Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered | Paleobiology | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

We believe that punctuational change dominates the history of life: evolution is concentrated in very rapid events of speciation (geologically instantaneous, even if tolerably continuous in ecological time). Most species, during their geological history, either do not change in any appreciable way, or else they fluctuate mildly in morphology, with no apparent direction. Phyletic gradualism is very rare and too slow, in any case, to produce the major events of evolution. Evolutionary trends are not the product of slow, directional transformation within lineages; they represent the differential success of certain species within a clade—speciation may be random with respect to the direction of a trend (Wright's rule).

As an a priori bias, phyletic gradualism has precluded any fair assessment of evolutionary tempos and modes. It could not be refuted by empirical catalogues constructed in its light because it excluded contrary information as the artificial result of an imperfect fossil record. With the model of punctuated equilibria, an unbiased distribution of evolutionary tempos can be established by treating stasis as data and by recording the pattern of change for all species in an assemblage. This distribution of tempos can lead to strong inferences about modes. If, as we predict, the punctuational tempo is prevalent, then speciation—not phyletic evolution—must be the dominant mode of evolution.

We argue that virtually none of the examples brought forward to refute our model can stand as support for phyletic gradualism; many are so weak and ambiguous that they only reflect the persistent bias for gradualism still deeply embedded in paleontological thought. Of the few stronger cases, we concentrate on Gingerich's data for Hyopsodus and argue that it provides an excellent example of species selection under our model. We then review the data of several studies that have supported our model since we published it five years ago. The record of human evolution seems to provide a particularly good example: no gradualism has been detected within any hominid taxon, and many are long-ranging; the trend to larger brains arises from differential success of essentially static taxa. The data of molecular genetics support our assumption that large genetic changes often accompany the process of speciation.

Phyletic gradualism was an a priori assertion from the start—it was never “seen” in the rocks; it expressed the cultural and political biases of 19th century liberalism. Huxley advised Darwin to eschew it as an “unnecessary difficulty.” We think that it has now become an empirical fallacy. A punctuational view of change may have wide validity at all levels of evolutionary processes. At the very least, it deserves consideration as an alternate way of interpreting the history of life.

References

Ager, D. V. 1973. The Nature of the Stratigraphical Record. 114 pp. John Wiley; New York.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism Manual. 891 pp. Foreign Languages Publishing House; Moscow.Google Scholar

Avise, J. C. 1976. Genetic differentiation during speciation. pp. 106–122. In: Ayala, F. J., ed. Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar

Avise, J. C. and Ayala, F. J. 1976. Genetic differentiation in speciose versus depauperate phylads: evidence from the California minnows. Evolution. 30:46–58.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. J. 1976. Molecular genetics and evolution. pp. 1–20. In: Ayala, F. J., ed. Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. J., Tracey, M. L., Hedgecock, D., and Richmond, R. C. 1974. Genetic differentiation during the speciation process in Drosophila. Evolution. 28:576–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bettenstaedt, F. 1962. Evolutionsvorgänge bei fossilen Foraminiferen. Mitt. Geol. Staatsinst. Hamburg. 31:385–460.Google Scholar

Bush, G. L. 1969. Host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Evolution. 23:237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, G. L., Case, S. M., Wilson, A. C., and Patton, J. L.. Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.Google Scholar

Carson, H. L. 1975. The genetics of speciation at the diploid level. Am. Nat. 109:83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darlington, P. J. Jr. 1976. Rates, patterns, and effectiveness of evolution in multi-level situations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 73:1360–1364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diamond, J. 1975. Assembly of species communities. pp. 342–444. In: Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M., eds. Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Dodson, M. M. 1975. Quantum evolution and the fold catastrophe. Evol. Theory. 1:107–118.Google Scholar

Dodson, M. M. 1976. Darwin's law of natural selection and Thom's theory of catastrophes. Math. Biosci. 28:243–274.Google Scholar

Drooger, C. W. 1963. Evolutionary trends in the Miogypsinidae. pp. 315–349. In: von Koenigswald, G. H. R., Emeis, J. D., Buning, W. L., and Wagner, C. W., eds. Evolutionary Trends in Foraminifera. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Durham, J. W. 1971. The fossil record and the origin of the Deuterostomata. North Am. Paleontol. Conv., Chicago, :1104–1132.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. 1974. Stability, diversity, and speciation in Paleozoic epeiric seas. J. Paleontol. 48:540–548.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. 1974. Testing evolutionary hypotheses in paleontology: a comment on Makurath and Anderson (1973). Evolution. 28:478–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eldredge, N. 1975. Character displacement in evolutionary time. Am. Zool. 14:1083–97.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. pp. 82–115. In: Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Co.; San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1974. Reply to Hecht (1974). Evol. Biol. 7:303–308.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J.. Evolutionary models and biostratigraphic strategies. pp. 24–40. In: Kauffman, E. G. and Hazel, J., eds. Concepts and Methods of Biostratigraphy. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross; Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. and Tattersall, I. 1975. Evolutionary models, phylogenetic reconstruction, and another look at hominid phylogeny. In: Szalay, F. S., ed. Approaches to Primate Paleobiology. Contrib. Primatol. 5:218–242.Google Scholar

Ferris, S. D. and Whitt, G. S. 1975. Gene duplication and functional diploidization in the Catastomidae. Genetics. 80(suppl.):30.Google Scholar

Fortey, R. A. 1974. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen I. Olenidae. Skrift. Norsk Polarinst. . 129 pp.Google Scholar

Frazzetta, T. H. 1975. Complex Adaptations in Evolving Populations. 267 pp. Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar

Gingerich, P. D. 1974. Stratigraphic record of early Eocene Hyopsodus and the geometry of mammalian phylogeny. Nature. 248:107–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gingerich, P. D. 1976. Paleontology and phylogeny: patterns of evolution at the species level in early Tertiary mammals. Am. J. Sci. 276:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gingerich, P. D.. d. In: Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of Evolution. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1972. Allometric fallacies and the evolution of Gryphaea. Evol. Biol. 6:91–119.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1976. Ladders, bushes, and human evolution. Nat. Hist. 85(No. 4):24–31.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass. .Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1977. Eternal metaphors of paleontology. In: Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of Evolution. Elsevier; Amsterdam. .Google Scholar

Hanson, N. R. 1969. Perception and Discovery. 435 pp. Freeman, Cooper and Co.; San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar

Hallam, A. 1968. Morphology, palaeoecology, and evolution of the genus Gryphaea in the British Lias. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 254:91–128.Google Scholar

Harper, C. W. Jr. 1975. Origin of species in geologic time: alternatives to the Eldredge-Gould model. Science. 190:47–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayami, I. 1973. Discontinuous variation in an evolutionary species, Cryptopecten vesiculosus, from Japan. J. Paleontol. 47:401–420.Google Scholar

Hecht, M. K. 1974. Morphological transformation, the fossil record, and the mechanisms of evolution. Evol. Biol. 7:295–303.Google Scholar

Henry, J. L. and Clarkson, E. N. K. 1975. Enrollment and coaptations in some species of the Ordovician trilobite genus Placoparia. Fossils and Strata. 4:87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howells, W. W.. Homo erectus in human descent: ideas and problems. Can. Assoc. Phys. Anthrop. Symp.Google Scholar

Hurst, J. M. 1975. Resserella sabrinae Bassett, in the Wenlock of Wales and the Welsh Borderland. J. Paleontol. 49:316–328.Google Scholar

Huxley, J. 1958. Evolutionary processes and taxonomy, with special reference to grades. pp. 21–38. Uppsala Univ. Arsskr.Google Scholar

Irvine, W. 1959. Apes, Angels, and Victorians. 399 pp. Meridian Books; New York.Google Scholar

Jerison, H. J. 1973. The Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. 482 pp. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. G. 1975. Allopatric speciation in fossil brachiopods. J. Paleontol. 49:646–661.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. G. and Norris, A. W. 1972. Tecnocyrtina, a new genus of Devonian brachiopods. J. Paleontol. 46:565–572.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. G., Reso, A., and Stephens, M. 1969. Late Upper Devonian brachiopods from the West Range Limestone of Nevada. J. Paleontol. 43:1351–1368.Google Scholar

Kellogg, D. E. 1975. The role of phyletic change in the evolution of Pseudocubus vema (Radiolaria). Paleobiology. 1:359–370.Google Scholar

Kellogg, D. E. and Hays, J. D. 1975. Microevolutionary patterns in Late Cenozoic Radiolaria. Paleobiology. 1:150–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, M. C. and Wilson, A. C. 1975. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science. 188:107–116.Google Scholar

Kitts, D. B. 1974. Paleontology and evolutionary theory. Evolution. 28:458–472.Google Scholar

Klapper, G. and Johnson, D. B. 1975. Sequence in conodont genus Polygnathus in Lower Devonian at Lone Mountain, Nevada. Geol. et Paleontol. 9:65–83.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 172 pp. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar

Leakey, R. E. F. and Walker, A. 1976. Australopithecus, Homo erectus, and the single species hypothesis. Nature. 261:572–574.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. 346 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. and Hubby, J. L. 1966. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 54:595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lespérance, P. J. and Bertrand, R. 1976. Population systematics of the Middle and Upper Ordovician trilobite Cryptolithus from the St. Lawrence lowlands and adjacent areas of Quebec. J. Paleontol. 50:598–613.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O. 1936. The Great Chain of Being. 376 pp. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Lovtrup, S. 1974. Epigenetics. 547 pp. John Wiley; New York.Google Scholar

MacGillavry, H. J. 1968. Modes of evolution mainly among marine invertebrates. Bijdragen Tot De Dierkunde. 38:69–74.Google Scholar

Makurath, J. H. 1974. Evolution of Appalachian gypidulid brachiopods: A reply to Eldredge (1974). Evolution. 28:481–483.Google Scholar

Makurath, J. H. and Anderson, E. J. 1973. Intraand interspecies variation in gypidulid brachiopods. Evolution. 27:303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nei, M. 1975. Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution. 253 pp. American Elsevier; New York.Google Scholar

Ovcharenko, V. N. 1969. Transitional forms and species differentiation of brachiopods. Paleontol. J. 3:57–63.Google Scholar

Oxnard, C. E. 1975. Uniqueness and Diversity in Human Evolution: Morphometric Studies of Australopithecines. 133 pp. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar

Ozawa, T. 1975. Evolution of Lepidolina multiseptata (Permian foraminifer) in East Asia. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., Ser. D Geol. 23:117–164.Google Scholar

Pilbeam, D. R. 1975. Middle Pleistocene hominids. pp. 809–856. In: Butzer, K. W. and Isaac, G. L., eds. After the Australopithecines. Mouton; The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raup, D. M.. Probabilistic models in evolutionary paleobiology. Am. Sci.Google Scholar

Rensch, B. 1960. Evolution Above the Species Level. 419 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar

Reyment, R. A. 1975. Analysis of a generic level transition in Cretaceous ammonites. Evolution. 28:665–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robison, R. A. 1975. Species diversity among agnostoid trilobites. Fossils and Strata. 4:219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowe, A. W. 1899. An analysis of the genus Micraster, as determined by rigid zonal collecting from the zone of Rhynchonella Cuvieri to that of Micraster cor-anguinum. Q. J. Geol. Soc. London. 55:494–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruzhentsev, V. Y. 1964. The problem of transition in paleontology. Int. Geol. Rev. 6:2204–2213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaeffer, B. 1965. The role of experimentation in the origin of higher levels of organization. Syst. Zool. 14:318–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schopf, J. W. and Oehler, D. Z. 1976. How old are the eukaryotes. Science. 193:47–49.Google Scholar

Scott, G. H. 1974. Biometry of the foraminiferal shell. pp. 55–151. In: Hedley, R. H. and Adams, C. G., eds. Foraminifera. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar

Scott, G. H. 1976. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy and evolutionary models. Syst. Zool. 25:78–80.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. 237 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. 434 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sprinkle, J. 1976. Classification and phylogeny of “pelmatozoan” echinoderms. Syst. Zool. 25:83–91.Google Scholar

Stanley, S. M. 1976. Stability of species in geologic time. Science. 192:267–268.Google Scholar

Sylvester-Bradley, P. C.. Biostratigraphical tests of evolutionary theory. pp. 41–63. In: Kauffman, E. G. and Hazel, J., eds. Concepts and Methods of Biostratigraphy. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross; Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar

Truemen, A. E. 1922. The use of Gryphaea in the correlation of the Lower Lias. Geol. Mag. 59:256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valentine, J. W. and Campbell, C. A. 1975. Genetic regulation and the fossil record. Am. Sci. 63:673–680.Google ScholarPubMed

Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory. 1:1–30.Google Scholar

Walker, A. 1975. Splitting times among hominoids deduced from the fossil record. . 65. Progress in Molecular Anthrop. Google Scholar

Wilson, A. C. 1976. Gene regulation in evolution. pp. 225–234. In: Ayala, F. J., ed. Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates; Sunderlan, Mass.Google Scholar

Wright, S. 1967. Comments on the preliminary working papers of Eden and Waddington. In: Moorehead, P. S. and Kaplan, M. M., eds. Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Theory of Evolution. . 5:117–120.Google Scholar

Ziegler, A. M. 1966. The silurian brachiopod Eocoelia hemisphaerica (J. de C. Sowerby) and related species. Palaeontology. 9:523–543.Google Scholar

Zuckerkandl, E. 1968. Hemoglobins, Haeckel's “Biogenetic Law,” and molecular aspects of development. pp. 256–274. In: Rich, A. and Davidson, N., eds. Structural Chemistry and Molecular Biology. W. H. Freeman; San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar