant difference in the glial activation between the MTX-treated groups (A, D, and F) and the saline treated groups (B and E). (Figs. 3 and 4)
OX-42 immunoreactivity (microglial marker) in the ipsilateral spinal cord at day 7 following L5 spinal root injury: (a) rat in group A (administered MTX at surgery, at days 2 and 4 post injury); (b) rat in group B (administered saline at surgery, at days 2 and 4 postsurgery); (c) normal rat. Note the intensity of microglial reaction in the L5 root injured rats as compared to the normal rat.
Spinal astrocytic responses as illustrated by GFAP immunoreactivity. (a) Spinal cord GFAP immunoreactivity in a normal rat. The rectangle indicates the area of the ipsilateral dorsal horn which was magnified for (b–d). (b) Ipsilateral spinal dorsal horn GFAP immunoreactivity in the rat of group A (MTX was administered intrathecally (1 mg/kg) and around the spinal root (1 mg/kg) at surgery and at days 2 and 4 postsurgery), (c) rat in group B (saline treatment), (d) rat in group C (MTX administration following sham operation).
MHC II-like immunoreactivity was markedly increased in 5/5 rats in the saline treated group from the Phase II study (see Fig. 5). The morphology of MHC II staining was identical to microglia. In contrast, 5/6 rats demonstrated no detectable MHC II staining in Group D (Saline:MTX group); see Table 1.
Representative photomicrograph of MHC II-like immunoreactivity in the ipsilateral dorsal horn from a rat in the saline treated group (rat #23 in Phase II).
Presence of MHC II-like immunoreactivity in the gray matter of the dorsal horn following root injury in either saline treated rats or saline:MTX treated rats
4. Discussion
4.1. Summary
These data demonstrate a statistically significant attenuation of the incidence of withdrawal to von Frey stimulation in a radicular pain model following central administration of low dose MTX, a recognized immunosuppressive agent. The possibility that the increased response of withdrawal to von Frey stimulation is due to a confounding factor such as weight bearing as discussed by Kauppila et al. (1998) is very unlikely. Previous studies have confirmed mechanical allodynia is present in restrained rats after the identical root injury (Kawakami et al., 1994). Although the presence of mechanical allodynia in humans with radiculopathy is observed, the incidence is relatively rare. This raises the possibility that the rats are responding to ongoing pain, not pain evoked by tactile stimulation. This factor is very difficult to ascertain in any rat model of persistent pain. However, it is highly relevant to consider for the clinical translation of drug studies performed in animal models.
The precise site of action (nerve root versus spinal cord) was not determined in the present study. Since MTX was effective both as a preventative agent (Phase I) as well as demonstrating efficacy on existing radicular pain (Phase II), these behavioral results support a neuroimmune/inflammatory component in the generation and maintenance of persistent pain associated with root injury.
4.2. Potential mechanisms of action
We are confident that effective levels of MTX reach spinal nociceptive regions because of the report by Burch et al. (1988). In their autoradiographic study using rabbits, 67–99% of the total area of the spinal cord sections were shown to be exposed to intrathecally administered MTX 1 h after administration. They also reported that high drug levels were seen in the area of the substantia gelatinosa and peripheral white matter.
4.3. Action as an immunomodulator
The exact mechanism of action of MTX in attenuating mechanical allodynia in this study has not yet been fully elucidated. In our initial investigation, we focused on the role of glial cells as a potential drug target. MTX is a folic acid antagonist that inhibits dihydrofolate reductase and, thereby blocks thymidilate synthesis, arresting cells in late S phase (Jolivet et al., 1983). Billingsley et al. (1982) reported that intraperitoneal pretreatment of MTX (10 mg/kg per day×5 days) depressed trauma-induced glial proliferation in the rat brain. The astrocytic depression was also reported in MTX administered cell culture (Gregorios and Soucy, 1990). Previously, we have demonstrated activation of glial cells (microglia and astrocytes) in the relevant spinal segments using the same animal model as this study (Hashizume et al., 2000). In the present study, using immunohistochemistry, there was no significant difference in the activation of glial cells between the MTX treated and the saline-injected groups. This may not be surprising if one recognizes that both OX-42 and GFAP are sensitive but not specific markers of CNS injury. In addition, it is unlikely that, in the doses given in the present study, methotrexate diminished proliferation of glial cells by inhibiting de novo purine and pyrimidine synthesis.
It has been recognized, however, that a subpopulation of microglia (the macrophages of the central nervous system) become immunocompetent in response to infection or injury. One way in which this occurs is through the expression of MHC class II. In normal CNS, both MHC class I and MHC class II expression is minimal compared to other tissues (Hickey and Kimura, 1988; Kreutzberg, 1996). This low expression of MHC and reduced immune surveillance are believed to contribute to the immune-privileged status of non-renewable CNS neurons. Part of the complex peripheral immune response involves CD4+ T cells recognizing foreign antigens bound to self class II MHC molecules. MHC class II is expressed on antigen presenting cells (APC) which present antigen to T cells. Microglia are the antigen presenting cells of the CNS (Wekerle et al., 1986).
Cytokines are key modulators of MHC class I and II genes in a wide variety of cells. Of relevance to the discussion of cytokines and pain processing, proinflammatory cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) enhance MHC class II expression. Glia do not normally express MHC class II but its expression can be induced by cytokines (Roitt et al., 1998). The mediators which alter the expression of the MHC class II antigens are tissue specific. This has implications for possible selective immunomodulation of MHC class II in tissues in which it is over expressed without affecting MHC class II expression in other tissues. We have previously demonstrated an increase in spinal MHC class II expression as compared with a sham surgery group or normal rats in the same radiculopathy model as used in the present study (Hunt et al., 1999). The presence of spinal cord MHC class II-like immunoreactivity in the lumbar radiculopathy model in cells which morphologically resemble activated microglia (see Fig. 5) further supports the notion that central neuroinflammatory processes involving immune recognition are involved in root injury.
Genes encoding MHC class II are immensely polymorphic. Specific alleles for MHC class II has been associated with a variety of autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus (Roitt et al., 1998). A genetic component of chronic pain has recently emerged to help explain why all individuals with a similar injury or disease may not experience the same type of pain (Mogil et al., 1999). Similarly, we have put forth a provocative theory that specific polymorphisms in membrane glycoproteins such as MHC class II may render an individual more susceptible to persistent pain after a root or peripheral nerve injury (DeLeo, 1999).
It is well known that immune cells (macrophages, monocytes and lymphocytes) are commonly observed in the herniated discs and that various cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α etc.) are produced by the disc materials (Kang et al., 1996; Kawakami et al., 1996). Several reports note reduction in immunoglobulin (IgG) synthesis with significantly lowered levels of all IgG isotypes after 3 months of MTX treatment (Roitt et al., 1998). Administration of low-doses of MTX (450 mg/kg per week×4 weeks) inhibits LPS-induced TNF-production by macrophages (Durez et al., 1998). In addition, it has been demonstrated that immunosuppressive therapy with MTX modulates cytokine production by T cells and macrophages (Becker et al., 1998; Neurath et al., 1999). It has been reported that MTX inhibited macrophage activation, PGE2 and IL-1 production, cyanine dye accumulation as well as the influx of Ia positive macrophages into synovial tissue (Johnson et al., 1988). Finally, MTX is capable of modulating the cytokine network by increasing Th2 anti-inflammatory cytokines and decreasing Th1 proinflammatory cytokines (Constantin et al., 1998). This mechanism has been proposed to explain the in vivo action of MTX as a potent anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory agent.
We speculate that MTX may act as an anti-inflammatory agent or as an immunomodulator in the spinal cord and/or the injury site based on the finding that central administration of MTX reduced or eliminated MHC II expression on microglia after root injury. In addition, our observation that granulation and adhesion around the injured nerve root was much less in the MTX treated group as compared to the saline treated group demonstrated that MTX may reduce inflammation around the nerve root caused by the inflammatory chromic gut.
