Creativity in Science (original) (raw)

Adams, C. W. (1946). The age at which scientists do their best work. Isis, 36, 166–169

Adler, A. (1938). Social interest: A challenge to mankind (J. Linton & R. Vaughan, Trans.). London: Faber & Faber

Albert, R. S. (1971). Cognitive development and parental loss among the gifted, the exceptionally gifted and the creative. Psychological Reports, 29, 19–26

Allison, P. D., Long, J. S., & Krauze, T. K. (1982). Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review, 47, 615–625

Allison, P. D., Price, D. S., Griffith, B. C., Moravcsik, M. J., & Stewart, J. A. (1976). Lotka's law: A problem in its interpretation and application. Social Studies of Science, 6, 269–276

Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596–606

Altus, W. D. (1966, January 7). Birth order and its sequelae. Science, 151, 44–48

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013

American heritage electronic dictionary (3rd ed.). (1992). Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Andrews, F. M. (1979). Motivation, diversity, and the performance of research units. In F. M. Andrews (Ed.), Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries (pp. 253–289). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press

Ansburg, P. I., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality & Individual Differences, 34, 1141–1152

Ashton, S. V., & Oppenheim, C. (1978). A method of predicting Nobel prizewinners in chemistry. Social Studies of Science, 8, 341–348

Austin, J. H. (1978). Chase, chance, and creativity: The lucky art of novelty. New York: Columbia University Press

Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Baer, J. (1994). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multidomain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35–46

Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–187

Bain, A. (1977). The senses and the intellect (D. N. Robinson, Ed.). Washington, DC: University Publications of America. (Original work published 1855.)

Barron, F. X. (1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 153–160). New York: Wiley

Barron, F. X. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston

Barron, F. X., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476

Barsalou, L. W., & Prinz, J. J. (1997). Mundane creativity in perceptual symbol systems. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 267–309). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Bayer, A. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1977). Career age and research — Professional activities of academic scientists: Tests of alternative non-linear models and some implications for higher education faculty policies. Journal of Higher Education, 48, 259–282

Bayer, A. E., & Folger, J. (1966). Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science. Sociology of Education, 39, 381–390

Bell, E. T. (1937). Men of mathematics. New York: Simon & Schuster

Bell, E. T. (1951). Mathematics: Queen and servant of science. New York: McGraw Hill

Bernal, J. D. (1971). Science in history (4 vols., 3rd. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Berry, C. (1981). The Nobel scientists and the origins of scientific achievement. British Journal of Sociology, 32, 381–391

Berry, C. (1999). Religious traditions as contexts of historical creativity: Patterns of scientific and artistic achievement and their stability. Personality & Individual Differences, 26, 1125–1135

Beveridge, W. I. B. (1957). The art of scientific investigation (3rd ed.). New York: Vintage

Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., & Hall, D. E. (1978). Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51, 132–141

Bliss, W. D. (1970). Birth order of creative writers. Journal of Individual Psychology, 26, 200–202

Bloom, B. S. (1963). Report on creativity research by the examiner's office of the University of Chicago. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 251–264). New York: Wiley

Boden, M. A. (1991). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms. New York: Basic Books

Boden, M. A. (1995). What is creativity? In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75–117). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bohr, H. (1967). My father. In S. Rozental (Ed.), Niels Bohr: His life and work as seen by his friends and colleagues (pp. 325–335). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing

Boring, E. G. (1963). History, psychology, and science (R. I. Watson & D. T. Campbell, Eds.). New York: Wiley

Bowen, D. D., Perloff, R., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Improving manuscript evaluation procedures. American Psychologist, 27, 221–225

Bowerman, W. G. (1947). Studies in genius. New York: Philosophical Library

Bowers, K. S., Farvolden, P., & Mermigis, L. (1995). Intuitive antecedents of;insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 27–51). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bradshaw, G. F., Langley, P. W., & Simon, H. A. (1983). Studying scientific discovery by computer simulation. Science, 222, 971–975

Bramwell, B. S. (1948). Galton's “Hereditary” and the three following generations since 1869. Eugenics Review, 39, 146–153

Brannigan, A. (1981). The social basis of scientific discoveries. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press

Brannigan, A., & Wanner, R. A. (1983a). Historical distributions of multiple discoveries and theories of scientific change. Social Studies of Science, 13, 417–435

Brannigan, A., & Wanner, R. A. (1983b). Multiple discoveries in science: A test of the communication theory. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 8, 135–151

Brimhall, D. R. (1922). Family resemblances among American Men of Science. American Naturalist, 56, 504–547

