Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network ... : PAIN (original) (raw)

Research papers

Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values

Rolke, R.a,b; Baron, R.c,1; Maier, C.d,1; Tölle, T. R.e,*,1; Treede, - D. R.a,1; Beyer, A.f; Binder, A.c; Birbaumer, N.g; Birklein, F.b; Bötefür, I. C.h; Braune, S.h; Flor, H.i; Huge, V.f; Klug, R.j; Landwehrmeyer, G. B.j; Magerl, W.a; Maihöfner, C.k; Rolko, C.i; Schaub, C.d; Scherens, A.d; Sprenger, T.e; Valet, M.e; Wasserka, B.g

a_Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany_

b_Department of Neurology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany_

c_Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University of Kiel, Germany_

d_Department of Pain Management, BG Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany_

e_Department of Neurology, Technische Universität München, Germany_

f_Department of Anaesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany_

g_Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany_

h_Department of Neurology, University of Freiburg, Germany_

i_Institute of Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Mannheim, Germany_

j_Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Germany_

k_Institute of Physiology and Experimental Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen, Germany_

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 89 4140 4670; fax: +49 89 4140 4659.

E-mail address:[email protected]

1 DFNS steering committee.

Received July 29, 2005; received in revised form November 28, 2005; accepted January 25, 2006.

Abstract

The nationwide multicenter trials of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) aim to characterize the somatosensory phenotype of patients with neuropathic pain. For this purpose, we have implemented a standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol giving a complete profile for one region within 30 min. To judge plus or minus signs in patients we have now established age- and gender-matched absolute and relative QST reference values from 180 healthy subjects, assessed bilaterally over face, hand and foot. We determined thermal detection and pain thresholds including a test for paradoxical heat sensations, mechanical detection thresholds to von Frey filaments and a 64 Hz tuning fork, mechanical pain thresholds to pinprick stimuli and blunt pressure, stimulus/response-functions for pinprick and dynamic mechanical allodynia, and pain summation (wind-up ratio). QST parameters were region specific and age dependent. Pain thresholds were significantly lower in women than men. Detection thresholds were generally independent of gender. Reference data were normalized to the specific group means and variances (region, age, gender) by calculating _z_-scores. Due to confidence limits close to the respective limits of the possible data range, heat hypoalgesia, cold hypoalgesia, and mechanical hyperesthesia can hardly be diagnosed. Nevertheless, these parameters can be used for group comparisons. Sensitivity is enhanced by side-to-side comparisons by a factor ranging from 1.1 to 2.5. Relative comparisons across body regions do not offer advantages over absolute reference values. Application of this standardized QST protocol in patients and human surrogate models will allow to infer underlying mechanisms from somatosensory phenotypes.