Due to the semi-quantitative nature of immunocytochemistry, analysis of cytokine expression was not attempted in this study. Experiments in progress and future studies planned include an assessment of cytokine expression after MTX treatment utilizing quantifiable methods like enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for protein detection (ELISA) and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for mRNA detection. Given the multifaceted dimensions of nociceptive processing after nerve or root injury and the complex pharmacology of MTX, it may be difficult to assess the specific mechanism of action. Indeed, MTX may have multiple actions which may partly explain its enhanced efficacy over other agents.
4.4. Enhanced adenosine
Unlike its use in the treatment of malignancies (pulses of 20–250 mg/kg), MTX is administered weekly in low doses (0.1–0.3 mg/kg) to treat rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory diseases (Furst and Kremer, 1988). Cronstein et al., 1993 demonstrated that low-dose weekly methotrexate therapy leads to intracellular accumulation of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR), which promotes increased adenosine release at sites of inflammation. Several studies have shown the antinociceptive effects of adenosine and adenosine analogs when administered intrathecally to rodents in models of acute and chronic pain (Holmgren et al., 1983; Reeve and Dickenson, 1995; Cui et al., 1997). Moreover, adenosine, acting at an A3 receptor, interrupts the endotoxin CD14 receptor signal transduction pathway and blocks induction of cytokine TNF in macrophages (McWhinney et al., 1996).
4.5. Potential spinal toxicity
The dosage of MTX in this study was 1 mg/kg for intrathecal injection and 1 mg/kg for the nerve root administration. Clinically, MTX can be administered orally, intravenously, intramusculary, or intrathecally. MTX diffuses from the periphery into the cerebrospinal fluid with difficulty and peak CSF levels are less than 0.1% of corresponding plasma levels following intravenous injection of a single 50 mg dose (Shapiro et al., 1975). For this reason, we performed intrathecal administration for MTX delivery to the spinal cord. Of particular clinical interest, intrathecal MTX has been associated with a variety of neurotoxic effects ranging from acute chemical arrachnoiditis to motor dysfunction, seizures, and coma (Gagliano and Costanzi, 1976; Kaplan and Wiernik, 1982). The MTX dosage in this study, 1 mg/kg, was a quarter of the previously reported dose that was maximally tolerated by rats without acute neurotoxic effects (Morris et al., 1992). The rats in group C, which underwent a sham operation and MTX administration, showed neither evidence of motor paresis nor allodynia in response to von Frey stimulation. Intrathecal injections of MTX or saline were performed intermittently without catheterization because we have previously reported that intrathecal catheterization itself induces neuroimmune activation (enhanced glial activation and cytokine expression) in the rat and may alter nociceptive processing (Serpell et al., 1993; DeLeo et al., 1997a).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that MTX administered intrathecally and around the spinal root had an antinociceptive effect in this combined chemical/mechanical lumbar root injury model. MTX administration, thus, may offer a new treatment modality for radicular pain with or without disc herniation as well as directing new research into the development of novel immunomodulators for the treatment of chronic pain. In addition, these data also support the use of this model as a tool to study new therapies for chronic low back pain model associated with radiculopathy.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr William F. Hickey for providing the antibodies, OX-42 and anti-MHC II, Janice Arruda and Tracy Wynkoop for editorial assistance; and the following for grant support: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR44757); Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation; and Bristol-Myers Squibb/Zimmer Orthopaedic Foundation.
References
Becker C, Barbulescu K, Kildner K, Meyter zum Buschenfelde KH, Neurath ME. Activation and methotrexate-mediated suppression of the TNF alpha promoter in T cells and macrophages. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1998;859:311-314.
Bennett GJ, Xie YK. A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in man. Pain. 1988;33:87-107.
Billingsley ML, Hall N, Mandel HG. Trauma-induced glial proliferation: possible involvement of the immune system. Immunopharmacology. 1982;5:95-101.
Burch PA, Grossman SA, Reinhard CS. Spinal cord penetration of intrathecally administered cytarabine and methotrexate: a quantitative autoradiographic study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;15:1211-1216.
Colburn RW, DeLeo JA, Rickman AJ, Yeager MP, Kwon P, Hickey WF. Dissociation of microglial activation and neuropathic pain behaviors following peripheral nerve injury in the rat. J Neuroimmunol. 1997;79:163-175.
Colburn RW, Rickman AJ, DeLeo JA. The effect of site and type of nerve injury on spinal glial activation and neuropathic pain behavior. Exp Neurol. 1999;157:289-304.
Constantin A, Loubet-Lescoulie P, Lambert N, Yassine-Diab B, Abbal M, Mazieres B, de Preval C, Cantagrel A. Anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory action of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: evidence of increased interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 gene expression demonstrated in vivo by competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Arthritis Rheumat. 1998;41:48-57.
Cronstein BN, Naime D, Ostad E. The anti-inflammatory mechanism of methotrexate: increased adenosine release at inflamed sites diminishes leukocyte accumulation. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:2675-2682.
Cui JG, Sollevi A, Linderoth B, Meyerson BA. Adenosine receptor activation suppresses tactile hypersensitivity and potentiates spinal cord stimulation in mononeuropathic rats. Neurosci Lett. 1997;223:173-176.
DeLeo JA. Correlation of animal models to the clinical syndrome of low back pain, 9th World Congress of Pain. Vienna, Austria: IASP; 1999.
DeLeo JA, Colburn RW., 1996. The role of cytokines in nociception and chronic pain. In: Weinstein JN, Gordon SL, editors., Low back pain: a scientific and clinical overview. AAOS Publishers, Rosemont, IL, pp. 163-185.
DeLeo JA, Colburn RW, Nichols M, Malhotra A. Interleukin-6-mediated hyperalgesia/allodynia and increased spinal IL-6 expression in a rat mononeuropathy model. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1996;16:695-700.
DeLeo JA, Colburn RW, Rickman AJ, Yeager MP. Intrathecal catheterization alone induces neuroimmune activation in the rat. Eur J Pain. 1997;1:115-122.
DeLeo JA, Colburn RW, Rickman AJ. Cytokine and growth factor immunohistochemical spinal profiles in two animal models of mononeuropathy. Brain Res. 1997;759:50-57.
Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu YJ. Descriptive epidemiology of low back pain and its related medical costs in the United States. Spine. 1987;12:264-268.
Durez P, Appelboom T, Vray B, Pira C, Goldman M. Methotrexate inhibits LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor production in vivo. Eur Cytokine Network. 1998;9:669-676.
Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:263-271.
Furst DE, Kremer JM. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumat. 1988;31:305-314.
Gagliano RG, Costanzi JJ. Paraplegia following intrathecal methotrexate. Cancer. 1976;37:1663-1668.
Gregorios JB, Soucy D. Effects of methotrexate on astrocytes in primary culture: light and electron microscopic studies. Brain Res. 1990;516:20-30.
Hashizume H, DeLeo JA, Colburn RW, Weinstein JN. Spinal glial activation and cytokine expression following lumbar root injury in the rat. Spine. 2000;25(10), in press
Hickey WF, Kimura H. Perivascular microglial cells of the CNS are bone marrow-derived and present antigen in vivo. Science. 1988;238:290-292.
Holmgren M, Hednar T, Nordberg G, Mellstrand T. Antinociceptive effects in the rat of an adenosine analogue, N-6-phenylisopropyladenosine. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1983;35:679-680.
Hunt JL, DeLeo JA, Weinstein JN. The role of central neuroinflammation in lumbar radiculopathy. Spine 1999 (submitted).
Johnson WJ, DiMartino MJ, Meunier PC, Muirhead KA, Hanna N. Methotrexate inhibits macrophage activation as well as vascular and cellular inflammatory events in rat adjuvant induced arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:745-749.
Jolivet J, Cowan KH, Curt GA, Clendeninn NJ, Chabner BA. The pharmacology and clinical use of methotrexate. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:1094-1104.
Kang JD, Georgescu HI, McIntyre-Larkin L, Stefanovic-Racic M, Donaldson WF III, Evans CH. Herniated lumbar intervertebral discs spontaneously produce matrix metalloproteinase, nitric oxide, interleukin-6 and prostaglandin E2. Spine. 1996;21:271-277.
Kaplan RS, Wiernik PH. Neurotoxicity of antineoplastic drugs. Semin Oncol. 1982;9:103-130.
Kauppila T, Kontinen VK, Pertovaara A. Weight bearing of the limb as a confounding factor in assessment of mechanical allodynia in the rat. Pain. 1998;4:55-59.
Kawakami M, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Chatani K, Traub RJ, Meller ST, Gebhart GF. Experimental lumbar radiculopathy: Immunohistochemical and quantitative demonstrations of pain induced by lumbar nerve root irritation of the rat. Spine. 1994;19:1780-1794.
Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Weinstein JN, Hashizume H, Nishi H, Meller ST. Pathomechanisms of pain-related behavior produced by allografts of intervertebral disc in the rat. Spine. 1996;21:2101-2107.
Kreutzberg GW. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:312-318.
McCarron RF, Wimpee MW, Hudkins P, Laros GS. The inflammatory effect of nucleus pulposus: a possible element in the pathogenesis of low-back pain. Spine. 1987;12:760-764.
McWhinney CD, Dudley MW, Bowlin TL, Peet NP, Schook L, Bradshaw M, De M, Borcherding DR, Edwards CK III. Activation of adenosine A3 receptors on macrophages inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996;310:209-216.
Mogil JS, Wilson SG, Bon K, Lee SE, Chung K, Raber P, Pieper JO, Hain HS, Belknap JK, Hubert L, Elmer GI, Chung JM, Devor M. Heritability of nociception I: responses of 11 inbred mouse strains on 12 measures of nociception. Pain. 1999;80:67-82.
Morris GM, Hopewell JW, Morris AD. The influence of methotrexate on radiation-induced damage to different lengths of the rat spinal cord. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:152-156.
Neurath ME, Hildner K, Becker C, Schlack JF, Barbulescu K, Germann T, Schmitt E, Schirmacher P, Haralambous S, Pasparakis M, Meyer zum Buschemfelde KH, Kollias G, Marker-Hermann E. Methotrexate specifically modulates cytokine production by T cells and macrophages in murine collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Clin Exp Immunol. 1999;115:42-55.
Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S, Bagge U. Effects of experimental graded compression on blood flow in spinal nerve roots. A vital microscopic study on the porcine cauda equina. J Orthop Res. 1989;7:817-823.
Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine. 1993;18:1425-1432.
Reeve AJ, Dickenson AH. The roles of spinal adenosine receptors in the control of acute and more persistent nociceptive responses of dorsal horn neurones in the anaesthetized rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;116:2221-2228.
Roitt I, Brostoff J, Male D., 1998. Immunology, 5th ed. Mosby International Ltd, London.
Serpell MG, DeLeo JA, Coombs DW, Colburn RW, Twitchell BB, Willenbring S, Fromm C. Intrathecal catheterization alone reduces autotomy after sciatic cryoneurolysis in the rat. Life Sci. 1993;53:1887-1892.
Shapiro WR, Young DG, Metha BM. Methotrexate distribution in cerebrospinal fluid after intravenous, ventricular, and lumbar injections. New Eng J Med. 1975;293:161-166.
Wekerle H, Linington C, Lassman H, Meyermann R. Cellular immune reactivity within the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1986;9:271-277.
Keywords:
Methotrexate; Nerve root; Radiculopathy; Chronic pain
© 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.