Brimhall, D. R. (1923a). Family resemblances among American Men of Science. II. Degree of resemblance in comparison with the generality: Proportion of workers in each science and distribution of replies. American Naturalist, 57, 74–88

Brimhall, D. R. (1923b). Family resemblances among American Men of Science. III. The influence of the nearness of kinship. American Naturalist, 57, 137–152

Bringmann, W. G., & Balk, M. M. (1983). Wilhelm Wundt's publication record: A re-examination. Storia e Critica della Psichologia, 4, 61–86

Brown, F. (1968). Bereavement and lack of a parent in childhood. In E. Miller (Ed.), Foundations of child psychiatry (pp. 435–455). Oxford, England: Pergamon

Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 208–212

Burt, C. (1943). Ability and income. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 83–98

Burt, C. (1963). Is intelligence distributed normally?British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16, 175–190

Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1984). Selected personality traits and achievement in male scientists. Journal of Psychology, 116, 117–131

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400

Candolle, A. de (1873). Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles. Genève: Georg

Cannon, W. B. (1940). The role of chance in discovery. Scientific Monthly, 50, 204–209

Carringer, D. C. (1974). Creative thinking abilities in Mexican youth. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 492–504

Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506

Cassandro, V. J. (2001). Versatility, creative products, and the personality correlates of eminent creators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis

Cattell, R. B., & Drevdahl, J. E. (1955). A comparison of the personality profile (16 P. F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators, and of the general population. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 248–261

Chambers, J. A. (1964). Relating personality and biographical factors to scientific creativity. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78 (7, Whole No. 584)

Charlton, S., & Bakan, P. (1988–89). Cognitive complexity and creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 8, 315–322

Christensen, H., & Jacomb, P. A. (1992). The lifetime productivity of eminent Australian academics. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 7, 681–686

Cicchetti, D. V. (1991). The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119–186

Clark, R. D., & Rice, G. A. (1982). Family constellations and eminence: The birth orders of Nobel Prize winners. Journal of Psychology, 110, 281–287

Cohen, J. M., & Cohen, M. J. (Eds.). (1960). The Penguin dictionary of quotations. Baltimore: Penguin Books

Cole, J. R. (1987). Women in science. In D. N. Jackson & J. P. Rushton (Eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 359–375). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

Cole, J., & Cole, S. (1972, October 27). The Ortega hypothesis. Science, 178, 368–375

Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific performance. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 958–977

Cole, S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences?American Journal of Sociology, 89, 111–139

Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32, 377–390

Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Cole, S., Cole, J. R., & Simon, G. A. (1981). Chance and consensus in peer review. Science, 214, 881–886

Comte, A. (1855). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte (H. Martineau, Trans.). New York: Blanchard. (Original work published 1839–1842.)

Constant, E. W., II (1978). On the diversity of co-evolution of technological multiples: Steam turbines and Pelton water wheels. Social Studies of Science, 8, 183–210

Corry, L., Renn, J., & Stachel, J. (1997, November 14). Belated decision in the Hilbert-Einstein priority dispute. Science, 278, 1270–1273

Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

Crane, D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist, 2, 195–201

Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684

Cropper, W. H. (1970). The quantum physicists. New York: Oxford University Press

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park: Sage

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Daintith, J., Mitchell, S., & Tootill, E. (1981). A biographical encyclopedia of scientists (Vol. 1). New York: Facts on File

Darwin, F. (Ed.). (1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin and selected letters. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1892.)

Davis, G. A. (1975). In frumious pursuit of the creative person. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 75–87

Davis, R. A. (1987). Creativity in neurological publications. Neurosurgery, 20, 652–663

Dennis, W. (1954a, September). Bibliographies of eminent scientists. Scientific Monthly, 79, 180–183

Dennis, W. (1954b). Productivity among American psychologists. American Psychologist, 9, 191–194

Dennis, W. (1955, April). Variations in productivity among creative workers. Scientific Monthly, 80, 277–278

Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 1–8

Dennis, W., & Girden, E. (1954). Current scientific activities of psychologists as a function of age. Journal of Gerontology, 9, 175–178

Dewing, K., & Battye, G. (1971). Attention deployment and nonverbal fluency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 214–218

Diamond, A. M. Jr. (1980). Age and the acceptance of cliometrics. Journal of Economic History, 40, 838–841

Díaz de Chumaceiro, C. L. (1995). Serendipity or pseudoserendipity? Unexpected versus desired results. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 143–147

Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509

Dirac, P. A. M. (1963). The physicist's picture of nature. Scientific American, 208 (5), 45–53

Downs, R. B. (1983). Books that changed the world (rev. ed.). New York: New American Library

Dryden, J. (1885). Epistle to Congreve. In W. Scott & G. Saintsbury (Eds.), The works of John Dryden (Vol. 11, pp. 57–60). Edinburgh: Paterson. (Original work published 1693)

Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H.-C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722–735

Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365–396). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward & S. M. Smith (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461–493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Eiduson, B. T. (1962). Scientists: Their psychological world. New York: Basic Books

Eisenman, R. (1964). Birth order and artistic creativity. Journal of Individual Psychology, 20, 183–185

Eisenstadt, J. M. (1978). Parental loss and genius. American Psychologist, 33, 211–223

Ellis, H. (1926). A study of British genius (rev. ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–178

Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Creativity and personality: Word association, origence, and psychoticism. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 209–216

Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press

Faust, D. (1984). Limits of scientific reasoning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

Feist, G. J. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science, 4, 366–371

Feist, G. J. (1994). Personality and working style predictors of integrative complexity: A study of scientists' thinking about research and teaching. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 474–484

Feist, G. J. (1997). Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important?Creativity Research Journal, 10, 325–335

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309

Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88

Feist, G. J., & Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2, 3–47

Ferber, M. A. (1986). Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit?Signs, 11, 381–389

Fernberger, S. W. (1946, August 23). Scientific publication as affected by war and politics. Science, 104, 175–177

Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill

Fowler, R. G. (1987). Toward a quantitative theory of intellectual discovery (especially in physics). Journal of Scientific Exploration, 1, 11–20

Furumoto, L. (1989). The new history of psychology. In I. S. Cohen (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall lecture series (Vol. 9, pp. 9–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Gabora, L. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In T. Hewett & T. Kavanagh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 126–133). United Kingdom: Loughborough University

Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan

Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan

Galton, F. (1972). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences (2nd ed.). Gloucester, MA: Smith. (Original work published 1892.)

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books

Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books

Garfield, E. (1987). Mapping the world of science: Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? In D. N. Jackson & J. P. Rushton (Eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 98–128). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

Garvey, W. D., & Tomita, K. (1972). Continuity of productivity by scientists in the years 1968–1971. Science Studies, 2, 379–383

Ghadirian, A.-M., Gregoire, P., & Kosmidis, H. (2001). Creativity and the evolution of psychopathologies. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 145–148

Gholson, B., Shadish, Jr., W. R., Neimeyer, R. A., & Houts, A. C. (Eds.). (1989). The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Gibson, J., & Light, P. (1967). Intelligence among university scientists. Nature, 213, 441–443

Gieryn, T. F., & Hirsh, R. F. (1983). Marginality and innovation in science. Social Studies of Science, 13, 87–106

Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, V. & Goertzel, T. G. (1978). 300 eminent personalities: A psychosocial analysis of the famous. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. G. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston: Little, Brown

Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Gooding, D. C. (1996). Scientific discovery as creative exploration: Faraday's experiments. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 189–205

Gottfredson, S. D. (1978). Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. American Psychologist, 33, 920–934

Gough, H. G. (1976). Studying creativity by means of word association tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 348–353

Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405

Greenwald, A. G., & Schuh, E. S. (1994). An ethnic bias in scientific citations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 623–639

Gruber, H. E. (1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. New York: Dutton

Gruber, H. E. (1989). Networks of enterprise in creative scientific work. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, Jr., R. A. Neimeyer, & A. C. Houts (Eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 246–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Gruszka, A., & Necka, E. (2002). Priming and acceptance of close and remote associations by creative and less creative people. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 193–205

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill

Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Hagstrom, W. O. (1974). Competition in science. American Sociological Review, 39, 1–18

Haight, F. A. (1967). Handbook of the Poisson distribution. New York: Wiley

Han, K. S. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–142

Hargens, L. L. (1978). Relations between work habits, research technologies, and eminence in science. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 5, 97–112

Hargens, L. L., McCann, J. C., & Reskin, B. F. (1978). Productivity and reproductivity: Fertility and professional achievement among research scientists. Social Forces, 57, 154–163

Hart, M. H. (1987). The 100: A ranking of the most influential persons in history. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press

Helmholtz, H. von (1898). An autobiographical sketch. In Popular lectures on scientific subjects, second series (E. Atkinson, Trans., pp. 266–291). New York: Longmans, Green

Helmholtz, H. von (1971). An autobiographical sketch. In R. Kahl (Ed.), Selected writings of Hermann von Helmholtz (pp. 466–478). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. (Original work published 1891.)

Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane, W. E., Lucker, G. W., & Matthews, K. A. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 896–908

Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Thorbecke, W. L. (1981). On the stability of productivity and recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 516–522

Helson, R. (1980). The creative woman mathematician. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Women and the mathematical mystique (pp. 23–54). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Helson, R., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: The creative researcher and the average Ph.D.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 250–257

Hoffman, B. (1972). Albert Einstein: Creator and rebel. New York: Plume

Holland, J. (1975). Natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press

Holland, J. H. (1992). Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, 267 (1), 66–72

Holton, G. (1971–72). On trying to understand the scientific genius. American Scholar, 41, 95–110

Holton, G. (1982). Toward a theory of scientific progress. In G. A. Almond, M. Chodorow, & R. H. Pearce (Eds.), Progress and its discontents (pp. 202–225). Berkeley: University of California Press

Hook, E. B. (2002). Prematurity in scientific discovery: On resistance and neglect. Berkeley: University of California Press

Horner, K. L., Rushton, J. P., & Vernon, P. A. (1986). Relation between aging and research productivity of academic psychologists. Psychology and Aging, 1, 319–324

Horner, K. L., Murray, H. G., & Rushton, J. P. (1994). Aging and administration in academic psychologists. Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 343–346

Horvitz, L. A. (2000). The quotable scientist: Words of wisdom from Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman, Galileo, Marie Curie, and more. New York: McGraw-Hill

Huber, J. C. (1998a). Invention and inventivity as a special kind of creativity, with implications for general creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 58–72

Huber, J. C. (1998b). Invention and inventivity is a random, Poisson process: A potential guide to analysis of general creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 231–241

Huber, J. C. (1999). Inventive productivity and the statistics of exceedances. Scientometrics, 45, 33–53

Huber, J. C. (2000). A statistical analysis of special cases of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 203–225

Huber, J. C. (2001). A new method for analyzing scientific productivity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 1089–1099

Huber, J. C. (2002). A new model that generates Lotka's Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 209–219

Huber, J. C., & Wagner-Döbler, R. (2001a). Scientific production: A statistical analysis of authors in mathematical logic. Scientometrics, 50, 323–337

Huber, J. C., & Wagner-Döbler, R. (2001b). Scientific production: A statistical analysis of authors in physics, 1800–1900. Scientometrics, 50, 437–453

Hudson, L. (1958). Undergraduate academic record of Fellows of the Royal Society. Nature, 182, 1326

Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary imaginations. Baltimore: Penguin

Hudson, L., & Jacot, B. (1986). The outsider in science. In C. Bagley & G. K. Verma (Eds.), Personality, cognition and values (pp. 3–23). London: Macmillan

Hull, D. L., Tessner, P. D., & Diamond, A. M. (1978, November 17). Planck's principle: Do younger scientists accept new scientific ideas with greater alacrity than older scientists?Science, 202, 717–723

Illingworth, R. S., & Illingworth, C. M. (1969). Lessons from childhood. Edinburgh: Livingston

James, W. (1880, October). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441–459

Jeans, J. (1942). Newton and the science of to-day. Nature, 150, 710–715

Jevons, W. S. (1900). The principles of science: A treatise on logic and scientific method (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1877.)

Johnson, S. (1781). The lives of the most eminent English poets (Vol. 1). London: Bathurst et al

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Human and machine thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Juda, A. (1949). The relationship between highest mental capacity and psychic abnormalities. American Journal of Psychiatry, 106, 296–307

Jungk, R. (1958). Brighter than a thousand suns (J. Cleugh, Trans.). New York: Harcourt Brace

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press

Kantorovich, A., & Ne'eman, Y. (1989). Serendipity as a source of evolutionary progress in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 20, 505–529

Kaplan, R. (Ed.). (2001). Science says: A collection of quotations on the history, meaning, and practice of science. New York: Freeman

Karlson, J. I. (1970). Genetic association of giftedness and creativity with schizophrenia. Hereditas, 66, 177–182

Kasof, J. (1997). Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 303–315

King, L. A., McKee Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personaltiy, 30, 189–203

Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific creativity: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 524–543

Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan

Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes (E. Winter, Trans.). New York: Harcourt, Brace

Koza, J. R. (1992). Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Koza, J. R. (1994). Genetic programming II: Automatic discovery of reusable programs. Cambridge: MIT Press

Koza, J. R., Bennett III, F. H., Andre, D., & Keane, M. A. (1999). Genetic programming III: Darwinian invention and problem solving. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann

Kroeber, A. L. (1917). The superorganic. American Anthropologist, 19, 163–214

Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press

Kroeber, A. L. (1963). Anthropology: Culture patterns and processes. New York: Harbinger Book

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Kulkarni, D., & Simon, H. A. (1988). The process of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation. Cognitive Science, 12, 139–175

Kyvik, S. (1989). Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka's law. Scientometrics, 15, 205–214

Kyvik, S. (1990). Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 20, 149–160

Lamb, D., & Easton, S. M. (1984). Multiple discovery. Avebury, England: Avebury

Lambert, W. E., Tucker, G. R., & d'Anglejan, A. (1973). Cognitive and attitudinal consequences of bilingual schooling: The St. Lambert project through grade five. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 141–159

Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zythow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Lee, J. D., Vicente, K. J., Cassano, A., & Shearer, A. (2003). Can scientific impact be judged prospectively? A bibliometric test of Simonton's model of creative productivity. Scientometrics, 56, 223–232

Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Lehman, H. C. (1947). The exponential increase of man's cultural output. Social Forces, 25, 281–290

Lehman, H. C. (1958, May 23). The chemist's most creative years. Science, 127, 1213–1222

Lehman, H. C., & Witty, P. A. (1931). Scientific eminence and church membership. Scientific Monthly, 33, 544–549

Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1989). Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education, 30, 531–549

Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review, 81, 114–132

Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1999, August 20). Are the foreign born a source of strength for U.S. science?Science, 285, 1213–1214

Lindsey, D. (1988). Assessing precision in the manuscript review process: A little better than a dice roll. Scientometrics, 14, 75–82

Long, J. S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71, 159–178

Lopez, E. C., Esquivel, G. B., & Houtz, J. C. (1993). The creative skills of culturally and linguistically diverse gifted students. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 401–412

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–323

Ludwig, A. M. (1992). Creative achievement and psychopathology: Comparison among professions. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46, 330–356

Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford Press

Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 93–101

Mach, E. (1896, January). On the part played by accident in invention and discovery. Monist, 6, 161–175

MacKinnon, D. W., & Hall, W. B. (1972). Intelligence and creativity. Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Applied Psychology, Liege, Belgium (Vol. 2, 1883–1888). Brussels: EDITEST

Mandler, G. (1995). Origins and consequences of novelty. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 9–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Manis, J. G. (1951). Some academic influences upon publication productivity. Social Forces, 29, 267–272

Mansfield, R. S., & Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery: Scientists and their work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall

Marsh, H. W., & Ball, S. (1989). The peer review process used to evaluate manuscripts submitted to academic journals: Interjudgmental reliability. Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 151–169

Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 211–232). New York: Plenum Press

Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books

Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249–268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Martindale, C., Brewer, W. F., Helson, R., Rosenberg, S., Simonton, D. K., Keeley, A., Leigh, J., & Ohtsuka, K. (1988). Structure, theme, style, and reader response in Hungarian and American short stories. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 267–289). Hamburg: Buske

McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality. (pp. 825–847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press

McCurdy, H. G. (1960). The childhood pattern of genius. Horizon, 2, 33–38

McReynolds, P. (1971). Reliability of ratings of research papers. American Psychologist, 26, 400–401

Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232

Mendelsohn, G. A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 44, 341–369

Mendelsohn, G. A. & Griswold, B. B. (1966). Assessed creative potential, vocabulary level, and sex as predictors of the use of incidental cues in verbal problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 423–431

Merton, R. K. (1961a). The role of genius in scientific advance. New Scientist, 12, 306–308

Merton, R. K. (1961b). Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105, 470–486

Merton, R. K. (1968, January 5). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63

Miles, C. C., & Wolfe, L. S. (1936). Childhood physical and mental health records of historical geniuses. Psychological Monographs, 47, 390–400

Miller, A. I. (2000). Insights of genius: imagery and creativity in science and art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Molina, E. C. (1942). Poisson's exponential binomial limit. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand

Moulin, L. (1955). The Nobel Prizes for the sciences from 1901–1950: An essay in sociological analysis. British Journal of Sociology, 6, 246–263

Mullins, C. J. (1963). Prediction of creativity in a sample of research scientists. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-10 (2), 52–57

Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Johnson, T. F. (1998). Domain based scoring of divergent thinking tests: Validation evidence in an occupational sample. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 151–164

Myers, C. R. (1970). Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology. American Psychologist, 25, 1041–1048

Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 277–282

Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 788–799

Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45–55

Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychological Review, 65, 151–166

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259

Ochse, R. (1989). A new look at primary process thinking and its relation to inspiration. New Ideas in Psychology, 7, 315–330

Ogburn, W. K., & Thomas, D. (1922). Are inventions inevitable? A note on social evolution. Political Science Quarterly, 37, 83–93

Olby, R. (1979). Mendel no Mendelian?History of Science, 17, 53–72

Oromaner, M. (1977). Professional age and the reception of sociological publications: A test of the Zuckerman-Merton hypothesis. Social Studies of Science, 7, 381–388

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1957). The revolt of the masses (M. Adams, Trans.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1932.)

Over, R. (1981). Affiliations of psychologists elected to the National Academy of Sciences. American Psychologist, 36, 744–752

Over, R. (1982). Research productivity and impact of male and female psychologists. American Psychologist, 37, 24–31

Over, R. (1988). Does scholarly impact decline with age?Scientometrics, 13, 215–223

Over, R. (1989). Age and scholarly impact. Psychology and Aging, 4, 222–225

Over, R. (1990). The scholarly impact of articles published by men and women in psychology journals. Scientometrics, 18, 71–80

Patinkin, D. (1983). Multiple discoveries and the central message. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 306–323

Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Perkins, D. N. (2000). The eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. New York: Norton

Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 5, 187–255

Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 323–332

Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality & Individual Differences, 33, 1137–1147

Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1999). The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 188–203

Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers (F. Gaynor, Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library

Platt, W., & Baker, R. A. (1931). The relation of the scientific “hunch” to research. Journal of Chemical Education, 8, 1969–2002

Platz, A. (1965). Psychology of the scientist: Ⅺ. Lotka's law and research visibility. Psychological Reports, 16, 566–568

Platz, A., & Blakelock, E. (1960). Productivity of American psychologists: Quantity versus quality. American Psychologist, 15, 310–312

Poincaré, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method (G. B. Halstead, Trans.). New York: Science Press

Popper, K. (1959). The logic of discovery. New York: Basic Books

Post, F. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: A study of 291 world-famous men. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 22–34

Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press

Price, D. (1965, July 9). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515

Price, D. (1978). Ups and downs in the pulse of science and technology. In J. Gaston (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp. 162–171). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Proctor, R. A. (1993). Computer stimulated associations. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 391–400

Rainoff, T. J. (1929). Wave-like fluctuations of creative productivity in the development of West-European physics in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Isis, 12, 287–319

Raskin, E. A. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A biographical study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 20–35

Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press

Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B, 4, 131–134

Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: an analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Roberts, R. M. (1989). Serendipity: Accidental discoveries in science. New York: Wiley

Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead

Roe, A. (1965, October 15). Changes in scientific activities with age. Science, 150, 113–118

Roe, A. (1972, May 26). Patterns of productivity of scientists. Science, 176, 940–941

Rodgers, R. C., & Maranto, C. L. (1989). Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 636–649

Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1993). Identification of scientists making long-term, high-impact contributions, with notes on their methods of working. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 329–343

Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 115–137

Rothenberg, A. (1983). Psychopathology and creative cognition: A comparison of hospitalized patients, Nobel laureates, and controls. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 937–942

Rothenberg, A. (1986). Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus combined-composite visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 370–381

Rothenberg, A. (1987). Einstein, Bohr, and creative thinking in science. History of Science, 25, 147–166

Rothenberg, A. (1996). The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 207–231

Rubinstein, G. (1999). Authoritarianism and its relation to creativity: A comparative study among students of design, behavioural sciences and law. Personality & Individual Differences, 34, 695–705

Rushton, J. P. (1990). Creativity, intelligence, and psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1291–1298

Rushton, J. P. (2000). Individual differences and scientific productivity. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 173–194). New York: Kluwer Academic

Scarr, S., & Weber, B. L. R. (1978). The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist. American Psychologist, 33, 935

Schaefer, C. E., & Anastasi, A. (1968). A biographical inventory for identifying creativity in adolescent boys. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 42–48

Schachter, S. (1963). Birth order, eminence, and higher education. American Sociological Review, 28, 757–768

Schlipp, P. A. (Ed.). (1951). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist. New York: Harper

Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Schneider, J. (1937). The cultural situation as a condition for the achievement of fame. American Sociological Review, 2, 480–491

Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97–133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Schubert, D. S. P., Wagner, M. E., & Schubert, H. J. P. (1977). Family constellation and creativity: Firstborn predominance among classical music composers. Journal of Psychology, 95, 147–149

Scott, W. A. (1974). Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychologist, 29, 698–702

Seelig, C. (1958). Albert Einstein: A documentary biography (M. Savill, Trans.). London: Staples Press

Segal, S. M., Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1980). The relationship of scientific creativity in the biological sciences to predoctoral accomplishments and experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 491–502

Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N., Patalano, A. L., & Yaniv, I. (1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 65–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Shadish, W. R., Jr. (1989). The perception and evaluation of quality in science. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, Jr., R. A. Neimeyer, & A. C. Houts (Eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 383–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Shapiro, G. (1986). A skeleton in the darkroom: Stories of serendipity in science. San Francisco: Harper & Row

Shockley, W. (1957). On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 45, 279–290

Shrager, J., & Langley, P. (Eds.). (1990). Computational models of scientific discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann

Silverman, S. M. (1974). Parental loss and scientists. Science Studies, 4, 259–264

Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42, 425–440

Simon, H. A. (1973). Does scientific discovery have a logic?Philosophy of Science, 40, 471–480

Simon, H. A. (1986). What we know about the creative process. In R. L. Kuhn (Ed.), Frontiers in creative and innovative management (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger

Simon, R. J. (1974). The work habits of eminent scientists. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 1, 327–335

Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133

Simonton, D. K. (1976a). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218–226

Simonton, D. K. (1976b). Do Sorokin's data support his theory?: A study of generational fluctuations in philosophical beliefs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 187–198

Simonton, D. K. (1976c). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630–640

Simonton, D. K. (1976d). The sociopolitical context of philosophical beliefs: A trans historical causal analysis. Social Forces, 54, 513–523

Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804

Simonton, D. K. (1978). Independent discovery in science and technology: A closer look at the Poisson distribution. Social Studies of Science, 8, 521–532

Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1603–1616

Simonton, D. K. (1980a). Intuition and analysis: A predictive and explanatory model. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 102, 3–60

Simonton, D. K. (1980b). Techno-scientific activity and war: A yearly time-series analysis, 1500–1903 A.D.Scientometrics, 2, 251–255

Simonton, D. K. (1980c). Thematic fame and melodic originality in classical music: A multivariate computer-content analysis. Journal of Personality, 48, 206–219

Simonton, D. K. (1980d). Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 972–983

Simonton, D. K. (1983). Formal education, eminence, and dogmatism: The curvilinear relationship. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 149–162

Simonton, D. K. (1984a). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286

Simonton, D. K. (1984b). Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process. Developmental Review, 4, 77–111

Simonton, D. K. (1984c). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

Simonton, D. K. (1984d). Is the marginality effect all that marginal?Social Studies of Science, 14, 621–622

Simonton, D. K. (1984e). Scientific eminence historical and contemporary: A measurement assessment. Scientometrics, 6, 169–182

Simonton, D. K. (1985). Quality, quantity, and age: The careers of 10 distinguished psychologists. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 21, 241–254

Simonton, D. K. (1986a). Biographical typicality, eminence, and achievement style. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 14–22

Simonton, D. K. (1986b). Multiple discovery: Some Monte Carlo simulations and Gedanken experiments. Scientometrics, 9, 269–280

Simonton, D. K. (1986c). Multiples, Poisson distributions, and chance: An analysis of the Brannigan-Wanner model. Scientometrics, 9, 127–137

Simonton, D. K. (1986d). Stochastic models of multiple discovery. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B 36, 138–141

Simonton, D. K. (1987). Multiples, chance, genius, creativity, and zeitgeist. In D. N. Jackson & J. P. Rushton (Eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 98–128). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

Simonton, D. K. (1988a). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research?Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251–267

Simonton, D. K. (1988b). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Simonton, D. K. (1989a). Age and creative productivity: Nonlinear estimation of an information-processing model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 29, 23–37

Simonton, D. K. (1989b). The chance-configuration theory of scientific creativity. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, Jr., R. A. Neimeyer, & A. C. Houts (Eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 170–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Simonton, D. K. (1989c). Shakespeare's sonnets: A case of and for single-case historiometry. Journal of Personality, 57, 695–721

Simonton, D. K. (1990). Lexical choices and aesthetic success: A computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 251–264

Simonton, D. K. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119–130

Simonton, D. K. (1991b). Latent-variable models of posthumous reputation: A quest for Galton's G. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 607–619

Simonton, D. K. (1992a). Leaders of American psychology, 1879–1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5–17

Simonton, D. K. (1992b). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463

Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press

Simonton, D. K. (1995). Foresight in insight? A Darwinian answer. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 465–494). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Simonton, D. K. (1997a). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89

Simonton, D. K. (1997b). Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 86–94

Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Creativity and genius. In L. A. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press

Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Matthew effects. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 185–192). San Diego: Academic Press

Simonton, D. K. (1999c). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press

Simonton, D. K. (1999d). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435–457

Simonton, D. K. (2000a). Creativity: Cognitive, developmental, personal, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–158

Simonton, D. K. (2000b). Methodological and theoretical orientation and the long-term disciplinary impact of 54 eminent psychologists. Review of General Psychology, 4, 1–13

Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology's history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Simonton, D. K. (2003a). Creativity as variation and selection: Some critical constraints. In M. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 3–18). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press

Simonton, D. K. (2003b). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Psychology's status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Review of General Psychology, 7

Skinner, B. F. (1959). A case study in scientific method. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2, pp. 359–379). New York: McGraw-Hill

Smith, W. J., Albright, L. W., & Glennon, J. R. (1961). The prediction of research competence and creativity from personal history. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 59–62

Sobel, R. S., & Rothenberg, A. (1980). Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus separated visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 953–961

Sorokin, P. A. (1969). Society, culture, and personality. New York: Cooper Square. (Original work published 1947)

Stavridou, A., & Furnham, A. (1996). The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality & Individual Differences, 21, 143–153

Stent, G. S. (1972). Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. Scientific American, 227, 84–93

Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Computational models of scientific discovery: Do they compute? [Review of Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative process] Contemporary Psychology, 34, 895–897

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100

Sternberg, R. J. (2004). WICS: A theory of wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press

Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Sternberg, R. J., & Gordeeva, T. (1996). The anatomy of impact: What makes an article influential?Psychological Science, 7, 69–75

Stewart, J. A. (1983). Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces, 62, 166–189

Stumpf, H. (1995). Scientific creativity: A short overview. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 225–241

Suedfeld, P. (1985). APA presidential addresses: The relation of integrative complexity to historical, professional, and personal factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 848–852

Suedfeld, P., & Coren, S. (1992). Cognitive correlates of conceptual complexity. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1193–1199

Suler, J. R. (1980). Primary process thinking and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 144–165

Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon

Taylor, D. W. (1963). Variables related to creativity and productivity among men in two research laboratories. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 228–250). New York: Wiley

Taylor, M. S., Locke, E. A., Lee, C., & Gist, M. E. (1984). Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 402–418

Terman, L. M. (1954). Scientists and nonscientists in a group of 800 gifted men. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 68 (7, Whole No. 378), 1–44

Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Tweney, R. D. (1989). Fields of enterprise: On Michael Faraday's thought. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies (pp. 90–106). New York: Oxford University Press

Tweney, R. D. (1990). Five questions for computationalists. In J. Shrager & P. Langley (Eds.), Computational models of scientific discovery and theory information (pp. 471–484). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann

Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., & Mynatt, C. R. (Eds.). (1981). On scientific thinking. New York: Columbia University Press

Zelst, R. H., & Kerr, W. A. (1951). Some correlates of technical and scientific productivity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 470–475

Visher, S. S. (1947, Autumn). Starred scientists: A study of their ages. American Scientist, 35, 543, 570, 572, 574, 576, 578, 580

Wagman, M. (2000). Scientific discovery processes in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger

Walberg, H. J., Rasher, S. P., & Parkerson, J. (1980). Childhood and eminence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13, 225–231

Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace

Wan, W. W. N., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2002). Effects of novel conceptual combination on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 227–240

Wechsler, J. (Ed.). (1978). On aesthetics in science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Weisberg, R. W. (1992). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman

Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today

Wertheimer, M. (1982). Productive thinking (M. Wertheimer, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1945.)

Whaples, R. (1991). A quantitative history of the Journal of Economic History and the cliometric revolution. Journal of Economic History, 51, 289–301

White, L. (1949). The science of culture. New York: Farrar, Straus

White, K. G., & White, M. J. (1978). On the relation between productivity and impact. Australian Psychologist, 13, 369–374

Wilson, T. D., DePaulo, B. M., Mook, D. G., & Klaaren, K. J. (1993). Scientists' evaluations of research: The biasing effects of the importance of the topic. Psychological Science, 4, 322–325

Wolff, W. M. (1970). A study of criteria for journal manuscripts. American Psychologist, 25, 636–639

Wolff, W. M. (1973). Publication problems in psychology and an explicit evaluation schema for manuscripts. American Psychologist, 28, 257–261

Woodward, W. R. (1974). Scientific genius and loss of a parent. Science Studies, 4, 265–277

Wuthrich, V., & Bates, T. C. (2001). Schizotypy and latent inhibition: Non-linear linkage between psychometric and cognitive markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 783–798

Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Yuasa, M. (1974). The shifting center of scientific activity in the West: From the sixteenth to the twentieth century. In. N. Shigeru, D. L. Swain, & Y. Eri (Eds.), Science and society in modern Japan (pp. 81–103). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press

Zajonc, R. B. (1976, April 16). Family configuration and intelligence. Science, 192, 227–235

Zhao, H. (1984). An intelligence constant of scientific work. Scientometrics, 6, 9–17

Zhao, H., & Jiang, G. (1985). Shifting of world's scientific center and scientist's social ages. Scientometrics, 8, 59–80

Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite. New York: Free Press

Zuckerman, H., Cole, J. R., & Bruer, J. T. (Eds.). (1991). The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. New York: Norton

Zusne, L. (1976). Age and achievement in psychology: The harmonic mean as a model. American Psychologist, 31, 805–807