Detection of prospective memory deficits in mild cognitive impairment of suspected Alzheimer’s disease etiology using a novel event-based prospective memory task | Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

We investigated the relative discriminatory efficacy of an event-based prospective memory (PM) task, in which specificity of the instructions and perceptual salience of the PM cue were manipulated, compared with two widely used retrospective memory (RM) tests (Rivermead Paragraph Recall Test and CERAD-Word List Test), when detecting mild cognitive impairment of suspected Alzheimer’s disease etiology (MCI-AD) (N = 19) from normal controls (NC) (N = 21). Statistical analyses showed high discriminatory capacity of the PM task for detecting MCI-AD. The Non-Specific-Non-Salient condition proved particularly useful in detecting MCI-AD, possibly reflecting the difficulty of the task, requiring more strategic attentional resources to monitor for the PM cue. With a cutoff score of <4/10, the Non-Specific-Non-Salient condition achieved a sensitivity = 84%, and a specificity = 95%, superior to the most discriminative RM test used (CERAD-Total Learning: sensitivity = 83%; specificity = 76%). Results suggest that PM is an early sign of memory failure in MCI-AD and may be a more pronounced deficit than retrospective failure, probably reflecting the greater self-initiated retrieval demands involved in the PM task used. Limitations include the relatively small sample size, and the use of a convenience sample (i.e. memory clinic attenders and healthy active volunteers), reducing the generalizability of the results, which should be regarded as preliminary. (JINS, 2009, 15, 154–159.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Coups, E. (2006). Statistics for Psychology. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A., Emslie, H., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1992). The Speed and Capacity of Language Processing (SCOLP) Test. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar

Benton, A.L. & Hamsher, K. (1978). Multilingual Aphasia Examination manual. Iowa City: University of Iowa.Google Scholar

Brandimonte, M.A. & Pasolunghi, M.C. (1994). The Effect of cue-familiarity, cue-distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 565–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, W.P. & Semrau, G. (1986). The rated typicality of items in semantic categories: Some Irish norms. Irish Journal of Psychology, 2, 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coen, R.F., Kirby, M., Swanwick, G.R., Maguire, C.P., Walsh, J.B., Coakley, D., O’Neill, D., & Lawlor, B.A. (1997). Distinguishing between patients with depression or very mild Alzheimer’s disease using the Delayed-Word-Recall test. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 8, 244–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Driscoll, I., McDaniel, M.A., & Guynn, M.J. (2005). Apolipoprotein E and prospective memory in normally aging adults. Neuropsychology, 19, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Einstein, G.O. & McDaniel, M.A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In Brandimonte, M., Einstein, G.O., & McDaniel, M.A. (Eds.), Prospective Memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grober, E., Hall, C.B., Lipton, R.B., Zonderman, A.B., Resnick, S.M., & Kawas, C. (2008). Memory impairment, executive dysfunction, and intellectual decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; JINS, 14, 266–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henry, J.D., MacLeod, M.S., Phillips, L.H., & Crawford, J.R. (2004). A meta-analysis review of prospective memory in aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huppert, F.A., Brayne, C., Gill, C., Paykel, E.S., & Beardsall, L. (1995). CAMCOG- a concise neuropsychological test to assist dementia diagnosis: Sociodemographic determinants in an elderly population sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 529–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kazui, H., Matsuda, A., Hirono, N., Mori, E., Miyoshi, N., Ogino, A., Tokunaga, H., Ikejiri, Y., & Takeda, M. (2005). Everyday memory impairment of patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 19, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kluger, A., Golomb, J., & Ferris, S.H. (2000). Mild cognitive impairment. In Qizilbash, N. (Ed.), Evidence-based Dementia Practice (pp. 341–354). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Knopman, D.S. & Ryberg, S. (1989). A verbal memory test with high predictive accuracy for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology, 46, 1097–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lawton, P.M. & Brody, E.M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Manos, P.J. (1999). Ten-point clock test sensitivity for Alzheimer’s disease in patients MMSE scores greater than 23. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 454–458.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Monsch, A.U., Bondi, M.W., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P., Katzman, R., & Thal, L.J. (1992). Comparison of verbal fluency tasks in the detection of dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Archives of Neurology, 49, 1253–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDaniel, M.A. & Einstein, G.O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDaniel, M.A. & Einstein, G.O. (2007). Prospective memory: A new research enterprise. In McDaniel, M.A. & Einstein, G.O. (Eds.), Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field (pp. 1–11). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDaniel, M.A., Einstein, G.O., & Rendell, P.G. (2008). The puzzle of inconsistent age-related declines in prospective memory: A multiprocess explanation. In Kligel, M., McDaniel, M.A. & Einstein, G.O. (Eds.), Prospective Memory: Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives (pp. 141–158). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Nelson, H.E. (1991). National Adult Reading Test (NART). Test Manual (revised). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar

Petersen, R.C., Doody, R., & Kuz, A. (2001). Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology, 58, 1985–1992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Portet, F., Ousset, P.J., Visser, P.J., Frisoni, G.B., Nobili, F., Scheltens, P., Vellas, B., & Touchon, J. (2006). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in medical practice: A critical review of the concept and new diagnostic procedure. Report of the MCI Working Group of the European Consortium on Alzheimer’s Disease (EADC). Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 77, 714–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheikh, J.A. & Yesavage, J.A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS); Recent findings and development of a shorter version. In Brink, T.L. (Ed.), Clinical Gerontology: A Guide to Assessment and Intervention (pp. 165–173). New York, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar

Swanwick, G.J., Coen, R.F., O’Mahony, D., Tully, M., Bruce, I., Buggy, F., Lawlor, B.A., Walsh, J.B., & Coakley, D. (1996). A memory clinic for the assessment of mild dementia. Irish Medical Journal, 89; 104–105.Google ScholarPubMed

Troyer, A.K. & Murphy, K.J. (2007). Memory for intentions in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Time- and event-based prospective memory. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; JINS, 13, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Welsh, K.A., Butters, N., Mohs, R.C., Beekly, D., Edland, S., Fillenbaum, G., & Heyman, G. (1994). The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery. Neurology, 44, 609–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, B.A., Cockburn, J., & Baddeley, A.D. (1985). The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test.Google Scholar