Patterns in helminth communities in freshwater fish in Great Britain: alternative strategies for colonization | Parasitology | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)
Summary
Examples of the apparently stochastic nature of freshwater fish helminth communities illustrating the erratic and unpredictable occurrence and distribution of many species are provided for six species of fish from several localities throughout Britain. By focussing on parasite colonization strategies two categories of helminths are recognized: autogenic species which mature in fish and allogenic species which mature in vertebrates other than fish and have a greater colonization potential and ability. Three groups of fish are distinguished: salmonids, in which helminth communities are generally dominated by autogenic species which are also responsible for most of the similarity within and between localities; cyprinids, in which they are dominated by allogenic species which are also responsible for most of the similarity within and between localities; and anguillids, whose helminth communities exhibit intermediate features with neither category consistently dominating nor providing a clear pattern of similarity. Recognition and appreciation of the different colonization strategies of autogenic and allogenic helminths in respect of host vagility and ability to cross land or sea barriers and break down habitat isolation, and their period of residence in a locality, whether transient or permanent, provides an understanding of, and explanation for, the observed patchy spatial distribution of many helminths. Comparison with other parts of the world indicates that colonization is a major determinant of helminth community structure.
Information
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988
Access options
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Andrews, C., Chubb, J. C., Coles, T., & Dearsley, A., (1981). The occurrence of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934 (B. gowkongensis) (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) in the British Isles. Journal of Fish Diseases 4, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, O. N., & Stolyarov, V. P., (1961). Formation of the parasite fauna and parasitic diseases of fish in hydro-electric reservoirs. In Parasitology of Fishes, (ed. Dogiel, V. A., Petrushevski, G. K. and Polyanski, Y. I.) pp. 246–254. London: Oliver & Boyd.Google ScholarPubMed
Chubb, J. C., (1970). The parasite fauna of British freshwater fish. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology 8, 119–44.Google Scholar
Conneely, J. J., & McCarthy, T. K., (1984). The metazoan parasites of freshwater fishes in the Corrib catchment area, Ireland. Journal of Fish Biology 24, 363–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogiel, V. A., (1964). General Parasitology. Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Dubinina, M. N., (1980). Tapeworms (Cestoda, Ligulidae) of the Fauna of the USSR. New Delhi: Amerind.Google Scholar
Hine, P. M., (1978). Distribution of some parasites of freshwater eels in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 12, 179–87.Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. L., (1967). Parasites of North American Freshwater Fishes. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, G. L., (1980). Asian tapeworm, Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934, in North America. Beiträge zur Fischpathologie und Toxicologie 8, 69–75.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R., Kennedy, C. R., & Meder, J., (1986). Effects of Eubothrium salvelini Schrank, 1790 on arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.), in an alpine lake. Journal of Fish Diseases 9, 153–7.Google Scholar
Hugghins, E. J., (1957). Ecological studies on a strigeid trematode at Oakwood Lakes, South Dakota. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Sciences 35, 204–6.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H., (1978). The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., (1978 a). An analysis of the metazoan parasitocoenoses of brown trout Salmo trutta from British lakes. Journal of Fish Biology 13, 255–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., (1978 b). The parasite fauna of resident char Salvelinus alpinus from Artie Islands, with special reference to Bear Island. Journal of Fish Biology 13, 457–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., (1978 c). Studies on the biology of Eubothrium salvelini and E. crassum in resident and migratory Salvelinus alpinus and Salmo trutta and in S. salar in North Norway and the islands of Spitsbergen and Jan Mayen. Journal of Fish Biology 12, 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., (1981). Parasitocoenoses dynamics in freshwater ecosystems in Britain. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta, Akademia Nauk USSR 108, 9–22.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., (1985). Interactions offish and parasite populations: to perpetuate or pioneer? In Ecology and Genetics of Host—Parasite Interactions, Linnean Society Symposium Series vol. 11 (ed. Rollinson, D. and Anderson, R. M.), pp. 1–20. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., (1987). Long term stability in the population levels of the eyefluke Tylodelphys podicipina (Digenea: Diplostomatidae) in perch. Journal of Fish Biology 31, 571–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., Bush, A. O., & Aho, J. M., (1986). Patterns in helminth communities: why are birds and fish different? Parasitology 93, 205–15.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., Laffoley, D. d' A., Bishop, G., Jones, P., & Taylor, M., (1986). Communities of parasites of freshwater fish of Jersey, Channel Islands. Journal of Fish Biology 29, 215–26.Google Scholar
Konovalov, S. M., (1975). Differentiation of local populations of sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum). Trans. Sagen, L. V.. University of Washington Publications in Fisheries New Series 6, 1–290.Google Scholar
Leong, T. S., & Holmes, J. C., (1981). Communities of metazoan parasites in open water fishes of Cold Lake, Alberta. Journal of Fish Biology 18, 693–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, X., & Liang, Z., (1987). Distribution of Ligulid tapeworms in China. Journal of Parasitology 73, 36–48.Google Scholar
Lincoln, R. J., Boxshall, G. A., & Clark, P. F., (1982). A Dictionary of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maitland, P. S., (1972). A key to the freshwater fishes of the British Isles with notes on their distribution and ecology. Scientific Publications of the Freshwater Biological Association 27, 1–139.Google Scholar
Margolis, L., & Arthur, J. R., (1979). Synopsis of the parasites of fishes of Canada. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 199, 1–269.Google Scholar
Moravec, F., (1985). Occurrence of endoparasitic helminths in eels (Anguilla anguilla (L.)) from the Macha Lake fishpond system, Czechoslovakia. Folia Parasitologica (Praha) 32, 113–25.Google Scholar
Price, P. W., & Clancy, K. M., (1983). Patterns in number of helminth parasite species in freshwater fishes. Journal of Parasitology 69, 449–54.Google Scholar
Riggs, M. R., & Esch, G. W., (1987). The suprapopulation dynamics of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi in a North Carolina cooling reservoir: abundance, dispersion and prevalence. Journal of Parasitology 73, 877–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E., (1978). Ecological Methods, 2nd edn.London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Tinsley, R. C., & Earle, C. M., (1983). Invasion of vertebrate lungs by the polystomatid monogeneans Pseudodiplorchis americanus and Neodiplorchis scaphiopodis. Parasitology 86, 501–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar