Functional diversity of terrestrial microbial decomposers and their substrates (original) (raw)

[1] D.C. Catling; M.W. Claire How Earth's atmosphere evolved to an oxic state: a status report, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Volume 237 (2005), pp. 1-20

[2] H.D. Holland The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. B, Volume 361 (2006), pp. 903-915

[3] T.W. Dahl; E.U. Hammarlund; A.D. Anbar; D.P.G. Bond; B.C. Gill et al. Devonian rise in atmospheric oxygen correlated to the radiations of terrestrial plants and large predatory fish, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences U. S. A., Volume 107 (2010), pp. 17911-17915

[4] J.H. Lawton; R.M. May Extinction rates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995

[5] J. Feehan; M. Harley; J. van Minnen Climate change in Europe. 1. Impact on terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity. A review, Agr. Sust. Develop., Volume 29 (2009), pp. 409-421

[6] E.D. Schulze; H.A. Mooney Biodiversity and ecosystem function, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1993

[7] F.S. Chapin; E. Zavaleta; V.T. Eviner; R. Naylor; P.M. Vitousek et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity, Nature, Volume 405 (2000), pp. 234-242

[8] A. Hector; B. Schmid; C. Beierkuhnlein; M.C. Caldeira; M. Diemer et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands, Science, Volume 286 (1999), pp. 1123-1127

[9] D.U. Hooper; F.S. Chapin; J.J. Ewel; A. Hector; P. Inchausti et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge, Ecol. Monogr., Volume 75 (2005), pp. 3-35

[10] E.M. Spehn; A. Hector; J. Joshi; M. Scherer-Lorenzen; B. Schmid et al. Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands, Ecol. Monogr., Volume 75 (2005), pp. 37-63

[11] D.A. Wardle; K.I. Bonner; K.S. Nicholson Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function, Oikos, Volume 79 (1997), pp. 247-258

[12] S. Hättenschwiler; A.V. Tiunov; S. Scheu Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., Volume 36 (2005), pp. 191-218

[13] M.O. Gessner; C.M. Swan; C.K. Dang; B.G. McKie; R.D. Bardgett; D.H. Wall; S. Hättenschwiler Diversity meets decomposition, Trends Ecol. Evol., Volume 25 (2010), pp. 372-380

[14] D. Tilman; D. Wedin; J. Knops Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems, Nature, Volume 379 (1996), pp. 718-720

[15] M.A. Huston Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity, Oecologia, Volume 110 (1997), pp. 449-460

[16] J.P. Grime Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects, J. Ecol., Volume 86 (1998), pp. 902-910

[17] M. Loreau; S. Naeem; P. Inchausti; J. Bengtsson; J.P. Grime et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges, Science, Volume 294 (2001), pp. 804-808

[18] J. Fargione; D. Tilman; R. Dybzinski; J. Hille Ris Lambers; C. Clark et al. From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity-productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Volume 274 (2007), pp. 871-876

[19] E. Garnier; J. Cortez; G. Billès; M.-L. Navas; C. Roumet et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession, Ecology, Volume 85 (2004), pp. 2630-2637

[20] D.U. Hooper; P.M. Vitousek Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling, Ecol. Monogr., Volume 68 (1998), pp. 121-149

[21] E.M. Spehn; M. Scherer-Lorenzen; B. Schmid; A. Hector; M.C. Caldeira et al. The role of legumes as a component of biodiversity in a cross-European study of grassland biomass nitrogen, Oikos, Volume 98 (2002), pp. 205-218

[22] N. Montès; F.T. Maestre; C. Ballini; V. Baldy; T. Gauquelin et al. On the relative importance of the effects of selection and complementarity as drivers of diversity-productivity relationships in Mediterranean shrublands, Oikos, Volume 117 (2008), pp. 1345-1350

[23] J. van Ruijven; F. Berendse Long-term persistence of a positive plant diversity-productivity relationship in the absence of legumes, Oikos, Volume 118 (2009), pp. 101-106

[24] S. Diaz; M. Cabido Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes, Trends Ecol. Evol., Volume 16 (2001), pp. 646-655

[25] S. Lavorel; E. Garnier Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail, Funct. Ecol., Volume 16 (2002), pp. 545-556

[26] C. Violle; M.L. Navas; D. Vile; E. Kazakou; C. Fortunel et al. Let the concept of trait be functional!, Oikos, Volume 116 (2007), pp. 882-892

[27] O.L. Petchey; K.J. Gaston Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward, Ecol. Lett., Volume 9 (2006), pp. 741-758

[28] E. Weiher; A. van der Werf; K. Thompson; M. Roderick; E. Garnier et al. Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology, J. Veg. Sci., Volume 10 (1999), pp. 609-620

[29] J.H.C. Cornelissen; S. Lavorel; E. Garnier; S. Diaz; N. Buchmann et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide, Austr. J. Bot., Volume 51 (2003), pp. 335-380

[30] S. Villéger, M.A. Mouchet, S. Brosse, M.J. Vanni, D. Mouillot, Do functional traits hold water? Towards a unified functional approach to fish communities (submitted manuscript).

[31] L. Brussaard; V.M. Behan-Pelletier; D.E. Bignell; V.K. Brown; W. Didden et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in soil, Ambio, Volume 26 (1997), pp. 563-570

[32] P. Lavelle; A.V. Spain Soil Ecology, Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002

[33] D. Wardle Communities and ecosystems: linking the aboveground and belowground components, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 2002

[34] R. Bardgett The biology of soil: a community and ecosystem approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005

[35] P. Lavelle; D. Bignell; M. Lepage; V. Wolters; P. Roger et al. Soil function in a changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers, Eur. J. Soil. Biol., Volume 33 (1997), pp. 159-193

[36] S. Scheu; H. Setälä Multitrophic interactions in decomposer communities (T. Tscharntke; B.A. Hawkins, eds.), Multitrophic Level Interactions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002 (pp. 223–264)

[37] J. Mikola; R.D. Bardgett; K. Hedlund Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and soil decomposer food webs (M. Loreau; S. Naeem; P. Inchausti, eds.), Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning-Synthesis and Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002, pp. 169-180

[38] M.J. Swift; O.W. Heal; J.M. Anderson Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1979

[39] G. Cadish; K.E. Giller Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition, CAB Int., Wallingford, 1997

[40] J. Cebrian Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities, Am. Nat., Volume 154 (1999), pp. 449-468

[41] B. Berg; M.P. Berg; P. Bottner; E. Box; A. Breymeyer et al. Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and eastern United States: some relationship with climate and litter quality, Biogeochem., Volume 20 (1993), pp. 127-159

[42] M.-M. Coûteaux; P. Bottner; B. Berg Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality, Trends Ecol. Evol., Volume 10 (1995), pp. 63-66

[43] R. Aerts Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship, Oikos, Volume 79 (1997), pp. 439-449

[44] T.R. Moore; J.A. Trofymow; J.A. Taylor; C. Prescott; C. Camiré et al. Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests, Glob. Change Biol., Volume 5 (1999), pp. 75-82

[45] J.M. Melillo; J.D. Aber; J.F. Muratore Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics, Ecology, Volume 63 (1982), pp. 621-626

[46] B.R. Taylor; D. Parkinson; W.F.J. Parsons Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test, Ecology, Volume 70 (1989), pp. 97-104

[47] S. Coq; J.M. Souquet; E. Meudec; V. Cheynier; S. Hättenschwiler Interspecific variation in leaf litter tannins drives decomposition in a tropical rainforest of French Guiana, Ecology, Volume 91 (2010), pp. 2080-2091

[48] S. Hättenschwiler; S. Coq; S. Barantal; I.T. Handa Leaf traits and decomposition in tropical rainforests: revisiting some commonly held views and towards a new hypothesis, New Phytol., Volume 189 (2011), pp. 950-965

[49] N. Perez-Harguindeguy; S. Diaz; J.H.C. Cornelissen; F. Vendramini; M. Cabido et al. Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina, Plant Soil, Volume 218 (2000), pp. 21-30

[50] W.K. Cornwell; J.H.C. Cornelissen; K. Amatangelo; E. Dorrepaal; V.T. Eviner et al. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide, Ecol. Lett., Volume 11 (2008), pp. 1065-1107

[51] S. Hättenschwiler; B. Aeschlimann; M.-M. Coûteaux; J. Roy; D. Bonal High variation in foliage and leaf litter chemistry among 45 tree species of a neotropical rainforest community, New Phytol., Volume 179 (2008), pp. 165-175

[52] T.B. Gartner; Z.G. Cardon Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter, Oikos, Volume 104 (2004), pp. 230-246

[53] K.Y. Epps; N.B. Comerford; J.B. Reeves; W.P. Cropper; Q.R. Araujo Chemical diversity–highlighting a species richness and ecosystem function disconnect, Oikos, Volume 116 (2007), pp. 1831-1840

[54] N.W.H. Mason; D. Mouillot; W.G. Lee; J.B. Wilson Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity, Oikos, Volume 111 (2005), pp. 112-118

[55] D. Schleuter; M. Daufresne; F. Massol; C. Argillier A user's guide to functional diversity indices, Ecol. Monogr., Volume 80 (2010), pp. 469-484

[56] M.A. Mouchet; S. Villéger; N.W.H. Mason; D. Mouillot Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules, Funct. Ecol., Volume 24 (2010), pp. 867-876

[57] J.H.C. Cornelissen; S. Lavorel; E. Garnier; S. Diaz; N. Buchmann; D.E. Gurvich et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide, Aust. J. Bot., Volume 51 (2003), pp. 335-380

[58] C.L. Meier; W.D. Bowman Links between plant litter chemistry, species diversity, and below-ground ecosystem function, Proc, Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, Volume 105 (2008), pp. 19780-19785

[59] C.L. Meier; W.D. Bowman Chemical composition and diversity influence non-additive effects of litter mixtures on soil carbon and nitrogen cycling: implications for plant species loss, Soil Biol. Biochem., Volume 42 (2010), pp. 1447-1454

[60] S. Hättenschwiler; H. Bracht Jørgensen Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest, J. Ecol., Volume 98 (2010), pp. 754-763

[61] B. Walker; A. Kinzig; J. Langridge Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species, Ecosystems, Volume 2 (1999), pp. 95-113

[62] S. Barantal, J. Roy, N. Fromin, H. Schimann, S. Hättenschwiler, Long-term presence of tree species but not chemical diversity affect litter mixture effects on decomposition in a neotropical rainforest. Oecologia, in press.

[63] O.L. Petchey; K.J. Gaston Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition, Ecol. Lett., Volume 5 (2002), pp. 402-411

[64] Z. Botta-Dukat Rao's quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits, J. Veg. Sci., Volume 16 (2005), pp. 533-540

[65] L.F. Roesch; R.R. Fulthorpe; A. Riva; G. Casella; A.K.M. Hadwin et al. Pyrosequencing enumerates and constrasts soil microbial diversity, ISME J., Volume 1 (2007), pp. 283-290

[66] U.M.E. Schütte; Z. Abdo; J. Foster; J. Ravel; J. Bunge et al. Bacterial diversity in a glacier foreland of the high Arctic, Mol. Ecol., Volume 19 (2010) no. Suppl. 1, pp. 54-66

[67] M. Buée; M. Reich; C. Murat; E. Morin; R.H. Nilsson et al. 454 Pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity, New Phytol., Volume 184 (2009), pp. 449-456

[68] Y.W. Lim; B.K. Kim; C. Kim; H.S. Jung; B.S. Kim et al. Assessment of soil fungal communities using pyrosequencing, J. Microbiol., Volume 48 (2010), pp. 284-289

[69] V. Torsvik; L. Øvreås Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., Volume 5 (2002), pp. 240-245

[70] S.D. Allison; J.B.H. Martiny Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences U S A, Volume 105 (2008), pp. 11512-11519

[71] M. Loreau Microbial diversity, producer-decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B, Volume 268 (2001), pp. 303-309

[72] S.A. Waksman; F.G. Tenney; K.R. Stevens The role of microorganisms in the transformation of organic matter in forest soils, Ecology, Volume 9 (1928), pp. 126-144

[73] S.D. Garrett Ecological groups of soil fungi: a survey of substrate relationships, New Phytol., Volume 50 (1951), pp. 149-160

[74] J.C. Frankland Fungal succession - unravelling the unpredictable, Mycol. Res., Volume 102 (1998), pp. 1-15

[75] A.H. Kjøller; S. Struwe Fungal communities, succession, enzymes, and decomposition (R.G. Burns; R.P. Dick, eds.), Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology and applications,, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 267-284

[76] D.L. Hawksworth The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited, Mycol. Res., Volume 105 (2001), pp. 1422-1432

[77] C.A. Hanson; S.D. Allison; M.A. Bradford; M.D. Wallenstein; K.K. Treseder Fungal taxa target different carbon sources in forest soil, Ecosystems, Volume 11 (2008), pp. 1157-1167

[78] K.L. McGuire; E. Bent; J. Borneman; A. Majumder; S.D. Allison; K.K. Treseder Functional diversity in resource use by fungi, Ecology, Volume 91 (2010), pp. 2324-2332

[79] J.W. Deacon Decomposition of filter paper cellulose by thermophilic fungi acting singly, in combination, and in sequence, Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., Volume 85 (1985), pp. 663-669

[80] B.P. Degens Decrease in microbial functional diversity do not result in corresponding changes in decomposition under different moisture conditions, Soil Biol. Biochem., Volume 30 (1998), pp. 1989-2000

[81] K. Hedlund; M. Sjögren Öhrn Tritrophic interaction in a soil community enhance decomposition rates, Oikos, Volume 88 (2000), pp. 585-591

[82] B.S. Griffiths; K. Ritz; R.D. Bardgett; R. Cook; S. Christensen; F. Ekelund et al. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship, Oikos, Volume 90 (2000), pp. 279-294

[83] H. Setälä; M.A. McLean Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi, Oecologia, Volume 139 (2004), pp. 107-198

[84] D.L. Wohl; S. Arora; J.R. Gladstone Functional redundancy supports biodiversity and ecosystem function in a closed and constant environment, Ecology, Volume 85 (2004), pp. 1534-1540

[85] A.V. Tiunov; S. Scheu Facilitative interactions rather than resource partitioning drive diversity-functioning relationships in laboratory fungal communities, Ecol. Lett., Volume 8 (2005), pp. 618-625

[86] T. Bell; J.A. Newman; B.W. Silverman; S.L. Turner; A.K. Lilley The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services, Nature, Volume 436 (2005), pp. 1157-1160

[87] M.S. Strickland; C. Lauber; N. Fierer; M.A. Bradford Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition, Ecology, Volume 90 (2009), pp. 441-451

[88] S.K. Chapman; G.S. Newman Biodiversity at the plant-soil interface: microbial abundance and community structure respond to litter mixing, Oecologia, Volume 162 (2010), pp. 763-769

[89] T. Miki; M. Ushio; S. Fukui; M. Kondoh Functional diversity of microbial decomposers facilitates plant coexistence in a plant-microbe-soil feedback model, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 107 (2010), pp. 14251-14256

[90] D.L. Moorhead; R.L. Sinsabaugh A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction, Ecol. Monogr., Volume 76 (2006), pp. 151-174

[91] J.L. Garland; A.L. Mills Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 57 (1991), pp. 2351-2359

[92] J.F. Salles; F. Poly; B. Schmid; X. Le Roux Community niche predicts the functioning of denitrifying bacterial assemblages, Ecology, Volume 90 (2009), pp. 3324-3332

[93] M.P. Waldrop; T.C. Balser; M.K. Firestone Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., Volume 32 (2000), pp. 1837-1846

[94] S. Wertz; V. Degrange; J.I. Prosser; F. Poly; C. Commeaux et al. Maintenance of soil functioning following erosion of microbial diversity, Environ. Microbiol., Volume 8 (2006), pp. 2162-2169

[95] Z.L. He; T.J. Gentry; C.W. Schadt; L.Y. Wu; J. Liebich et al. GeoChip: a comprehensive microarray for investigating biogeochemical, ecological and environmental processes, The ISME J., Volume 1 (2007), pp. 67-77

[96] Y.G. Zhang; X.Q. Zhang; X.D. Liu; Y. Xiao; L.J. Qu et al. Microarray-based analysis of changes in diversity of microbial genes involved in organic carbon decomposition following land use/cover changes, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., Volume 266 (2007), pp. 144-151

[97] J.A. Gilbert; D. Field; P. Swift; S. Thomas; D. Cummings et al. The taxonomic and functional diversity of microbes at a temperate coastal site: a ‘multi-omic’ study of seasonal and diel temporal variation, PLoS ONE, Volume 5 (2010), p. e15545

[98] S.E. Morales; W.E. Holben Linking bacterial identities and ecosystem processes: can ‘omic’ analyses be more than the sum of their parts?, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., Volume 75 (2011), pp. 2-16

[99] J.E. Duffy; B.J. Cardinale; K.E. France; P.B. McIntyre; E. Thébault et al. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity, Ecol. Lett., Volume 10 (2007), pp. 522-538

[100] J. Reiss; J.R. Bridle; J.M. Montoya; G. Woodward Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research, Trends Ecol. Evol., Volume 24 (2009), pp. 505-514