Language as shaped by the brain | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

References

Abzhanov, A., Kuo, W. P., Hartmann, C., Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R. & Tabin, C. J. (2006) The calmodulin pathway and evolution of elongated beak morphology in Darwin's finches. Nature 442:563–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abzhanov, A., Protas, M., Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R. & Tabin, C. J. (2004) Bmp4 and morphological variation of beaks in Darwin's finches. Science 305:1462–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alter, S. (1998) Darwinism and the linguistic image: Language, race, and natural theology in the nineteenth century. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Arbib, M. A. (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(2):105–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baker, C. L. & McCarthy, J. J., eds. (1981) The logical problem of language acquisition. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baker, M. C. (2001) The atoms of language: The mind's hidden rules of grammar. Basic Books.

Batali, J. (1998) Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. In: Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases, ed. Hurford, J. R., Studdert Kennedy, M. & Knight, C., pp. 405–26. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1979) A functionalist approach to the acquisition of grammar. In: Developmental pragmatics, ed. Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B., pp. 167–209. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987) Competition, variation, and language learning. In: Mechanisms of language acquisition, ed. MacWhinney, B., pp. 157–93. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Beer, G. (1996) Darwin and the growth of language theory. In: Open fields: Science in cultural encounter, by Beer, G., pp. 95–114. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beja-Pereira, A., Luikart, G., England, P. R., Bradley, D. G., Jann, O. C., Bertorelle, G., Chamberlain, A. T., Nunes, T. P., Metodiev, S., Ferrand, N. & Erhardt, G. (2003) Gene-culture coevolution between cattle milk protein genes and human lactase genes. Nature Genetics 35:311–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berwick, R. C. & Weinberg, A. S. (1984) The grammatical basis of linguistic performance: Language use and acquisition. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bever, T. G. (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Cognition and language development, ed. Hayes, R., pp. 277–360. Wiley.Google Scholar

Bever, T. G. & Langendoen, D. T. (1971) A dynamic model of the evolution of language. Linguistic Inquiry 2:433–63.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. (1984) The language bio-program hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, D. (1995) Language and human behavior. University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. (2003) Symbol and structure: A comprehensive framework for language evolution. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 77–93. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, S. (1984) Spreading the word. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blackmore, S. J. (1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (2001) Précis of How children learn the meanings of words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(6):1095–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boeckx, C. (2006) Linguistic minimalism: Origins, concepts, methods, and aims. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borer, H. (1984) Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2005) The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, J. (1982) The mental representation of grammatical relations. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Briscoe, E. J. (2003) Grammatical assimilation. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 295–316. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D. S., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E. & Sudhalter, V. (1993) Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language 32:76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. L. (2002) Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In: The evolution of language out of pre-language, ed. Givón, T. & Malle, B., pp. 107–32. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. L. (2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. L. (in press) Language universals and usage-based theory. In: Language universals, ed. Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D. & Pagliuca, W. (1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1965) Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In: Social change in developing areas: A reinterpretation of evolutionary theory, ed. Barringer, H. R., Blanksten, G. I. & Mack, R. W., pp. 19–49. Schenkman.Google Scholar

Cannon, G. (1991) Jones's “Spring from some common source”: 1786–1986. In: Sprung from some common source: Investigations into the pre-history of languages, ed. Lamb, S. M. & Mitchell, E. D.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. (2003) The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution. Nature Genetics 33:266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chater, N. (2005) Mendelian and Darwinian views of memes and cultural change. In: Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science, vol. 2, ed. Hurley, S. & Chater, N., pp. 355–62. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chater, N. & Vitányi, P. (2007) “Ideal learning” of natural language: Positive results about learning from positive evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 51:135–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1972) Language and mind, Extended edition. Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1988) Language and the problems of knowledge. The Managua Lectures. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H. (1994) Infinite languages, finite minds: Connectionism, learning and linguistic structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H. (2000) Using artificial language learning to study language evolution: Exploring the emergence of word universals. In: The evolution of language: 3rd international conference, ed. Dessalles, J. L. & Ghadakpour, L., pp. 45–48. Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S., eds. (in press) Language universals. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christiansen, M. H., Conway, C. M. & Onnis, L. (2007) Overlapping neural responses to structural incongruencies in language and statistical learning point to similar underlying mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. MacNamara, D. S. & Trafton, J. G., pp. 173–78. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H. & Dale, R. (2004) The role of learning and development in the evolution of language. A connectionist perspective. In: Evolution of communication systems: A comparative approach. The Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology, ed. Kimbrough Oller, D. & Griebel, U., pp. 90–109. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H. & Devlin, J. T. (1997) Recursive inconsistencies are hard to learn: A connectionist perspective on universal word order correlations. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Shafto, M. G. & Langley, P., pp. 113–18. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H., Kelly, L., Shillcock, R. & Greenfield, K. (submitted) Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H., Reali, F. & Chater, N. (2006) The Baldwin effect works for functional, but not arbitrary, features of language. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Evolution of Language, ed. Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. & Smith, K., pp. 27–34. World Scientific.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1975) Bridging. In: Theoretical issues in natural language processing, ed. Schank, R. C. & Nash-Webber, B. L., pp. 169–74. Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

Conway, C. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2001) Sequential learning in non-human primates. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:539–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Conway, C. M., Karpicke, J. & Pisoni, D. B. (2007) Contribution of implicit sequence learning to spoken language processing: Some preliminary findings with hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 12:317–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Corballis, M. C. (2003) From hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 201–18. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornish, H. (2006) Iterated learning with human subjects: An empirical framework for the emergence and cultural transmission of language. Unpublished Masters thesis, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Crain, S. (1991) Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:597–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crain, S., Goro, T. & Thornton, R. (2006) Language acquisition is language change. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35:31–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crain, S. & Pietroski, P. (2001) Nature, nurture and universal grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy 24:139–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crain, S. & Pietroski, P. (2006) Is Generative Grammar deceptively simple or simply deceptive? Lingua 116:64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, W. (2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Longman.Google Scholar

Croft, W. (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005) Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition 96:233–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. & Segui, J. (1986) The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language 25:385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dabrowska, E. (1997) The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics 35:735–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1874) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, 2nd edition.John Murray.Google Scholar

Davidson, I. (2003) The archaeological evidence of language origins: States of art. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 140–57. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, A. M. (1987) “Organic” and “Organism” in Franz Bopp. In: Biological metaphor and cladistic classification, ed. Bopp, Franz. In: 81–107. University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1986) The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. Penguin.Google Scholar

Deacon, T. W. (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton/Penguin.Google Scholar

Dediu, D. & Ladd, D. R. (2007) Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes. ASPM and microcephalin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:10944–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1995) Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Penguin/Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

de Vries, M., Monaghan, P., Knecht, S., & Zwitserlood, P. (in press) Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: The learnability of embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. (1992) The third chimpanzee: The evolution and future of the human animal. Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. (1997) Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Donald, M. (1998) Mimesis and the executive suite: Missing links in language evolution. In: Approaches to the evolution of language, ed. Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Knight, C., pp. 44–67. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003) The origin and subsequent evolution of language. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 219–34. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellefson, M. R. & Christiansen, M. H. (2000) Subjacency constraints without universal grammar: Evidence from artificial language learning and connectionist modeling. In: The Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Gleitman, L. R. & Joshi, A. K., pp. 645–50. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L. (1999) Origins of language: A conspiracy theory. In: The emergence of language, ed. MacWhinney, B.. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. (1996) Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Emlen, S. T. (1970) Celestial rotation: Its importance in the development of migratory orientation. Science 170:1198–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S. E., Lai, C. S. L., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., Monaco, A. P. & Pääbo, S. (2002) Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature 418:869–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Everett, D. L. (2005) Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46:621–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H. & Monaghan, P. (2006) Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:12203–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fitneva, S. A. & Spivey, M. J. (2004) Context and language processing: The effect of authorship. In: Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, ed. Trueswell, J. C. & Tanenhaus, M. K., pp. 317–28. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fleischman, S. (1982) The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1975) The language of thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Frean, M. R. & Abraham, E. R. (2004) Adaptation and enslavement in endosymbiont-host associations. Physical Review E 69:051913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friederici, A. D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schibotz, R. I. & Anwander, A. (2006) The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:2458–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K. & Pfeifer, E. (2002) Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99:529–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frigo, L. & McDonald, J. L. (1998) Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses. Journal of Memory and Language 39:218–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerhart, J. & Kirschner, M. (1997) Cells, embryos and evolution: Toward a cellular and developmental understanding of phenotypic variation and evolutionary adaptability. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Givón, T. (1979) On understanding grammar. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Givón, T. (1998) On the co-evolution of language, mind and brain. Evolution of Communication 2:45–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. & Malle, B. F., eds. (2002) The evolution of language out of pre-language. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, E. (1967) Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 16:447–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldsby, R. A., Kindt, T. K., Osborne, B. A. & Kuby, J. (2003) Immunology, 5th edition.W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bloom, L., Smith, L., Woodward, A., Akhtar, N., Tomasello, M. & Hollich, G., eds. (2000) Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gómez, R. L. & Gerken, L. A. (2000) Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4:178–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gould, S. J. (1993) Eight little piggies: Reflections in natural history. Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 205:581–98.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. & Vrba, E. S. (1982) Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. D. (2003) Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426:435–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, T. R. G. (1979) Necessity of syntax markers: Two experiments with artificial languages. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18:481–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenfield, P. M. (1991) Language, tools, and the brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14(4):531–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1967) Logic and conversation. William James Lectures. Manuscript, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Gruber, O. (2002) The co-evolution of language and working memory capacity in the human brain. In: Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language, ed. Stamenov, M. I. & Gallese, V., pp. 77–86. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haber, R. N. (1983) The impending demise of the icon: The role of iconic processes in information processing theories of perception (with commentaries). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampe, B., ed. (2006) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hauser, M. D. (2001) Wild minds: What animals really think. Owl Books.Google Scholar

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598):1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hauser, M. D. & Fitch, W. T. (2003) What are the uniquely human components of the language faculty? in: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 158–81. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. (1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawks, J. D., Hunley, K., Lee, S-H. & Wolpoff, M. (2000) Population bottlenecks and Pleistocene human evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:2–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hecht Orzak, S. & Sober, E., eds. (2001) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, B. (1991) Grammaticalization. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. (2002) On the evolution of grammatical forms. In: Transitions to language, ed. Wray, A., pp. 376–97. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, G. E. & Nowlan, S. J. (1987) How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems 1:495–502.Google Scholar

Hoen, M., Golembiowski, M., Guyot, E., Deprez, V., Caplan, D. & Dominey, P. F. (2003) Training with cognitive sequences improves syntactic comprehension in agrammatic aphasics. NeuroReport 14: 495–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N. (2001) Move! A minimalist approach to construal. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N. & Boeckx, C. (in press) Approaching universals from below: I-Universals in light of a minimalist program for linguistic theory. In: Language universals, ed. Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D., eds. (1981) Explanations in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition. Longman.Google Scholar

Hsu, H.-J., Christiansen, M. H., Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X. & Gómez, R. L. (2006) Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in adolescents with and without language impairment. Poster presented at the 2006 Symposium on Research in Child Language DisordersMadison, WI.Google Scholar

Hudson Kam, C. L. & Newport, E. L. (2005) Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 1:151–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurford, J. R. (1990) Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In: Logical issues in language acquisition, ed. Roca, I. M., pp. 85–136. Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurford, J. R. (1991) The evolution of the critical period for language learning. Cognition 40:159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurford, J. R. (2003) The language mosaic and its evolution. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 38–57. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurford, J. R. & Kirby, S. (1999) Co-evolution of language size and the critical period in: Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, ed. Birdsong, D., pp. 39–63. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (1989) The inheritance of acquired epigenetic variations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 139:69–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jackendoff, R. (2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jain, S., Osherson, D., Royer, J. & Sharma, A. (1999) Systems that learn, 2nd edition.MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, L. (2000) Biolinguistics: Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansson, S. (2006) Working backwards from modern language to proto-grammar. In: The evolution of language, ed. Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. D. M. & Smith, K., pp. 160–67. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juliano, C. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994) A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23:459–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M. & Haywood, S. (2003) The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49:133–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaschak, M. P. & Glenberg, A. M. (2004) This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133:450–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kauffman, S. A. (1995) The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Keller, R. (1994) On language change: The invisible hand in language. Routledge.Google Scholar

Kirby, S. (1998) Fitness and the selective adaptation of language. In: Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases, ed. Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Knight, C., pp. 359–83. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kirby, S. (1999) Function, selection and innateness: The emergence of language universals. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirby, S., Dowman, M. & Griffiths, T. (2007) Innateness and culture in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:5241–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kirby, S. & Hurford, J. (1997) Learning, culture and evolution in the origin of linguistic constraints. In: ECAL97, ed. Husbands, P. & Harvey, I., pp. 493–502. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kirby, S. & Hurford, J. (2002) The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. In: Simulating the evolution of language, ed. Cangelosi, A. & Parisi, D., pp. 121–48. Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhl, P. K. (1987) The special mechanisms debate in speech research: Categorization tests on animals and infants. In: Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition, ed. Harnad, S., pp. 355–86. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kvasnicka, V. & Pospichal, J. (1999) An emergence of coordinated communication in populations of agents. Artificial Life 5:318–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lai, C. S. L., Fisher, S. E., Hurst, J. A., Vargha-Khadem, F. & Monaco, A. P. (2001) A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature 413:519–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lai, C. S. L., Gerrelli, D., Monaco, A. P., Fisher, S. E. & Copp, A. J. (2003) FOXP2 expression during brain development coincides with adult sites of pathology in a severe speech and language disorder. Brain 126:2455–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lanyon, S. J. (2006) A saltationist approach for the evolution of human cognition and language. In: The evolution of language, ed. Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. D. M. & Smith, K., pp. 176–83. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashley, K. S. (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, ed. Jeffress, L. A., pp. 112–46. Wiley.Google Scholar

Laubichler, M. D. & Maienschein, J., eds. (2007) From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1987a). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23:379–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1987b) Minimization and conversational inference. In: The pragmatic perspective: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pragmatics at Viareggio, ed. Papi, M. & Verschueren, J., pp. 61–129. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (1998) The evolution of cognition: Questions we will never answer. In: An invitation to cognitive science, vol. 4: Methods, models, and conceptual issues, ed. Scarborough, D. & Sternberg, S.. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Li, M. & Vitányi, P. (1997) An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity theory and its applications, 2nd edition.Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, P. (1984) The biology and evolution of language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lieberman, P. (1991) Speech and brain evolution. Behavioral and Brain Science 14:566–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, P. (2003) Motor control, speech, and the evolution of human language. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 255–71. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, D. (2000) The spandrels of the linguistic genotype. In: The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form, ed. Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Hurford, J. R., pp. 231–47. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B. & Goldinger, S. D. (1994) Spoken word recognition. In: Handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. Gernsbacher, M. A., pp. 265–318. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Livingstone, D. & Fyfe, C. (2000) Modelling language-physiology coevolution. In: The emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form, ed. Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Hurford, J. R., pp. 199–215. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locke, J. L. & Bogin, B. (2006) Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:259–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lupyan, G. & Christiansen, M. H. (2002) Case, word order, and language learnability: Insights from connectionist modeling. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Gray, W. D. & Schunn, C. D., pp. 596–601. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

MacDermot, K. D., Bonora, E., Sykes, N., Coupe, A. M., Lai, C. S. L., Vernes, S. C., Vargha-Khadem, F., McKenzie, F., Smith, R. L., Monaco, A. P. & Fisher, S. E. (2005) Identification of FOXP2 truncation as a novel cause of developmental speech and language deficits. American Journal of Human Genetics 76:1074–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MacDonald, M. C. & Christiansen, M. H. (2002) Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109:35–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101:676–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mackay, D. J. C. (2003) Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

MacNeilage, P. F. (1998) The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:499–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MacWhinney, B., ed. (1999) The emergence of language. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C. & Friederici, A. D. (2001) Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience 4:540–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Malle, B. F. (2002) The relation between language and theory of mind in development and evolution. In: The evolution of language out of pre-language, ed. Givón, T. & Malle, B., pp. 265–84. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, G. F. (2004) The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Maynard-Smith, J. (1978) Optimization theory in evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9:31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClintock, B. (1950) The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36:344–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Monaghan, P., Chater, N. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005) The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. Cognition 96:143–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Monaghan, P. & Christiansen, M. H. (2008) Integration of multiple probabilistic cues in syntax acquisition. In: Trends in corpus research: Finding structure in data (TILAR Series), ed. Behrens, H., pp. 139–63. John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K. (1996) Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. L., Meier, R. P. & Newport, E. L. (1987) Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology 19:498–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munroe, S. & Cangelosi, A. (2002) Learning and the evolution of language: the role of cultural variation and learning cost in the Baldwin Effect. Artificial Life 8:311–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nerlich, B. (1989) The evolution of the concept of “linguistic evolution” in the 19th and 20th century. Lingua 77:101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nettle, D. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1997) Social markers and the evolution of reciprocal exchange. Current Anthropology 38:93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newmeyer, F. J. (1991) Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language and Communication 11:3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newmeyer, F. J. (2003) What can the field of linguistics tell us about the origin of language? in: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 58–76. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newport, E. L. & Aslin, R. N. (2004) Learning at a distance: I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 48:127–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N. & Feldman, M. W. (2003) Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Onnis, L., Christiansen, M. H., Chater, N. & Gómez, R. (2003) Reduction of uncertainty in human sequential learning: Evidence from artificial grammar learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Alterman, R. & Kirsh, D., pp. 886–91. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Chater, N. & Richmond, K. (2005) Phonology impacts segmentation in speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language 53:225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osherson, D., Stob, M. & Weinstein, S. (1986) Systems that learn. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A. & Mehler, J. (1993) Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 32:258–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Packard, M. & Knowlton, B. (2002) Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25:563–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Patel, A. D., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M. & Holcomb, P. J. (1998) Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10:717–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pearlmutter, N. J. & MacDonald, M. C. (1995) Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 34:521–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peña, M., Bonnatti, L., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (2002) Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science 298:604–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Percival, W. K. (1987) Biological analogy in the study of languages before the advent of comparative grammar. In: Biological metaphor and cladistic classification, ed. Hoenigswald, H. M. & Wiener, L. F., pp. 3–38. University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersson, K. M., Forkstam, C. & Ingvar, M. (2004) Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cognitive Science 28:383–407.Google Scholar

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1989) Evolution, selection and cognition: From “learning” to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. Cognition 31(1):1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994) Ever since language and learning: Afterthoughts on the Piaget-Chomsky debate. Cognition 50:315–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pinker, S. (1984) Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2003) Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 16–37. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. (2005) The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition 95(2):201–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. (in press) The components of language: What's specific to language, and what's specific to humans? in: Language universals, ed. Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Plante, E., Gómez, R. L. & Gerken, L. A. (2002) Sensitivity to word order cues by normal and language/learning disabled adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 35:453–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pomerantz, J. R. & Kubovy, M. (1986) Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization: Simplicity and likelihood principles. In: Handbook of perception and human performance, vol. 2: Cognitive processes and performance, ed. Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J. P., pp. 36–1–36–46. Wiley.Google Scholar

Raddick, G. (2000) Review of S. Alter's Darwinism and the Linguistic Image. British Journal for the History of Science 33:122–24.Google Scholar

Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2007) Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 57:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (in press) Sequential learning and the interaction between biological and linguistic adaptation in language evolution. Interaction Studies.Google Scholar

Reeder, P. A. (2004). Language learnability and the evolution of word order universals: Insights from artificial grammar learning. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis, Department of Psychology, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. (1983) Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. (2005) Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Ritt, N. (2004) Selfish sounds and linguistic evolution: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossel, S., Corlija, J. & Schuster, S. (2002) Predicting three-dimensional target motion: How archer fish determine where to catch their dislodged prey. Journal of Experimental Biology 205:3321–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saffran, J. R. (2001) The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 44:493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saffran, J. R. (2002) Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 47:172–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saffran, J. R. (2003) Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12:110–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996a) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274:1926–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L. & Aslin, R. N. (1996b) Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language 35:606–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sag, I. A. & Pollard, C. J. (1987) Head-driven phrase structure grammar: An informal synopsis. CSLI Report 87–79. Stanford University.Google Scholar

Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C. & Aronoff, M. (2005) The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(7):2661–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schleicher, A. (1863) Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Böhlau.Google Scholar

Schlosser, G. & Wagner, G. P., eds. (2004) Modularity in development and evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Schoenemann, P. T. (1999) Syntax as an emergent characteristic of the evolution of semantic complexity. Minds and Machines 9:309–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidenberg, M. S. (1985) The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19:1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seidenberg, M. S. (1997) Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science 275:1599–1604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seidenberg, M. S. & MacDonald, M. (2001) Constraint-satisfaction in language acquisition. In: Connectionist psycholinguistics, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N., pp. 281–318. Ablex.Google Scholar

Senghas, A., Kita, S. & Özyürek, A. (2004) Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science 305(5691):1779–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sereno, M. I. (1991) Four analogies between biological and cultural/linguistic evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 151:467–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simoncelli, E. P. & Olshausen, B. A. (2001) Natural image statistics as neural representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24:1193–1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Slobin, D. I. (1973) Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In: Studies of child language development, ed. Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I., pp. 175–208. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. & Bever, T. G. (1982) Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition 12:229–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, K. (2002) Natural selection and cultural selection in the evolution of communication. Adaptive Behavior 10:25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K., Brighton, H. & Kirby, S. (2003a) Complex systems in language evolution: The cultural emergence of compositional structure. Advances in Complex Systems 6:537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stallings, L., MacDonald, M. & O'Seaghdha, P. (1998) Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language 39:392–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevick, R. D. (1963) The biological model and historical linguistics. Language 39:159–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Goldstein, L. (2003) Launching language: The gestural origin of discrete infinity. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 235–54. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suzuki, D. T., Griffiths, A. J. F., Miller, J. H. & Lewontin, R. C. (1989) An introduction to genetic analysis, 4th edition.W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Syvanen, M. (1985) Cross-species gene transfer: Implications for a new theory of evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 112:333–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M. & Sedivy, J. E. (1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268:1632–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tanenhaus, M. K. & Trueswell, J. C. (1995) Sentence comprehension. In: Handbook of cognition and perception, ed. Miller, J. & Eimas, P., pp. 217–62. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2000a) Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74:209–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2000b) The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4:156–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tomasello, M. ed. (2000c) The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2004) What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? A commentary on Wunderlich. Studies in Language 28(3):642–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. & Moll, H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:675–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tomblin, J. B., Mainela-Arnold, M. E. & Zhang, X. (2007) Procedural learning in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Language Learning and Development 3:269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomblin, J. B., Shriberg, L., Murray, J., Patil, S. & Williams, C. (2004) Speech and language characteristics associated with a 7/13 translocation involving FOXP2. American Journal of Medical Genetics 130B:97.Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92:231–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van Everbroeck, E., (1999) Language type frequency and learnability: A connectionist appraisal. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Hahn, M. & Stoness, S. C., pp. 755–60. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Voight, B. F., Kudaravalli, S., Wen, X. & Pritchard, J. K. (2006) A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PloS Biology 4:e72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

von Humboldt, W. (1836/1999) On language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the metal development of the human species. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1836).Google Scholar

Vouloumanos, A. & Werker, J. F. (2007) Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science 10:159–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waddington, C. H. (1942) Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150:563–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, B. H. & Depew, D. J., eds. (2003) Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B., eds. (2001) Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wilkins, W. K. & Wakefield, J. (1995) Brain evolution and neurolinguistic preconditions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18:161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yamashita, H. & Chang, F. (2001) “Long before short” preference in the production of a head-final language. Cognition 81:B45–B55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yamauchi, H. (2001) The difficulty of the Baldwinian account of linguistic innateness. In: ECAL-01, ed. Kelemen, J. & Sosík, P., pp. 391–400. Springer.Google Scholar

Yang, C. D. (2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zeevat, H. (2006) Grammaticalisation and evolution. In: The evolution of language, ed. Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. D. M. & Smith, K., pp. 372–78. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuidema, W. (2003) How the poverty of the stimulus solves the poverty of the stimulus. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, ed. Becker, S., Thrun, S. & Obermayer, K., pp. 51–58. MIT Press.Google Scholar