The Mediated Horserace: Campaign Polls and Poll Reporting | Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Abstract. Although “horserace journalism” is thought to be central to contemporary election news coverage and has generated a great deal of criticism, there is no general model of the nature and dynamics of horserace journalism or “poll reporting.” This paper proposes and empirically evaluates such a model. The model builds on and extends John Zaller's “theory of media politics” to consider specifically what citizens demand from polls and what journalists supply. Aside from the generic motivations of politicians, citizens and journalists, the model emphasizes the unique features of polls as objects of news coverage. The paper finds considerable support for the model in an analysis of newspaper coverage of horserace polls (that is, vote intention polls) in the Canadian general election of 2006. Our findings from this one case have potentially broad implications for our understanding of the relationship between polls and electoral democracy both empirically and normatively.

Résumé. Même si le journalisme de course (“horserace journalism”) est vu comme étant une composante centrale de la couverture électorale et qu'il a généré sa part de critiques, il n'existe pas de modèle général de la nature et de la dynamique de ce type de journalisme. Cet article propose, et évalue empiriquement, un tel modèle. Prenant comme point de départ la « Theory of Media Politics » de John Zaller, ce modèle considère plus spécifiquement ce que les citoyens demandent des sondages et ce que les journalistes leurs procurent. Au-delà des motivations génériques des politiciens, citoyens et journalistes, le modèle met l'accent sur les caractéristiques uniques des sondages en tant qu'objet de couverture journalistique. L'article présente des résultats supportant considérablement le modèle à travers une analyse de la couverture des sondages par les journaux (c'est-à-dire des sondages sur les intentions de vote) durant l'élection générale canadienne de 2006. Nos résultats émanant de ce cas ont potentiellement des implications beaucoup plus grandes pour notre compréhension de la relation entre les sondages et la démocratie électorale, à la fois sur le plan empirique et sur le plan normatif.

References

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. “Of Horseshoes and Horse Races: Experimental Studies of the Impact of Poll Results on Electoral Behavior.” Political Communication 11 (4): 413–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nadeau, Richard and Nevitte, Neil. 2002. Anatomy of a Liberal Victory: Making Sense of the Vote in the 2000 Canadian Election. Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Nevitte, Neil. 2006. “Do Polls Influence the Vote?” In Capturing Campaign Effects, ed. Brady, Henry E. and Johnston, Richard. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Burden, Barry and Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2009. “Polls and Elections: Opinion Formation, Polarization, and Presidential Reelection.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 (3): 619–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101 (4): 637–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science: Strategies of Inquiry, ed. Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Peter A. and De Clercy, Cristine. 2005. “Regulatory Compliance in Opinion Poll Reporting during the 2004 Canadian Election.” Canadian Public Policy 31 (3): 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankovic, K. A. 2005. “Reporting ‘the Polls’ in 2004.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 682–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geer, John. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23: 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth, Maioni, Antonia and Soroka, Stuart. 2004. “The Role of the Media: A Campaign Saved by a Horserace.” Policy Options 87: 86–91.Google Scholar

Hayes, Danny and Guardino, Matt. 2010. “Whose Views Made the News? Media Coverage and the March to War in Iraq.” Political Communication 27 (1): 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Healy, Andrew and Malhotra, Neil. 2009. “Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald. 1987. News that Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Norpoth, Helmut and Hahn, Kyu. 2004. “Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells.” Journal of Politics 66 (1): 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Richard, Blais, Andre, Brady, Henry E. and Crete, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, Patrick J. and Rice, Tom W.. 1994. “The Psychology of Political Momentum.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (4): 923–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, Stephanie G. 1999. “Public Opinion in Television Election News: Beyond Polls.” Political Communication 16 (2): 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Matthews, J. Scott. 2010. “Enlightenment, Equalization or What? Campaigns, Learning and the Economy in Canadian Elections.” In Voting Behaviour in Canada, ed. Anderson, Cameron and Stephenson, Laura. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

McCombs, Maxwell and Shaw, Donald. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehta, Cyrus and Patel, Nitin. 1995. “Exact Logistic Regression: Theory and Examples.” Statistics in Medicine 14: 2143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Patterson, Thomas E. 2005. “Of Polls, Mountains: US Journalists and Their Use of Election Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 716–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pederson, Mogens N. 1983. “Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems 1948–1977.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, ed. Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Pickup, Mark. 2010. “Campaign Election Polls and Democracy in Canada.” In Perspectives on the Canadian Voter: Puzzles of Influence and Choice, ed. Stephenson, Laura and Anderson, Cameron. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Pickup, Mark and Johnston, Richard. 2007. “Campaign Trial Heats as Electoral Information: Evidence from the 2004 and 2006 Canadian Federal Elections.” Electoral Studies 26 (2): 460–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickup, Mark and Johnston, Richard. 2008. “Campaign Trial Heats as Election Forecasts: Measurement Error and Bias in 2004 Presidential Campaign Polls.” International Journal of Forecasting 24 (2): 272–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosensteil, Tom. 2005. “Political Polling and the New Media Culture: A Case of More Being Less.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 716–24.Google Scholar

Schudson, Michael. 2002. “The Newsmedia As Political Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soroka, Stuart. 2002. Agenda-setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 8 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trimble, Linda and Sampert, Shannon. 2004. “Who's in the Game? The Framing of Election 2000 by the Globe and Mail and the National Post.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, John. 1998. “The Rule of Product Substitution in Presidential Campaign News.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 560 (1): 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar