Canadian raising | Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Extract

This Paper discusses a particular phonological rule that occurs in several English dialects, including Canadian English. The rule will be referred to throughout as ‘Canadian Raising’ purely for mnemonic purposes; no geographical rigour is intended by the epithet ‘Canadian’—a point that is made abundantly clear in §4, where the distribution of the rule is taken up. The appropriateness of the term resides in the relative role the rule plays in Canadian English, where its effect is the most readily identifiable trait of the dialect. Thus, speakers of Canadian English are often identified by the speakers of adjoining dialects by their pronunciation of words like wife and south, which are usually mis-heard by speakers of General American as weef and sooth.

The main facts about Canadian Raising were first organized systematically three decades ago by Martin Joos, in a short article entitled “A phonological dilemma in Canadian English” (1942). Since then, they have been cursorily referred to in the literature several times (for example: Bloomfield 1948: 62; McDavid 1963: 470, etc.) and have been reorganized in a different theoretical framework (Halle 1962: 343) with no augmentation—and usually a simplification—of Joos’s observations.

References

Bloomfield, Morton W. 1948 Canadian English and its relation to eighteenth century American speech. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 47. 59–67.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 1971 A phonological argument for the derivation of the ø-subclass. Papers in Linguistics 4. 433–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1964 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton [Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 38].Google Scholar

CHomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris 1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris 1962 Phonology in generative grammar. In The Structure of Language, Katz, Fodor & (eds.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964. pp. 334–52 [Original: Word 18. 54–72 (1962)].Google Scholar

Halle, Morris and Jay Keyser, Samuel 1971 English Stress: its Form, its Growth, and its Role in Verse. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Hoard, James E. 1971 Aspiration, tenseness and syllabication in English. Language 47. 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenyon, John Samuel and Knott, Thomas Albert 1944 A Pronouncing Dictionary of American English. Springfield: Merriam.Google Scholar

Klparsky, Paul 1968 universals, Linguistic and linguistic change. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Harms, Bach & (eds.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 170–202.Google Scholar

Klparsky, Paul 1971 Historical linguistics. In A Survey of Linguistic Science. Dingwall, W. O. (ed.). College Park: University of Maryland, pp. 576–649.Google Scholar

Kurath, Hans and McDavid, Raven I. Jr., 1961 The Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press [Studies in American English, 3].Google Scholar

Labov, William 1965 On the mechanism of linguistic change. Georgetown University Monographs on Language and Linguistics 18. 91–114.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Philip 1965 On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. In Language: Selected Readings, Oldfield & Marshall (eds.). Penguin Books, 1968, pp. 107–22 [Original: Word 21. 40–54 (1965)].Google Scholar

McDavid, Raven I. JR., 1963 Mencken’s ‘The American Language’. One volume abridged edition with new material, edited with the assistance of Maurer, David W.. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar