Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits*: V. Changes in the innate resistance of Australian Wild rabbits exposed to myxomatosis | Epidemiology & Infection | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Annually for 4 years groups of young Australian wild rabbits have been captured during non-epizootic periods from areas in which myxomatosis has occurred during the previous summer. The intensity of the preceding epizootic was measured by testing a sample of survivors for antibody. The captured young rabbits were raised in the laboratory until they were about 4 months old and then inoculated intradermally with small doses of the slightly attenuated myxoma virus strain Aust/Corowa/12–52/2 (KM 13), all samples of virus being derived from the same batch which has been stored at -70°C.

The results show there is a significant negative correlation between the mortality rate and the degree of exposure to myxomatosis of the forbears of the tested animals. Passive and active immunization have been excluded and this result is ascribed to increased genetic resistance.

We are greatly indebted to Mr. F. N. Ratcliffe, Officer in Charge of the Wildlife Survey Section of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Organization, and to his officers, especially Messrs W. E. Poole, K. E. Myers, G. Douglas, B. V. Fennessy, H. Frith and K. Keith for their invaluable assistance in collecting rabbits and serum samples.

We have had valuable discussions with Dr W. R. Sobey, Dr P. J. Claringbold and Dr G. S. Watson on genetical and statistical aspects of the problems under study.

Type

Research Article

References

Anonymous (1912). Plague Supplement. J. Hyg., Camb., 12, 229.Google Scholar

Claringbold, P. J., Biggers, J. D. & Emmens, C. W. (1953). Biometrics, 9, 467.Google Scholar

Clopper, C. J. & Pearson, E. S. (1934). Biometrika, 26, 404. Quoted by Snedecor, G. W. (1946). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, p. 4. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State College Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Downie, A. W., McCarthy, K., MacDonald, A., MacCallum, F. O. & Macrae, A. I. (1953). Lancet, ii, 164.Google Scholar

Fenner, F. & Marshall, I. D. (1954). J. Hyg., Camb., 52, 321.Google Scholar

Fenner, F. & Marshall, I. D. (1957). J. Hyg., Camb., 55, 149.Google Scholar

Fenner, F., Marshall, I. D. & Woodroofe, G. M. (1953). J. Hyg., Camb., 51, 225.Google Scholar

Fenner, F., Poole, W. E., Marshall, I. D. & Dyce, A. L. (1957). J. Hyg., Camb., 55, 192.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fenner, F. & Woodroofe, G. M. (1953). Brit. J. exp. Path. 34, 400.Google Scholar

Gowen, J. W. (1951). In Genetics in the Twentieth Century, ed. Dunn, L. C, New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar

Houlihan, R. B. & Derrick, W. A. (1945). Science, 101, 364.Google Scholar

Kapteyn, J. C. (1903). Skew Frequency Curves in Biology and Statistics. Groningen: P. Noordhoff. Quoted by Finney, D. J. (1952). Statistical Method in Biological Assay. London: Charles Griffin and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar

Mykytowycz, R. (1956). Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 34, 121.Google Scholar

Scott, J. H. (1882). Trans. Proc. New Zealand Inst. 15, 484.Google Scholar

Sobey, W. R. & Turnbull, K. (1956). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 455.Google Scholar

Sokhey, S. S. & Chitre, R. B. G. D. (1937). Bull. Off. int. Hyg. publ. 29, 2093.Google Scholar