Embodied interdisciplinarity: what is the role of polymaths in environmental research? | Environmental Conservation | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Summary

Interdisciplinarity can be interpreted broadly as an active, multi-faceted learning process between researchers from different disciplines to create a common ground for a special purpose. Interdisciplinary approaches are regarded as necessary in environmental research, especially in view of global environmental change. However, some argue there is a lack of genuine interdisciplinarity in environmental research. Polymaths can play a potentially important role in environmental research. Environmental polymaths can enhance the effectiveness of interdisciplinarity through their knowledge and understanding of different disciplinary languages, epistemologies and methodologies, and as such, should be acknowledged more explicitly in interdisciplinary discussions.

References

Anbar, M. (1973) The ‘bridge scientist’ and his role. Research/Development 24: 30–34.Google Scholar

Baumann, H. (2009) Don't fence me in . . . In: The Social Embeddedness of Industrial Ecology, ed. Boons, F. & Howard-Grenville, J., pp. 48–64. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, G.A. & Bekoff, M. (2001) Ecology and social responsibility: the re-embodiment of science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 460–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J. & Williams, R. (2004) Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures 36 (4): 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, S.R., De Vries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H.A., Polasky, S., Reid, R.V. & Scholes, R.J. (2006) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: research needs. Science 314: 257–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Daily, G.C. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1999) Managing Earth's ecosystems: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2: 277–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewel, K.C. (2001) Natural resource management: the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Ecosystems 4: 716–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fazey, I., Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2005) What do conservation biologists publish? Biological Conservation 124: 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Funtowicz, S.O. & Ravetz, J.R. (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 (7): 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbons, M. (2000) Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science. Science and Public Policy 27 (3): 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janssen, W. & Goldsworthy, P. (1996) Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: conceptual and practical implications. Agricultural Systems 51: 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karlqvist, A. (1999) Going beyond disciplines: the meanings of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences 32 (4): 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinzig, A.P. (2001) Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 4: 709–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, J.T. & Porter, A.L. (1990) Preconditions for interdisciplinary research. In: Studies in Interdisciplinary Methods from Business, Government and Academia, ed. Birnbaum-More, P.H., Rossini, F.A. & Baldwin, D.R., pp. 11–19. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacLachlan, M. (2009) Rethinking global health research: towards integrative expertise. Globalization and Health 5: 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marzano, M., Carss, D.N. & Bell, S. (2006) Working to make interdisciplinarity work: investing in communication and interpersonal relationships. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (2): 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissani, M. (1997) Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity. Social Science Journal 32 (2): 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, J., Lancaster, F.W. & Allen, B. (1997) Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (10): 893–916.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillitoe, P. (2004) Interdisciplinary experiences: working with indigenous knowledge in development. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 29 (1): 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, C.J., Fraser, I., Mitchley, J. & Thomas, M.B. (2007) Making ecological science policy-relevant: issues of scale and disciplinary integration. Landscape Ecology 22 (6): 799–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vedeld, P.O. (1994) The environment and interdisciplinarity: Ecological and neoclassical economical approaches to the use of natural resources. Ecological Economics 10: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winnacker, E.-L. (2003) Interdisciplinary sciences in the 21st century. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 14 (3): 328–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed