Pattern and paradox in parasite reproduction | Parasitology | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Summary

Parasites are more fecund than free-living relatives. The traditional explanation of this is that parasites have to compensate for massive mortality in the transmission phase of their life cycles, but there are neo-Darwinian problems with this interpretation. Similarly, parasites invest more resources in reproduction than free-living relatives but often live longer as adults, and yet negative correlations are expected between fecundity and longevity. These patterns and paradoxes are discussed within the context of a general life-cycle theory. The theory is also used to address questions concerning the influence of age-specific mortality on life-cycle patterns, the trade-off between gamete size and numbers, and the relative merits of gametic and non-gametic reproduction. Wherever possible, the theory is related to facts about parasites.

References

Boddington, M. J. & Mettrick, D. F. (1981). Production and reproduction in Hymenolepis diminuta. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59, 1962–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calow, P. (1979). Costs of reproduction – a physiological approach. Biological Reviews 54, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calow, P. (1981). Resource utilization and reproduction. In Physiological Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach to Resource Use (ed. Townsend, C. R. and Calow, P.), pp. 245–270. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar

Calow, P. (1983). Economics of ontogeny. Adaptational aspects. In British Ecological Society Symposium on Evolutionary Ecology (ed. Shorrocks, B.), Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar

Calow, P. & Sibly, R. (1983). Physiological trade-offs and the evolution of life cycles. Science Progress (in the Press).Google Scholar

Calow, P. & Townsend, C. R. (1981). Resource utilization in growth. In Physiological Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach to Resource Use (ed. Townsend, C. R. and Calow, P.), pp. 220–224. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, B. (1980). Evolution in Age-structured Populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dogiel, V. A. (1965). General Protozoology, 2nd ed., revised by Poljanskij, T. I. and Chejsin, E. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heyneman, D. (1960). On the origin of complex life cycles in the digenetic flukes. In Libro Homenaje al Dr. Eduardo Caballero y Caballero, pp. 133–152, Secretaria de Educacion Publica, Inst. Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Crencias Biologicas, Mexico City.Google Scholar

Hirshfield, M. F. (1980). An experimental analysis of reproductive effort and cost in the Japanese Medaka, Oryzias latipes. Ecology 61, 287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyman, L. H. (1940). The Invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. B. & Calow, P. (1975). The relationship between high fecundity and the evolution of entoparasitism. Oecologia 21, 109–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kennedy, C. R. (1975). Ecological Animal Parasitology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar

Lack, D. (1954). The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Moore, J. (1981). Asexual reproduction and environmental predictability in cestodes (Cyclo-phyllidea: Taeniidae). Evolution 35, 723–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schaffer, W. M. (1974). Selection for optimal life histories: the effects of age structure. Ecology 55, 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffer, W. M. & Rosenzweig, M. L. (1977). Selection for optimal life-history. II. Multiple equilibria and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies. Ecology 58, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sibly, R. & Calow, P. (1982). Asexual reproduction in Protozoa and invertebrates. Journal of Theoretical Biology 96, 401–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sibly, R. & Calow, P. (1983). An integrated approach to life-cycle evolution using selective landscapes. (in the Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, F. E. (1954). Quantitative aspects of population growth. In Dynamics ofGrowth Processes, (ed. Boell, E. J.). pp. 277–294. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wardle, R. A. & McLeod, J. A. (1952). The Zoology of Tapeworms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar